Whats wrong if son stays out late and girls come out home early? whats literally wrong with that. OR is it just the sting of never existing equality bite your butt? Every man wants to protect their sisters/mothers/wives or females of family because they put respect and pride in them. Where as men are on expandable side of population compared to women, what wrong in their protection this way?
That is lower self-esteem which haunt you more than anything else and it is mainly because you ve been told ever and ever again negatively by media. You ve literally presumed the false things about jats.
What pitbull? You are sounding like a meek cat here forget about pitbull and fancy stuff. How would you even stand when your confidence is broken loose with an exaggerated video here and there. Forget the fight boy!
You are not complaining rather whining like a 6th class student whose school bus seems to desert him in a stark summer afternoon. I will not choose to slap you (electronically). Its your own choice to believe on horseshyt. Help yourself, I am not a babysitter.
Yeah, you also join the bandwagon with this guy of cursing men for everything. Ask me, do I care? If it is chauvinism to be a proud jat man then I am very happy as a branded chauvinist.
अगर प्रकाश डालने से काम चल जाता है तो जरुर डालता हूँ ! हर उलटे सीधे काम के लिए पूर्ण मर्द जाती को दोषी ठहराना और उसके बाद उदित की तरह स्वयम की कौम पर लगे मिथ्यारोपो को सत्य मानते हुए अपरिपक्वता भरे सवाल करना मेरे शब्दकोष में फेमिनिस्म है ! कुदरत के बनाये नियमों के विरुद्ध जाकर अस्तित्व विहीन समानता के नारे लगाना और साथ में विशेष व्यवहार की अपेक्षा करना फेमिनिसटो का फैशन सा बन ग्या है ! सबसे बड़ा खतरा इस फेमिनिस्म से अगर कुछ है तो वो है स्त्री - पुरुष की बीच की खायी को ना पाटने की हद तक बढ़ा देना !
This video even doesn't work on my side but feminist belief is what I said to Udit's portrayal of things. If you talk of hypocrisy then it is equal in females too for example-Treating Bahu and Beti in different ways, a strong desire for male child and discrimination against girl child by the same mother and then being a part of female infanticide. They should be exposed equally.
Thanks Samar for saving some typing efforts for me.
PS:Wondering, how could two people with so different experiences think so much similar.
Sh Udit Hooda Ji
,
What if you both (you and that singer -Mr M
anpreet Ji) look as being opportunistic to me? What if Mr M
anpreet Ji himself is a real "dharki" and is trying to woo women folks by his song?
To be honest, this is the perception that I have got by "reading" your posts and "listening" to Mr Manpreet. Could this be a "fact"? Only you and Manpreet can tell this with
some certainty.
Abhik,
Most humans treat themselves and believe in using their body as a tool for marketing themselves. Some people, go overboard in this marketing and trade their body like a commodity. And this is not a problem. It's all a game, different people use different tricks/skills.
The problem (w.r.t current topic) starts firstly with how nature has created people (men and women) and secondly with the humans belief of thinking themselves as different from
other animals.
The first issue is that the nature has made a male and a female differently. While a male can meet his objective (sex) by using aggression, a female can not, regardless of how muscular she is. She has to lure male to meet her objective. So nature wise female is at a disadvantage (for meeting this particular objective) as she can only use one method (luring) while male can use two (luring and aggression).
The second issue is that the first issue is a non-issue for all species in nature except for "humans". Humans think that they are superior than all other species and prefer to control nature rather-than being controlled by nature. (And I need a sociologist who can explain me what is wrong in extrapolating this logic to "Whites thinking superior to blacks", "Brahmins thinking superior to dalits" and "Mem thinking superior to women". I believe something is wrong with this extrapolation, however, I am unclear on
what). To address this nature's inequality, humans made
different societies with
different rules on how man and woman can meet this objective of having sex. So the problem is across the societies (that is worldwide), the difference lies not on the mindset (mindset is a product of society) but on the number of rules. Where there are more rules, there is more problem. So if humans want a total eradication of the problem, then, logically, they should dissolve all rules and adopt nature. But then that brings us where we started - calling ourselves humans.
