Chautalas convicted for illegal recruitment

There should be drastic change in Civil Services at States & in UPSC

Mr.Mohan & Others,
We need to know for whom we select the persons in Civil Services, whether they are selected by honest or unfair process, after being selected they are the one of the bad persons of society -
1.They think that by being selected they are the king and even ill treat the others
2.They are full of ego
3.They do not tolerate any other person in parallel to them , I have seen many IAS & State Civil officers that they are so jealeous of each others.
4.Hardley 5 % of seleted persons have ever faced hard living standard in life
5.They worked hard to get in exam and to get the position not to serv the society
6.All the Civil Service Candidates selected hardly constitute 5 % of rural area.

Change is required to select the candidate in civil services with
1.60% Candidates selected should be of rural background with at least primary education in rural area.
2.Psyco Test to know the social behaviour of candidate
3.Ability the shed the Ego
4.School Performance

Why we select the Candidate from 10% of population to rule the 70% of population living in Rural.


Regards to all JAT Members
Krishan Lakra




atishmohan said:
BS Hooda did the similar thing in HCS exam 2009.

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/c...ud-haryana-civil-services-merit-list/740789/0

http://iasaspirant.wordpress.com/

HPSC organized HCS-2009 exam under aegis of new chairman [Mr. Batra who later replaced by Mr. R D Sheokand] but HPSC failed to meet standard of Transparency and Accountability. Commission charged a fee of Rs. 1000/candidate when UPSC charged Rs. 20/candidate for same. Commission didn’t allow candidates to take away question papers neither in Prelims nor in Mains. May I ask why..??? Once again when final result of HCS-2009 was declared by HPSC on 4[SUP]th[/SUP]Jan 2011, History repeated itself and most influential candidates (Close relatives of Board Members, Political Leaders and Bureaucrats) sailed through. INLD (Main Opposition Political Party) came with an advance list of 15 names on 21[SUP]st[/SUP] December 2010 who would get selected and socking reality is that 10 names out of them are in the list of successful candidatesList of some favoured candidates in HCS-2009 Exam:-**This time written carried 600 marks and interview carried 75 marks


Apart from above mentioned candidates several other candidates who are close to either Politicians or Bureaucrats made it in list of successful candidates. They all are supposed to join on 18[SUP]th[/SUP] Jan 2011. Many deserving candidates, who did very well in the written test, were intentionally given low marks in the interview either to push their rank low or kick them out. For instance candidate with Roll No-1184 has secured 411 marks in the written test but only 18 in the interview. Similarly, a candidate bearing Roll No- 2069 secured 409 marks in the written test but only 11 in the interview. There is very high variation in marks awarded in interview from minimum 10 to maximum 66. It will be not wrong we say that HCS stands for “Hidden Civil Services”.
Click to expand...
 
desijat said:
जहाँ तक मैं जनता हू हुडा भी उतना ही जाट है जितना चौटाला तो ये म्हारे वाला आर थारे वाला बनने के मानक के है?
Click to expand...

मित्र अगर बंटी और बबली अंदर होते में कभी "अपना" "हमारे वाला" शब्द का उपयोग न करता किन्तु चौटाला राजनितिक रूप से आज न भाजपा के साथ है न कांग्रेस के साथ , इसलिए सीबीआई की कारवाई भी तुरंत हो गयी । जब ऐसा होता है , तो मैं जरूर अपनी जाति के लिए खड़ा हुंगा , चाहे वोह एक जाट नेता हो या एक आम जाट।
धन्यवाद
 
Last edited:
phoolkumar said:
INLD to capitalise on JBT
scam verdict
Naveen S
Garewal
Tribune News Service
​

Chandigarh, January 19
The conviction of former Haryana Chief Minister and
Indian National Loki Dal (INLD) chief Om Parkash Chautala and his MLA son Ajay
Chautala along with others in the JBT recruitment scam has taken a political
twist with the party capitalising on judgement that says that recruitments were
done purely “for adjusting their own people” and “no bribe was paid or taken” to
provide jobs to the selected 3,206 JBT teachers.

“Chautala and his son have gone to jail for a secure future of their
supporters and their kin” is the new mantra of the INLD that aims to cash in on
the judgement that is considered too weak to keep the father-son duo behind bars
for long. On the other hand, based on the feeling that the judgement has no
concrete evidence against the Chautalas and a lot of emphasis is laid on
“presumptions”, both the Congress and the Haryana Janhit Congress (HJC) have
started a blame game on the issue of “motives behind the timing of the
judgement”.

Contrary to popular belief that the INLD has suffered a big setback owing to
the jail term for the top INLD leadership and their close aids, the issue may
actually boomerang and create a “sympathy factor” for the party.

Om Parkash Chautala, in his statement before the CBI court at Rohini in Delhi
that convicted him, denied any knowledge or his role in the scam. The order
reads, “Om Prakash Chautala, Ajay Singh Chautala and Sher Singh Badshami have
denied not only their participation in the crime, but also having any knowledge
of the same at the relevant time”.

The 308-page judgement does not refer to any direct involvement of Chautala
or Ajay. Chautala has been convicted on the basis of the statement of IAS
officer Sanjiv Kumar, whose each and every argument has been rejected by the
court, except the fact that “Chautala called him for breakfast and asked him to
change the list of candidates”. In case of Ajay, the judgement reads that Ajay
was present in meetings where there was talk about the lists being altered, but
Ajay never once asked anyone to change the lists. His presence in the meetings
is taken as his being the mastermind behind changing of the lists.

The judgement acknowledges that Chautala did state to the court that IAS
officers Sanjiv Kumar and Rajni Sekhri Sibal were “playing in the hands of their
political opponents namely Bhupinder Singh Hooda, the present Chief Minister of
Haryana and earlier the main Opposition leader belonging to the Indian National
Congress party, in connivance with another politicians like Karan Dalal and
Kapil Sibal”.

Denying any role, the Congress has started a campaign that suggests that the
HJC leadership is behind the speeding up of the trial. This, they say, has been
done to prevent all possibilities, though remote, of the BJP having a re-think
on its poll alliance with the HJC and forming one with the INLD prior to the
2014 Parliamentary and Vidhan Sabha elections.

The INLD has decided to highlight relevant portions of the judgement that
support their proposed campaign to turn Chautalas into heroes.

One such para reads, “Though, it is true that there is no evidence that they
took any bribe from any candidate nor there is any evidence to show that they
favoured any of his relatives but there is enough evidence to show that their
political and bureaucratic bosses intended to cause wrongful gain to some
candidates and wrongful loss to the other candidates”.
In plain English, the INLD plans to translate this to read that the party
leadership cares for its supporters, workers and their well being. “Is it a
crime to fulfil the needs and aspirations of the party workers?” is an argument
given out by the party think tank.
Click to expand...
asli khoota iss sanjiv kumar ka tokkya hoi s....iss list m 25 naam add karya tha paisa lay k jo choutala sahab n katway orr dahmkaya tha sare amm.
haryana ki hakkiqat h koi bhi jat cm nakuri k liye paissa nahi leta....
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This case was started by cbi in 99-2000 when NDA was in power and Chautala's INLD was part of it. ebb udde setting kyun na kari ?CBI ko congress Bureau of investigation kahne ka ebb k fayda? .Pahle corruption kari n uper tai murkhata bhi ??

Ya to wah ho ri sai ki kutte ki lath mara kise aur na n roya mhare ghar aagey to mhare k galti ?
 
jaisingh318 said:
haryana ki hakkiqat h koi bhi jat cm nakuri k liye paissa nahi leta....
Click to expand...

Pachle MP elction ki baat ahi Shri Ajay Chautala ek ghar mein vote mangane chala gye n kaha ki aap ladka lagwaya tha humari sarkar ne to vote do aap hume. Agle ne aisa sidha jawab dia tha ' k free mein lagwaya tha paise diye the meri marji tain vote gerunga' ebb vo paise kon leta hai ye to pta nhi lekin hua INLD sarkar mein tha n na pta ho to apne kisi aaka se puch lena jo election mein Ajay k sath the:)
 
rinkusheoran said:
This case was started by cbi in 99-2000 when NDA was in power and Chautala's INLD was part of it. ebb udde setting kyun na kari ?CBI ko congress Bureau of investigation kahne ka ebb k fayda? .Pahle corruption kari n uper tai murkhata bhi ??
Click to expand...

Aur bhai khati to CBI bhi hai, jo agle ki neet hi na ho pisa chodhne ki to jail hi hovegi :tongue:
 
rinkusheoran said:
Pachle MP elction ki baat ahi Shri Ajay Chautala ek ghar mein vote mangane chala gye n kaha ki aap ladka lagwaya tha humari sarkar ne to vote do aap hume. Agle ne aisa sidha jawab dia tha ' k free mein lagwaya tha paise diye the meri marji tain vote gerunga' ebb vo paise kon leta hai ye to pta nhi lekin hua INLD sarkar mein tha n na pta ho to apne kisi aaka se puch lena jo election mein Ajay k sath the:)
Click to expand...
jitne muh utni baat .............paissa laker koi kisse kay ghar ja kar vote na mang sakta ya baat kahkar ki tera choora lagvaya tha.
baki phoolkumar ki post m clear h ki bribe k bare m court n kya kha h.
 
Ye dekh lo B.S Hooda ke karnaame(Corruption in HPSC):
HPSC apologises in HC for false info
Manish Sirhindi
Tribune News Service​

Yamunanagar, January 21
Providing false information to one of the aspirants for the job of college principal has landed the Haryana State Public Service Commission (HPSC) in soup as the authorities had to file a written apology in the Punjab and Haryana High Court for the discrepancy.
Dr Anil Kumar, a local resident with adequate experience in teaching, had applied for the post of college principal which had been advertised by the HPSC in 2010. However, Kumar did not get selected and he put up an RTI with the HPSC seeking his score in the interview and the criteria for the selection.
Anil Kumar claimed that in reply to the RTI, the HPSC informed that he had scored 34 marks in the interview, which if added to the numbers awarded to him for his experience and qualification, made him eligible for getting selected for the post.
On the basis of this information, Anil Kumar challenged the selection procedure in the high court, which sought a reply from the commission. In its reply, the commission stated that Anil Kumar had been provided wrong information and that he had scored 31 marks in the interview.
Anil Kumar said in the name of the criteria, he was provided with a performa, which was meant for the selection of the managers (planning) in the HSIDC, a copy of which was produced by him. He said the commission failed to produce any documents about the criteria for the post of the college principal. The commission again advertised five posts of college principals in 2012 and he again applied for the same. This time before appearing for the interview, Kumar sought details about the criteria for selections, under the RTI. However, the commission informed him that no criteria had so far been set. Kumar said when the UPSC and other government and semi-government agencies had set criteria for the selection of senior officials, then why did the HPSC have no criteria for the selection of college principals. He said providing false information under the RTI was also a serious matter as it reflected poorly on the commission. Kumar also contended that as per the recommendations of the UGC, only 20 per cent marks should have been allotted for the interview, but the commission had allotted 60 per cent marks for the interview while only 40 per cent were allotted for experience and qualifications.
 
Om Prakash Chautala sentenced for 10 years, that is a bit too harsh I believe.

If sentence is not changed then his political career is over.
 
atishmohan said:
He can still appeal in High court and then supreme court.
Click to expand...
but despite his appeal and status of appeal - even if he is aquitted, he can not contest for 6 years. This is based on current judgement itself and future aquittal wil not help. this is what i heard.
 
they will be convicted only and only if they do not hail mata sonia. mata sonia ji manages congres and cbi.
cooljat said:
I appreciate it too but what about Kalmaadi, Raja, Manmohan, Chidambram and all other culprits from UPA govt?
Shouldn't they deserve at least life term for their crimes?
Click to expand...
 
forget abt his career. what abt your careir in mata sonia's chamcha list - getting some promotion or not. you hv been biggest congres chamcha on jatland. hay hay haya hay

desijat said:
Om Prakash Chautala sentenced for 10 years, that is a bit too harsh I believe.

If sentence is not changed then his political career is over.
Click to expand...
 
just want to say one thing jab jab tum jaso ne ye kakha party khatam ya phir inld k neta khatam tab tab inhone jabardast wapsi ki h issi jatland par 2009 k election par tum jasie log inld ki 2 seats b nahi aane ki baat karte the aur resutl ne tum jase loge par tala laga diya. bhai ye jat h jat jo mulayam ya mayawati ki tarah sonia k kadmo mein jane ki bajay samay aane par dikha dega chahe kitna jor lagolo ye mar jayenge leking jhukenge nahi.
 
so what if he can't contest..... ab to dushyant chautala n others bhee bade ho liye hai............
sunnytewatia said:
but despite his appeal and status of appeal - even if he is aquitted, he can not contest for 6 years. This is based on current judgement itself and future aquittal wil not help. this is what i heard.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top