Achievments of Modi

Do you think Modi and his governance has played vital role in development of Gujarat.


  • Total voters
    59
नरेन्द्र मोदी १५ सितम्बर, २०१३ को सैनिकों के गढ़ कहे जाने वाले अहिरवाल के रेवाड़ी (हरियाणा ) में भूतपूर्व
सैनिकों की एक विशाल रैली को संबोधित करेंगे। यहाँ से पूरे उत्तर भारत के सेवारत और भूतपूर्व सैनिकों को बीजेपी से
जोड़ने का सन्देश जायेगा।
 
Modi's achievement
1. Gaining so much popularity
2. Clean image
3. Nepotism not in place
4. Keh ke lena wala attitude
5. Kangress high command has asked its puppets not to comment of Lion without their consent
6. 24 hours electricity
7. Roit free Gujarat
8. Safety of its citizens
many more
 
Rather, it is bit late to suggest still shouldn't we be discussing the "Achievements" of Rahul / Manmohan and "Promises / Potential" of Modi as a PM candidate? This is because Rahul and his team has been running this country for 10 years and Modi yet to get a chance.
 
so how come Modi became important leader in last year and not the decade previously.
why they decided to meet him all of a sudden in 10 year of his govt., the same people who were accusing him for 9 yrs ..something has definitely changed..
something has really made Modi important.

Agreed that it was an ''engagement'' and not ''endorsement'' BUT it CERTAINLY is ''RECOGNITION''.

Engaging Narendra Modi is not an endorsement of him, says Sir James Bevan, UK envoy to India

Ha, Pannu padh le

Ten months later today, Sir James Bevan said about his meeting with Mr Modi, "Engagement is not an endorsement. My job is to meet important leaders all over India."

Just reasserts what i said
 
No it was not all of a sudden, just because you dont hear about it does not mean it does not happen. Modi's PR was never so aggressive about it before like it is now that they beat trumpets about anything and everything now.

Ambassadors meet all CMs for the usual pleasing, and you may read the article for that.


You are....... going to any extent to prove your faith in him [Modi].


so how come Modi became important leader in last year and not the decade previously.
why they decided to meet him all of a sudden in 10 year of his govt., the same people who were accusing him for 9 yrs ..something has definitely changed..
something has really made Modi important.

Agreed that it was an ''engagement'' and not ''endorsement'' BUT it CERTAINLY is ''RECOGNITION''.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mahoday, fer yeh court faansi kyu na laga deti Modi ke? Aaj tak to kahin saza nahi huyi uski - Zor laga diya Gandhi family, Congress er CBI ne .... !!!
agar saza paimana hain to fer is hisaab ta gandhi parivar bhi sahukar hoya !!!
thotha chana baaje gana wahe baat s modi gailya.....
baaki thaam lage raho ...haam tem aawega jab dekhenge is dhongi teli ne itne dusre kaam ta nipat le :stupid:
 
Gandhi parivaar aur unke rishtedaar isliye jail nahi gaye kyunki unhone satta se door hokar nahi dekha! Datt ja thode din Vadra er Gandhi inki sachhaayi desh k saamne aawegi!
agar saza paimana hain to fer is hisaab ta gandhi parivar bhi sahukar hoya !!!
thotha chana baaje gana wahe baat s modi gailya.....
baaki thaam lage raho ...haam tem aawega jab dekhenge is dhongi teli ne itne dusre kaam ta nipat le :stupid:
 
या बात मत कह भाई के इनने सत्ता त दूर रह के नहीं देखा , 1975 मे इन्दिरा त सिर्फ एक हफ्ते की जेल दिखाई उसके बाद के रहा , वेही ढ़ाक के तीन पात , कुल ढाई साल मे उल्टी कांग्रेस की सरकार केंद्र ल्या दी इस जनता ने और इस ढाई साल के दौरान सत्ता मे जो पार्टी थी उसने इनके खिलाफ क्या एक्शन लिया , पता नहीं ...
फिर वीपी सिंह , चंद्र शेखर , देवे गौड़ा , गुजराल कितनों को मौका मिला फिर भी इनके खिलाफ कोई एक्शन नहीं .....
1996 मे भाजपा को मौका मिला , उस दौरान बोफोर्स मुद्दा खूब उछाला गया , भाजपा ने इसे चुनावी मुद्दा भी बनाया था पर सत्ता मे आने के बाद कोई एक्शन नहीं .....
इससे तो वही बात जाहीर होती हैं की " दादी तेरे छोटे पोते का न्योता स , बोली मेरे तो सारे एकसे स "
तो भाई ये सारे एकसे स ....अगर नहीं होते तो आरटीआई व दागी वाले मुद्दे पर कांग्रेस का साथ नहीं देते ...
इन मौसेरे भाइयो के चुनावी मुद्दे सिर्फ सत्ता हासिल करने तक सीमित होते हैं न की एक दूसरे को सजा दिलाने के लिए , हर चुनाव मे ये लोग कांग्रेस के घौटालों को सिर्फ मुद्दा बनाते आगे कुछ नहीं होता , सिर्फ एक लाइन होती हैं 'कानून अपना काम कर रहा हैं ' .....
65 साल हो गए अब तक गांधी परिवार की सच्चाई सामने नहीं आई कमाल हैं .... समस्या यह हैं की सच्चाई तो कई बार सामने आई पर उस सच्चाई को दूसरे वाले अपनी खुद की सच्चाई के आगे ढक जाते हैं
:stupid:
 
Last edited:
agar saza paimana hain to fer is hisaab ta gandhi parivar bhi sahukar hoya !!!
thotha chana baaje gana wahe baat s modi gailya.....
baaki thaam lage raho ...haam tem aawega jab dekhenge is dhongi teli ne itne dusre kaam ta nipat le :stupid:

विदेशी बार बाला तें ,स्वदेशी ढोंगी तेल्ली आछा । एक जट्टू कहावत "आपणा मारे ,छाहँ में गेरे "।
 
या बात मत कह भाई के इनने सत्ता त दूर रह के नहीं देखा , 1975 मे इन्दिरा त सिर्फ एक हफ्ते की जेल दिखाई उसके बाद के रहा , वेही ढ़ाक के तीन पात , कुल ढाई साल मे उल्टी कांग्रेस की सरकार केंद्र ल्या दी इस जनता ने और इस ढाई साल के दौरान सत्ता मे जो पार्टी थी उसने इनके खिलाफ क्या एक्शन लिया , पता नहीं ...
फिर वीपी सिंह , चंद्र शेखर , देवे गौड़ा , गुजराल कितनों को मौका मिला फिर भी इनके खिलाफ कोई एक्शन नहीं .....
1996 मे भाजपा को मौका मिला , उस दौरान बोफोर्स मुद्दा खूब उछाला गया , भाजपा ने इसे चुनावी मुद्दा भी बनाया था पर सत्ता मे आने के बाद कोई एक्शन नहीं .....
इससे तो वही बात जाहीर होती हैं की " दादी तेरे छोटे पोते का न्योता स , बोली मेरे तो सारे एकसे स "
तो भाई ये सारे एकसे स ....अगर नहीं होते तो आरटीआई व दागी वाले मुद्दे पर कांग्रेस का साथ नहीं देते ...
इन मौसेरे भाइयो के चुनावी मुद्दे सिर्फ सत्ता हासिल करने तक सीमित होते हैं न की एक दूसरे को सजा दिलाने के लिए , हर चुनाव मे ये लोग कांग्रेस के घौटालों को सिर्फ मुद्दा बनाते आगे कुछ नहीं होता , सिर्फ एक लाइन होती हैं 'कानून अपना काम कर रहा हैं ' .....
65 साल हो गए अब तक गांधी परिवार की सच्चाई सामने नहीं आई कमाल हैं .... समस्या यह हैं की सच्चाई तो कई बार सामने आई पर उस सच्चाई को दूसरे वाले अपनी खुद की सच्चाई के आगे ढक जाते हैं
:stupid:

या कति साच्ची बात से तेरी । पर इबके मोदी इन् ने छोड्डे कोणी । दुश्मन को ठीकाने लगाने में इसका कोई सानी नहीं हे । पहले इसने बिज़े.पि के अन्दर वाले अपने राह के रोड़े ठीकाने लगाए ,अब खान्ग्रेस्सी देश के दुश्मनों की बारी हे ।
 
Gujrat's Agriculture development and Rural development

1. ) From 2000-2001 to 2007-2008, gujrats agriculture grew at the rate of 9.6% per annum.
this growth rate marked in one of the fastest in the world.

2.) Gujarat has one of the best rural road networks in India, and 98.7% of villages are connected by pukka roads.

3.) Ground Water level has gone up in Gujrat.

4.) SOIL HEALTH cards is a sign of making agriculture ''professional''... a sign of moving forward.
 
Last edited:
Clearly you dont read whats written in the thread...

read post #10

Modi same as rest
1. ) From 2000-2001 to 2007-2008, gujrats agriculture grew at the rate of 9.6% per annum.
this growth rate marked in one of the fastest in the world.

2.) Gujarat has one of the best rural road networks in India, and 98.7% of villages are connected by pukka roads.

3.) Ground Water level has gone up in Gujrat.

4.) SOIL HEALTH cards is a sign of making agriculture ''professional''... a sign of moving forward.
 
Correct but may you answer why PV Narsimharao became PM when he was the Home Minister during Sikh Riots and in Delhi Police is controlled by Center govt and why Rajive Gandhi became the PM ... ?????? i Know you will not answer this question
Tytler and Sajjan were not head of the states under whom the security of the state was.
 
Why is 1984 always answer to 2002? 2 wrongs dont make a right, do they?

Correct but may you answer why PV Narsimharao became PM when he was the Home Minister during Sikh Riots and in Delhi Police is controlled by Center govt and why Rajive Gandhi became the PM ... ?????? i Know you will not answer this question
 
due to your biased approach :) and they are not equal one was Genocide and one was Riot ... I just want to know the reasoning behind PV Narsimharao's appointment why he appointed after having a tainted image ????

Atleast bash both of them equally ... but alas your approach is to bash only side only

Why is 1984 always answer to 2002? 2 wrongs dont make a right, do they?
 
If I were biased I would have never written '2 wrongs never make a right'. Your perception has become so strong that your will always see everything biased, and am quite surprised at that coming from you.

I basg 2002 because the man who orchistrated those riots wants to be the PM and followed by a lot of blind followers, 1984 culprits have either died, or are no longer in active politics.



due to your biased approach :) and they are not equal one was Genocide and one was Riot ... I just want to know the reasoning behind PV Narsimharao's appointment why he appointed after having a tainted image ????

Atleast bash both of them equally ... but alas your approach is to bash only side only
 
Back
Top