Which MAHABHARTA character is most liked by you and why?

[arvindjangu]

waise Ramayan Mahabharata tei pehlyan banni/liikhi/hui (whatever) thi....aur usme Hanumaan na ka ek bander-bhagwan-insaan thaa.....aur woh JAT tha...yeah pehle kayi baaar prove ho chukka hai....to caste system to define ho chuukaa tha.....lekin mahabharat likhniye itne enlightened nahi the......jei Jatland website uss time banni hotti to shayad kuch kiya jaa sakke tha.....lekin iib ke faayedaa

so stuck to the point of topic.....whoz yr fav...and why....and I still m firm on Duryodhan......and no arguments ......

chhore bahut definition jane s
taine sikhandi bi achha lagya hoga

 

[amritameerut01]

Please enlighten me

A couple of points:

1) Samar though was sarcastic but was true ! Never heard of the story of pandavas putting bodies of their own sons ! Thats not at all a FACT!


When Duryodhana was killed, Ashwathama decided to kill Pandavas in their sleep, but Krishna came to know this somehow, and made their sons to sleep instead of Pandav brothers. Hence, their sons were killed. Sry, I quoted it as Lakshagrah but the fact is true.

Karna was not allowed to show his archary skills only ( but not fighting skills ) in an official function of the Hastinapur where ONLY Kuru Princes were supposed to participate. Nothing wrong in that.

If you talking about the fight between Karna and Arjuna, they did fight many time face to face and each and every time Karna ran away.

If you have read whole Mahabharta then let me know when and where Karna and Arjuna were face to face.
It's a quiz for you ? Answer it or ask me if you don't know

Oops....did I heard those words from u Vijay ji. Well, Karan was never a coward. Krishna and Drona never wanted Karan and Arjun to come face to face bcz they know Karan is more powerful than Arjun. Arjun killed Karan by foul play.

Ur knowledge of the epic is gr8, but its sad to know that Karan ran away.

Now I think, I should recommend u the book.
Kindly go thru "Rashmirathi" by Ram Dhari Singh, even if u have read it earlier.
U can check it on www.kavitakosh.org
Even after reading it carefully, u think that all what u quoted is right, then no one can help.

Kauravas may be wrong, but Pandavas are not always right.

But hey one thing we both agree to is that we disgree...

2) Some people seem to be really confused on which character they like , and which they don't , and who was the real cause of war , or on what is the criterion for any of the above ? Please make up your mind! [/quote]


If this is for me, then I still stick to Karan.
No confusion, no arguements in that.

 

[amritameerut01]

If you have read whole Mahabharta then let me know when and where Karna and Arjuna were face to face.
It's a quiz for you ? Answer it or ask me if you don't know.

You win... There is no point discussing this.

 

[keshavdahiya]

chhore bahut definition jane s
taine sikhandi bi achha lagya hoga

ei marre yaar...Lhukma Shikhandi ka zikarrra kyun chedei sei ?.....keh dei tanne aacha laage sei to.....

er uncle Jhangu aapko mein hi milla itni baddi thread mein ???

lemme be straight on this, Are you sure you are messing with right person, or is it just another fluke ??

 

[keshavdahiya]

It's a quiz for you ? Answer it or ask me if you don't know.

Jinnn degga ke naa VJ chorri nei......darrdi tanne kham kha....bhai aap jitna chunt koi konya aaadei.....let her like who so ever she has to

yeah uuupe Arvind Jhanghu uncle nei Shikhandi pasand aa rehya hai....iss per prakash daaliye plzzz

 

[satyenderdeswal]

Shikhandi is also a impressive character ( Na tey bheesam pitamah mar deta pandava ne)

Jinnn degga ke naa VJ chorri nei......darrdi tanne kham kha....bhai aap jitna chunt koi konya aaadei.....let her like who so ever she has to

yeah uuupe Arvind Jhanghu uncle nei Shikhandi pasand aa rehya hai....iss per prakash daaliye plzzz

 

[amritameerut01]

Jinnn degga ke naa VJ chorri nei......darrdi tanne kham kha....bhai aap jitna chunt koi konya aaadei.....let her like who so ever she has to

Kehsav ji, ya baat to sahi hai ki Vijay ji jitna chunt koi naa...par isme darne ki kya baat hai, he can find the answer once he carefully goes thru the book quoted i.e, Rashmirathi

And I m still on my words.

 

[vijay]

Oops....did I heard those words from u Vijay ji. Well, Karan was never a coward. Krishna and Drona never wanted Karan and Arjun to come face to face bcz they know Karan is more powerful than Arjun. Arjun killed Karan by foul play.

Ur knowledge of the epic is gr8, but its sad to know that Karan ran away.

Now I think, I should recommend u the book.
Kindly go thru "Rashmirathi" by Ram Dhari Singh, even if u have read it earlier.
U can check it on www.kavitakosh.org
Even after reading it carefully, u think that all what u quoted is right, then no one can help.

Kauravas may be wrong, but Pandavas are not always right.

But hey one thing we both agree to is that we disgree...

Amrita,

I read the whole POEM mentioned by you and i must say that it is a nice poetic composition by Dinkar Ji. I said nice poem and that's what it is ONLY. It can be considered a nice and good literature but we, here, are talking about the historical facts ( at least based on the EPIC Mahabharta and some other ancient books). It (the above said peom) says nothing about the fight between Arjuna and Karan neither it tells us any factual details of Kurukshetra or any other battles of that times. It's just a poem on Karan and have no historical value.

Maybe you never read about any incident between Karan and Arjuna face to face. So, let me mention one among them here. It happens during the अज्ञातवास of Pandvas when they were staying in the Kingdom of King Virat. Yudhisthra was knows as Kank, Bheema worked as Cook, Arjuna wokred as a female dance teacher Varhannla (बृहन्नला), Nakula and Sehdev worked as Horse caretakers.

During that time Duroyadhan was friend of King of Trigata. King of Trigata asked Duryodhana to help him to attack on Virat and Duryodhana agreed. Their combined forecs ( Duryodhana's and Trigata's ) attacked on Virat. Karan was the leader of that army. That battle happend at a place named Uttar Goharn (उत्तर गोहरण) which is situated in the west of present Dehradoon. In that battle, Arjuna fought on behalf of King of Virat (still in a female attire) and defeated the Karan and his army. Both Karan and Duryodhana RAN AWAY from the battlefield.


Let me know if you know any other incident or like to know about any other incident.

Karna was great archer but Arjuna was the best. The only thing Duryodhana beleived that only Karan can kill Arjuna was that karan had a divine weapon gifted by Lord Indra and which was unbeatable and was sure a death to the on whom it might be used. Now you will ask why Karan didn't used it on Arjuna ? A very simple answer sometimes Karan didn't got time to use it while some other time he didn't know that he was fighting with Arjuna ( like the case i mentioned where Arjuna was in a female attire). That weapon was only reason behind the confidence of Karan that he can kill Arjuna and one day he would otherwise Arjuna was much better archer than him.


Now let me tell you when and how karan used that weapon and all his hopes to kill Arjuna was shattered :

इसके बाद कर्ण रण के मैदान में आया और अर्षभृँग व अलायुधासुर का उसने संहार किया। कर्ण अपने तीक्षण बाणों से घटोत्कच पर वार करने लगा । कर्ण के बाण मायावी घटोत्कच पर कोई प्रभाव नहीं कर रहे थे । घटोत्कच ने कर्ण पर अपनी शक्तियों से भीषण प्रहार करने आरम्भ कर दिये । पर वह घटोत्कच के वारों से वह बच नहीं सका । कर्ण पास इंद्र की दी हुई अमोघ शक्ति थी। कर्ण उसका प्रयोग केवल अर्जुन पर ही करना चाहता था क्योंकि केवल उसी शक्ति से वह अर्जुन को मार सकता था। दुर्योधन को कर्ण पर बहुत आशा थी और उसे विश्वास था कि कौरव सेना में कर्ण को छोड़कर कोई और भी वीर अर्जुन को नहीं मार सकता। फिर कर्ण को अर्जुन के साथ अपना भी हिसाब-किताब चुकाना था। वह अनेक अवसरों पर अर्जुन से अपमानित हो चुका था। किन्तु घटोत्कच कौरवों की सेना पर उस दिन ऐसी कहर ढा रहा था मानों उस दिन एक भी कौरव नहीं बचेगा। इसलिए विवश होकर उसने इस शक्ति का प्रयोग घटोत्कच पर किया। इस वजह से घटोत्कच की मृत्यु हुई । दुयोधन बहुत खुश हुआ और अपने मित्र कर्ण को गले लगा लिया । लेकिन कर्ण इतना खुश नहीं था । उसने घटोत्कच को तो मार गिराया परन्तु उसके पास अब अर्जुन को मारने वाला कोई अस्त्र नहीं बचा था ।


At last, would like to paste here a very common views about Mahabharta and its characters :

महाभारत संस्कृत साहित्य का एक महान् ग्रन्थ है। इसमें पात्रों का चरित्र-चित्रण बहुत ही श्रेष्ठ ढंग से किया गया है। सबके सब पात्र दो श्रेणियों में बांटे जा सकते हैं। एक वे, जो अपने मन, वचन और कर्म से आस्तिक हैं। इनमें भगवान श्रीकृष्ण, पांडव, कृष्ण द्वैपायन इत्यादि उल्लेखनीय हैं। दूसरे वे पात्र हैं जो मन, वचन और कर्म से नास्तिक हैं। कंस इत्यादि इसी श्रेणी के पात्र हैं। दुर्योधन तथा उसके भाई, कर्ण, शकुनि इत्यादि इसी श्रेणी के पात्र हैं। एक तीसरी श्रेणी के पात्र भी हैं। वे आज के युग के बुद्धिवादी पात्रों के समान हैं। इनमें भीष्म, द्रोणाचार्य तथा कृपाचार्य आदि हैं। ये ‘बुद्धिजीवी’ मन ने आस्तिकों का और कभी नासित्कों का समर्थन करते देखे जाते हैं। परन्तु कर्म से इन्होंने कभी भी आस्तिकों का समर्थन नहीं किया। ठीक निर्णयात्मक समय पर ये नास्तिकों की ओर लुढ़क जाते रहे हैं।

As a person anybody can admire any given personality in Mahabharta as every character have some extraordinaly qualities. So, people can admire anybody and i respect their choice. But, yes if someone says that Duryodhana had the right to become King of Hastinapur that is totally unacceptable by all the means. Yes you can point out some qualities in him which you can admire and appreciate. But as a whole, Pandavs were symbol of truth of justice and Kaurva were symbol of Injustice.

I can say and prove it thousand times if someone like to discuss constructively instead of firing a dozen of out of context questions like riddles.

In that case, I am OFF.

 

[amritameerut01]

Thnx Vijay for taking time to read this beautiful poem.

Amrita,

I read the whole POEM mentioned by you and i must say that it is a nice poetic composition by Dinkar Ji. I said nice poem and that's what it is ONLY. It can be considered a nice and good literature but we, here, are talking about the historical facts ( at least based on the EPIC Mahabharta and some other ancient books). It (the above said peom) says nothing about the fight between Arjuna and Karan neither it tells us any factual details of Kurukshetra or any other battles of that times. It's just a poem on Karan and have no historical value.

Does it means that Dinkar ji's poem is factless. Just his imagination....


Maybe you never read about any incident between Karan and Arjuna face to face. So, let me mention one among them here. It happens during the अज्ञातवास of Pandvas when they were staying in the Kingdom of King Virat. Yudhisthra was knows as Kank, Bheema worked as Cook, Arjuna wokred as a female dance teacher Varhannla (बृहन्नला), Nakula and Sehdev worked as Horse caretakers.

During that time Duroyadhan was friend of King of Trigata. King of Trigata asked Duryodhana to help him to attack on Virat and Duryodhana agreed. Their combined forecs ( Duryodhana's and Trigata's ) attacked on Virat. Karan was the leader of that army. That battle happend at a place named Uttar Goharn (उत्तर गोहरण) which is situated in the west of present Dehradoon. In that battle, Arjuna fought on behalf of King of Virat (still in a female attire) and defeated the Karan and his army. Both Karan and Duryodhana RAN AWAY from the battlefield.

Do u think females were allowed to come to battlefields?? Arjun fought in a female attire to confuse Karan and how can Karna fight with a women??? Isn't it a cheating??..


Karna was great archer but Arjuna was the best. The only thing Duryodhana beleived that only Karan can kill Arjuna was that karan had a divine weapon gifted by Lord Indra and which was unbeatable and was sure a death to the on whom it might be used. Now you will ask why Karan didn't used it on Arjuna ? A very simple answer sometimes Karan didn't got time to use it while some other time he didn't know that he was fighting with Arjuna ( like the case i mentioned where Arjuna was in a female attire). That weapon was only reason behind the confidence of Karan that he can kill Arjuna and one day he would otherwise Arjuna was much better archer than him.

Gifted???.....and u might now know the reason why Inder gifted that divine weapon. Inder, father of Arjun, was afraid that Karan can beat his son, and out of son-love he begged "kavach-kundle' from Karan and that too by cheating (Inder approachs Karan in a Brahmin attire). Isn't it a cheating??


Now let me tell you when and how karan used that weapon and all his hopes to kill Arjuna was shattered :

इसके बाद कर्ण रण के मैदान में आया और अर्षभृँग व अलायुधासुर का उसने संहार किया। कर्ण अपने तीक्षण बाणों से घटोत्कच पर वार करने लगा । कर्ण के बाण मायावी घटोत्कच पर कोई प्रभाव नहीं कर रहे थे । घटोत्कच ने कर्ण पर अपनी शक्तियों से भीषण प्रहार करने आरम्भ कर दिये । पर वह घटोत्कच के वारों से वह बच नहीं सका । कर्ण पास इंद्र की दी हुई अमोघ शक्ति थी। कर्ण उसका प्रयोग केवल अर्जुन पर ही करना चाहता था क्योंकि केवल उसी शक्ति से वह अर्जुन को मार सकता था। दुर्योधन को कर्ण पर बहुत आशा थी और उसे विश्वास था कि कौरव सेना में कर्ण को छोड़कर कोई और भी वीर अर्जुन को नहीं मार सकता। फिर कर्ण को अर्जुन के साथ अपना भी हिसाब-किताब चुकाना था। वह अनेक अवसरों पर अर्जुन से अपमानित हो चुका था। किन्तु घटोत्कच कौरवों की सेना पर उस दिन ऐसी कहर ढा रहा था मानों उस दिन एक भी कौरव नहीं बचेगा। इसलिए विवश होकर उसने इस शक्ति का प्रयोग घटोत्कच पर किया। इस वजह से घटोत्कच की मृत्यु हुई । दुयोधन बहुत खुश हुआ और अपने मित्र कर्ण को गले लगा लिया । लेकिन कर्ण इतना खुश नहीं था । उसने घटोत्कच को तो मार गिराया परन्तु उसके पास अब अर्जुन को मारने वाला कोई अस्त्र नहीं बचा था ।


At last, would like to paste here a very common views about Mahabharta and its characters :

महाभारत संस्कृत साहित्य का एक महान् ग्रन्थ है। इसमें पात्रों का चरित्र-चित्रण बहुत ही श्रेष्ठ ढंग से किया गया है। सबके सब पात्र दो श्रेणियों में बांटे जा सकते हैं। एक वे, जो अपने मन, वचन और कर्म से आस्तिक हैं। इनमें भगवान श्रीकृष्ण, पांडव, कृष्ण द्वैपायन इत्यादि उल्लेखनीय हैं। दूसरे वे पात्र हैं जो मन, वचन और कर्म से नास्तिक हैं। कंस इत्यादि इसी श्रेणी के पात्र हैं। दुर्योधन तथा उसके भाई, कर्ण, शकुनि इत्यादि इसी श्रेणी के पात्र हैं। एक तीसरी श्रेणी के पात्र भी हैं। वे आज के युग के बुद्धिवादी पात्रों के समान हैं। इनमें भीष्म, द्रोणाचार्य तथा कृपाचार्य आदि हैं। ये ‘बुद्धिजीवी’ मन ने आस्तिकों का और कभी नासित्कों का समर्थन करते देखे जाते हैं। परन्तु कर्म से इन्होंने कभी भी आस्तिकों का समर्थन नहीं किया। ठीक निर्णयात्मक समय पर ये नास्तिकों की ओर लुढ़क जाते रहे हैं।

This is the way how writer feels. He too feels like many of us. And this is what we are taught in our childhood that is why we hardly care to look the other side. We follow what others say.


Now just read it as :
सबके सब पात्र दो श्रेणियों में बांटे जा सकते हैं। एक वे, जो अपने मन, वचन और कर्म से नास्तिक हैं। इनमें भगवान श्रीकृष्ण, पांडव, कृष्ण द्वैपायन इत्यादि उल्लेखनीय हैं। दूसरे वे पात्र हैं जो मन, वचन और कर्म से आस्तिक हैं। कंस इत्यादि इसी श्रेणी के पात्र हैं। दुर्योधन तथा उसके भाई, कर्ण, शकुनि इत्यादि इसी श्रेणी के पात्र हैं।


As a person anybody can admire any given personality in Mahabharta as every character have some extraordinaly qualities. So, people can admire anybody and i respect their choice. But, yes if someone says that Duryodhana had the right to become King of Hastinapur that is totally unacceptable by all the means. Yes you can point out some qualities in him which you can admire and appreciate. But as a whole, Pandavs were symbol of truth of justice and Kaurva were symbol of Injustice.

I will still say that being the eldest son of Dhritrashtra, who was eldest son of Vichitraveerya, Duryodhana has the right to the throne of Hastinapur.

Pandavas cheated Duryodhana and Kauravas on many occasion and atlast won, if winning by cheating is truth/justice to you, then you are right.



I can say and prove it thousand times if someone like to discuss constructively instead of firing a dozen of out of context questions like riddles.

Yes, thats the point, if one try to question all the incidents ,then one can see there are many loopholes in Pandavas win. Ya , but if one doesnt want to see those, then the matter is different.

In that case, I am OFF. [quote/]

 

[amritameerut01]

Let me know if you know any other incident or like to know about any other incident. [/B]


I can say and prove it thousand times if someone like to discuss constructively instead of firing a dozen of out of context questions like riddles.

In that case, I am OFF.

Can u please tell me :
1. Why was Karan not allowed to show his archary skills at that competition, even after Duryodhana crowned him as King of "Angdesh"?
If it a rule that Arjun will fight only with Kshtriyas, do u think this is a right rule, formed by those who have soft corner for Arjun.
If he was a real fighter he shud have competed Karan in that competition happily.
There also, Kunti knows but didnt disclosed that at that occasion.

2. Drona, took off the thumb of "Eklavya", reason being, he dont want any body to overtake Arjun which he was afraid that "Eklavya" can.

3. Inder, father of Arjun, begs Karan of Kavach kundle by cheating to protect his son. Why??

4. Bheem killed Duryodhana by hitting on thighs whereas in a war, it is a rule, that one is not suppose to attack below waist.

5. Arjun killed Karan when he was out of his chariot and without any weapon busy taking off the wheel of his chariot.

 

[vijay]

Thnx Vijay for taking time to read this beautiful poem.

Does it means that Dinkar ji's poem is factless. Just his imagination....

Yes it is in a way. It tells us that Karan was son on Kunti. It tell us That Karan was not allowed to show his skills of archary ( here i have some contradiction but the way ur just arguing it is unecessory to bring farward that ). It tell us How Karan's guru Pershuram Kicked out Karan of his Ashram because Karan lied and cheated him. Parshuram cursed Karan that the he ( Karan ) would forget the things he tought him. It tells us that Krishana asked him to join Pandavas and Karan refused. In last, it tells us how Krishana went to karan in form of a begger and asked his Kavach Kundal. Fine ... all said ... OK.

Now tell me is it the whole Mahabharat. Its not even a 1% of the whole Mahabharat. Are you argiung here just on the basis of this beautiful poem ONLY.

Do u think females were allowed to come to battlefields?? Arjun fought in a female attire to confuse Karan and how can Karna fight with a women??? Isn't it a cheating??..

What are you upto ? Do you want to know about the incident between Karan and Arjuna or talking about rules of the battlefield. Then listen, The thumb rule is that whenever someone attacks every citizen ( including women and childern have the RIGHT to fight with the enemy ). Duroyodhana and Karan attacked the Virat King and they have every right to defend. Now don't say that Virat King ne Karan ki Bhains khol li thi and he has the RIGHT to attack him. It is not funny at all.

Some greedy people attacked someone and that seems justified to you and a person came forward to save them in a female attire which seems a cheating to you ??????????
GOD BLESS YOU.

Gifted???.....and u might now know the reason why Inder gifted that divine weapon. Inder, father of Arjun, was afraid that Karan can beat his son, and out of son-love he begged "kavach-kundle' from Karan and that too by cheating (Inder approachs Karan in a Brahmin attire). Isn't it a cheating??

Now tell me which poem told you that Indra asked for the Kavach and Kundal from Karan ?????

GOD PLEASE READ MAHABHARTA AGAIN.

That was Krishan not INDRA who asked for Karan's Kavach and Kundal .

Indra gifted him that weapon long back.

I will still say that being the eldest son of Dhritrashtra, who was eldest son of Vichitraveerya, Duryodhana has the right to the throne of Hastinapur.

Yes, you are right word to word.
I rest my case for the sake of all the Goodness, Kindness, Truth and justice of Holy Spirit Duryodhana.

 

[amritameerut01]

Yes it is in a way. It tells us that Karan was son on Kunti. It tell us That Karan was not allowed to show his skills of archary ( here i have some contradiction but the way ur just arguing it is unecessory to bring farward that ). It tell us How Karan's guru Pershuram Kicked out Karan of his Ashram because Karan lied and cheated him. Parshuram cursed Karan that the he ( Karan ) would forget the things he tought him. It tells us that Krishana asked him to join Pandavas and Karan refused. In last, it tells us how Krishana went to karan in form of a begger and asked his Kavach Kundal. Fine ... all said ... OK. [quote/]

Not to ask for kavach kundal but to show Arjun that how large hearted Karan is. Krishna asked him anything he cud give and Karan gave him his golden teeth even while he was dying. That means u have not read it properly.



[quote/]Now tell me is it the whole Mahabharat. Its not even a 1% of the whole Mahabharat. Are you argiung here just on the basis of this beautiful poem ONLY. [quote/]

Not at all, but can put several questions that put a big question mark on Pandavas truth and justice.

[quote/]What are you upto ? Do you want to know about the incident between Karan and Arjuna or talking about rules of the battlefield. Then listen, The thumb rule is that whenever someone attacks every citizen ( including women and childern have the RIGHT to fight with the enemy ). Duroyodhana and Karan attacked the Virat King and they have every right to defend. Now don't say that Virat King ne Karan ki Bhains khol li thi and he has the RIGHT to attack him. It is not funny at all. [quote/]

Women and children can ofcourse fight but when a man (Arjun) fights in a female attire, its a clear cheating.



[quote/now tell me which poem told you that Indra asked for the Kavach and Kundal from Karan ?????

GOD PLEASE READ MAHABHARTA AGAIN.

That was Krishan not INDRA who asked for Karan's Kavach and Kundal .

Indra gifted him that weapon long back. [quote/]


It is Indra who begged Kavach kundal from Karan. U may check the following links for that:


http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Pantheon/4789/Articles/Persons/Karna.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karna

http://www.karna.org/body_story_behind_karna.html

http://www.geocities.com/mahaabhaarat/witnesses/people/men/karn.htm


And also this :

'यह कुछ मुझको नहीं चाहिए, देव धर्म को बल दें,
देना हो तो मुझे कृपा कर कवच और कुंडल दें.'
'कवच और कुंडल!' विद्युत छू गयी कर्ण के तन को;
पर, कुछ सोच रहस्य, कहा उसने गंभीर कर मन को.



'समझा, तो यह और न कोई, आप, स्वयं सुरपति हैं,
देने को आये प्रसन्न हो तप को नयी प्रगती हैं.
धन्य हमारा सुयश आपको खींच मही पर लाया,
स्वर्ग भीख माँगने आज, सच ही, मिट्टी पर आया.

'क्षमा कीजिए, इस रहस्य को तुरत न जान सका मैं,
छिप कर आये आप, नहीं इससे पहचान सका मैं.
दीन विप्र ही समझ कहा-धन, धाम, धारा लेने को,
था क्या मेरे पास, अन्यथा, सुरपति को देने को?

'केवल गन्ध जिन्हे प्रिय, उनको स्थूल मनुज क्या देगा?
और व्योमवासी मिट्टी से दान भला क्या लेगा?
फिर भी, देवराज भिक्षुक बनकर यदि हाथ पसारे,
जो भी हो, पर इस सुयोग को, हम क्यों अशुभ विचरें?



पड़ पुत्र-प्रेम में आया था छल ही करने को,
जान-बूझ कर कवच और कुण्डल तुझसे हरने को,
वह छल हुआ प्रसिद्ध किसे, क्या मुख अब दिखलाऊंगा,
आया था बन विप्र, चोर बनकर वापस जाऊँगा.




Now tell me WHO NEEDS TO READ MAHABHARAT AGAIN???


[quote/]Yes, you are right word to word.
I rest my case for the sake of all the Goodness, Kindness, Truth and justice of Holy Spirit Duryodhana. [quote/]

I know its very difficult to answer those questions.
Anyways, thnx for a healthy discussion with no conclusion

Let Kauravas’ and Pandavas’ soul rest in peace.

Thanks

 

[vijay]

I know its very difficult to answer those questions.
Anyways, thnx for a healthy discussion with no conclusion

Let Kauravas’ and Pandavas’ soul rest in peace.

Thanks

You are absolutely Right.

 

[keshavdahiya]

VJ and Amrita......is your hearing done ??

So, which Character did you guys like eventually, I am just curious to know plzz....

.
.
.
.
and yeasshhh plzz dont give us any reason again.....ek aur mahabharat na liikhni

 

[vijay]

VJ and Amrita......is your hearing done ??

So, which Character did you guys like eventually, I am just curious to know plzz....

.
.
.
.
and yeasshhh plzz dont give us any reason again.....ek aur mahabharat na liikhni

My favourite is Bheema ...

 

[keshavdahiya]

My favourite is Bheema ...

हैँ हैँ ......जबै डरा रेहया सै आढै सबनै ???

 

[vineetakadian]

Seems people have done proper Wiki of the Mahabharat n its characters... Gud to see so much of participation n healthy discussion

My Favourite character is Bheesm Pitamah ...

 

[amritameerut01]

VJ and Amrita......is your hearing done ??

So, which Character did you guys like eventually, I am just curious to know plzz....

.
.
.
.
and yeasshhh plzz dont give us any reason again.....ek aur mahabharat na liikhni

My favourite is KARAN.

 

[deepshi]

Abhimanyu..

sabsey nakli tha dhritrashtra
baski kuch tha nii,,gaddi pe pasra rehta
bina dimaag ka weak minded pest

 

[keshavdahiya]

Abhimanyu..

sabsey nakli tha dhritrashtra
baski kuch tha nii,,gaddi pe pasra rehta
bina dimaag ka weak minded pest

ooh really......ja tu dhritraashtra hii bann ke diikha dei nei....dekhi naa, funk kha rhi kham kha.....nyu kemhe nahi keh deggi, woh mere fav ka baabu tha