पी एम हो तो मोदी जैसा...........

Status
Not open for further replies.
jisne bhi ye article likha hai... kya vo bhai thodi si research kar ke batayega ki... Modi ke CM banne ke baad Gujarat ko kitni bar best state ka award mila hai? Modi ko kitni bar best CM ka award mila hai? or agar aadhe se jayada bar mila hai to ye kaise bola ki "gujarat has done no better than many states" and "earlier CM's were better than modi"... or agar ye boli gai batein sahi hain to... centre govt(congress ruled) ne paise le ke award diye hain kya apne sab se bade dushman ko??? or agar award dene mai koi dhandlebazi nahi hui to award jeetne wala, na jeetne walo se better to hoga hi... or agar vo better hai to ye negative propegenda kyon failaya ja ruha hai kisi ke bare mai???

is bhai ko kuch dikhai nahi deta... or mere liye preshani ki baat ye hai ki... agar aankho ka andha hota to mai apne marne ke baad apni aakhein to isko donate kar jata... par jo akal ka aandha ho jaye usko akal kaise du???
pehalmm to nuuu beraaa paadoo kee yee someone see kaun??????maane to bhai iske post dekhe hi pehli barrr see.....
 
jisne bhi ye article likha hai... kya vo bhai thodi si research kar ke batayega ki... Modi ke CM banne ke baad Gujarat ko kitni bar best state ka award mila hai? Modi ko kitni bar best CM ka award mila hai? or agar aadhe se jayada bar mila hai to ye kaise bola ki "gujarat has done no better than many states" and "earlier CM's were better than modi"... or agar ye boli gai batein sahi hain to... centre govt(congress ruled) ne paise le ke award diye hain kya apne sab se bade dushman ko??? or agar award dene mai koi dhandlebazi nahi hui to award jeetne wala, na jeetne walo se better to hoga hi... or agar vo better hai to ye negative propegenda kyon failaya ja ruha hai kisi ke bare mai???

is bhai ko kuch dikhai nahi deta... or mere liye preshani ki baat ye hai ki... agar aankho ka andha hota to mai apne marne ke baad apni aakhein to isko donate kar jata... par jo akal ka aandha ho jaye usko akal kaise du???

Well he's a winner of online polls and surveys, no doubt about that. If you have any doubts about the article you should probably question the author. But since you believe you know better than what many economists or journalists point out then what to say? You probably trust online pols and awards more than hard data.

And nice touch by changing my name but still quoting the original post. Your childishness knows no bounds!

And let me be the blind one and you the enlightened one.
 
bhai mera post bhi ek bar fir se padh lo or thodi or reserch kar lo... Best CM ka award online poll se nahi mila, centre mai baithi UPA govt ne diya hai...

or ruhi baat online poll ko trust karne ki to aisa nahi hai ki online polls unreliable data hota hai... vo bhi aapke hard data jitna reliable lagta hai mugjhe to... farak sirf itna hai ki ek mai sirf net users involve hote hain or doosre mai sari public... or agar online data mai jahan hera-feri kai multiple users kar dete hain... to aapke hard data mai wahi kaam bengladeshi kar dete hain... loop-holes to dono jagah hi hain...

aapko na udta teer lene ki aadhat hai... maine aapko quote nahi kiya tha... vo reply us author ke liye tha, jo negative propaganda faila ruha tha... aapne to bas share kiya tha... or isi liye maine aapka naam remove kar diya tha... or 2-4 sawal pooch liye the... agar aapke pass un sawalo ke jawad ho to dedo... na ho to dhoond lao...

mugjhe ignorent ya childesh bolne ke bajai or mere upar sarcastic hone ke bajai agar un sawalo ke jawab do to kuch mera bhi gyan badhe or aapka bhi...

Well he's a winner of online polls and surveys, no doubt about that. If you have any doubts about the article you should probably question the author. But since you believe you know better than what many economists or journalists point out then what to say? You probably trust online pols and awards more than hard data.

And nice touch by changing my name but still quoting the original post. Your childishness knows no bounds!

And let me be the blind one and you the enlightened one.
 


ये मुंबई में रहने वाली गुजराती नाटक और फिल्म कलाकार तुलिका पटेल है. इसे कांग्रेस ने 80 लाख रूपये में अपने प्रचार कैम्पेन "આઓ ગુજરાત ની દિશા બદલીએ અને દશા પણ બદલીએ' के लिए साइन किया है.

रोचक बात ये है कि ये तुलिका पटेल स्वयं कांग्रेस से बहुत घृणा करती है. इसके साथी कलाकार कहते हैं कि ये नरेन्द्र मोदी की बहुत बड़ी समर्थक है और कई बार गुजरात रंगमंच के समारोहों पर ये मोदी की गुजरात में रंगमंच के लिए किये गये अच्छे कामों और गुजराती फिल्मों पर टैक्स समाप्त करने जैसे मोदी के निर्णयों की सराहना करती है.


परन्तु जब इसके साथी कलाकारों ने पूछा कि तुम कांग्रेस के एड कैम्पेन में मोदी और मोदी सरकार की आलोचना करती हो, क्यों?

तो इस पर तुलिका पटेल ने कहा कि कलाकार केवल कलाकार होता है. मैं वही बोलती हूँ जो मेरा पटकथा लेखक मुझे बोलने के लिए देता है और मेरे चेहरे के भाव ही मेरी रोजी-रोटी है क्योंकि मैं एक कलाकार हूँ एवं जो मैं कांग्रेस के कैम्पेन के लिए कर रही हूँ वो केवल और केवल एक कलाकार की हैसियत से कर रही हूँ. जैसे अमिताभ बच्चन और दूसरे क्रिकेट खिलाडी मैगी जैसे प्रोडक्ट का विज्ञापन करते हैं परन्तु स्वयं अमिताभ कभी मैगी नही खाते.


इसने ये भी कहा कि ये स्वयं गुजराती है और गुजरात के विकास से बहुत प्रभावित है और मोदी को प्रधानमन्त्री बनते देखना चाहती है.

वेलडन तुलिका पटेल ! हम जानते हैं कि आप जो भी बोल रही हैं वो आपकी कला है और पेशा है परन्तु ये जानकर अत्यंत प्रसन्नता हुई कि आप स्वयं मोदी को प्रधानमन्त्री बनते देखना चाहती हैं.





​
 
He is a man with great Vision and sense. He deserves a chance at the center. First candidate for the most coveted post i.2 PM of India.
 
When Modi was banned few years ago by both US and UK, Modi clearly said we will make them come to Gujarath. Now it happened. Modi is a great visionary whom we want for 2014 as PM.

[/URL]http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-...e1-943065.aspx [/URL]


Damn it!!! "Communal" England wants to build ties with Gujarat. Time for media crooks to paint UK a deeply "communal" country.
Blow to Modi :boxing::boxing:
 
Last edited:
Looks like Sushma Swaraj agrees with the title of the thread.

Modi competent and fit to be a PM: Sushma Swaraj

​
In a new twist to the internal tussle within the BJP over its leadership ahead of the next general election, senior leader Sushma Swaraj for the first time endorsed Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi as a possible candidate for prime minister. Support from Swaraj, the head of the

Opposition in the Lok Sabha, is significant because she is herself seen as a frontrunner for the mantle and has in the past only given lukewarm support to Modi.She told reporters on Modi’s campaign trail in Vadodara that the Gujarat strongman, who is seeking his third term at the helm of the state, is “a competent and proper leader to be the prime minister of India”.
Swaraj has never spoken openly about the possibility of Modi for the top slot, let alone endorse his candidature.

In fact, two years ago, she had said, “Modi’s magic and charisma have worked in Gujarat but it is not necessary that everybody’s magic works at every place.”

Her latest statement has come a week after her counterpart in the Rajya Sabha, Arun Jaitley, had said, "since so many leaders have campaigned in Gujarat, it indicates that the entire BJP is behind Modi. We are here to give our party a historic victory”.

All eyes within the BJP are on Modi and the strong possibility of an enhanced role for him in the event of a massive win in Gujarat, which goes to the polls on December 13 and 17.

In apparent preparation for a larger role at the Centre, the man himself has been focusing on national issues in his campaign speeches, blaming the Congress-led UPA for the country's ills.
A big win could force the BJP leaders as well as the party's ideological patron, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), to respond to pressure from the rank and file to project him as the party's candidate for PM, BJP insiders say.

Swaraj's praise for Modi could also be prompted by intricate party politics, BJP sources say. Modi and Jaitley are close to each other, while Swaraj has often been seen as a strong supporter of BJP patriarch LK Advani, who at 85 is viewed by many as lacking the steam to lead the party in the future. Falling in behind Modi would bring Swaraj closer to the RSS, which favours a bigger role for him.

However, Modi's handicap is that he is not acceptable to key allies of the NDA like Bihar chief minister and Janata Dal (United) leader Nitish Kumar.

He is seen by them as one of the country's most divisive figures, with a question mark hanging over him from the 2002 communal riots in Gujarat that killed 1,000 people, most of them Muslims.

Last year, instead of ordering a case against him, the Supreme Court sent back to a local court a special investigation team report on accusations against Modi, a development Modi hailed as a clean chit.

The court's move was also welcomed by Sushma, who said then that Modi had "overcome all his obstacles, his setbacks and cleared his agnipariksha".


 
270032_529192553757732_122198541_n.jpg



मोदी जैसे बब्बर शेर का नाम सुनकर अच्छे-अच्छे लोगों की हवा निकल जाती है। तो ये कांग्रेसी कौन से खेत की मूली है।
मित्रों ! इस भोंदू की भी हवा निकल गयी, किस मार्ग से निकली, ये मत पूछना।
 
Top BJP leaders praising modi,which is a good sign if it is meant to project him at centre level, but if it is to gain votes in Gujrat only then it is really an example of cheap politics.
 


ये मुंबई में रहने वाली गुजराती नाटक और फिल्म कलाकार तुलिका पटेल है. इसे कांग्रेस ने 80 लाख रूपये में अपने प्रचार कैम्पेन "આઓ ગુજરાત ની દિશા બદલીએ અને દશા પણ બદલીએ' के लिए साइन किया है.

रोचक बात ये है कि ये तुलिका पटेल स्वयं कांग्रेस से बहुत घृणा करती है. इसके साथी कलाकार कहते हैं कि ये नरेन्द्र मोदी की बहुत बड़ी समर्थक है और कई बार गुजरात रंगमंच के समारोहों पर ये मोदी की गुजरात में रंगमंच के लिए किये गये अच्छे कामों और गुजराती फिल्मों पर टैक्स समाप्त करने जैसे मोदी के निर्णयों की सराहना करती है.


परन्तु जब इसके साथी कलाकारों ने पूछा कि तुम कांग्रेस के एड कैम्पेन में मोदी और मोदी सरकार की आलोचना करती हो, क्यों?

तो इस पर तुलिका पटेल ने कहा कि कलाकार केवल कलाकार होता है. मैं वही बोलती हूँ जो मेरा पटकथा लेखक मुझे बोलने के लिए देता है और मेरे चेहरे के भाव ही मेरी रोजी-रोटी है क्योंकि मैं एक कलाकार हूँ एवं जो मैं कांग्रेस के कैम्पेन के लिए कर रही हूँ वो केवल और केवल एक कलाकार की हैसियत से कर रही हूँ. जैसे अमिताभ बच्चन और दूसरे क्रिकेट खिलाडी मैगी जैसे प्रोडक्ट का विज्ञापन करते हैं परन्तु स्वयं अमिताभ कभी मैगी नही खाते.


इसने ये भी कहा कि ये स्वयं गुजराती है और गुजरात के विकास से बहुत प्रभावित है और मोदी को प्रधानमन्त्री बनते देखना चाहती है.

वेलडन तुलिका पटेल ! हम जानते हैं कि आप जो भी बोल रही हैं वो आपकी कला है और पेशा है परन्तु ये जानकर अत्यंत प्रसन्नता हुई कि आप स्वयं मोदी को प्रधानमन्त्री बनते देखना चाहती हैं.





​
बिकाऊ शब्द ऐसे ही लोगो के लिए इस्तेमाल होता हैं और जो बिकाऊ की प्रशंसा करे उसे दल्ला कहते हैं |
 
बिकाऊ शब्द ऐसे ही लोगो के लिए इस्तेमाल होता हैं और जो बिकाऊ की प्रशंसा करे उसे दल्ला कहते हैं |


निश्चित रूप से मैं भारत माता का पुत्र हूँ।
कांग्रेसी (काले अंग्रेज) अथवा अन्य देशद्रोही मुझे किसी भी नाम से पुकार सकते हैं।
 
Reality Bites, Modi knowns how to PR based on MoUs not many of which come in action. Read these:

Gujrat is almost number 1 in poverty
In vibrant gujarat there are more poor people(31.8%) than there are in
Kerala(19.7%),
Tamilnadu(28.9%),
AP(29.9%),
HP(22.9%),
Punjab(20.9%),
JnK(13.2) ,
Haryana(24.1%)..

How can a state like Gujarat claim to be developed under the Mr. Future PM if 40% of its people are poor? Also not to mention, growth in Gujarat is much less than that of Bihar.
 
I wrote this in another thread but here you go again :

Gujarat has been a growing state even before the Modi government took over. However, what is interesting to see is Narendra Modi’s actual contribution to the development of Gujarat in his tenure. Data collected from the Directorate of Economics and Statistics of various states indicates that Gujarat has actually slowed down under the leadership of Modi with a growth rate of only 10.08% in its GDP. It further reveals that the state’s growth rate is worse than Maharashtra (10.75%), Tamil Nadu (10.27%) and even Bihar (11.42%) from the year 2004 to 2011. These figures clearly indicate the pathetic progress of Gujarat which has been cleverly hidden from the public eye. One of the ways of assessing a state’s progress is to compare it with other similar states in the country. In this case Gujarat has obviously failed and comes out looking worse than Bihar even.

If the figures are to be believed then one can easily conclude that the otherwise steep progressive curve of Gujarat has actually seen a down trend during Narendra Modi’s leadership. His inefficacy has slowed the state’s development. This has led to the common Gujarati being deprived of better living conditions, job opportunities, civic facilities and a lot more.In comparison to other states, Gujarat is a grim tale as far as the GDP figures go. However, what is worth noticing is the fact that Narendra Modi has failed to add to this growth story ever since he became the Chief Minister. While Bihar has shown a promising growth rate of 6.48% from 2004 to 2011, Gujarat has been able to achieve only half of it with 3.63%. Thisis a strong evidence of the incompetency of Narendra Modi as the Chief Minister of Gujarat. Where other CM’s have led their states to a healthy growth, Modi and his team seem to have done less but talked more.


In short, Gujarat has seen a downfall in growth during Modi regime, growth in Gujrat is less than that of Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu and BIHAR....
 
Reality Bites, Modi knowns how to PR based on MoUs not many of which come in action. Read these:

Gujrat is almost number 1 in poverty
In vibrant gujarat there are more poor people(31.8%) than there are in
Kerala(19.7%),
Tamilnadu(28.9%),
AP(29.9%),
HP(22.9%),
Punjab(20.9%),
JnK(13.2) ,
Haryana(24.1%)..

How can a state like Gujarat claim to be developed under the Mr. Future PM if 40% of its people are poor? Also not to mention, growth in Gujarat is much less than that of Bihar.

These must be stats reported by paid media. These Sickulars I tell you! :)
 
Haha

I wonder how many will get the sarcasm

Well, does it matter? People will still harp upon Modi's (dubious) development credentials. And if all else fails they will start calling the kettle black, and say "when Congress didn't reduce poverty either, how can we ask Modi to do it in 10 years?"

The simplest truth is that data doesn't lie. And I dont want to sound pompous, but anybody who has studied even basic marketing can easily figure out the modus operandi. Modi's PR team hype up business deals and investment stats. At the same time a simple Google search will tell you that TN and Maharasthra received higher FDI than Gujarat. Many other states perform better on many other social indicators.

Another tactic is that Modi's name is associated whenever any business faces trouble in any other state. Take Tata and Singur or Maruti and Manesar labor disputes. Modi makes a statement inviting Tata and Maruti just at the right time and his PR machinery cleverly makes him look like a messiah for Indian industry. Later everything goes back to normal. Tata churns out Nano from its Pantnagar plant and Maruti continues from Manesar. In reality every company has a back up manufacturing location. But Modi captures mindspace via this tactic and people fall for it.

Nobody delves deeper to analyse how much investment is actually made on the ground. And how come even after so much investment, more poor are found in Gujarat than many other states? And more malnourished too, I must add. Are all those industries employing outsiders? Who are they benefiting if they are not elevating poverty in Gujarat? Surely the way Modi's PR machinery makes it sound, Gujarat has everybody well fed and well employed?

But no, Modi is the one with the golden wand to transform India. Never mind the clever spin and the blatant effort to fool people which is just a ploy to highlight his credentials and elevate him as the BJP's main candidate. And simply going by things in the online world, its surely working!

And to compound matters, the inefficacy of the current government makes Modi sound even better. Its not that people cant see beyond Modi's facade, its that people are so frustrated by the current rule that they choose to ignore it or side step it. People are so blinded by darkness that Modi seems a ray of shining white light and never mind the quite evident shades of grey. But go back a little in history and the worse leaders have taken over when everything seemed hopeless and people were clamoring for a charismatic leader. Mussolini, Hitler, even Saddam. They all rose on the back of resurgent nationalism after a time of historical lows preceding it. And people loved them, even though they showed signs of megalomania and despotism and carried hate, overtly or covertly. The rest, as they say, is history.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top