Aisa bhi Hota Hai...

tree houses

sampuran said:
News has come from Germany of another novelty in the line of business: hotel accommodation in the branches of a 30-foot high tree. If you have grown a little tired of staying on the ground level that is just the alternative that will suit you. The rooms numbering five are wooden and are connected by narrow walkways and come with small balconies, electric lights and shared toilets. On the opening night all the rooms were fully booked at the cost of £ 100 to £ 150 a night.
Kerala has some tree houses that are 90 feet above the ground! They are built on trees inside the tropical rain forest, and are very popular with foreign tourists. Here are more details -

http://travel.vsnl.com/palmland/treehouse
 
Fatwa authorises sexual abuse of Infant

Bahraini Women's Rights Activist Ghada Jamshir Attacks Islamic Clerics for Issuing Fatwas Authorizing Sexual Abuse of Infants
​
The following are excerpts from an interview with Bahraini women's rights activist Ghada Jamshir, which aired on Al-Arabiya TV on December 21, 2005.
TO VIEW THIS CLIP, VISIT: http://www.memritv.org/search.asp?ACT=S9&P1=978.

Interviewer: "What do you have against the Shari'a courts?"
Ghada Jamshir: "I have a lot against them. What they have done to Bahraini women is not a trivial matter. For years women have been going into these courts, only to be oppressed and treated unjustly. We have reached the point that we say: Enough. We have reached the breaking point."
[...]
"We have a problem with family planning. We have no family planning in Bahrain. The Shiites in Bahrain have marriages for the purpose of mut'ah [pleasure]. They bring multitudes of children into the world, without thinking, who grow up in the streets.
"It's accepted for a man to marry a Filipino woman, a Bahraini woman, and a third woman from Iran, and then he takes two or three women in mut'ah marriage... How many children will he have?!"
Interviewer: "On September 12 you declared that you call upon or advise the persecuted women of the Gulf, and especially the Bahraini women, to request 'social asylum' in France..."
Ghada Jamshir: "Not in France, in Spain."
Interviewer: "Pardon me, in Spain."
Interviewer: "You want opposition from abroad?"
Ghada Jamshir: "The point is not to have opposition from abroad. The point is for them to live and be protected in a safe country. If a woman cannot get any protection in her country, cannot get any protection from the courts, cannot get any protection in the marital home - where will she go? Where will she go?"
[...]
Interviewer: "Some people say that Ghada Jamshir is a Sunni, and that this is why she is leading the battle against [mut'ah] marriages, which are authorized by religious law among the Shi'ites."
Ghada Jamshir: "Authorized by religious law?!"
Interviewer: "Among the Shiites, yes."
Ghada Jamshir: "Does the Islamic Shari'a authorize mut'ah marriages? Does the Islamic Shari'a authorize mut'ah according to the following classification: 'Pleasure from sexual contact with her thighs.' They have: 'Pleasure from sexual touching,' 'pleasure from sexual contact with her breasts.' 'Pleasure from a little girl.' Do you know what 'pleasure from a little girl' means? It means that they derive sexual pleasure from a girl aged two, three, or four."
Interviewer: "Let's not go into details..."
Ghada Jamshir: "Let me tell you what 'pleasure from sexual contact with her thighs' means..."
Interviewer: "Don't give me the details..."
Ghada Jamshir: "This is a violation of children's rights! This constitutes sexual assault of the girl. What does 'pleasure from sexual contact with her thighs' mean? It means deriving sexual pleasure from an infant. How old is an infant? One year, a year and a half, a few months?
"Is it conceivable for a grown man to have sex with an infant girl? And you people tell me that the Islamic Shari'a authorizes this? Forget about the mut'ah. Let's talk about misyar. What do misyar marriages mean? You said that I'm a Sunni and that's why I'm attacking the Shiites. No!"
Interviewer: "Some people claim that."
Ghada Jamshir: "No, no. What does the misyar marriage mean? A man marries a woman from another town, and goes to her once a month. He 'visits' her. He calls her his 'wife.'"
Interviewer: "Not necessarily once a month. He might go there every day."
Ghada Jamshir: "Brother Turki, this kind of marriage, this kind of behavior, diminishes the woman's honor as a human being."
[...]
"All her life, the woman is a prisoner in her own home. In the past, she would not go out to work, or to study abroad. Very few women would go to university outside Bahrain. She is at home in order to cook, sweep, and raise the children. How will she get an education? There are women whose families are extremist. They even force them to marry against their will.
"You tell me, why is female circumcision still practiced in the Arab world? Why? Because there is no education, no awareness. A few days ago, a four-year-old girl called An'am died in Sudan."
Interviewer: "Why?"
Ghada Jamshir: "Because she had been circumcised. Four years old, and she died of blood poisoning."
[...]
"I am convinced that I was 100% right in everything I have done."
Interviewer: "You have been accused of heresy by some places... some Internet forums."
Ghada Jamshir: "So what? Even in mosques they accuse me of heresy. So what? You think that if they accuse me of heresy, it affects me?"
Interviewer: "You don't care?"
Ghada Jamshir: "No. Allah will decide whether I go to Paradise or to Hell, not them."
Interviewer: "Don't you think that those who accuse you of heresy..."
Ghada Jamshir: "These are the methods of the weak."
Interviewer: "They say they are right, and you say you are right."
Ghada Jamshir: "Who gave them the right to accuse me of heresy?"
Interviewer: "Who gave you the right..."
Ghada Jamshir: "What, did they go into my heart..."
Interviewer: "They say..."
Ghada Jamshir: "Did they see whether I pray or not? Or maybe it's because I don't wear a veil."
Interviewer: "So you don't care. It doesn't affect you?" Ghada Jamshir: "It doesn't bother me at all."
 
Pleasure marriages' regain popularity in Iraq

By Rick Jervis
USA TODAY
BAGHDAD — In the days when it could land him in jail, Rahim Al-Zaidi would whisper details of his muta'a only to his closest confidants and the occasional cousin. Never his wife.
Al-Zaidi hopes to soon finalize his third muta'a, or “pleasure marriage,” with a green-eyed neighbor. This time, he talks about it openly and with obvious relish. Even so, he says, he probably still won't tell his wife.
The 1,400-year-old practice of muta'a — “ecstasy” in Arabic — is as old as Islam itself. It was permitted by the prophet Mohammed.
Pleasure marriages were outlawed under Saddam Hussein but have begun to flourish again. The contracts, lasting anywhere from one hour to 10 years, generally stipulate that the man will pay the woman in exchange for sexual intimacy. Now some Iraqi clerics and women's rights activists are complaining that the contracts have become less a mechanism for taking care of widows than an outlet for male sexual desires.
The renaissance of the pleasure marriage coincides with a revival of other Shiite traditions long suppressed by the former regime. Interest in Shiite customs has accelerated since Shiite parties swept Jan. 30 elections to become the biggest bloc in the new National Assembly.
“Under Saddam, we were very scared,” says Al-Zaidi, 39, a lawyer from Sadr City, a sprawling Shiite neighborhood in eastern Baghdad. “They would punish people. Now, all my friends are doing it.”
A turbaned Shiite cleric who issues wedding permits from a street-side counter in Sadr City says he encourages permanent marriages but gives the OK for pleasure marriages when there are “special reasons.” The cleric, Sayid Kareem As-Sayid Abdullah Al-Mousawi, says he grants licenses for muta'a in cases where the woman is widowed or divorced, or for single women who have approval from their fathers.
“Clerics who blessed them were hounded by security during the previous regime,” he says. “I can assure you, these (muta'a) marriages are flourishing in (Shiite cities) Najaf, Karbala and Kadhamiya in an amazing way. There are a lot of hotels (patronized) by Shiites who approve of such marriages.”
Shiites and Sunnis both permit men to take more than one permanent wife, but the rival branches of Islam are deeply split over pleasure marriages.
Most Shiite scholars today consider it halal, or religiously legal. Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, the highest religious authority in Shiite Islam, sets conditions and obligations for muta'a on his website. (“A woman with whom temporary marriage is contracted is not entitled to share the conjugal bed of her husband and does not inherit from him …”)
Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari and other Shiite lawmakers have said they want Iraq's new constitution to use the sharia, or Islamic law, as its basis. That could give muta'a formal legal protection. Sunni Arabs and Kurds, who are mainly Sunni, oppose the idea. But the practice is growing among Sunnis and Shiites alike.
Sunni scholars fear that giving official sanction to pleasure marriages — many of which are only verbal agreements between the couple — are little more than legalized prostitution that could lead to a collapse of moral values, especially among young people.
“We have reports about one-hour pleasure marriages that are flourishing among students,” says Sheik Ali Al-Mashhadani, a Sunni imam at the Ibn Taimiya mosque in Baghdad. “I'm advising parents to watch their sons very carefully, particularly those who are in the colleges and universities.”
Short-term marriages were considered idolatry by Saddam's ruling Baath Party in the 1970s and '80s, says Kamal Hamdul, president of the Iraqi Bar Association. Muta'a were punishable by fines or prison, he says. Couples took the practice underground, meeting in out-of-the-way apartments and hotels — and rarely telling even family members.
Pleasure marriages began to resurface after the fall of Baghdad in 2003. One reason is that Shiites, 60% of Iraq's population, have a greater ability to shape social mores than they did under Saddam, a Sunni Arab whose top aides were also Sunnis.
A woman agreeing to a pleasure marriage that involves a one-time encounter might be able to count on about $100. For a muta'a that runs longer, she might be paid $200 a month, though the amounts vary widely and can depend on whether she has children.
Zeinab Ahmed, 31, lost her husband in a car accident five years ago. She says she has considered entering into a muta'a contract with a man, but the stigma attached has kept her from doing so.
“All my friends who have done this have told me they got married in this way just to meet their sexual desires,” Ahmed says, “but later on they started to love that man, and he does not accept to get married permanently. … Most of the men, at the end of the contract, they feel contempt towards the woman.”
Contracts for pleasure marriage strongly favor men.
Married women can't enter a muta'a, although a married man can. Men can void the contract at any time; women don't have that option unless it's negotiated at the outset. The couple agrees not to have children. A woman who unintentionally gets pregnant can have an abortion but must then pay a fine to a cleric.
Women's rights activists are concerned. Salama Al-Khafaji, a Shiite lawmaker who supports the concept of sharia law but advocates for women's rights, calls the re-emergence of muta'a an “unhealthy phenomenon.”
With the right intentions, she says, muta'a can serve the noble purpose of helping divorced and widowed women. But too many men are using temporary marriages to exploit women for sex, she says. Her solution is to reinforce the importance of permanent marriages with work programs for newlywed couples and education campaigns.
“A woman who practices muta'a does not usually feel comfortable about it,” Al-Khafaji says. “People these days are creating excuses to practice these acts.”
Al-Mousawi, the Shiite cleric, says the practice of pleasure marriages is open to abuse and misinterpretation. He says he is particularly troubled by kiss-and-tell men. “After they've finished with the woman, they've told their friends about her beauty and given a description of her body, which is something absolutely unacceptable in Islam,” he says.
Al-Zaidi, the Sadr City lawyer, says his motivations are spiritual. In 2002, he says he persuaded a Sunni widow to enter into a one-year muta'a with him, even though at first she refused.
To him, pleasure marriages are legitimate in God's eyes. They bring responsibility and formality to what would otherwise be squalid and sinful, he says. “There is a noble goal in this kind of marriage,” says Al-Zaidi, still married to his first wife and has five children. “It's to eradicate moral corruption.”
In the past, some muta'a contracts have been struck when permanent, legal marriages were not possible.
Ayad Muhammed Ali fell in love eight years ago with a woman who walked into his Baghdad tailor shop. She was a widow with two young sons whose husband, a member of an underground group outlawed by Saddam, had been executed by Saddam's men. The woman also was richer than Ali, so her family would never have consented to a legal marriage.
The lovers agreed to a yearlong muta'a in 1993 and have renewed their contract every year since, he says. In the decade after their muta'a, the couple never dared meet in the open. In April 2003, the month U.S. forces swept into the capital, they began meeting in public places for the first time, he says.
“I was always so afraid someone would find out and I'd go to prison,” says Ali, 29. “Now, I'm not afraid. My only fear is her family.”
if (((new String(navigator.type))==4)&&((new String(navigator.version)).indexOf("4.")!=-1)){ //setTimeout necessary for Netscape4 to render button window.setTimeout("MM_showHideLayers('rightsLinkNSlyr','','show');", 500); } else { eval(document.getElementById("rightsLinkButton").innerHTML = ''); } function RightslinkPopUp(){ var url = "https://s100.copyright.com/AppDispatchServlet"; var location = url + "?publisherName=" + escape( "USATODAY" ) // required, hard-coded + "&publication=" + escape( "USATODAY" ) // required, hard-coded + "&title=" + escape( "‘Pleasure marriages' regain popularity in Iraq " ) // required + "&publicationDate=" + escape( "05-05-2005") // required + "&author=" + escape( "By Rick Jervis, USA TODAY" ) + "&contentID=" + escape( "" ) // required + "&orderBeanReset=true"; // required, hard-coded PopUp = window.open( location, "Rightslink", "toolbar=no,directories=no,status=no,menubar=no,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,width=650,height=550"); }
 
Sudan man forced to 'marry' goat

A Sudanese man has been forced to take a goat as his "wife", after he was caught having sex with the animal.
The goat's owner, Mr Alifi, said he surprised the man with his goat and took him to a council of elders.
They ordered the man, Mr Tombe, to pay a dowry of 15,000 Sudanese dinars ($50) to Mr Alifi.
"We have given him the goat, and as far as we know they are still together," Mr Alifi said.
Mr Alifi, Hai Malakal in Upper Nile State, told the Juba Post newspaper that he heard a loud noise around midnight on 13 February and immediately rushed outside to find Mr Tombe with his goat.
"When I asked him: 'What are you doing there?', he fell off the back of the goat, so I captured and tied him up".
Mr Alifi then called elders to decide how to deal with the case. "They said I should not take him to the police, but rather let him pay a dowry for my goat because he used it as his wife," Mr Alifi told the newspaper.
 
Best part is

The man may have indeed been sleep-talking. But now the ulemas are not redy to let them live peacefully. See the excerpts below :-

The leaders, quoting the Shariyat, ruled that the talaq has to be implemented and if it is not acceptable, the only alternative was temporary separation for 100 days during which the wife will live at her father's house and spend a night with another man.
She can remarry her husband only after the man has given her talaq.


A somewhat similar incident happened in western UP some months ago. One bhai saheb uttered Talaq thrice, in a fit of rage.
Later they repented and did not want to let it go out of family. But jo Mohammed ne kaha tha woh kaise ignotre kar dete. Hellfire mein thode hi jalanaa tha.

So the deided to get the girl marry to the younger brother of the man. This fellow was a minor.

And the reverend ulema declared it Haraam. How can marriage be accepted when conjugation cant occur ??



While people laugh it off, any take on why this Allah revealed such a stupid law to Mohammed ?
 
there is no end to innovative marketing ideas in India. Here are two new trends which are taking off;

1. http://www.ndtv.com/morenews/showmo...ase+curing+clothes&id=88880&category=National

2. http://www.ndtv.com/morenews/showmo...astu+umbrella+time&id=88876&category=National

we have Vaastu umbrellas and Ayurvastra the disease curing clothes. Also a new occasion called Aksya tritiya is gaining momentum to purchase gold.. Looks like in India we will have many noble ways of marketing various commodities...

RK^2
 
Here is the interesting story of a never die Jat lover from Distt. Muzaffar Nagar;

http://indiatoday.intoday.in/site/Story/96278/India/His+fight+for+freedom+to+marry+at+87.html
............................................................................................................................................
His fight for freedom to marry at 87 Bhuvan Bagga
Shamli (Muzzafarnagar), May 7, 2010


Chaudhary Om Prakash, 87, has survived many wars: He fought for the British Indian Army in the Second World War; he was captured by the Japanese in Burma (now Myanmar); he joined the Indian National Army of Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose and fought the British on battlefronts across many nations and returned home a hero, a freedom fighter.

But almost 63 years since leaving the trenches, Prakash finds himself facing fire of a different kind, on a different front line. In this war for love and the "freedom and right to marry" his Muslim companion, Gasia, 50, Prakash is pitted against his very own.

The octogenarian's association with Gasia began about 11 years ago when his eldest son, a deputy superintendent of police, employed her to take care of him.

Prakash had till then led a solitary life in his house at Gadi Pukhta village in Muzzafarnagar district. His wife had died and children (two sons and three daughters) were living separately after they got married.

The freedom fighter's bonding with Gasia grew stronger with time and he decided to marry her recently. However, when Prakash filed an application before the court to marry Gasia, his children and other family members turned against him. Even the Shamli court, before which he first filed an application for marriage, rejected his application initially.

But Prakash was not one to give up easily. "He forwarded an application to the Muzzafarnagar court, which, too, rejected the plea. Finally he got a hearing in Shamli a few months ago," said Pradeep Panwar, Prakash's advocate.

However, while SDM Ghanshyam Singh of Shamli allowed hearing on the plea, Prakash's sons and other family members raised objections in court.

The first objection they raised was that Gasia had only separated from and not divorced her husband in Lakhimpur.

According to SDM Singh, though, it was no longer a problem.

"After that hearing, Gasia divorced her husband and again submitted an application before the court with updated facts," he said.

Prakash's sons then alleged that Gasia wanted to marry him for his property and that she posed a threat to their father's life.

The veteran, though, stood firm by his choice. "To prove them wrong about Gasia, I bequeathed my property to my grandsons," Prakash said. "He updated these facts and approached the court again. Now there was nothing else that could stop them from getting married," SDM Singh said.

But one more hurdle was placed in Prakash's way. This time the sons played the religion card. Panwar said: "The sons argued that as their father was a Hindu and Gasia a Muslim, their marriage could lead to communal tension." But Prakash overcame the hurdle by getting a "recommendation letter" from sitting Rajya Sabha MP A.A. Khan. "The MP stated that the marriage was entirely a personal matter and couldn't lead to any communal situation," Panwar said.

A fortnight ago, the court finally set into motion the formalities required for a court marriage.

"I don't care what my sons or anyone says. How can they decide what I should or should not do?" he said. "I gave away all my property to my grandsons but I have a monthly freedom fighter's pension of over Rs 16,400, which I want to leave for Gasia when I die," he said.

And what if the court didn't permit the marriage? Prakash plans to leave his village and go to Lakhimpur - Gasia's hometown.
..........................................................................

RK^2
 
Here is the interesting story of a never die Jat lover from Distt. Muzaffar Nagar;

"I don't care what my sons or anyone says. How can they decide what I should or should not do?" he said. "I gave away all my property to my grandsons but I have a monthly freedom fighter's pension of over Rs 16,400, which I want to leave for Gasia when I die," he said.
.........................................................................

RK^2

Obviously she is marrying him for his pension which she will keep on enjoying after his death. Mhara jat choudahry seems to be out of his senses.
 
Single people banned from living in Mumbai housing societies?

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Obviously she is marrying him for his pension which she will keep on enjoying after his death. Mhara jat choudahry seems to be out of his senses.

What's wrong in this pension enjoyed by her, how does it concern to our chaudhary saheb anyways after he his gone. Even when there is no Gasia, his son's won't get any pension either..
After all, she took great care of him in all these 11 years. Unlike his son's/daughters who abandoned him only to led a solitary life back in village , when he needed them the most.

Grandson's have anyways got the share of ancestrial property, it doesn't matter to them either.
In fact, hat's off to Gasia, that even when he has left all the property, she is still very much with him.
It's a win win situation for everyone (Except offcourse, Gasia's divorced husband).
 
Watch this Indian guy lifting the motorcycle on his head and then walking up the ladder to the roof of a bus;

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

what a man..

RK^2
 
I was reading a news item that from now on trees won't be cut in India and instead will be transplanted. I got curious about the method. I came across this video in which a massive 100 year old tree is being transplanted;

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

let us hope no more trees will be cut in India and soon we will have as many machines as possible.

RK^2
 
Back
Top