पी एम हो तो मोदी जैसा...........

Status
Not open for further replies.
Grand salute & Many Congrats to Modi. He's the Lion among blood sucking parasites .. only ray of hope in this dark phase our country goin' through.

If Modi contest for PM in 2014, I'll definitely come down to support n' vote for him.

Best wishes! \m/

Cheers
Jit
 
bhai bhai... itni low self esteem to bas congressiyo mai hi ho sakti hai... aapne aisi baat kyon likh di... modi pichli baar ke aakde ke liye thodi lad lad ruha... ye to congress ke leaders the jo modi and BJP ko 117 se kam pe rook ke khush ho ruhe the... humein to tab khushi manani chahiye jab Modi, centre mai congress ne jeetne ke bajai unki dhajjiyan udaaye... :)

SandeepSirohi said:
पिछला आकड़ा तो पूरा हो गया :singing: अब ++++++++
Click to expand...
 
malikdeepak1 said:
Yu Modi to fer jitwa diya gujrat ke anpadh loga ne..
BJP getting around 115 seats out of 182. Lagatar teesri baar bhari bahumat ki or Modi..
how can be Gujjus so blind to elect a sickularist thrice?? "kala motiya" to nahi ho rhya se unke?? ;)
Click to expand...
yaar disappoint kar diya Modi ne thoda sa. main to sochu tha ak katti goo sa likaad dega Congress ka Gujarat me. Anyway all is well that ends well. :victorious:. Time to gather the stats at the start of his term now and see where he takes Gujarat after 5 years.
 
bhai do baat bolna chahunga...

1. agar congress ne keshu bhai patel ko 250 crore nahi diye hote to aapki ye iccha bhi poori ho jati... waise muh dikhane layak to abhi bhi nahi chooda...

2. afsos hai aap 5 saal tak Modi ko gujarat mai kaam karte huae nahi dekh paoge... thoda time gujarat mai kam karega or fir centre mai as a PM of india, fir dono bhai mil ke ye dekhangae ki modi India ko kahan le jata hai, apni leadership mai... :) Gujarat mai to hum Modi de baad Saurab Patel ka jalwa dekhange...


VPannu said:
yaar disappoint kar diya Modi ne thoda sa. main to sochu tha ak katti goo sa likaad dega Congress ka Gujarat me. Anyway all is well that ends well. :victorious:. Time to gather the stats at the start of his term now and see where he takes Gujarat after 5 years.
Click to expand...
 
sanjeev1984 said:
bhai bhai... itni low self esteem to bas congressiyo mai hi ho sakti hai... aapne aisi baat kyon likh di... modi pichli baar ke aakde ke liye thodi lad lad ruha... ye to congress ke leaders the jo modi and BJP ko 117 se kam pe rook ke khush ho ruhe the... humein to tab khushi manani chahiye jab Modi, centre mai congress ne jeetne ke bajai unki dhajjiyan udaaye... :)
Click to expand...

हा हा हा संजीव भाई मैंने तो इस लिए लिखा की किसी कांग्रेसी ने कहा की मोदी को 117 से पहले ही रोक दिया ओर गुजरात में कांग्रेस मजबूत हुई है |:victorious:
२००७ में था : 117 / 59
२०१२ में है : 120 / 56
 
VPannu said:
yaar disappoint kar diya Modi ne thoda sa. main to sochu tha ak katti goo sa likaad dega Congress ka Gujarat me. Anyway all is well that ends well. :victorious:. Time to gather the stats at the start of his term now and see where he takes Gujarat after 5 years.
Click to expand...

Bhai it was a hype being created around by his critics so that they can demean his huge win. He got 121 seats out of 182 which is 66.5%. Fighting for a majority third time in a row and getting 4 seats more than previous term shows how big he has won.
Aur bhai stats sirf NDTV se uthana, baaki to non-trustworthy aur waste hai.. maine bhi ye 121/182 wala aankda wahi se liya hia ;)
 
desijat said:
If still unclear, please feel free to let me know and I will simplify further.
Click to expand...
Yeah, why don't you enlighten our poor souls. Maybe in Hindi this time. teri inglish to uppar ko jaan laag gi. Maybe you tried to provide too much information/sarcasm in one line and none of them was delivered. PAN is a prerequisite that you need before you start working (solely talking about job, not about business). You provide this to your employer for TDS. Correct me if I am wrong please.
 
Chief Minister Narendra Modi has played a hat-trick in Gujarat. BJP has won 115 seats out of 182. Now let us see what are the implications of this election and what does this election mean to India?


· This is the beginning of the end of Nehru-Gandhi dynasty in Delhi.


· This election is a slap on the face of anti-Hindu Congress Party.

· Gujarat elections have exposed anti-Hindu/India Media’s malicious propaganda against Narendra Modi.

· The diabolical designs of deadly combination of Leftist/Islamist axis have been nipped in the bud.

· This election has proved beyond any shadow of doubt that Sonia and Rahul are no match for Narendra Modi.

· The defeat of senior Gujarat Congress leaders in election has cast an aspersion on their credibility, integrity and popularity.

· This election is vindication for Narendra Modi’s policies of progress and peace.

· People have voted for Narendra Modi’s capability to contain terrorism and communal riots in Gujarat.

· This election will play the role of a game changer. This election has demoralized anti-Hindu/India forces and emboldened Hindu patriots.

· Gujarati voters have defeated Congress squarely in Gujarat. I hope that in the 2014 Elections Hindu voters will vote in unison and strategically for nationalist forces and get back India from the corrupt anti-Hindu Congress Government.


· Narendra Modi is a dynamic and charismatic leader. He is unstoppable now. It is our duty to support him whole-heartedly and ensure that he becomes the next Prime Minister of India.
 
Muslims Voted for BJP in Gujrat

I really like when Gujrati muslim discarded the election gimmicks and the environment of paranoia created but Congress and voted for a transparent and pro development govt ....... I think PM's post require modi more then modi himself aspire to become PM

It will be one of the greatest day in our recent history when a political battle tested veteran become the prime minister of India

I never voted in my life but will vote for sure in coming Parliamentary elections for Modi for Country.

Jai maa Bharti

http://post.jagran.com/minorities-tilt-towards-bjp-in-narendra-modis-gujarat-1356089668
 
Gujraat election ke result se saaf hain ki vahan election bjp vs congress na hokar vikaas vs anti-hindu activity tha.. jo result banaaskantha se aaye hain vo to bade hi chakit karne wale hain iss jille me modi ki haar ka kaaran congress ki vajah se nahin modi ke vikas ki vajah se hi haar ho gayi. modiji ne gujraat me vikas ke sath sath rajasthan ke vikas ke liye narmada ka paani diya yeh vikas uss jille ki logon ko raas nahin aaya.
 
sorry jaat bros mai post karne mai thoda late ho gaya.....mujhe to modi ke jeetan ki itni khushi hai jitni modi ke maa ko bhi na hogi....waisee iss baarrr modi ne saaaree apne critics ke muhh pur zor ka thapad maraa hai:)......ghatia and toochi politics karne wala eek barr jeet sakta hai yaa lucky hai to 2 barr but hatrick ni kar saktaa....congress ke politicians eek barr se zeyada jeeet naa paatee:)....dont worry keeep it up congress walo n uske critics......modi se seekho politics.....kaise usne muslims ko bhi apne support mai kar liyaa.....eek CM ki pechaan uske state ki development se hoti hai....elections se pehle roz news mai aata tha modi vs modi....aab news mai jaldi hi aane wala hai modi vs congress....:)....hope to c him as PM of india soon
 
Dilli main kya hota hai sab ko pata hai par main batata hu bhai gujarat main kya hua tha jo log dekh kar aankh moond lete hai...

During 2002 riots several woman were raped, a lot of complaints were lodged and not even one conviction has taken place... these are little less known facts ignored by internet tigers

ravinderpannu said:
OR DILLI me kya kya hota hai............aage te tu bhi samajh gya hoga bhai...!!!
Click to expand...
 
Three major hurdles in Modi's march to 7, RCR, Delhi

To make it to PM's post, Modi has to cross three major hurdles - win the mandate of BJP, gain the trust of NDA allies and appeal to voters outside Gujarat.

About winning thrice consecutively, Shivraj Chauhan in MP and Raman Singh in Chattisgarh could do the same in 2013.

[h=1]Swaminomics: Three major hurdles in Modi's march to 7, RCR, Delhi[/h]Let me stick out my neck and say Narendra Modi will not lead the next BJP election campaign. Almost all other analysts, whether pro- or anti-Modi, think he is inexorably headed for New Delhi as the new battering ram of the BJP. Modi's own post-election speech showed clearly that he aimed to become the next PM.
His third successive victory in Gujarat was stellar. He has an enviable development record. Yet Indian history shows that successful chief ministers do not translate into Prime Ministers. Morarji Desai, Charan Singh and Deve Gowda, each lasted just a few months or years as Prime Minister. Narasimha Rao lasted five years, but was made PM because he was a lightweight.
Modi has three hurdles to overcome. First, he must be acceptable to NDA allies of the BJP. But Nitish Kumar (JDU), Chandrababu Naidu (TDP), Mamata Banerjee (TMC) and Jayalalithaa (AIADMK), all woo Muslim vote banks.
Now, these are cynical politicians, perfectly willing to share a platform with Hindu communalists if there is an electoral advantage. If by accepting Modi's leadership they think they can gain more Hindu votes than the Muslim votes they lose, they will do so. But the very opposite is true.
Naidu concluded that associating with Modi caused his 2004 defeat in Andhra Pradesh. Nitish Kumar was with the NDA for years, and indeed defended the BJP when he was railway minister during the Godhra riots. But once he became Bihar CM, he saw Modi as a serious liability, and refused to accept even a flood relief donation from Modi after the Kosi floods. Mamata joined hands with the Jamaat-e-Islami in her famous Singur agitation. These NDA allies refuse to accept Modi as NDA leader. For that reason alone, his bid for prime ministership looks doomed.
Second, he faces many rivals and enemies within the BJP. They will argue that opposition from NDA allies makes him totally unsuitable. Besides, Shivraj Chauhan in Madhya Pradesh and Raman Singh in Chhattisgarh, both aim to win third successive terms as CMs in the 2013 state elections. If they succeed, Modi's triple victory will cease to look exceptional. MP has 290 Lok Sabha seats against Gujarat's 26, and Chauhan is more acceptable to NDA allies than Modi.
Modi's third hurdle comes from voters. Political analysts usually discuss elections in national terms, but elections are decided mainly on local issues. National politics is not irrelevant, but is secondary.
Possibly 90-95% of Indians have never seen a Central government official. The only face of government they see is the patwari, thanedar, electricity linesman, and a few officials at the tehsil level. National issues like inflation or the Kargil war can indeed swing national elections, but not development policy issues.
The best proof of this came from Yogendra Yadav's assessment of whether voters backed or opposed the economic reforms of 1991-96. The question he asked in a survey was: "Are you aware of any change whatsoever in economic policies?" Almost 80% said no!
Despite the hue and cry in Parliament, despite raging debates in the media, voters mostly didn't know or care. They surely liked new TV channels and cellphones, but did not associate these with economic reform in any policy sense. At the grassroots, the 1996 general election was decided on more local issues.
Modi is a great administrator with a great record in economic development in Gujarat. But if he goes to other states and boasts he has built thousands of check dams and attracted major industries to Gujarat, will voters there care?
Almost certainly not. This strength of local issues explains why no strong chief minister has ever swung voters in other states, despite trying.
Modi refused to campaign for his party in Punjab and Uttarakhand in state elections last February. He campaigned outside Gujarat for the first time in Himachal Pradesh this time.
The outcome was dismal. In his absence, the BJP won in Punjab and only just lost in Uttarakhand, a fair performance. But in Himachal, despite Modi's campaigning, the BJP was thrashed.
Now Himachal is a small state, and Modi addressed only two major rallies. It can be argued this was not enough to have an impact. Yet in a small state two major rallies should matter. His thrashing in HP is surely not conclusive. But he has made a weak, unconvincing start as a vote-getter outside Gujarat. His Midas touch seems to desert him.
Modi may be the darling of TV analysts, stock markets and Twitterers. But he is opposed by NDA allies, questioned by rival BJP factions, and ignored (so far) by voters outside Gujarat. Can such a man become Prime Minister?
 
desijat said:
Dilli main kya hota hai sab ko pata hai par main batata hu bhai gujarat main kya hua tha jo log dekh kar aankh moond lete hai...

During 2002 riots several woman were raped, a lot of complaints were lodged and not even one conviction has taken place... these are little less known facts ignored by internet tigers
Click to expand...


Jo tu aur members ke baare me kah rha hai wo tere upar bhi fit baith-ti hai bhai "desi". Aankh to teri bhi mich rhi se kaangrese ke parde niche. Thik e kahve se log ak ke to tere ghar me koi kangrese ka leader hia, ar ke fer tu supne leve hai ticket len ke.

Tere itni simple si baat samajh me koni aayi ak party to BJP hi thi HP or Gujarat me chunaav ladne wali, par HP me haar gayi aur Gujarat me bhari bahumat se jeet gayi.. sirf ek leader ki vjah se. Par kangrese aalya ke pet me dard uth rhya hai ak Modi kyukar jeet gya. Log usne galat samjhte to (gor kariye) muslim majority ki 33 seat me te 20 na jeetvate usne (ndtv ki khabar hai ya).

Tu manne konya par ek bar Kaangrease ke chasme ne hata ke isne bhi dekhiye bhai :

Gujarat -> 2002 --> 2012 == 10 Years
Delhi -> 1984 --> 2012 == 28 Years

koi clue chaiye ho to bta diye..
 
Indian population ( yes!! me, you , he and she) has an intrinsic nature of forgetting and forgiving easily, be it heroes, villains or normal people. This articles in a way suggests that a tree must not be taken for the forest.


swaich said:
To make it to PM's post, Modi has to cross three major hurdles - win the mandate of BJP, gain the trust of NDA allies and appeal to voters outside Gujarat.

About winning thrice consecutively, Shivraj Chauhan in MP and Raman Singh in Chattisgarh could do the same in 2013.

[h=1]Swaminomics: Three major hurdles in Modi's march to 7, RCR, Delhi[/h]Let me stick out my neck and say Narendra Modi will not lead the next BJP election campaign. Almost all other analysts, whether pro- or anti-Modi, think he is inexorably headed for New Delhi as the new battering ram of the BJP. Modi's own post-election speech showed clearly that he aimed to become the next PM.
His third successive victory in Gujarat was stellar. He has an enviable development record. Yet Indian history shows that successful chief ministers do not translate into Prime Ministers. Morarji Desai, Charan Singh and Deve Gowda, each lasted just a few months or years as Prime Minister. Narasimha Rao lasted five years, but was made PM because he was a lightweight.
Modi has three hurdles to overcome. First, he must be acceptable to NDA allies of the BJP. But Nitish Kumar (JDU), Chandrababu Naidu (TDP), Mamata Banerjee (TMC) and Jayalalithaa (AIADMK), all woo Muslim vote banks.
Now, these are cynical politicians, perfectly willing to share a platform with Hindu communalists if there is an electoral advantage. If by accepting Modi's leadership they think they can gain more Hindu votes than the Muslim votes they lose, they will do so. But the very opposite is true.
Naidu concluded that associating with Modi caused his 2004 defeat in Andhra Pradesh. Nitish Kumar was with the NDA for years, and indeed defended the BJP when he was railway minister during the Godhra riots. But once he became Bihar CM, he saw Modi as a serious liability, and refused to accept even a flood relief donation from Modi after the Kosi floods. Mamata joined hands with the Jamaat-e-Islami in her famous Singur agitation. These NDA allies refuse to accept Modi as NDA leader. For that reason alone, his bid for prime ministership looks doomed.
Second, he faces many rivals and enemies within the BJP. They will argue that opposition from NDA allies makes him totally unsuitable. Besides, Shivraj Chauhan in Madhya Pradesh and Raman Singh in Chhattisgarh, both aim to win third successive terms as CMs in the 2013 state elections. If they succeed, Modi's triple victory will cease to look exceptional. MP has 290 Lok Sabha seats against Gujarat's 26, and Chauhan is more acceptable to NDA allies than Modi.
Modi's third hurdle comes from voters. Political analysts usually discuss elections in national terms, but elections are decided mainly on local issues. National politics is not irrelevant, but is secondary.
Possibly 90-95% of Indians have never seen a Central government official. The only face of government they see is the patwari, thanedar, electricity linesman, and a few officials at the tehsil level. National issues like inflation or the Kargil war can indeed swing national elections, but not development policy issues.
The best proof of this came from Yogendra Yadav's assessment of whether voters backed or opposed the economic reforms of 1991-96. The question he asked in a survey was: "Are you aware of any change whatsoever in economic policies?" Almost 80% said no!
Despite the hue and cry in Parliament, despite raging debates in the media, voters mostly didn't know or care. They surely liked new TV channels and cellphones, but did not associate these with economic reform in any policy sense. At the grassroots, the 1996 general election was decided on more local issues.
Modi is a great administrator with a great record in economic development in Gujarat. But if he goes to other states and boasts he has built thousands of check dams and attracted major industries to Gujarat, will voters there care?
Almost certainly not. This strength of local issues explains why no strong chief minister has ever swung voters in other states, despite trying.
Modi refused to campaign for his party in Punjab and Uttarakhand in state elections last February. He campaigned outside Gujarat for the first time in Himachal Pradesh this time.
The outcome was dismal. In his absence, the BJP won in Punjab and only just lost in Uttarakhand, a fair performance. But in Himachal, despite Modi's campaigning, the BJP was thrashed.
Now Himachal is a small state, and Modi addressed only two major rallies. It can be argued this was not enough to have an impact. Yet in a small state two major rallies should matter. His thrashing in HP is surely not conclusive. But he has made a weak, unconvincing start as a vote-getter outside Gujarat. His Midas touch seems to desert him.
Modi may be the darling of TV analysts, stock markets and Twitterers. But he is opposed by NDA allies, questioned by rival BJP factions, and ignored (so far) by voters outside Gujarat. Can such a man become Prime Minister?
Click to expand...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top