Narendra Modi preferred over Rahul Gandhi: Poll
- Thread starter sjakhars
- Start date
sanjeev1984
New member
To be honest I didnt even see the video after first 30 seconds... I realised I have better things to do or better sources to get my knowledge from and then I recalled the video I shared which re-established my opinion.
Secondly, personal attacks and sarcasm will not take you any where. I dont want to go into a pers. argument of you Vs. me because I would certainly not want to boast about myself or would want to ridicule anyone for his/her ignorance and poor attitude.
Secondly, personal attacks and sarcasm will not take you any where. I dont want to go into a pers. argument of you Vs. me because I would certainly not want to boast about myself or would want to ridicule anyone for his/her ignorance and poor attitude.
Last edited:
Instead of teaching me please refer to the post I quoted and the comment you make.
Interrospect yourself and the reply instead of always rushing in to show your Google skills
Interrospect yourself and the reply instead of always rushing in to show your Google skills
FDI in retail and FDI in Infrastructure ... dono mai farak pata hai aapko...
mere kisi bhi post maine bola hai ki infra mai FDI nahi honi chahiye... Delhi Metro mai bhi bahar ka paisa laga hua tha... kisi ne uska oppose nahi kiya... india mai kai toll roads FDI se hi bane hain... kisi ne oppose nahi kiya... pata hai kyon??? i know aapko nahi pata hoga... me batata hu... jab infrastructure ke liye FDI le kar kaam suru hota hai to bahot sare logo ko job milti hai... Delhi Metro ka hi example le lo... construction ke liye cement-steel banane wali companies ko kam mila... construction ke time pe labour... project complete hone ke baad bhi kitne sare logo ko jobs... law ke hisaab se bhi bahot feasable hote hain infra projects... vendors bade hote hain... agar Delhi Metro hera feri karta to vendor ke pass itna paisa hota hai ki vo client se lad sakte hain... labor ka dhayan rukhne ke liye bahot sari govt bodies hain... bahot cases mai labor ko dabaya bhi jata hai... but fir bhi kafi haad tak un govt bidies se badi companis dabb ke rehti hain...
FDI in retail...
1. 30% indian vendor se langae... baki bahar se... matlab indian menufacturing will be directly effected...
2. indian legal system... history hain in mega stores ki... pehle kuch saal to farmars ko acche rates dete hain fir khud rate decide karte hain... or agar farmar agree nahi karte to... lene se mana kar dete hain... farmars ke liye to ladai karne ki koi jagah nahi nahi reh jati...
3. ek or reason dete hain ki, indian mai agriculture unorganised hai... to usko orgnize karna ka kaam FDI la kar mega retailers ka hai ya sarkar ka??? aaj sarkar agriculture ko organize karne ke liye FDI la ruhi hai... kal agar farmars ke saath injustice hua to... lwyers bhi bahar se lane wali hai kya sarkar???
or sab se important baat... iska virodh is liye nahi ho ruha hai ki ye kharab hai... balki is liye ho ruha hai ki ye sarkar ka jaldbaji mai liya gaya faisla hai, jo inhone sirf scams ke pressure mai aa ke liya hai... jaldi hi march 2013 mai is sarkar ka last budget pesh hone wala hai... or us budget mai inko dikhana hai ki inke pass kitna paisa hai or us paise ko kahan/kaise lagane wale hain...
agar sarkar ne bahot sare loop holes ko aviod kiye bina... soc samajh ke faisla liya hota... to mai bhi aapke saath FDI ke favour mai bol ruha tha... vo alag baat hai ki mere ya aapke bolne se koi farak nahi padta but fir bi...
i hope thoda bahot samjhane mai safal ruha hounga...
sanjeev1984
New member
cutejaatsandeep
New member
areyy bhai tu nuuu bataaa jisss walmart ki tu itni wakalat kar ryaa hai.....unskaa virodh to khudd americans kar rahe hai....sooo plzz thoda mujhe gyaaan de ki aisa kyo kar rahe hai woo?
http://mises.org/daily/1521
Though you quoted me on a wrong post in a wrong thread but here are a few points to respect your reply:
The article you shared talks purely about wages and work issue, that depends on company to company, country to country and if you read the article you will find contradictions yourself. Hamare yaha bhi Maruti kaand hua, jo is article ke saamne riot ke barabar hai iska matlab Suzuki ko bahar nikal de?
If you have specific reservations, post them and trust me I will have an answer
The article you shared talks purely about wages and work issue, that depends on company to company, country to country and if you read the article you will find contradictions yourself. Hamare yaha bhi Maruti kaand hua, jo is article ke saamne riot ke barabar hai iska matlab Suzuki ko bahar nikal de?
If you have specific reservations, post them and trust me I will have an answer
In latest interview with "The Economist" a reputed UK based magazine, Modi says, " I am neither a dictator nor an ambitious person. Justice to all and appeasement to none. I am open to criticism but against the allegation."
An interview with Narendra Modi
Fresh start
Sep 27th 2012, 10:53 by The Economist online
NARENDRA MODI, Gujarat's chief minister, is arguably India's most controversial politician. But as the country begins to look for a new prime minister, he is gaining attention, and plaudits, at a national level.
INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPT
The Economist: Tell me about your style of leadership, because it is sometimes controversial. One of the criticisms of you is that you are not a team player.
Narendra Modi: The success story of Gujarat, credit goes to team Gujarat. If I would not have been a player, Gujarat would not have given this success. This success is because we are all team players. In the political system we are a team, politics and bureaucracy we are a team. The politicians, bureaucrats and the people we are a team. And this is the result of the team. So these allegations are absolutely baseless allegations. This type of person can work for one year, two years, not for 12 years. Impossible.
TE: So you are not a dictator? You are not pushing your style?
NM: You cannot do that. Unless and until you inspire the people, you will not get results. Imposition will never give you the results. Inspiration will always give you the results. Our progress is because of clarity of the thoughts, faith and conviction, character to act. These are the basic things, that is why we are getting success. We are a policy-driven state. In my state, we are the only state, we put our policy draft on the net, we invite the people, go through our draft policy, give your suggestions, then we discuss, then we finalise. Have you heard of this, such a democratic way? No one does it. You will never find a draft policy from any government. We circulate the draft to the people!
TE: Do you feel as though you are an open leader, someone who takes criticism well if someone is opposed to you?
NM: I’m telling you, the essence of democracy is criticism. I always welcome criticism. But I am against the allegations. What we hear is not a criticism, it is an allegation. So we must differentiate what is criticism and what is allegation. You have every right to do the criticism. I am beneficiary from criticism. I learn so many things through the criticism.
TE: But what about outside of the state, if people outside of Gujarat are thinking “Oh there’s a man who could be a good leader”, what would you say to those outside of Gujarat?
NM: In the last ten years, eight times I was selected as the best chief minister by the people of India. Not by the people of Gujarat.
TE: I know you visited Japan recently and you visited China a few months ago. Your relations with Western countries are more complicated. Where do you see that relationship?
In our last vibrant summit the maximum number of delegations was from the USA. Canada is a western country, Canada was a partner of my vibrant summit. So this is a myth, this is not a reality. The maximum investment in my state is from the British. So we are very cordially working with countries all over the world. And you know, the motor of our whole lifestyle, we do believe that whole world is one family, and from ages we do believe in this philosophy.
TE: Would you like to be prime minister of India?
NM: Before I became a chief minister I never thought that one day I’d be the chief minister. My basic philosophy is, I don’t want to be anything. But I want to do something. So I’m not interested in becoming anything, but I am interested in doing something for my country and for the poor people.
TE: Do you think you have changed in your political career? In ten years in office , have you changed how you see your role as a political leader? Do you think you now have a different approach?
NM: I’m not an ambitious person, there is no ambition in my life. I have a mission in my life. And my mission is to serve my country. And when I am working for my state, it means I am working for my country, or my nation.
TE: But you would consider working for your nation in another form, if the chance came along? You wouldn’t turn it down?
NM: In 2012 we are going for election. I’m confident that the people of Gujarat will give me chance to do this service. And I’m happy with this job. So I don’t look beyond this. I’m committed to the people of Gujarat. I will devote each and every moment to serve my people of Gujarat.
TE: The Chief Minister of Bihar [Nitish Kumar] has talked of India needing a secular leader. How do you respond to that?
NM: Yes I do believe my constitution says that the country must be secular, political parties must be secular, leaders must be secular. This is an article of faith, and we consider that justice to all, appeasement to none.
TE: And you consider yourself a secular leader?
NM: Let others give me a certificate. Why should I give a certificate to myself?
TE: I know you’re keen on the environment, I think you published a book last year about the environment. Some critics might say “Oh you’re trying to rebrand yourself, it’s actually an exercise in changing how people perceive you". How strong is this belief? You have a lot of petro-chemical industry, you have a lot of heavy industry in Gujarat that isn’t very good for the environment. So which is it? Is it a really sincere belief?
NM: You see Gujarat is the fourth state in the world where we have a separate climate-change department. Whatever I have said in my book is what we have done in the last ten years. In 2001, when I took charge, in the first eight months we took the initiative for the earthquake rehabilitation programme and I was very conscious that there should be rainwater harvesting in each and every house. And because of this we got an award from the World Bank, the Green Award, a very important award, this is everything before 2002. So if you don’t have any problem to judge a person in toto, then you will understand everything. But if you have any problem with 2002 then I am helpless, I can’t help you.
http://www.economist.com/node/21563185
An interview with Narendra Modi
Fresh start
Sep 27th 2012, 10:53 by The Economist online
NARENDRA MODI, Gujarat's chief minister, is arguably India's most controversial politician. But as the country begins to look for a new prime minister, he is gaining attention, and plaudits, at a national level.
INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPT
The Economist: Tell me about your style of leadership, because it is sometimes controversial. One of the criticisms of you is that you are not a team player.
Narendra Modi: The success story of Gujarat, credit goes to team Gujarat. If I would not have been a player, Gujarat would not have given this success. This success is because we are all team players. In the political system we are a team, politics and bureaucracy we are a team. The politicians, bureaucrats and the people we are a team. And this is the result of the team. So these allegations are absolutely baseless allegations. This type of person can work for one year, two years, not for 12 years. Impossible.
TE: So you are not a dictator? You are not pushing your style?
NM: You cannot do that. Unless and until you inspire the people, you will not get results. Imposition will never give you the results. Inspiration will always give you the results. Our progress is because of clarity of the thoughts, faith and conviction, character to act. These are the basic things, that is why we are getting success. We are a policy-driven state. In my state, we are the only state, we put our policy draft on the net, we invite the people, go through our draft policy, give your suggestions, then we discuss, then we finalise. Have you heard of this, such a democratic way? No one does it. You will never find a draft policy from any government. We circulate the draft to the people!
TE: Do you feel as though you are an open leader, someone who takes criticism well if someone is opposed to you?
NM: I’m telling you, the essence of democracy is criticism. I always welcome criticism. But I am against the allegations. What we hear is not a criticism, it is an allegation. So we must differentiate what is criticism and what is allegation. You have every right to do the criticism. I am beneficiary from criticism. I learn so many things through the criticism.
TE: But what about outside of the state, if people outside of Gujarat are thinking “Oh there’s a man who could be a good leader”, what would you say to those outside of Gujarat?
NM: In the last ten years, eight times I was selected as the best chief minister by the people of India. Not by the people of Gujarat.
TE: I know you visited Japan recently and you visited China a few months ago. Your relations with Western countries are more complicated. Where do you see that relationship?
In our last vibrant summit the maximum number of delegations was from the USA. Canada is a western country, Canada was a partner of my vibrant summit. So this is a myth, this is not a reality. The maximum investment in my state is from the British. So we are very cordially working with countries all over the world. And you know, the motor of our whole lifestyle, we do believe that whole world is one family, and from ages we do believe in this philosophy.
TE: Would you like to be prime minister of India?
NM: Before I became a chief minister I never thought that one day I’d be the chief minister. My basic philosophy is, I don’t want to be anything. But I want to do something. So I’m not interested in becoming anything, but I am interested in doing something for my country and for the poor people.
TE: Do you think you have changed in your political career? In ten years in office , have you changed how you see your role as a political leader? Do you think you now have a different approach?
NM: I’m not an ambitious person, there is no ambition in my life. I have a mission in my life. And my mission is to serve my country. And when I am working for my state, it means I am working for my country, or my nation.
TE: But you would consider working for your nation in another form, if the chance came along? You wouldn’t turn it down?
NM: In 2012 we are going for election. I’m confident that the people of Gujarat will give me chance to do this service. And I’m happy with this job. So I don’t look beyond this. I’m committed to the people of Gujarat. I will devote each and every moment to serve my people of Gujarat.
TE: The Chief Minister of Bihar [Nitish Kumar] has talked of India needing a secular leader. How do you respond to that?
NM: Yes I do believe my constitution says that the country must be secular, political parties must be secular, leaders must be secular. This is an article of faith, and we consider that justice to all, appeasement to none.
TE: And you consider yourself a secular leader?
NM: Let others give me a certificate. Why should I give a certificate to myself?
TE: I know you’re keen on the environment, I think you published a book last year about the environment. Some critics might say “Oh you’re trying to rebrand yourself, it’s actually an exercise in changing how people perceive you". How strong is this belief? You have a lot of petro-chemical industry, you have a lot of heavy industry in Gujarat that isn’t very good for the environment. So which is it? Is it a really sincere belief?
NM: You see Gujarat is the fourth state in the world where we have a separate climate-change department. Whatever I have said in my book is what we have done in the last ten years. In 2001, when I took charge, in the first eight months we took the initiative for the earthquake rehabilitation programme and I was very conscious that there should be rainwater harvesting in each and every house. And because of this we got an award from the World Bank, the Green Award, a very important award, this is everything before 2002. So if you don’t have any problem to judge a person in toto, then you will understand everything. But if you have any problem with 2002 then I am helpless, I can’t help you.
http://www.economist.com/node/21563185
sanjeev1984
New member
not agree... last 10-15 din mai maine bahot sare questions pooche hain... ek ka bhi jawab aapne nahi diya... so please ye congress ki tarah fake promises mat karo...
Though you quoted me on a wrong post in a wrong thread but here are a few points to respect your reply:
The article you shared talks purely about wages and work issue, that depends on company to company, country to country and if you read the article you will find contradictions yourself. Hamare yaha bhi Maruti kaand hua, jo is article ke saamne riot ke barabar hai iska matlab Suzuki ko bahar nikal de?
If you have specific reservations, post them and trust me I will have an answer
Bhai. sawal ho to puch ye tuch congress vs. BjP ki rajniti na kar. And stop poking in posts which are a reply to others that too with such odd comments.
sanjeev1984
New member
kai bar pooche the bhai... but aapne har bar question ko neglect kar ke, kisi or hi topic pe baat suru kar di... ab un sab question ko fir se likhne ki himmat nahi hai... agar jawab dene mai intrested ho hi gaye ho to... ek baar conversation padh ke jawab de doge to mai aapka aabhari rahunga...
waise mere post mai congress vs BJP ki kounsi rajniti kar di maine...
waise mere post mai congress vs BJP ki kounsi rajniti kar di maine...
sanjeev1984
New member
Gujrat's Progress is quite evident now. Can be a role model for other states. Excellent governance
http://www.economist.com/node/21563412
A far more encouraging example can be found farther up the coast. Surat, a city in Gujarat of 4.5m people, is a flourishing trading hub that not long ago was a wretched dump like Gorakhpur. In 1994, after a reported (but never confirmed) outbreak of pneumonic plague, it became famous for squalor, gridlock, slums and rotten management. Since then it has been transformed. Effective managers cleaned up. Rubbish was collected and transport improved, streets were swept and public services delivered. Miraculously, the improvements were sustained. Some 96% of residents pay their municipal taxes on time. Manoj Kumar Das, who now runs the city, says that over the past decade the growth in Surat’s population averaged 5% a year, among the fastest of any city in the world. According to his planners, by 2031 it could have 9.3m people, overtaking London.
It helps that the local economy is thriving, with diamond polishing, textiles and petrol products doing particularly well. The boss of a diamond firm says his home town has been reshaped and feels great. Investors like its reliable power, traffic that flows and the can-do culture of Surtis. Even the grimier end of town is uplifting. On a sweltering monsoon day the lack of smell, flies, dust or noise at the municipal dump is strangely thrilling. It is efficiently run by private contractors, a model that other cities could copy tomorrow. Even the rubbish is being put to work: soon about 1,200 tonnes will be burned daily in German-built incinerators.
The city’s sewage works are similarly impressive: efficient, computerised and run largely on electricity from a biomass plant fired by methane. Over 90% of households are said to be connected to sewerage. The municipal engineer says the entire city has clean piped drinking water. Slums are being cleared and parks being created by the river. Next on the list is a rapid bus transport system, more flyovers and a Bollywood theme park modelled on Disneyland. There are posh car showrooms, and retailers like Jimmy Choo, Burberry, Armani and Gucci are due to open soon.
What made Surat work? An assortment of businessmen, the boss of a jewellers’ association, the local chamber of commerce and a prominent city journalist all give the same answer: governance. When residents felt able to trust officials and their plans, they happily contributed to the city’s success. This year firms planted 200,000 trees to help make the place greener.
Mr Das says given the right motivation and belief in officials, others cities are capable of similar improvements. For instance, many people in Patna, Bihar’s capital and his home town, are now connected to the grid. When he was a boy, he had to study by lantern light.
http://www.economist.com/node/21563412
A far more encouraging example can be found farther up the coast. Surat, a city in Gujarat of 4.5m people, is a flourishing trading hub that not long ago was a wretched dump like Gorakhpur. In 1994, after a reported (but never confirmed) outbreak of pneumonic plague, it became famous for squalor, gridlock, slums and rotten management. Since then it has been transformed. Effective managers cleaned up. Rubbish was collected and transport improved, streets were swept and public services delivered. Miraculously, the improvements were sustained. Some 96% of residents pay their municipal taxes on time. Manoj Kumar Das, who now runs the city, says that over the past decade the growth in Surat’s population averaged 5% a year, among the fastest of any city in the world. According to his planners, by 2031 it could have 9.3m people, overtaking London.
It helps that the local economy is thriving, with diamond polishing, textiles and petrol products doing particularly well. The boss of a diamond firm says his home town has been reshaped and feels great. Investors like its reliable power, traffic that flows and the can-do culture of Surtis. Even the grimier end of town is uplifting. On a sweltering monsoon day the lack of smell, flies, dust or noise at the municipal dump is strangely thrilling. It is efficiently run by private contractors, a model that other cities could copy tomorrow. Even the rubbish is being put to work: soon about 1,200 tonnes will be burned daily in German-built incinerators.
The city’s sewage works are similarly impressive: efficient, computerised and run largely on electricity from a biomass plant fired by methane. Over 90% of households are said to be connected to sewerage. The municipal engineer says the entire city has clean piped drinking water. Slums are being cleared and parks being created by the river. Next on the list is a rapid bus transport system, more flyovers and a Bollywood theme park modelled on Disneyland. There are posh car showrooms, and retailers like Jimmy Choo, Burberry, Armani and Gucci are due to open soon.
What made Surat work? An assortment of businessmen, the boss of a jewellers’ association, the local chamber of commerce and a prominent city journalist all give the same answer: governance. When residents felt able to trust officials and their plans, they happily contributed to the city’s success. This year firms planted 200,000 trees to help make the place greener.
Mr Das says given the right motivation and belief in officials, others cities are capable of similar improvements. For instance, many people in Patna, Bihar’s capital and his home town, are now connected to the grid. When he was a boy, he had to study by lantern light.
Last edited:
sanjeev1984
New member
waiting for the day...
jab rahul kisi din modi ke saamne aise khada hoga... or modi uski bakhiya udheed ruha hoga...
i believe ki raul baba ka modi ke saamne aise khada hona... dharni pe kisi insaan (not so sure abt it, ke raul baba insaan hai bhi ya nahi) ka sab se daring act hoga...
http://www.thehindu.com/news/intern...on-economy-in-first-debate/article3964069.ece
jab rahul kisi din modi ke saamne aise khada hoga... or modi uski bakhiya udheed ruha hoga...
i believe ki raul baba ka modi ke saamne aise khada hona... dharni pe kisi insaan (not so sure abt it, ke raul baba insaan hai bhi ya nahi) ka sab se daring act hoga...
http://www.thehindu.com/news/intern...on-economy-in-first-debate/article3964069.ece
So you are saying Modi is THE PM Candidate?
waiting for the day...
jab rahul kisi din modi ke saamne aise khada hoga... or modi uski bakhiya udheed ruha hoga...
i believe ki raul baba ka modi ke saamne aise khada hona... dharni pe kisi insaan (not so sure abt it, ke raul baba insaan hai bhi ya nahi) ka sab se daring act hoga...
http://www.thehindu.com/news/intern...on-economy-in-first-debate/article3964069.ece
sanjeev1984
New member
ha ha ha... good morning... mai koun hu bolne wala... sari duniya bol ruhi hai...
kai bar tu manne confuse kar de hai bhai... ak tu ghana majakia hai ya innocent ghana hai ya ignorent ghana hai...
agar aise chutukle jan-boojh ke choodta hai to... Comedy Circus mai ja... bahot naam or paisa kama lega bhai..
kai bar tu manne confuse kar de hai bhai... ak tu ghana majakia hai ya innocent ghana hai ya ignorent ghana hai...
agar aise chutukle jan-boojh ke choodta hai to... Comedy Circus mai ja... bahot naam or paisa kama lega bhai..
Kuch to log kahenge, logo ka kaam hai kahna.
BJP to munh se kuch nahi nikalti. Unke 1 lakh PM ke jo umeedwar hai wo to nimat le pahle.
BJP to munh se kuch nahi nikalti. Unke 1 lakh PM ke jo umeedwar hai wo to nimat le pahle.
ha ha ha... good morning... mai koun hu bolne wala... sari duniya bol ruhi hai...
kai bar tu manne confuse kar de hai bhai... ak tu ghana majakia hai ya innocent ghana hai ya ignorent ghana hai...
agar aise chutukle jan-boojh ke choodta hai to... Comedy Circus mai ja... bahot naam or paisa kama lega bhai..
sanjeev1984
New member
tere kehne ka matlab hai ki BJP ka har leader PM ban-ne ke layak hai... or agar khud ko prove kare to ban bhi sakta hai...
bhai yahi to democracy hai... BJP mai kya... koi bhi indian PM ban sakta hai... bas banda khud ko prove kare... or apni davedari sabhit kare...
congress te tarah nahi ki gandhi parivar mai baccha paida hua... or uske mathe pe mohar laga di ki ye bada ho ke PM banega... or vo baccha 42 saal ka yuva hone ke baad bhi "seekhne" mai laga hua ho... kya seekh ruha hai kisi ko nahi pata...
BJP ke ander bhi democracy hai or bahar bhi democracy ke liye hi baat karte hain... or doosri taraf congress... jinhone Rajshahi hata ke india se... khud "Raul baba" ko India ka "rajkumar" hone ka claim karte hain... fake kahin ke...
bhai yahi to democracy hai... BJP mai kya... koi bhi indian PM ban sakta hai... bas banda khud ko prove kare... or apni davedari sabhit kare...
congress te tarah nahi ki gandhi parivar mai baccha paida hua... or uske mathe pe mohar laga di ki ye bada ho ke PM banega... or vo baccha 42 saal ka yuva hone ke baad bhi "seekhne" mai laga hua ho... kya seekh ruha hai kisi ko nahi pata...
BJP ke ander bhi democracy hai or bahar bhi democracy ke liye hi baat karte hain... or doosri taraf congress... jinhone Rajshahi hata ke india se... khud "Raul baba" ko India ka "rajkumar" hone ka claim karte hain... fake kahin ke...
Nahi, mein ye kah raha hu BJP mein har candidate PM ki race mein hai... worthy or not is no one's assesment
Dusra, democracy mein ek leader chunte hai, har koi leader nahi hota. Aisi democracy ka kya faida jo party le doobe? Jab tak Atal ji the, party mein leadership thi unke baad sare hi neta hai.
Ab ek umeed hai Modi BJP ko bachane ki, use bhi ye lad lad ke kho denge apas mein. Jinse apni party nahi sambhalti wo desh kya sambhalenge?
Dusra, democracy mein ek leader chunte hai, har koi leader nahi hota. Aisi democracy ka kya faida jo party le doobe? Jab tak Atal ji the, party mein leadership thi unke baad sare hi neta hai.
Ab ek umeed hai Modi BJP ko bachane ki, use bhi ye lad lad ke kho denge apas mein. Jinse apni party nahi sambhalti wo desh kya sambhalenge?