पी एम हो तो मोदी जैसा...........

Status
Not open for further replies.
Are you referring here Gujrat riot or Sikh massacre??

Which Modi statement? When you write or claim something....then write with references...don't just write for the sake of writing.

Tehelka is a paid media house....I don't believe in his reporting.

Lastly, every day in every state lots of killing happen....Just day before yesterday in day light there was 7 murrder case registered in Delhi. Is that mean They have got the support of P Chidamabram? Because the criminal was so confident even they are murdering in day light.

Don't give the childish argument to just prove your point. At the time of riot, the rioter don't care who is the CM or PM. The devil sitting inside the human lead the charge at that time.

I am referring to Gujarat riots of course.

Tehelka is paid? By whom? So which media house do you believe in? And do you have references to prove it? So who is writing for the sake of writing now?

His statements while going on his Gaurav Yatra after the riots and reminding people about Godhra to ensure voting happened on communal lines. So was done by most BJP party workers.

And good example about killing and crimes. 7, 10, even 20 murders can be seen as independent incidents. But all attacks happening at 9 30 - 10 am in the morning by people armed with cylinders, petrol and kerosene at different areas all over the city and state? How was that level of planning and coordination possible without involvement of party workers? And how would party workers do so much without the understanding that Shri Modi ji agres to this?
 
Yeah riot is still happening and will continue to do so in Gujrat.. You can say anything, who can stop you.

Bhai..thoda parh le..time laga aur fir bol...

I understand the state of the country makes us look for saviours in whatever form they might exist. But going for Modi will divide this country like never before.
 
Well, some people will go to any length to portray themselves as Sickularists, even if it requires to cry hoarse in targeting a particular leader without any rhyme or reason.

Coming of Modi to power at Centre will divide the country?????

WHAT IS THE CONGRESS DOING AT PRESENT???????????????????????????????????????

Dividing the country on religious lines - Reservation to Muslims in education, jobs, promotions. The same very basis on which the country was divided around 65 years ago and these sickularists DON'T utter a word against that.

Shame on the Sickularists!!
 
If you can't differentiate between riot and genocide then I rest my case there is no use of such discussion.

Quote his statement...don't shoot the gun in air....while referring he said this and that....

In Asaam in just 1 week more than 2 Lakh people has been displaced, one of the biggest displacement in Independent India. use the same logic of planning and coordination in Assam as well by CM and his party worker...can you???

I am referring to Gujarat riots of course.

Tehelka is paid? By whom? So which media house do you believe in? And do you have references to prove it? So who is writing for the sake of writing now?

His statements while going on his Gaurav Yatra after the riots and reminding people about Godhra to ensure voting happened on communal lines. So was done by most BJP party workers.

And good example about killing and crimes. 7, 10, even 20 murders can be seen as independent incidents. But all attacks happening at 9 30 - 10 am in the morning by people armed with cylinders, petrol and kerosene at different areas all over the city and state? How was that level of planning and coordination possible without involvement of party workers? And how would party workers do so much without the understanding that Shri Modi ji agres to this?
 
You are claiming something...Onus is on you to provide reference for your claim...instead of asking me to google out your claim.

Bhai..thoda parh le..time laga aur fir bol...

I understand the state of the country makes us look for saviours in whatever form they might exist. But going for Modi will divide this country like never before.
 
Last edited:
You are claiming something...Onus is on you to provide reference for your claim...instead of asking me the google out your claim.

I thought you saw the video. Modi can be seen invoking Godhra and asking people to vote on communal lines. Did you miss the part where BJP leaders were seen trying to remind people of Godhra and spread hate? Did you miss the VHP cd ?
 
Last edited:
If you can't differentiate between riot and genocide then I rest my case there is no use of such discussion.

Quote his statement...don't shoot the gun in air....while referring he said this and that....

In Asaam in just 1 week more than 2 Lakh people has been displaced, one of the biggest displacement in Independent India. use the same logic of planning and coordination in Assam as well by CM and his party worker...can you???

While we wait for detailed reports from Assam to come in, we can hardly make a comment on it. Things like riot or genocide cannot be made out so soon.

And read up the definition of genocide and you too can differentiate between a riot and genocide. What hapened in barreilly recently or the 1993 riots in Bombay could be described as riots. While 84 riots, Kashmiri Pandits removal from J&K and 2002 Gujarat are genocides.
 
In Case of Assam you'll wait for report, but in case of Modi even though the investigation is going on under the supervision of SC for alleged involvement, but you already declared him responsible for Gujrat riot.

In my dictionary I called it as double standard!

In Gujrat first 56 Hindus burned down in train at Godhra station then more than 400 Hindus got killed and around 2000 Muslim got killed....and It won't be called as riots, it will called as genocide...wow what a definition of genocide...

FYI let me help you to differentiate between genocide and riot...

"genocide"

The systematic and widespread extermination or attempted extermination of an entire national, racial, religious, or ethnic group.
​

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/genocide

"riot
"​
n.1. A wild or turbulent disturbance created by a large number of people.
2. Law A violent disturbance of the public peace by three or more persons assembled for a common purpose.
3. An unrestrained outbreak, as of laughter or passions.
4. A profusion: The garden was a riot of colors in August.
5.a. Unrestrained merrymaking; revelry.
b. Debauchery.

6. Slang An irresistibly funny person or thing: Isn't she a riot?

v. ri·ot·ed, ri·ot·ing, ri·ots
v.intr.1. To take part in a riot.
2. To live wildly or engage in uncontrolled revelry.

v.tr.
To waste (money or time) in wild or wanton living: "rioted his life out, and made an end"(Tennyson).

​
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/riot

Just read the definition if you've able to comprehend.

While we wait for detailed reports from Assam to come in, we can hardly make a comment on it. Things like riot or genocide cannot be made out so soon.

And read up the definition of genocide and you too can differentiate between a riot and genocide. What hapened in barreilly recently or the 1993 riots in Bombay could be described as riots. While 84 riots, Kashmiri Pandits removal from J&K and 2002 Gujarat are genocides.
 
In Case of Assam you'll wait for report, but in case of Modi even though the investigation is going on under the supervision of SC for alleged involvement, but you already declared him responsible for Gujrat riot.

10 years and 10 days? Do you understand the difference? The amount of material, eye witness accounts, journalists reports and other material that is avaliable for Gujarat vis-a-vis Assam? Do you still think we can compare the two?


In Gujrat first 56 Hindus burned down in train at Godhra station then more than 400 Hindus got killed and around 2000 Muslim got killed....and It won't be called as riots, it will called as genocide...wow what a definition of genocide...

FYI let me help you to differentiate between genocide and riot...

"genocide"

The systematic and widespread extermination or attempted extermination of an entire national, racial, religious, or ethnic group.
​

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/genocide

"riot
"​
n.1. A wild or turbulent disturbance created by a large number of people.
2. Law A violent disturbance of the public peace by three or more persons assembled for a common purpose.
3. An unrestrained outbreak, as of laughter or passions.
4. A profusion: The garden was a riot of colors in August.
5.a. Unrestrained merrymaking; revelry.
b. Debauchery.

6. Slang An irresistibly funny person or thing: Isn't she a riot?

v. ri·ot·ed, ri·ot·ing, ri·ots
v.intr.1. To take part in a riot.
2. To live wildly or engage in uncontrolled revelry.

v.tr.
To waste (money or time) in wild or wanton living: "rioted his life out, and made an end"(Tennyson).

​
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/riot

Just read the definition if you've able to comprehend.

Here's the definition:
The systematic and widespread extermination or attempted extermination of an entire national, racial, religious, or ethnic group.

The words in bold are what describe the Guj riots.

1. The planning and coordination on the first day itself points to a systematic approach.

2. The scale as you know was huge and included towns and villages.

3. The group targeted in all this was one particular community.

4. They moved to relief camps while their homes, shops and fields were taken over so that they couldn't return and settle back again. Further, VHP activists threatened them from coming back..2.5 lakh Muslim names were missing from the voter lists, as found by EC as they were forced to leave their native places.

So would you not call this a genocide?
​
 

To whomsoever it may concern



Does the discussion contribute in fostering communal harmony, national integration and unity of India?

If yes, it must be carried forward; and if answer is no, then we must call it a day!

To whomsoever it may concern

Just a discussion. Please let it be.

P.S. You write whomsoever but quote my post!
 
The investigation not completed. Not a single decision pronounced by court against Modi. Not a single charge sheet filed against Modi. Do you understand the difference???? You or any journalist are not the judge to decide Modi was responsible for the riot or not.

You again and again talking material against Modi. I've asked 3 times in last 3 post to post that material here. But you are not...why you are shying to post that anti Modi material here.

Further 3 Lakh people got displaced in Assam, if you still won't compare this situate of Asaam then when you'll compare it...when 1 or 2 Lakh people will get die???? 3 Lakh people got displaced, and CM doesn't know anything. Bodo Tribal Council which is ruled by the same party in alliance with one Bodo party...and they doesn't know anything...wow...what a analysis of situation....

10 years and 10 days? Do you understand the difference? The amount of material, eye witness accounts, journalists reports and other material that is avaliable for Gujarat vis-a-vis Assam? Do you still think we can compare the two?

Have you got failed in in English subject at your 10th standard? Is that how you read any sentence like only the bold word....Read the sentence again...

The systematic and
widespread extermination or attempted extermination of an entire national, racial,
religious, or ethnic group.
​

Was it really happened in Gujrat? The riot was mainly happened in 3-4 district of Gujrat not in whole Gujrat. People of both community Hindu as well as Muslim got killed in the riot. How this situation similar to "
an attempted extermination of an entire national, racial, ​
religious
, or ethnic group."​
and called it as Genocide when people got killed from both side??? If you can't really comprehand this part then attend some English classes to understand it.

Here's the definition:
The systematic and widespread extermination or attempted extermination of an entire national, racial, religious, or ethnic group.

The words in bold are what describe the Guj riots. ​


Everything got planned systematically on very first day...wow you deserve oscar award for script writing.

1. The planning and coordination on the first day itself points to a systematic approach.


The scale was just limited to 3 or 4 district of Gujrat Is there only 3 or 4 district in Gujrat????
2. The scale as you know was huge and included towns and villages.


Ain't the Hindu got killed during Gujrat riot? Ain't the Hindus of Muslim majority area took the shelter in relief camp???
3. The group targeted in all this was one particular community.


Again, Ain't the Hindu got killed during Gujrat riot? Ain't the Hindus of Muslim majority area took the shelter in relief camp??? Either you are blind or acting like an ostrich.

4. They moved to relief camps while their homes, shops and fields were taken over so that they couldn't return and settle back again. Further, VHP activists threatened them from coming back..


Again just shooting the empty gun in air...provide reference to prove your claim.
2.5 lakh Muslim names were missing from the voter lists, as found by EC as they were forced to leave their native places.


You're just proving yourself myopic by calling Gujrat riot as genocide!

So would you not call this a genocide?
 
Last edited:
Sir,

Some propaganda must have to busted!



To whomsoever it may concern



Does the discussion contribute in fostering communal harmony, national integration and unity of India?

If yes, it must be carried forward; and if answer is no, then we must call it a day!
 
While I reply to your last post, you could learn a little English. The correct sentence would be "Some propaganda must be busted or has to be busted".

Bhai angrezi to aapke sentence kee bhi kuchh garbarai lagati hai : i.e. "While I reply to your last post, you could learn a little English."
 
The investigation not completed. Not a single decision pronounced by court against Modi. Not a single charge sheet filed against Modi. Do you understand the difference???? You or any journalist are not the judge to decide Modi was responsible for the riot or not.

You again and again talking material against Modi. I've asked 3 times in last 3 post to post that material here. But you are not...why you are shying to post that anti Modi material here.
Ok. Think deeply. Do you think there would be visible links leading upto Modi and if there were Modi will allow them to remain? Take the example of 84 riots. You too would agree that something like that cannot happen without Rajiv's approval. Same is here with Modi. His actions, like not apologizing, and not reigning in his own party from using Godhra in the ensuing election alongwith his attempts to deny any mass scale riots and state role points to his guilt.

Further 3 Lakh people got displaced in Assam, if you still won't compare this situate of Asaam then when you'll compare it...when 1 or 2 Lakh people will get die???? 3 Lakh people got displaced, and CM doesn't know anything. Bodo Tribal Council which is ruled by the same party in alliance with one Bodo party...and they doesn't know anything...wow...what a analysis of situation....

Again, it could be genocide but it will be too soon to call it one.

Have you got failed in in English subject at your 10th standard? Is that how you read any sentence like only the bold word....Read the sentence again...

The systematic and
widespread extermination or attempted extermination of an entire national, racial,
religious, or ethnic group.
​

I think I showed you what is your level of English, so you can hardly teach me. The bold were included as I wanted to show you the relevant words applicable here. But again, here's what Wiki says on its first sentence on the Genocide page:
Genocide is defined as "the deliberate and systematic destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious, or national group",[SUP][1][/SUP] though what constitutes enough of a "part" to qualify as genocide has been subject to much debate by legal scholars.

See the underlined? In part?

W
as it really happened in Gujrat? The riot was mainly happened in 3-4 district of Gujrat not in whole Gujrat. People of both community Hindu as well as Muslim got killed in the riot. How this situation similar to "
an attempted extermination of an entire national, racial, ​
religious
, or ethnic group."​
and called it as Genocide when people got killed from both side??? If you can't really comprehand this part then attend some English classes to understand it.

3-4 districts. Curfew was imposed in 34 towns. Here's from WIki. Read carefully.

The Army began flag marches in the worst-affected areas and shoot-at-sight orders were issued in 34 curfew-bound cities and towns in Gujarat.[SUP][26][/SUP]
151 towns and 993 villages[SUP][27][/SUP] in fifteen to sixteen of the state's 25 districts were affected by the post-Godhra violence, which was particularly severe in about five or six districts. The violence raged largely between 28 February and 3 March, and after a drop, restarted on 15 March, continuing till mid June.[SUP][28][/SUP] Northern and central Gujarat, as well as the north-eastern tribal belt which are closer to Godhra City, were the worst affected while Saurashtra and Kutch remained largely peaceful.[SUP][27][/SUP]

Everything got planned systematically on very first day...wow you deserve oscar award for script writing.
There is ample evidence of that, but perhapos you choose to ignore it. Again, almost all attacks on 28th feb began at 9 30 or 10 am. When extremist groups like VHP, Bajrang Dal are already present with their cadres and with mobiles it isnt hard to communicate plans and organize.

The scale was just limited to 3 or 4 district of Gujrat Is there only 3 or 4 district in Gujrat????
Scroll above to see the response.

Ain't the Hindu got killed during Gujrat riot? Ain't the Hindus of Muslim majority area took the shelter in relief camp???


Again, Ain't the Hindu got killed during Gujrat riot? Ain't the Hindus of Muslim majority area took the shelter in relief camp??? Either you are blind or acting like an ostrich.

Agree Hindus got killed too, but it was after sustained attacks aided by the administration and govt that Muslims retaliated. Only then were Hindu lives lost. But the overwhelming deaths of Muslims along with the hate campaign and coordination points to genocide.


Again just shooting the empty gun in air...provide reference to prove your claim.

Here's the CEC Lyngdoh's statement: "
BOOTHS IN OTHER STATES: The Election Commission has asked the the Chief Electoral Officers of Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh to locate Gujarat's Muslim voters who might have shifted to their states after the riots so as to give them also an opportunity to participate in the elections. These efforts to locate the displaced electors will continue even after the announcement of elections, the EC Press note said.

He, however, made it clear that all 2.24 lakh missing voters may not be on account of the communal riots as it appears they had left Gujarat "mostly for economic reasons" as the September 11 terror attack in America had affected economy of the state. He cited instance of Surat where no riots took place and yet a large number of voters have shifted."
I didnt have time to find more sources for you, so just one for now, though you can find more with the same statement.:
http://www.angelfire.com/in/jalnews/2002/28101.htm


You're just proving yourself myopic by calling Gujrat riot as genocide!
​

I think you are closing your eyes to a large scale carnage carried out in the name of religion by playing a politics of hate. I understand if it was a riot only but the state support, police apathy and govt's cover up and denial is shameful. It has happened in 84 and probably in other places and will happen again going by the way our country functions.

But this isnt the worst of it. The worse is that such cases will always be highlighted and used by anti-national forces to incite terror. Why? Because there has been no redressal. No justice. The govt in such cases should move swiftly instead of dilly dallying. And while prosecuting should make an example out of people who incite in the name of religion. Praveen Togadia is openly seen giving hateful speeches equating riots with Hanuman ji's burning tail and justifying the revenge. The documentary has its footage. Why isn't he behind bars?

And why didnt BJP which was also at the centre at that time move swiftly to curb the carnage or prosecute people with a vengeance? Because it had a votebank to protect. And Modi's supporters love him for that.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top