Was Gautama Buddha a Jat?

  • Thread starter Thread starter amans
  • Start date Start date
A

amans

Guest
I know the question is unexpected. Buddha was called by another name "Sakyamuni" - the wise man of the sakyas.
Sakya is Indian word for Scythians. Jats are supposed to be descended from Scythians.
 
amans said:
I know....Jats are supposed to be descended from Scythians.
Click to expand...
Oh noooooo.....not again. :o bakass do kisse ne to. Pahle to is baat pe lado ak wo JAT tha ya nahi, fer is baat per joot baajega ak if he was a JAT then what was his gotra? Dahiya, Malik, Sangwan, falaana dheeekdaa etc etc....:tamatar
 
Okay, another question. Ossetians in Ossetia region - a part of georgia and russia are supposed to be descendents of Scythians. And Joseph stalin's father was an Ossetian from Georgia. So Stalin would be an Osetian and a descendant of Scythians just like a jat would be a descendent of scythians.
 
Gautam bhudda was a jat ,definitely !

And george bush is a Jat too , should tell before another question arises

amitabh bacchan bhi jat hai
 
not again!!!!

amans said:
Okay, another question. Ossetians in Ossetia region - a part of georgia and russia are supposed to be descendents of Scythians. And Joseph stalin's father was an Ossetian from Georgia. So Stalin would be an Osetian and a descendant of Scythians just like a jat would be a descendent of scythians.
Click to expand...

dude,
the human race evolved from monkeys....and if u wanna go farther than that...we all started from the single cell organisms!!....so each and everyone is connected on this planet...kindly put ur queries to rest... :)
 
listen, if you don't know, don't answer, okay. This is jat history forum and you cannot tell me to not ask this or ask that. By the way, humans did not originate from monkeys. Darwin's theory is only a theory.
 
amans said:
listen, if you don't know, don't answer, okay. This is jat history forum and you cannot tell me to not ask this or ask that. By the way, humans did not originate from monkeys. Darwin's theory is only a theory.
Click to expand...

okie....good enuf!!

then whts ur take on human evolution??...kindly share with us,since u know so much!!
 
Don't hijack my thread and open your own thread. And please don't answer again on this thread with your irrelevant questions.
 
amans said:
Don't hijack my thread and open your own thread. And please don't answer again on this thread with your irrelevant questions.
Click to expand...

my , my!!!....someone is sensitive around here!!!....and possessive too...

as for the irrelevancy bit...."Was Gautam Buddha a jat?" ....is not exactly a burning issue ... :)

anywayz , happy answer hunting!!
 
Too much intelligent answers.... thanx buddies :)
Even I got the "two" most beautiful answers for my a lot of confusions in this regard. :) :)


gaganjat said:
Gautam bhudda was a jat ,definitely !

And george bush is a Jat too , should tell before another question arises

amitabh bacchan bhi jat hai
Click to expand...

brainspeak said:
dude,
the human race evolved from monkeys....and if u wanna go farther than that...we all started from the single cell organisms!!....so each and everyone is connected on this planet...kindly put ur queries to rest... :)
Click to expand...
 
Guys, stop asking stupid questions! There is something called a search engine. If you really feel the urge to ask something stupid, then be prepared for it to be ridiculed!

Next one who comes back with a ridiculous query or response gets a 10 day ban!
 
Don

Thread start ker diya to tu ghana bada na hogya..aur irrelvant kuch konya..aur tere thread ne hijack kerke bada koi krodpati ban jaawega..
aur please kahn te nu na hian ke tu kuch galat na kahan laag raha..
nu bhi to kah sak tha ki please anwer with relvant thing as per thread..aur tane kuch relvant na laaga to ismain teri problem hain na ki aur kisi ki..

amans said:
Don't hijack my thread and open your own thread. And please don't answer again on this thread with your irrelevant questions.
Click to expand...
 
i don't find anything wrong in the thread, considering the fact tht aman is new on JATland. for others its no doubt an evry day story... nd repetition of an issue tht has bn discussed umpteen no. of times on JL. if folks have nuthin' to contribute then pls. calm down.
@ aman
pls. take it easy.. new members don't get easy recognition on JL.. cool down man just observe this portal b4 u start playin' yr. shots.. btw i liked yr. attitude :)
 
Guys, Please refrain urself from Leg Pulling ... :)

Aman's query is Geniune, as Gautam Buddha was a human & hailed from India ... so whats wrong if he trying to explore his connection with Jats?

Let the Jat Historians of JL shed some light on it ... if u dont have any idea about the subject just wait & watch the thread !

@ Satya : I dont think its a stupid question, Gautam Buddha was a human not a myth ... and I dont think Aman created this thread for fun as its posted in Jat History section ... he seriously wanna know !

Kharb Bhaisaab, Burdak & Ravi uncle ... plz give ur inputs ..


Rock on
Jit
 
Last edited:
i see mr. narendra kharb's post being deleted... it was post no. 13.
i wonder as to how he can contribute ?

... it'll b interesting to see wat saurav nandal has to say on this.
 
Last edited:
Aman doesn't seem to be a novice in History the way he asked about Buddha and Ossetians .Point is he knows something like Buddha related to sakya,Sakya being related to Scythians ,Scythians related to Jats It is another thing he might not have believed Jat version and just wanted to cross check all that .

I tried to answer that via a question which satya deleted for right reason as that was a personal one.

My answer is unless we know some basic concepts about Saka ,Scythians ,Yeuzhis Any answer will create further questions which very well can be answered by doing a google search .

Rest later.
 
Last edited:
I did not meant to offend anyone. I did not know that this question has been asked before. I am not sure if there were people known as jats at Buddha's time which would be from 580 to 460 bc. Some say jats are Indo-aryans some say Indo-scythians. But it is not clear if Shakyas were Scythians. Since according to historians Scythians were documented to enter India long after Budhha's time. May be Shakyas is not the same as Scythian but it is a mighty close term.
 
no....?

ye history ki kis book me likha h???
koi book me h to " " bata dena..
i think he s not a JAT...

Anil Jakhar

amans said:
I know the question is unexpected. Buddha was called by another name "Sakyamuni" - the wise man of the sakyas.
Sakya is Indian word for Scythians. Jats are supposed to be descended from Scythians.
Click to expand...
 
amans said:
Some say jats are Indo-aryans some say Indo-scythians. But it is not clear if Shakyas were Scythians. Since according to historians Scythians were documented to enter India long after Budhha's time. May be Shakyas is not the same as Scythian but it is a mighty close term.
Click to expand...

Indo Aryan does not mean anything if we want to define a race like Jats as Arya is not a racial word and Jats are reported all over from Iran Afghanistan Tajikistan Pakistan to eastern China so Indo word would be misnomer here. Yes Jats were Scythian .But Scythian term has not been properly understood ,I hope Ravi Laxman ji and others can give better input.

Jats were here in Alexander times so no surprises they should have been in Buddha times as well ,there are both Direct and Indirect evidences for that .

Direct evidences in form of quotes by foreign authors and Indirect in form of Genetic skeletal dental and craniometric evidences .

One of such quotes is often quoted by Tewatia ji that ...."On the other side of river were Indian Getae small in number yet ready to fight" .
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top