raj_rathee
New member
Didn't Sampat Singh get special farmhouse love as well..after it was discovered that he was planning to switch party...
- Status
rakeshsehrawat
New member
एक बात समझ नहीं आती की ये खुफिया खबरे कहाँ से आती हैं ! एक और तो ये कहते हैं की वहां कोई जा नहीं सकता किसी की पहुँच नहीं और फिर वहां की खबर भी आ जाती है ! दूसरी ये समझ नहीं आती की सी बी आई का छाप्पा पड़ने के बाद बहुत खबरे उडी थी की चौटाला को उम्र कैद होगी पर जांच का नतीजा क्या रहा ? जांच बंद क्यों हो गयी वो खुफिया खबर क्यों नहीं निकलता कोई ?
बाली पहलवान को कोई जानता है यहाँ पे ? कोई मिला है उस से ? कोए पास्सी पडोसी उसके हाथ पे चोट क्यूँ लगी न्यू बेरा है किसे ने ? खामखा की कहानी बनान तें मिले के है या समझ तें बहार है ! मेरे हलके का एम् एल ऐ था बाली और उसके साथ आछी उठा बैठी भी है अगर किसे ने सही कहानी पूछनी है तो साथ चल सके है और बाली के चोट कित लागी थी या बात पहलम बेरा पाड ल्यो !
आज कांग्रेस का एम् एल ऐ है आनंद सिंह दांगी और उनके बड्पन के किस्से दूर दूर तक मशहूर हैं! दांगी से लाख गुना बेहतर आदमी बाली है ! लोग ऐसे आदमियों की तारीफ करते नहीं थकते जो की उनसे पैसे लेकर उन्हें नौकरी दिलवा देते हैं और ऐसे आदमी के काम में नुक्स निकालने की कोशिश जो की उनके व्यक्तिगत काम नहीं करवाता ! लोग अपने फायदे के लिए पहले सोचते हैं और समाज के भले का बाद में लोगो को जे बी टी मास्टरों को लगवाने में की गयी धन्द्लेबाजी नज़र नहीं आती ऐम्स को झझर में लगवाने का मकसद नज़र नहीं आता ! चलिए जो हो रहा है आछा हो रहा है ! राम भली करे !
बाली पहलवान को कोई जानता है यहाँ पे ? कोई मिला है उस से ? कोए पास्सी पडोसी उसके हाथ पे चोट क्यूँ लगी न्यू बेरा है किसे ने ? खामखा की कहानी बनान तें मिले के है या समझ तें बहार है ! मेरे हलके का एम् एल ऐ था बाली और उसके साथ आछी उठा बैठी भी है अगर किसे ने सही कहानी पूछनी है तो साथ चल सके है और बाली के चोट कित लागी थी या बात पहलम बेरा पाड ल्यो !
आज कांग्रेस का एम् एल ऐ है आनंद सिंह दांगी और उनके बड्पन के किस्से दूर दूर तक मशहूर हैं! दांगी से लाख गुना बेहतर आदमी बाली है ! लोग ऐसे आदमियों की तारीफ करते नहीं थकते जो की उनसे पैसे लेकर उन्हें नौकरी दिलवा देते हैं और ऐसे आदमी के काम में नुक्स निकालने की कोशिश जो की उनके व्यक्तिगत काम नहीं करवाता ! लोग अपने फायदे के लिए पहले सोचते हैं और समाज के भले का बाद में लोगो को जे बी टी मास्टरों को लगवाने में की गयी धन्द्लेबाजी नज़र नहीं आती ऐम्स को झझर में लगवाने का मकसद नज़र नहीं आता ! चलिए जो हो रहा है आछा हो रहा है ! राम भली करे !
vikassingh1
Banned
Bhai saab,
First of all this event is 110% true and authentic.
The Gunman with the MLA had seen it with his own eyes. The driver saw it after the MLA came back outside and was driven from secretariat to PGI. The MLA first claimed to have 'just fallen down' the stairs to the doc
The doctors at PGI who treated him are very close friends of my family and they even questioned him back saying that most of the injuries were not consistent with someone falling down. he (the MLA) then changed his story saying that he was taking a walk at Sukhna and was brushed up by some random goons! Anyways the job of a doc was not to invesitigate but treat.
All I can tell you is that I have an extensive network of sources due to my family background in Haryana. This ranges from gunmen, cooks to senior IAS officers and the info I am providing is fully legitimate and accurate.
rahi baat aapke question ki about why was that MLA still in the party--reality is that life is not black and white. That person himself is not 'doodh ka dhoola'..the feud itself was over the amount of black money he was passing up to his superiors (read as the 3 my baaps) and how much he was keeping for his own pocket. Then beyond 'ego' you have to think practically about issues like
1) his own political future--(if you recall history is witness that most rebelious MLAs end up ruining their careers pretty soon)
2) the fact that he still has to live in the same society and among similar people and he has to consider his safety--his children his family etc.
3) Dozens of other blackmailing factors
just running away is easier said than done...it could make him a 'dhobi ka kutta' na galli ka, na ghaat ka!
Baaki bhai saab, I do not care if you or anyone else does not want to believe what I have said. If you don't want to believe- be my guest
I stated what is true.
First of all this event is 110% true and authentic.
The Gunman with the MLA had seen it with his own eyes. The driver saw it after the MLA came back outside and was driven from secretariat to PGI. The MLA first claimed to have 'just fallen down' the stairs to the doc
The doctors at PGI who treated him are very close friends of my family and they even questioned him back saying that most of the injuries were not consistent with someone falling down. he (the MLA) then changed his story saying that he was taking a walk at Sukhna and was brushed up by some random goons! Anyways the job of a doc was not to invesitigate but treat.
All I can tell you is that I have an extensive network of sources due to my family background in Haryana. This ranges from gunmen, cooks to senior IAS officers and the info I am providing is fully legitimate and accurate.
rahi baat aapke question ki about why was that MLA still in the party--reality is that life is not black and white. That person himself is not 'doodh ka dhoola'..the feud itself was over the amount of black money he was passing up to his superiors (read as the 3 my baaps) and how much he was keeping for his own pocket. Then beyond 'ego' you have to think practically about issues like
1) his own political future--(if you recall history is witness that most rebelious MLAs end up ruining their careers pretty soon)
2) the fact that he still has to live in the same society and among similar people and he has to consider his safety--his children his family etc.
3) Dozens of other blackmailing factors
just running away is easier said than done...it could make him a 'dhobi ka kutta' na galli ka, na ghaat ka!
Baaki bhai saab, I do not care if you or anyone else does not want to believe what I have said. If you don't want to believe- be my guest
I stated what is true.
D
dahiyarules
Guest
Par nyu te bata de kaunsa maarega? Photu bhi la de ... usne dekhte dudkee ho lyoonga.
Bhai manne te saare-e Chautala ke chohre ek jisse lagein sein!
Bhai saab,
First of all this event is 110% true and authentic.
The Gunman with the MLA had seen it with his own eyes. The driver saw it after the MLA came back outside and was driven from secretariat to PGI. The MLA first claimed to have 'just fallen down' the stairs to the doc
The doctors at PGI who treated him are very close friends of my family and they even questioned him back saying that most of the injuries were not consistent with someone falling down. he (the MLA) then changed his story saying that he was taking a walk at Sukhna and was brushed up by some random goons! Anyways the job of a doc was not to invesitigate but treat.
All I can tell you is that I have an extensive network of sources due to my family background in Haryana. This ranges from gunmen, cooks to senior IAS officers and the info I am providing is fully legitimate and accurate.
rahi baat aapke question ki about why was that MLA still in the party--reality is that life is not black and white. That person himself is not 'doodh ka dhoola'..the feud itself was over the amount of black money he was passing up to his superiors (read as the 3 my baaps) and how much he was keeping for his own pocket. Then beyond 'ego' you have to think practically about issues like
1) his own political future--(if you recall history is witness that most rebelious MLAs end up ruining their careers pretty soon)
2) the fact that he still has to live in the same society and among similar people and he has to consider his safety--his children his family etc.
3) Dozens of other blackmailing factors
just running away is easier said than done...it could make him a 'dhobi ka kutta' na galli ka, na ghaat ka!
Baaki bhai saab, I do not care if you or anyone else does not want to believe what I have said. If you don't want to believe- be my guest
I stated what is true.
VIkas bhai je tuu itne confidence se kah raha hai te phrr us MLA ka name kyo nahi bata deta yahan panchayat me.Ya to aap koi baat panchayat me kaho nahi aur kaho to apni baat ko puri kahne me daro ya sharmao nahi. INLD ke bare me ya baat ye bania,punjabi aur kamin kandu akhya karte. Ib ye jaat bhi kahan lage. Bade budhha ne ya baat sahi hi kahi se ke JATDA AUR KATDA AAPNE NE HI MARYA KARE.
ravindersura
New member
Bhai saab,
First of all this event is 110% true and authentic.
The Gunman with the MLA had seen it with his own eyes. The driver saw it after the MLA came back outside and was driven from secretariat to PGI. The MLA first claimed to have 'just fallen down' the stairs to the doc
The doctors at PGI who treated him are very close friends of my family and they even questioned him back saying that most of the injuries were not consistent with someone falling down. he (the MLA) then changed his story saying that he was taking a walk at Sukhna and was brushed up by some random goons! Anyways the job of a doc was not to invesitigate but treat.
All I can tell you is that I have an extensive network of sources due to my family background in Haryana. This ranges from gunmen, cooks to senior IAS officers and the info I am providing is fully legitimate and accurate.
rahi baat aapke question ki about why was that MLA still in the party--reality is that life is not black and white. That person himself is not 'doodh ka dhoola'..the feud itself was over the amount of black money he was passing up to his superiors (read as the 3 my baaps) and how much he was keeping for his own pocket. Then beyond 'ego' you have to think practically about issues like
1) his own political future--(if you recall history is witness that most rebelious MLAs end up ruining their careers pretty soon)
2) the fact that he still has to live in the same society and among similar people and he has to consider his safety--his children his family etc.
3) Dozens of other blackmailing factors
just running away is easier said than done...it could make him a 'dhobi ka kutta' na galli ka, na ghaat ka!
Baaki bhai saab, I do not care if you or anyone else does not want to believe what I have said. If you don't want to believe- be my guest
bhai tere jaisi baat lugaai karya kare . k to naam bata us mla ka aur nahi to us doctor ka a naam bata de us ta bhuj lyange .
k to baat nahi batani thi agar bata hi di to vishwaas dila na fer jikra kyaka .
ajay singh ke do pso ek baar unki kothi se paiso ka bag lekar farar ho gaye . unme ta ek mahra mittar s . usne un paisa ki hisaar kothi bana li . 2003 k rajasthan ke election ki baat s . hamne rajasthan jana tha wo bhai aa gaya ham us ta puchhan lage ak bhaisaab ne kimme nahi kahi . wo bolya k ebe bhaisaab ta baat koni hoi s . usne mahre aage ajay singh ka phone milaya . ajay singh n thaya thate hi bolya rr kaha hain tu isi bewkoonfi kya ta kari . m kade tamne mana kari paiso ki kaam ki . wo bolya bhaisaab galti ho gai . ajay singh pher itna hi bolya ak theek s bikaner chala ja kaam kar . wo aaj bhi ajay singh ke saath hain . election se aane ke baad usne apni gharwali bhi teacher lagwai . agar isi baat hoti to ajay singh usne bhi marwa deta ya pitwa deta wo k koi badi taup tha . na to wo pitwaya na hi usta recovery kari .
bhai kyu khamkha ka prachaar karo so . bhiwani me to eb ajay singh sare workera n marwa dega hare pachhe ..
vikassingh1
Banned
Bhai saab,
bhai tere jaisi baat lugaai karya kare . k to naam bata us mla ka aur nahi to us doctor ka a naam bata de us ta bhuj lyange .
k to baat nahi batani thi agar bata hi di to vishwaas dila na fer jikra kyaka .
bhai kyu khamkha ka prachaar karo so . bhiwani me to eb ajay singh sare workera n marwa dega hare pachhe ..
Normally I would not reply to people like yourself.
For very obvious reasons, I will not disclose the name of the MLA and/ or the doctor. This is not a public tamasha here and the privacy and discretion of both those people has to be respected. After all they both have to live in the same society even today.
About docs, there is a simple oath which all of them take before they embark on their profession. Its called the Hippocratic Oath. Whereby the doc is not supposed to release any private info that he/ she gained due to being in the position of a doc. Now ofcourse not everyone follows it relegiously and their close friends/ colleagues might come to know. But that does not mean that the same doc will start giving the info out to strangers like you or anyone else that enquires.
Infact in many countries, there can be a strong lawsuit against the medical practitioner for doing the same.
About belief, as I mentioned earlier I leave it to the reader. It is your wish whether you wish to read the thread or not. If you read it, then again your wish whether you believe it or not!
Your stupid comments like 'Lugai aise baat karti hain' probably reflect your educational/ maturity level, kindly dont expect any more answers from my side.
Regards,
Vikas
D
dahiyarules
Guest
Bhai mere! Who are you referring to as the goons who are paid/inspired by the Chautala family? I don't think Haryana politics have advanced to the point that paid undercover political operatives swarm online forums to shape public opinion.
vikassingh1
Banned
Bhaaijaan,
this is not only possible but even probable
People who make new IDs before elections, BS here with hundreds of postings glorifying some leader and then dissapear, what do you think that is?
Paid or unpaid, it surely smells like some political agenda to me! I am surprised that you are surprised to consider this possibility!
this is not only possible but even probable
People who make new IDs before elections, BS here with hundreds of postings glorifying some leader and then dissapear, what do you think that is?
Paid or unpaid, it surely smells like some political agenda to me! I am surprised that you are surprised to consider this possibility!
D
dahiyarules
Guest
A good chunk of posters on this forum are NRIs. I don't think NRIs and quite a few other posters in India even vote.
So, I think it would be a waste of resources for Political parties to position operatives on this forum.
The political field in India is still in its very early stages of ideological development. Politicians do not have a philosophy to offer to their voters. Election campaigns are more about material success rather than being about social responsibility and fulfillment.
Anyone in India with the right resources and connections can become a successful politician. Politics in India are still far from being a science. Unfortunately, I can safely say that politics in India arent anywhere close to being intellectually stimulating. It is all about who carries the longest stick and the deepest pockets.
I don't think people even know why they vote. They do not understand the meaning of living in a "true democracy." Just because we have the largest number of voters than any other country on earth, it does not make us a democracy.
Democracy is a consensus over a given ideology among those who vote and the ideologues who are given an opportunity in good faith by the former to promote the ideology.
In India, democracy is a big drama. It is all about who brings the highest grossing Bollywood star to campaign for them, or who can afford to throw around cash and alcohol until people loose their senses to an incredible degree of insanity.
I think Democracy in India was a big sham to start with. It was and will be for a long time to come, a highly complicated subject for people who still squat as part of their morning chores.
I believe we chose to be a democracy because with a populace as intellectually deprived as ours, a few corrupt individuals can control the country and its resources for an infinite period of time.
I believe Democracy seizes the monopoly over social change. The only people who have the power to bring change are the ones who run a democracy. And they have a highly vested interest in the possibility that change never happens. Our leaders really do not want our understanding of philosophy to evolve into anything better than the current state in which it exists. Because, if that were to happen, people will wake up one morning to realize they got screwed. That will be the end of democracy.
So, keeping in view what I have said above, we can safely assume this forum is free of paid political operative. It will be a long time before our politicians will feel the need to sponsor the formulation of opinion in online forums such as this one.
Last edited by a moderator:
vikassingh1
Banned
phew!
thank u for the lecture shurjee 
but it aint got nothing to do with what I was saying...
i had actually typed a good response ..but this stupid airport wireless did a boo boo and now all that is gone...dayum thing!
Time to board now...so gotaa go
thank u for the lecture shurjee but it aint got nothing to do with what I was saying...i had actually typed a good response ..but this stupid airport wireless did a boo boo and now all that is gone...dayum thing!
Time to board now...so gotaa go
A good chunk of posters on this forum are NRIs. I don't think NRIs and quite a few other posters in India even vote.
So, I think it would be a waste of resources for Political parties to position operatives on this forum.
The political field in India is still in its very early stages of ideological development. Politicians do not have a philosophy to offer to their voters. Election campaigns are more about material success rather than being about social responsibility and fulfillment.
Anyone in India with the right resources and connections can become a successful politician. Politics in India are still far from being a science. Unfortunately, I can safely say that politics in India arent anywhere close to being intellectually stimulating. It is all about who carries the longest stick and the deepest pockets.
I don't think people even know why they vote. They do not understand the meaning of living in a "true democracy." Just because we have the largest number of voters than any other country on earth, it does not make us a democracy.
Democracy is a consensus over a given ideology among those who vote and the ideologues who are given an opportunity in good faith by the former to promote the ideology.
In India, democracy is a big drama. It is all about who brings the highest grossing Bollywood star to campaign for them, or who can afford to throw around cash and alcohol until people loose their senses to an incredible degree of insanity.
I think Democracy in India was a big sham to start with. It was and will be for a long time to come, a highly complicated subject for people who still squat as part of their morning chores.
I believe we chose to be a democracy because with a populace as intellectually deprived as ours, a few corrupt individuals can control the country and its resources for an infinite period of time.
I believe Democracy seizes the monopoly over social change. The only people who have the power to bring change are the ones who run a democracy. And they have a highly vested interest in the possibility that change never happens. Our leaders really do not want our understanding of philosophy to evolve into anything better than the current state in which it exists. Because, if that were to happen, people will wake up one morning to realize they got screwed. That will be the end of democracy.
So, keeping in view what I have said above, we can safely assume this forum is free of paid political operative. It will be a long time before our politicians will feel the need to sponsor the formulation of opinion in online forums such as this one.
sidchhikara
New member
A good chunk of posters on this forum are NRIs. I don't think NRIs and quite a few other posters in India even vote.
So, I think it would be a waste of resources for Political parties to position operatives on this forum.
The political field in India is still in its very early stages of ideological development. Politicians do not have a philosophy to offer to their voters. Election campaigns are more about material success rather than being about social responsibility and fulfillment.
Anyone in India with the right resources and connections can become a successful politician. Politics in India are still far from being a science. Unfortunately, I can safely say that politics in India arent anywhere close to being intellectually stimulating. It is all about who carries the longest stick and the deepest pockets.
I don't think people even know why they vote. They do not understand the meaning of living in a "true democracy." Just because we have the largest number of voters than any other country on earth, it does not make us a democracy.
Democracy is a consensus over a given ideology among those who vote and the ideologues who are given an opportunity in good faith by the former to promote the ideology.
In India, democracy is a big drama. It is all about who brings the highest grossing Bollywood star to campaign for them, or who can afford to throw around cash and alcohol until people loose their senses to an incredible degree of insanity.
I think Democracy in India was a big sham to start with. It was and will be for a long time to come, a highly complicated subject for people who still squat as part of their morning chores.
I believe we chose to be a democracy because with a populace as intellectually deprived as ours, a few corrupt individuals can control the country and its resources for an infinite period of time.
I believe Democracy seizes the monopoly over social change. The only people who have the power to bring change are the ones who run a democracy. And they have a highly vested interest in the possibility that change never happens. Our leaders really do not want our understanding of philosophy to evolve into anything better than the current state in which it exists. Because, if that were to happen, people will wake up one morning to realize they got screwed. That will be the end of democracy.
So, keeping in view what I have said above, we can safely assume this forum is free of paid political operative. It will be a long time before our politicians will feel the need to sponsor the formulation of opinion in online forums such as this one.
Excellent analysis ... second it.
Now, about the guys who were on this forum during the campaign season - they were complete loonies. They joined this forum a month before the elections and then completely disappeared after the elections - highly focussed on the task at hand - propaganda. Empirically speaking it would be safe to assume that they had a dog in the race even if they were not paid. Maybe they had a family member who was a party worker and they were trying to help. Lets forgot about these flunkies ... whats important is that the analysis above is spot on. Welcome back.
Last edited:
ravindersura
New member
agar yo public tamasha nahi s to yaha ke kise ne lukma batawe tha k ...
achha doctor ne oath liye pachhe bhi tere ta bata di nirra khaki doctor s aur us doctor aali oath ne eb tu nibhaye s ....
maine kab kahi ke m kashi pad ke aa rahya su ...
A good chunk of posters on this forum are NRIs. I don't think NRIs and quite a few other posters in India even vote.
So, I think it would be a waste of resources for Political parties to position operatives on this forum.
The political field in India is still in its very early stages of ideological development. Politicians do not have a philosophy to offer to their voters. Election campaigns are more about material success rather than being about social responsibility and fulfillment.
Anyone in India with the right resources and connections can become a successful politician. Politics in India are still far from being a science. Unfortunately, I can safely say that politics in India arent anywhere close to being intellectually stimulating. It is all about who carries the longest stick and the deepest pockets.
I don't think people even know why they vote. They do not understand the meaning of living in a "true democracy." Just because we have the largest number of voters than any other country on earth, it does not make us a democracy.
Democracy is a consensus over a given ideology among those who vote and the ideologues who are given an opportunity in good faith by the former to promote the ideology.
In India, democracy is a big drama. It is all about who brings the highest grossing Bollywood star to campaign for them, or who can afford to throw around cash and alcohol until people loose their senses to an incredible degree of insanity.
I think Democracy in India was a big sham to start with. It was and will be for a long time to come, a highly complicated subject for people who still squat as part of their morning chores.
I believe we chose to be a democracy because with a populace as intellectually deprived as ours, a few corrupt individuals can control the country and its resources for an infinite period of time.
I believe Democracy seizes the monopoly over social change. The only people who have the power to bring change are the ones who run a democracy. And they have a highly vested interest in the possibility that change never happens. Our leaders really do not want our understanding of philosophy to evolve into anything better than the current state in which it exists. Because, if that were to happen, people will wake up one morning to realize they got screwed. That will be the end of democracy.
So, keeping in view what I have said above, we can safely assume this forum is free of paid political operative. It will be a long time before our politicians will feel the need to sponsor the formulation of opinion in online forums such as this one.
Am totally in your awe Sumit err your analysis
I second it too. Stellar!.
vikassingh1
Banned
Bhai Sura,
Either write totally in Hindi in Devnagiri or write English...its hard to really know what you are saying like this. Even though I dont really care.
Go take a walk and revere your leader, I have better things to do in life.
Either write totally in Hindi in Devnagiri or write English...its hard to really know what you are saying like this. Even though I dont really care.
Go take a walk and revere your leader, I have better things to do in life.
agar yo public tamasha nahi s to yaha ke kise ne lukma batawe tha k ...
achha doctor ne oath liye pachhe bhi tere ta bata di nirra khaki doctor s aur us doctor aali oath ne eb tu nibhaye s ....
maine kab kahi ke m kashi pad ke aa rahya su ...
Last edited:
jitendershooda
New member
NO offence to anyone. Just a simple query.
I agree and feel that almost all will agree and also some of you have already stated that Chautala favoured Jats the most.
Hukum Singh implemented Jat reservation around 1990. But was removed later on, after that INLD was in power but they didnt picked it up again. Now during last year too when jat sabha was demanding the same they never paid heed to it. WHY? If they wish to give favour to jats then is it required to do it by wrong means why not favour them legally by putting them under this cover. (Here all may have different opinion about jat reservation).
I agree and feel that almost all will agree and also some of you have already stated that Chautala favoured Jats the most.
Hukum Singh implemented Jat reservation around 1990. But was removed later on, after that INLD was in power but they didnt picked it up again. Now during last year too when jat sabha was demanding the same they never paid heed to it. WHY? If they wish to give favour to jats then is it required to do it by wrong means why not favour them legally by putting them under this cover. (Here all may have different opinion about jat reservation).
deepakchoudhry
New member
Public has given a fitting reply to political parties be it in Haryana or India.
Awareness is growing which will force the political mindset to change.
Stop harping on about Caste politics and rise about it.
We need commited and honest people to take this nation forward, which group or caste they belong to does not matter.
Awareness is growing which will force the political mindset to change.
Stop harping on about Caste politics and rise about it.
We need commited and honest people to take this nation forward, which group or caste they belong to does not matter.
Maaf karna Hooda saab
I believe Hukum Singh never implemented it for sure. I heard he just discussed it with his collgues.
Bakee our current CM saab ne bhee promise kiya thaa and our senior members have provided the proofs on it, but all was when he was no CM now after becoming CM he don't want to touch the topic.
I believe he is no different in terms of this subject.
Thanks
I believe Hukum Singh never implemented it for sure. I heard he just discussed it with his collgues.
Bakee our current CM saab ne bhee promise kiya thaa and our senior members have provided the proofs on it, but all was when he was no CM now after becoming CM he don't want to touch the topic.
I believe he is no different in terms of this subject.
Thanks
Vikaas Purush Ch. Bhupinder Singh Hooda ke baarei mein koye kuchh ulta-seedha iljaam laade te Bhai tu Baandar ki dhaal guchh le se ar ib Chautala sahab ke baarei mein kahi te kori afwaah ar bakwaas bataave se,,,,,,
ham ne to kah se Parcharak ar tu ke hoyaa bhai:rock
,,,,,,ham ne to kah se Parcharak ar tu ke hoyaa bhai:rock
- Status