Shri Mohanji Bhagwat in his speech says that people with good family values dont let women bow in front of them. View attachment 16225
Bhagwat ke byaan ka virodh karne walon ko delhi me saal dar saal badhte rape ke cases ka % bhi dekh lena chahiye....
Bhagwat ke byaan ka virodh karne walon ko delhi me saal dar saal badhte rape ke cases ka % bhi dekh lena chahiye....
I could provide you with links of over 1000 (literally) article by eminent writers who believe/claim that Jinnah was secular. And I can complement this with few doctoral theses on Jinnah in political science that eulogizes Jinnah for his secularism.
Yes, in Pakistan, educated middle class revere Jinnah as the messiah for Indian muslim BUT not as a religious nut; rather a secularist who wanted a muslim-majority secular Pakistan. See the subtlety. I understand the inherent irony but that is what people believe. They are quick to point out Jinnah as wine-drinking, non-namaji, clean-shaved, westernized attire and married to a non-muslim (Rattanbai Petit). Further, his speech in Pakistan assembly (you must have read).. "you are free to go to mosuqe, temples; state has nothing to do with your religion, and other bull-shits..." proves that Jinnah was secular in his speech.
In India: even the "communal" BJP leaders have written book on Jinnah's secularism. Historically, till 1942, almost every Indian leader believed Jinnah as a hard-core secularist; after that few blamed him for riots, few others said, Jinnah is right, rest were ambivalent (ignorant).
Lest I am taken wrong, I don't believe that Jinnah was secular, not at all. But me no matters. It is about the popular narrative.
By the way, you possibly can not know my intentions; you have to be a hell of a psychologist to figure that out. You can interpret my words but not my intentions.![]()
Ideally, I want private jet for me and a bit of weight gain. For India, I wish a homogeneous society, free of caste- religious- discrimination, free of poverty and diseases, better infrastructure, and high quality of life. I also want world-peace!! :very_drunk:
But utopia is too much to ask, so I wish to settle for the second best thing. Yes, I want polarization to increase and saturate resulting in a stalemate. As simple as that.
Of course I am agitated by MIM's antics. Not because it was a hate-speech but because it happens regularly and MIM gets away with it.
No, they are anti-national because they are anti-national. circular logic. And this is how it works: anti-Hindu/anti-minority/anti-dalit/anti-any-caste = anti-national. PERIOD.
As far as MIM, I can go back in History and narrate the Razakars episode but I believe you already know that story. You must also be aware of their rable-rousing speeches, their affinity towards MUSLIM-UMMAH, soft corner towards all muslim terrorists (they always justify their actions), their addressing of Indian parliament (and India) as Kufarstan, more sympathetic towards muslin atrocities in Palestine, Kashmir, Burma than next door victims of Islamic terrorism. Yes, this is what I called ANTI-NATIONAL.
Probably, you do not get what I mean by polarization. I don't mean polarization = Riots + Senseless Killing. There is also a severe religious polarization in Kerala. There is a caste polarization in UP, Bihar, TN, Karnataka and many other states: Does that mean caste-based target killings (and please don't invoke Ranveer Sena here!) ? No.
So, why are you so skeptical about religious polarization? or is it because muslims have shown propensity towards violence in such situations?
I am not mistaken. Of course, majority polarization will defeat the minority polarization or at least will render it (and their worth in electoral voting) moot. It has happened all over the world. Look at the recent Arab-spring: Muslim brotherhood is sweeping... how much is the worth of Coptic Christians votes (they are over 10% in Egypt)? Zilch. Nada. Zero. Nil. Sunay.
Look closer to home. Ever heard that minorities are king maker in democratic Bangladesh? their % was quite reasonable. Did minorities have any say in democratic Pakistan politics?
Why is this? If not the majority polarization, then what explain the worthlessness of religious minorities in most muslim-majority countries (even if they happen to be democratic)? Please enlighten me.
Once again, don't suspect my intentions; they are not necessarily good. :very_drunk: I have grown-up from that awkward immature-unrealistically-idealistic-phase of life.
That is THE point: Idiots don't stop. Otherwise there won't be any idiots. :singing:
Even assuming that MIM will stop using religious hatred against Hindus to garner votes is living in fool's paradise. Once this is settled, what do you propose to deal with vicious MIM? Their hatred is growing each day and influencing more and more people; so, why not cut the crap and go for the broke!?
Shri Mohanji Bhagwat in his speech says that people with good family values dont let women bow in front of them. View attachment 16225
Bade Bujrgo ke paanv chhoonga bhi hamari family values ka hi ek hissa hai -
Anyways, no wonder media grossly misinterpreted Bhagwat's speech about women housewife issue. Go thro' the whole video and figure out what wrong Bhagwat said!
http://samvada.org/2013/news-digest/video-rss-chief-mohan-bhagwat-speech-on-women-housewife-issue/
नरेन्द्र मोदी : अन्तराष्ट्रीय बिरादरी से मैं निपट लूँगा पर
मुझे दुश्मनों के 10 सर चाहिए, इसके लिए आपको मैं
पूरी छूट देता हूँ और इसके लिए आपको हर प्रकार
की सहायता दी जाएगी l
Desi aapne kahan ki mohan bhagwat, asharam aur saluram inme se to koi neta nahin hain aur maine to sirf netaon ki baat ki thi.......
desi (congress ke pravakta JL) :- meri sarkaar ko log fir napunsak kahenge main kya karun??? ohh Owl baba ke kisi chamche se baat karni padegi.....
Hehehehehehe kisi congressi ka naam bhi le lete.......
Ideally, I want private jet for me and a bit of weight gain. For India, I wish a homogeneous society, free of caste- religious- discrimination, free of poverty and diseases, better infrastructure, and high quality of life. I also want world-peace!! :very_drunk:
But utopia is too much to ask, so I wish to settle for the second best thing. Yes, I want polarization to increase and saturate resulting in a stalemate. As simple as that.
Of course I am agitated by MIM's antics. Not because it was a hate-speech but because it happens regularly and MIM gets away with it.
No, they are anti-national because they are anti-national. circular logic. And this is how it works: anti-Hindu/anti-minority/anti-dalit/anti-any-caste = anti-national. PERIOD.
As far as MIM, I can go back in History and narrate the Razakars episode but I believe you already know that story. You must also be aware of their rable-rousing speeches, their affinity towards MUSLIM-UMMAH, soft corner towards all muslim terrorists (they always justify their actions), their addressing of Indian parliament (and India) as Kufarstan, more sympathetic towards muslin atrocities in Palestine, Kashmir, Burma than next door victims of Islamic terrorism. Yes, this is what I called ANTI-NATIONAL.
Probably, you do not get what I mean by polarization. I don't mean polarization = Riots + Senseless Killing. There is also a severe religious polarization in Kerala. There is a caste polarization in UP, Bihar, TN, Karnataka and many other states: Does that mean caste-based target killings (and please don't invoke Ranveer Sena here!) ? No.
So, why are you so skeptical about religious polarization? or is it because muslims have shown propensity towards violence in such situations?
I am not mistaken. Of course, majority polarization will defeat the minority polarization or at least will render it (and their worth in electoral voting) moot. It has happened all over the world. Look at the recent Arab-spring: Muslim brotherhood is sweeping... how much is the worth of Coptic Christians votes (they are over 10% in Egypt)? Zilch. Nada. Zero. Nil. Sunay.
Look closer to home. Ever heard that minorities are king maker in democratic Bangladesh? their % was quite reasonable. Did minorities have any say in democratic Pakistan politics?
Why is this? If not the majority polarization, then what explain the worthlessness of religious minorities in most muslim-majority countries (even if they happen to be democratic)? Please enlighten me.
Once again, don't suspect my intentions; they are not necessarily good. :very_drunk: I have grown-up from that awkward immature-unrealistically-idealistic-phase of life.
That is THE point: Idiots don't stop. Otherwise there won't be any idiots. :singing:
Even assuming that MIM will stop using religious hatred against Hindus to garner votes is living in fool's paradise. Once this is settled, what do you propose to deal with vicious MIM? Their hatred is growing each day and influencing more and more people; so, why not cut the crap and go for the broke!?
Saluramji and Vikas
Its one thing to take cheap shots at politician but it is disgusting and despicable to make the mockery of martydom achieved by soldiers at battlefront. Knowing that our community has a major share manpower who form the frontline defence be it army or BSF.
It could be our bhai, beta or jamai. If these soldiers were not there, our enemies will be beheading us like them. Please show some respect to fallen soldiers.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.