पी एम हो तो मोदी जैसा...........
- Thread starter jatshiva1947
- Start date
- Status
sanjeev1984
New member
Double Standards & hypocrisy....
When it was about Owaisi : You said "I know. Happens with every party and every state." What about SIT, Seculars, Police and Court?
When it was about Maya Kodnani : You are saying "Yes, finally some justice. Good on the courts." If BJP will try to defend her they will be called Communal.
This is nothing but PLAIN HYPOCRISY.
When it was about Owaisi : You said "I know. Happens with every party and every state." What about SIT, Seculars, Police and Court?
When it was about Maya Kodnani : You are saying "Yes, finally some justice. Good on the courts." If BJP will try to defend her they will be called Communal.
This is nothing but PLAIN HYPOCRISY.
Last edited:
How is it hypocrisy? Are you saying BJP doesnt try to protect its votebanks? Every party does it. Some are relatively successful, some are not.
Just like the Congress gave tickets to the accused in 1984 riots, the BJP gave tickets to the accused of 2002 riots like Mayaben Kodani. They went one step further and made her a 'Child and Women development' minster. They didn't anticipate the courts pronouncing her and 30 others guilty.
cutejaatsandeep
New member
i am just a modi fan.....n i dont care about any party or any leader....soo mujhe sirf modi ke examples diya kar....vajpayee ho ya sonia gandhi mere liye dono same hai....99% riots are started by muslims but when hindus retaliate thn they say majority is killing minority.....i think u havent been into muslims...go n visit areas lik mewat,meerut,muzaffarnagar,saharanpur,rampur live there n thn tell me how r they....non muslim cant liv in muslim dominated areas coz they doesnt want u to follow any other religion other thn islam......sooo first get some real time experience thn talk.....lemme also tell u another fact..when US attacked iraq one of there fighter planes came to india for fuel but india refused to do so coz india had very good relationship with saddam hussain....sooo if india have guts to say no to US than rest of the countries r nothing for them..congress ke eek aur maahan neta jawahar lal impotant nehru bhi yehi bolta tha ki hume ladai nahi karni in 1960....kahi ghar bana rahe hai kahi road bana rahe hai....phir china ne aise taise ki tab jakar inki aankhh khulii....mai tere ghar pur roz attack karoonga to tu kab tak tolerate karega?kya tu apne padosi se poochega ki retaliate karu ya nahi?soo if u wana rule n wana make fear in ur enemy's heart thn u have to be aggressive n offensive.
All I gather from your last couple of posts is that Muslims, even those living in India, are the enemies. They dont tolerate other religions and need to be taught a lesson. Shri Modi, as he showed in 2002 is the person needed to teach them a lesson. Hence we should elect Modi so that he can carry it out on a national scale. Really appreciate the honesty. At least you don't hide behind the facade of development, man with a vision etc etc.
So tell me another thing, now that you have come to the conclusions that Indian Muslims should be kept on a leash if not exterminated all together, what should Modi do if he comes to power in 2014? What should be the first five steps he should take to control this menace and set things right?
cutejaatsandeep
New member
now you are talking just like a congressman does.....i am talking about something else....but u guys just dont wana understand that law is same for every1.....i luv all the religions but y a terrorist is always a muslim.....jiss bhi country mai muslims hai waha riots jaroor hote hai....recent example was burma....2days bak there was a news in dainik jagran tht an indian's tongue was chopped off coz he didnt want to convert to islam....what do u have to say about tht?y u never talk about minorities in pakistan and other muslim countries?they are treated lik animals but everybody is bothered about muslims in india...there is not even a single hindu temple in saudia arabia n many other muslim countires....aisa kyo?modi is preffered coz he believes in actions let it be for religion or for country......and now we reallly need a man lik him....
ankurmalik
New member
Has anyone read BJP manifesto.
Modi might have done some good things in Gujrat but in all BJP is a CRAP party.
I will not say it is an altrnate to congress.
All rubbish going on in social media nowdays.
Right wing and some political elements are actively engaged to distract people attention.
BJP has nothing concrete to present as alternate.
Modi might have done some good things in Gujrat but in all BJP is a CRAP party.
I will not say it is an altrnate to congress.
All rubbish going on in social media nowdays.
Right wing and some political elements are actively engaged to distract people attention.
BJP has nothing concrete to present as alternate.
ankurmalik
New member
Was dumbstruck after watching this video. Muslim MLA from Hyderabad using divisive politics to get votes. He is criticizing Modi and Indians except muslims and provocating Muslims to go against 100 Crore Indians.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=9sdy0HxcyUg&noredirect=1
such lumpen elements must be thrown out from the country. A case must be registered against them for provocating the sensitive issues.
Last edited:
Was dumbstruck after watching this video. Muslim MLA from Hyderabad using divisive politics to get votes. He is criticizing Modi and Indians except muslims and provocating Muslims to go against 100 Crore Indians.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=9sdy0HxcyUg&noredirect=1
such lumpen elements must be thrown out from the country. A case must be registered against them for provocating the sensitive issues.
Agreed. He ends up playing into the hands of the very people he's trying to oppose and counter - the right wingers and fascists on the other side. Now they will use this video to incite more communal hatred and the sickening behavior will continue - tit for tat.
ankurmalik
New member
Any news about action against Syed Ali Shah Geelani who gave an anti-India speech and pro-independence speech at Delhi right under the nose of govt? Or against his sympathizer Arundhati Roy who was also one of the speakers at the Azadi Conference?
But we for sure know that charges have been framed against Baba Ramdev, Kejriwal and Gen. VK Singh for allegedly instigating peaceful protestors to foment violence at India Gate.
But we for sure know that charges have been framed against Baba Ramdev, Kejriwal and Gen. VK Singh for allegedly instigating peaceful protestors to foment violence at India Gate.
Did that happen recently? Doesnt look like any mainstream media covered it.
It happened around 2-3 years ago and was surprisingly not brought into the limelight by the media.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kupxI4jv5WY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kupxI4jv5WY
Thanks for the link. My connection is a little slow, but I will definitely go through all of them.
I think just mentioning the thought or desire for Azadi is not a crime. And we should have platforms like the Azadi Conference where people who have divergent views about the Union of India can come in and express their views. That is better than any acts of terrorism or violence.
But this shouldn't be made a platform to abuse any group or communities.
You are talking about teaching Indian Muslims a lesson. Dont deny. Here's what you said -
What do 2002 riots have to do with whats happening in Burma or Saudi Arabia? And I understand the actions that you are talking about - your post about 'Sabak sikhana' is quoted above.
samarkadian
Active member
In a setback to Chief Minister Narendra Modi, the Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld the appointment of Gujarat Lokayukta.
Justice R A Mehta, who was appointed to the post by Gujarat Governor Kamala Beniwal in August 2011, will continue to be the Lokayukta.
The Narendra Modi Government had challenged the Lokayukta's appointment in the Gujarat High Court, and termed it illegal. The Gujarat Government had accused the Governor of not consulting it.
The Gujarat High Court had earlier on January 18 last year upheld the appointment of Lokayukta by the Governor, while dismissing the plea of the state challenging it
http://in.news.yahoo.com/sc-upholds-appointment-gujarat-lokayukta-053139226.html
Justice R A Mehta, who was appointed to the post by Gujarat Governor Kamala Beniwal in August 2011, will continue to be the Lokayukta.
The Narendra Modi Government had challenged the Lokayukta's appointment in the Gujarat High Court, and termed it illegal. The Gujarat Government had accused the Governor of not consulting it.
The Gujarat High Court had earlier on January 18 last year upheld the appointment of Lokayukta by the Governor, while dismissing the plea of the state challenging it
http://in.news.yahoo.com/sc-upholds-appointment-gujarat-lokayukta-053139226.html
sanjeev1984
New member
First -i am not batting for any in this comment and purely a legal interest in understanding the constitution.
A) it is a split judgement, and what is the view of other judges
B) if this report content is to be considered correct, a question arises on the observation of the bench which states " that the governor is bound to act on the advise of the council of ministers,BUT the appointment of Justice Mehta is right , as it was done in consultation with the chief justice" , whether the court considers the chief justice advise is as good as in lieu of the advise of the council of ministers.Can this be yard stick if the chief justice of supreme court advise be considered by the president and can act on that basis.
C) what is the constitutional crisis is involved when an constitutional ambiguity is referred to a legal battle for more clarity. reading this, a new constitutional ambiguity is created in the minds of people like us " whether the chief justice of the high court can be substituted in place of group of ministers, in a democratic system. ?
why the chief justice cannot advise the chief minister and if that been ignored then there is some meaning in the governors action and on the contrary if the governor had, bypassing the Government, had taken the advise of chief justice advise, then he or she becomes super policing official, which in our current system of democracy does not jell well , as this post of the governor has always been a political post.
FINAL QUESTION, will the center accept this formula, if LOKPAL is installed and president appoints LOKPAL judge directly in consultation with the chief justice of supreme court.?
A) it is a split judgement, and what is the view of other judges
B) if this report content is to be considered correct, a question arises on the observation of the bench which states " that the governor is bound to act on the advise of the council of ministers,BUT the appointment of Justice Mehta is right , as it was done in consultation with the chief justice" , whether the court considers the chief justice advise is as good as in lieu of the advise of the council of ministers.Can this be yard stick if the chief justice of supreme court advise be considered by the president and can act on that basis.
C) what is the constitutional crisis is involved when an constitutional ambiguity is referred to a legal battle for more clarity. reading this, a new constitutional ambiguity is created in the minds of people like us " whether the chief justice of the high court can be substituted in place of group of ministers, in a democratic system. ?
why the chief justice cannot advise the chief minister and if that been ignored then there is some meaning in the governors action and on the contrary if the governor had, bypassing the Government, had taken the advise of chief justice advise, then he or she becomes super policing official, which in our current system of democracy does not jell well , as this post of the governor has always been a political post.
FINAL QUESTION, will the center accept this formula, if LOKPAL is installed and president appoints LOKPAL judge directly in consultation with the chief justice of supreme court.?
I am not sure if people really know who owns Niti Central... a self proclaimed intellectual and an open right wing supporter...
All blame paid media on assumptions but this one is openly biased
All blame paid media on assumptions but this one is openly biased
He is not countering anyone - that is giving him too much credit. He is himself inciting communal hatred and he'd have done it even if there was nothing to counter. He is doing it because that makes the ordinary man forget his daily worries and keep him in power for protection, revenge, etc. etc.
- Status