urmiladuhan
New member
,पर कईयाँ ने ते न्यू दिखाणा स एक देख बावली बुचों मन्ने किन्नी बढ़िया JAATU आवे स | |
kya baadhiya jaatu bolnae waleae aisa soochtae hein ?
,पर कईयाँ ने ते न्यू दिखाणा स एक देख बावली बुचों मन्ने किन्नी बढ़िया JAATU आवे स | |
Could be true Kapil, but name a single editor who is completely free from political bias. All of them represent a particular political philosophy and a certain section of society.
This is true. I happened to watch a pakistani anchor once..atleast in this regards, they are much much better than us..
I don't like political biases in journalists. Perception of bias is going to be subjective - keeping that in mind, I'd say Shekhar Gupta, MJ Akbar and Manu Joseph appear independent minded to me. There is no problem if someone supports a particular view point. But problem with Vinod Sharma was that he seemed to be resorting to ridiculous arguments as if he was a card carrying member of Congress, while still claiming to be non politically affiliated. Chandan Mitra (editor of Pioneer) is completely biased as well but he appears officially for BJP. Maybe if Vinod Sharma too makes his Congress-leaning official like Chandan has, I'd be a bit softer on him.
It is my assessment that majority of editors and journalists follow the most popular stream of thought. This is a season of anti-establishment hostility – thanks to Anna Hazare who has brought the gangrene of corruption to the forefront making the gullible people think that corruption is something which has been perpetuated by Congress only and other parties are holy cows. All the media houses have sensed the popular mood and most of them have started shifting their loyalty towards greener pastures. In such circumstances, if a particular editor/journalist stands out, he would obviously be labelled as pro-government. Therefore, it is just a perception that Vinod Sharma is pro-Congress. His association or leaning towards one particular party or philosophy cannot be ruled out as he is also a human being like us. But the important thing to note is his public utterances and his critiques which I find unprejudiced. As against the robust pugnacity, derision and outrageous behaviour of some of his counterparts during TV debates (people like Tavleen Singh, Chandan Mitra and few other saffron-clad journos), he keeps his cool and give very balanced comments.
Chandan Mitra is in BJP so he has already expressed his stream of thought,. The problem is, Vinod Sharma tries to look independent and still his opinios are pro-govt. (congress). If he wants to be in favor of govt. (congress), wants to support their policies, no body has a problem but then he should accept it.![]()
It may be your perception and may not be a fact. So, why should he be forced to join any particular stream of thought. He is independent to express his thoughts and I don't see any pro-Congress bias in his comments.
It is my assessment that majority of editors and journalists follow the most popular stream of thought. This is a season of anti-establishment hostility – thanks to Anna Hazare who has brought the gangrene of corruption to the forefront making the gullible people think that corruption is something which has been perpetuated by Congress only and other parties are holy cows. All the media houses have sensed the popular mood and most of them have started shifting their loyalty towards greener pastures. In such circumstances, if a particular editor/journalist stands out, he would obviously be labelled as pro-government. Therefore, it is just a perception that Vinod Sharma is pro-Congress. His association or leaning towards one particular party or philosophy cannot be ruled out as he is also a human being like us. But the important thing to note is his public utterances and his critiques which I find unprejudiced. As against the robust pugnacity, derision and outrageous behaviour of some of his counterparts during TV debates (people like Tavleen Singh, Chandan Mitra and few other saffron-clad journos), he keeps his cool and give very balanced comments.
Agree on this. I have seen Vinod Sharma on ndtv and he looks completely pro-govt.
Barkha Dutt, she doesn't even let the guests talk, self-proclaimed intellectual.
Which newspaper(s) or magazine(s) do members find great for news and views? Also if you like any specific writers?
Amongst mainstream papers, I think Indian Express is the best for "Opinion" and "Op-Eds" - especially Pratap Bhanu Mehta and Shekhar Gupta. Express also has some good New York Times Opinion pieces.
In magazines, I follow India Today, Open and Outlook off and on. I find Manu Joseph of Open and M J Akbar of India Today.
For debates on current affairs, I enjoy watching NDTV's The Big Fight every saturday.
Yeah, but even that anchor (whats his name) has become really annoying. I think Left or Right is decent as both Mani Shankar Aiyar and Swapan Das Gupta are quite vocal and the anchor being a junior person, doesn't get hyperactive likes these other NDTV people do.
It may be your perception too.![]()
. I think Left or Right is decent as both Mani Shankar Aiyar and Swapan Das Gupta are quite vocal and the anchor being a junior person, doesn't get hyperactive likes these other NDTV people do.
भाई perception तो थाणेदार की बहू का गलत होज्या, मेरी और आपकी के बिसात सै I
पर ठीक सै, इब तू नहीं मानण नै त्यार तो न्यू मान ले के मेरा perception गलत सै I
For debates on current affairs, I enjoy watching NDTV's The Big Fight every saturday.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.