Haryana dy -cm taj mahomad missing

Status
Not open for further replies.
Just to clarify Brahm,

I guess we are deviating from what we have discussed. If we compare this guy with President of US, the obvious answer would be that this guy should not be allowed to work as DyCM... which is already done by Congress... and I liked this decision also! It is in best interest of their party and voters... Completely agree...

But, this guy has already kept all these things on stake..and has not shown any resistance in leaving his post...!! Now he is just an MLA and can not harm party and state! Still you think his personal decision is wrong and bad? Remember, I am just supporting his personal decision for his love and his boldness to take this step!! Hope my message is clear!


This case is not similar to US President's case. This is a legal act and in US President's case things were quite different and illegal.

Dharmendra is also a Public figure... a well renown actor as well as Politician... lekin dharmendra to sabka bhai hai kyunki woh jat hai ... hahaha
 
This is very correct Nishant bhai. He should have taken proper leave. Afterall, he is a govt servant under law and responsible for his unavailability in office without proper intimation!

But still, this point boils down to his dismissal - which Govt has done immediately... But still, issue of peeping into his personal life is there and should b avoided at all costs.


DK correct people should not look in other's personal life but he should have been resigned form his duties before getting absent from his duties he is responsible for other work too, this is the reason people r trying to get involved in his personal life.
 
Right bro... I totally agree wid you... in above post, my point was... even if you compare and find them same level guilty... at the max you can ask him to leave his post..... and not that he should be thrashed and blah blah...

People feel proud in criticizing people even for their personal matters!! And, simply without facts!

Huh!

This case is not similar to US President's case. This is a legal act and in US President's case things were quite different and illegal.

Dharmendra is also a Public figure... a well renown actor as well as Politician... lekin dharmendra to sabka bhai hai kyunki woh jat hai ... hahaha
 
Well, I would like to see authors posts also and his view points in the debate. Many a times ppl start a thread and let ppl fight like a true politician. I hope this wont be repeated.

Kindly, see the below link.

http://www.jatland.com/forums/showthread.php?t=25088

I questioned people and author in the mentioned thread but got no response. So, I concluded either some ppl enjoy others fighting unnecessarily, playing politics or they are so dumb they cant understand things. But one must be true.
 
इश्क ने गालिब निकम्मा कर दिया, वरना हम भी आदमी थे काम के.

sangwan bhai... i dont see anything for a discussion in yr argument above. it's a simple nd clear case of adultery nd thereby marring another female cos thts not possible in hinduism. his following claim tht...
is totally absurd nd stands no ground... my opinion.

falling in love is no crime... but for sure he is committing a crime to his earlier wife nd seem to be


भाई चंदर मोहन के या मन मैं आई . इस उमर मैं एक तो
दूसरी शादी नही करनी चाहिए थी . और कर भी ली तो यो
मुल्ला बन ने की के जरूरत थी , यो एक महीने से गायब बताया
जा रहा है . अब तो इसकी इन्क्वारी भी करवानी चाहिए ताज होटल
कांड में सामिल तो नही था मुल्ला बन कै , हूडा सरकार की नाक कट
वादी इसने तो . अब तो यो एक ही शेर गाये जा गा रोवता - रोवता ----
इश्क ने ग़ालिब निकम्मा कर दिया
वरना हम भी आदमी उप मुख्यमंत्री थे
 
This case is not similar to US President's case. This is a legal act and in US President's case things were quite different and illegal.

Dharmendra is also a Public figure... a well renown actor as well as Politician... lekin dharmendra to sabka bhai hai kyunki woh jat hai ... hahaha

i've said enuff on the topic nd wud not like to continue my rhetoric. However, i couldn't resist myself replying to DK...

yes DK, you are right this case is not similar to US president's case nd the act is right cos it has been executed legally with utmost precision... but where are the grounds of morality? this is very much possible in india nd ppl walk away with it. the US presidency aspirant had a conviction (... if i'm not wrong) to accept the public opinion nd eventually stepped down. he didn't adopted islam. but look here... this guy is hell bent on justifying his stand talking of women uplift-ment nd bla bla.

p.s. :
इश्क ने गालिब निकम्मा कर दिया, वरना हम भी आदमी थे काम के. ;)
 
Last edited:
Very true DK bhai !

Well, I would like to see authors posts also and his view points in the debate. Many a times ppl start a thread and let ppl fight like a true politician. I hope this wont be repeated.

Kindly, see the below link.

http://www.jatland.com/forums/showthread.php?t=25088

I questioned people and author in the mentioned thread but got no response. So, I concluded either some ppl enjoy others fighting unnecessarily, playing politics or they are so dumb they cant understand things. But one must be true.
 
This is right point Brahm and he should not link his personal decision to anything in society. He can not justify his decision... Thats why I said, if he tries to bring politics into picture here.... toh jootey maaro usko!!

One can even ask...he has been DyCM for more than 3.5 years... what has he done for upliftment of women in society?

Once again condemn trial to take political benefit of it!! Lekin still, his personal decision is something we should spare apart!!!


but look here... this guy is hell bent on justifying his stand talking of women uplift-ment nd bla bla.

;)
 
Jaago India Jaago

Bhaiyo ek common rule banane kii jarurat hai........kii agar Hindu, Muslim, Sikh ho ya Christan sabse pehle woh ek Indian hai aur hum sab Parties ya phir all religions ko milkar sabhi logo kii soch ko badalna padega koi ek pakka rule banana padega kii ek person religion change karke bhi doosri shaadi nahin kar sakta.


Agar koi vyakti sambhrant pariwar se hai to woh dharam badal kar doosra vivaah kar leta hai usse koi kuch nahin kahta wahin koi garib vyakti aisa karta hai to usse samaj kii bahut se dabavo ko jhelna padta hai.

HUM SAB YUVAO KO EK SATH MILKAR KUCH FAISLA KARNA PADEGA TABHI IS DESH KA KUCH HOGA
 
Dyaaki bitthha gya Killlllllka sahi baat pe !!!!

:D Congress aale uske joot maarann aale sein... DyCM tein toh maar e diya... party tein bhi...Kehwe toh ASBP ki taraf tein Rk uncle ji ne bhej k baat shuru karwa dein ... :D :D :D

The muslim face of ASBP ho jaaga... Kilkkkaaaaa!!!




Uncle ji chhore ka naam na bigaado:D,,,,itna suthra to naam dharya usne,,,,

Chand Mohmadd:D ,,,,,

Nav-Dampatti ko shubhkaamnaaye:D:D:rock.........Kilkaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
 
This is right point Brahm and he should not link his personal decision to anything in society. He can not justify his decision... Thats why I said, if he tries to bring politics into picture here.... toh jootey maaro usko!!

One can even ask...he has been DyCM for more than 3.5 years... what has he done for upliftment of women in society?
.......... ??? :)

Bhaiyo ek common rule banane kii jarurat hai........kii agar Hindu, Muslim, Sikh ho ya Christan sabse pehle woh ek Indian hai aur hum sab Parties ya phir all religions ko milkar sabhi logo kii soch ko badalna padega koi ek pakka rule banana padega kii ek person religion change karke bhi doosri shaadi nahin kar sakta.


Agar koi vyakti sambhrant pariwar se hai to woh dharam badal kar doosra vivaah kar leta hai usse koi kuch nahin kahta wahin koi garib vyakti aisa karta hai to usse samaj kii bahut se dabavo ko jhelna padta hai.

HUM SAB YUVAO KO EK SATH MILKAR KUCH FAISLA KARNA PADEGA TABHI IS DESH KA KUCH HOGA
kripaya apne vichaar yahaan prakat karein :) >>> http://www.jatland.com/forums/showthread.php?t=25524&highlight=unified+civil+code
 
Bhaiyo ek common rule banane kii jarurat hai........kii agar Hindu, Muslim, Sikh ho ya Christan sabse pehle woh ek Indian hai aur hum sab Parties ya phir all religions ko milkar sabhi logo kii soch ko badalna padega koi ek pakka rule banana padega kii ek person religion change karke bhi doosri shaadi nahin kar sakta.

Agar koi vyakti sambhrant pariwar se hai to woh dharam badal kar doosra vivaah kar leta hai usse koi kuch nahin kahta wahin koi garib vyakti aisa karta hai to usse samaj kii bahut se dabavo ko jhelna padta hai.

HUM SAB YUVAO KO EK SATH MILKAR KUCH FAISLA KARNA PADEGA TABHI IS DESH KA KUCH HOGA

Thanks for suggestion, But TEVATIA saab mein Dy. CM saab ke baare mein apne vichar prakat kar raha hun yahan.
zindagi ke taar har jagah jude hein. :)
 
Bhai Brahm ji aisa lagta hai ki aajkal DND ji ke Google search engine ki responsibility aapne le li hai ... mast google ki tarah threads khoj kar laate ho .. hahaha :);):D:p
DK the thread was very important nd very good one, unfortunately it didn't receive as much replies as expected... 2ndly i keep track at least on all those threads where i've participated. :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top