prashantacmet
New member
nahi..aapki mhains ka aata hai....AMUL baby ke baare main hi suna hai..ya AMUL doodh bhi piya hai kabhi?
पी एम हो तो मोदी जैसा...........
- Thread starter jatshiva1947
- Start date
- Status
nahi..aapki mhains ka aata hai....AMUL baby ke baare main hi suna hai..ya AMUL doodh bhi piya hai kabhi?
prashantacmet
New member
Imran masood ki kartoot pe ek bhi pseudo-secular comment nahi karega......aur modi jammu main paadta hai to inhe chennai tak badbu aati hai.....hadd hai
prashantacmet
New member
ek bhai ne teri maadi si haan main hi sun li..pakistani agent AK-49 to jutiya diya ek bhai ne...waah bhai waah
http://www.ndtv.com/elections/artic...-to-retaliate-501550?pfrom=home-lateststories
Last edited:
All good concerns and questions asked and needs to be answered by whosoever is PM candidate.
I hope if he is against crony capitalism. But he is more interested in populism than crony capitalism. That populism come at cost of baseless allegations sometimes which in turn create a fear among bureaucrats. Thus nothing move is such an environment. Bureaucrats tend to not make any decision. Let the business as usual which is very dangerous. Kezriwal focus is not on speeding investments or making business friendly atmosphere but rather has focus on stirring up popular anti-business sentiments. Opposing FDI in retail, focus on stopping privatization etc just to name a few. And his anti-corruption agenda for instance is highly flawed. Such anti-corruption agendas prove counter productive and never work. But why Kezriwal saheb needs to care about such things. He want to be in news all the time with his populist agendas. Some people get swayed with this populism while other take advantage of his popularity to get a breakthrough in politics. Sadly we are so obsessed with Bollywood. We cannot ignore such dramas.
I did answer to your question in my last post. In simple words, he is an opportunist like other politicians are in India. But he projects himself as altruistic and generous.
He often says: "Hum yahan rajniti ke liye nahi aaye hain". "Hum yahan kisi satta ke liye nahi aaye hain". "hume power se koi lena dena nahi hai", "hum yahan mukhyamantri banne thodi na aaye hain", "Hum yahan pradhan mantri thodi na banne aaye hain" etc etc.
Khair aage aur clear ho jaayega.
Issi bahane logo ko pata chal gaya, Imran Masood ke baare mei. Aaj kaal ye fashion sa ho gaya hai apne aap ko highlight karne ke liye. Kezriwal introduced such contemporary politics in India. Now we see so many followers!
NaMo Gets a Thumbs-up – Gujarat Tops in Economic Freedom :
Coming at a time when the Gujarat development model continues to be questioned, Modi’s state Gujarat has been ranked number 1 in a list of India’s 20 largest states in terms of “economic freedom”. The index on “economic freedom” takes into account governance, growth, citizens’ rights as well as labour and business regulations.
http://www.theindianrepublic.com/tb...c-freedom-100030205.html#sthash.AFxX9vs4.dpuf
http://www.theindianrepublic.com/tb...c-freedom-100030205.html#sthash.AFxX9vs4.dpuf
Coming at a time when the Gujarat development model continues to be questioned, Modi’s state Gujarat has been ranked number 1 in a list of India’s 20 largest states in terms of “economic freedom”. The index on “economic freedom” takes into account governance, growth, citizens’ rights as well as labour and business regulations.
http://www.theindianrepublic.com/tb...c-freedom-100030205.html#sthash.AFxX9vs4.dpuf
http://www.theindianrepublic.com/tb...c-freedom-100030205.html#sthash.AFxX9vs4.dpuf
Gujarat stays at No. 1, says Economic Freedom of the States of India 2013 report
Read more at: http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/...the-states-of-india-2013-report/1/350123.html
The Economic Freedom of the States of India report 2013 has shown that the Narendra Modihelmed Gujarat remains at number one. This is an index that measures governance, growth, citizens' rights, and labour and business regulation among the country's 20 largest states. Equally, Bihar gets a huge vote of affirmation for the work done by Nitish Kumar since he took over as chief minister (CM) in 2005.
The report states that Gujarat has widened its lead at the top of the economic freedom table with an index score of 0.65 (on a scale from 0 to 1.0) while Tamil Nadu remains in second position with 0.54.
Read more at: http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/...the-states-of-india-2013-report/1/350123.html
Read more at: http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/...the-states-of-india-2013-report/1/350123.html
The Economic Freedom of the States of India report 2013 has shown that the Narendra Modihelmed Gujarat remains at number one. This is an index that measures governance, growth, citizens' rights, and labour and business regulation among the country's 20 largest states. Equally, Bihar gets a huge vote of affirmation for the work done by Nitish Kumar since he took over as chief minister (CM) in 2005.
The report states that Gujarat has widened its lead at the top of the economic freedom table with an index score of 0.65 (on a scale from 0 to 1.0) while Tamil Nadu remains in second position with 0.54.
Read more at: http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/...the-states-of-india-2013-report/1/350123.html
rajpaldular
Active member
प्रश्न ये नहीं है कि इमरान मसूद ने क्या कहा अथवा क्यों कहा अथवा फिर कि क्या वो ऐसा कर सकता है अथवा नहीं। देखने वाली बात ये है कि इमरान मसूद ने जो कहा उससे हिन्दू भविष्य की तस्वीर देख पाते हैं अथवा नहीं? इमरान मसूद आज कुछ कर पाये अथवा नहीं, पर उसने अपने लोगों के इरादे तो उजागर कर ही दिये हैं कि शांति तभी तक है जब तक ये कौम 4% है. 42% होते ही क्या करेगी ये कौम, ये बात इमरान मसूद ने बता ही दी है. उदाहरण स्वरुप हैदराबाद , बंगाल, आसाम एवं काश्मीर आप सबके सामने हैं.
यदि आप अभी भी भविष्य का चित्र नहीं देख पा रहे हैं और सिकुलरिज्म के समर्थक हैं तो आप की आने वाली पीढ़ी को कश्मीरी पंडितों की तरह हिंसा, अमानवीय अत्याचार और नारकीय जीवन विरासत मे देने जा रहे हैं.
You can hate him but can't deny he stood up and challenged the political culture of ayashi on taxpayers money. The credit goes to him people started debating if this country is meant to be looted by politicians and royal families.
What he said is condemn-able irrespective of whichever political leader its about.
As mentioned before, religious fanatics and political opportunists on both sides deserve each other. They should be dealt with strongly.
There's an element of populism in his statements but irrespective of that are the issues he picks up needless?
Both parties are silent on the Gas pricing issue.
We know how media went all silent on the Ambani's son's car accident issue.
Why have both parties received big donation from Vedanta a foreign company and why are they silent about it?
Can we deny the fact the industry barons rule the country today together with the politicians? Why are such issues pushed to the fringes of our nation only to be pursued by NGOs and some lone crusaders?
And bhai, everyone has a motive to pick up these issues. Aamir Khan did it for commercial benefits. AAP and AK do it for political reasons. I would gladly take that over the lies peddled by both BJP and Congress as I believe they are highigting the right issues.
Last edited:
re bhai, iss makaar bodi ki itni vakalat karne se pahle ye soch ki ye banda bhasan dene se pehle ye bhi taklif nahi leta ki facts ko verify karle tote ki tara tarrane se pehle!
Kashmir ke nakse ki baat karne se pehle uss nakse ko dekh to leta!
re uss bodhi ki vakalat karne ki bajaye , internet par dhekh le, NCRB ki website pe jakar dhekh le!
Bodi ki Govt. ke joker kahte hein ki pichhle dus saal mein ek kisaan ne aatamhatya ki hai! what a joke! Yaar aap padhe likhe bande ho thoda apne dimag ka bhi istemaal karlo! isse dahej mein thode hi dena hai! bhai Modi ek chhalawa hai, Fenku hai, koi sach nahi hota , koi logical nahi hota, kewal lachhadar baaten, garib ka pet nahi bharti!
Bodi, ambani ka stooge hai, vo ambani aur adani ka stooge hai! ye log ek dollor ki gas ko 14 dollor mein bechna chahte hein!
Mere hisaab se se Sangeet som, hukam singh jaise logon ne WUP ke Bhole Bhale logon ko gumrah kiya hai aur dangon ki aag mie jhonk diya!
Jo garib muslim aur hindu , dashkon se mil jul kar rahte the sada ke liye juda kar diya! Abb aap kahoge mein iss area ke baare mein kya janta hun, australia mein rehta hun, haryana mein paida hua hun! likin yeh bhi sach hai ki ye vichar mere kisi ayese bande ke hein jo shamli ke paas paida hua aur bada hua, padha aur iss haalat par utna hi dukhi hai jitna ki aap!
AAr aur sun, ye jo badi badi baaten karta hai ! desh bhakti, aur raksha ki baat karta hai, ye sab to uske DNA mein hi nahi hai! ye drama kane mein mahir hai!
You know why, kya aapko pata hai ki Gujratis are the lowest percentage in defense forces! Check the stats!
Iss liye BJP ke badmashon ke chungal se nikaliye aur apni sawtantr soch ko ujjagar kariye , vahi sach hai! Jo nakli kavach aapne pehn rakha hai, usse uttar fenkiye1
Cheers!
Last edited:
1. Populism is intrinsically linked to politics.
2. Name a politician who doesn't care about popularity
3. There were some other politicians/political parties too that were opposed to FDI in retail and stalled the Indian Parliament while doing so.
4. What are the flaws in Kezriwal's anti-corruption agenda?
5. Which leader is running away from cameras? Name a politicians who puts a veil on his face when encountered with the media lenses?
6. What is your take on Sabir Ali's entry into BJP and exit within 24 hours?
Last edited:
nahi..aapki mhains ka aata hai....AMUL baby ke baare main hi suna hai..ya AMUL doodh bhi piya hai kabhi?
The majority of Amul milk sold in Delhi comes from surrounding areas and Delhi itself. Thoda padh lo fir comment karo.
Very few. But there are people like Jayprakash Narayan from Loksatta party.
We know majority of politicians care about popularity,Then how is Kezriwal different from others?
Yes there are. But is it in the interest of country? And how is Kezriwal different from other politicians?
Janlokpal in its original form is not an opinion of majority of elected representatives in India. JanLokpal required amendments for it's compatibility within existing constitutional framework. Kezriwal intention behind this JanLokpal was not genuine but rather was to fulfill his political ambitions.
That's why some elements were included in the JanLokpal so that it cannot be accepted in it's original form. And if government makes an amendment to it then protest against government and give a boost to anti-government protest and make yourself popular. This was all part of the game played by Kejriwal and his associates.
Anna left his protest because he knew Kejriwal was not genuine in his approach about anti-corruption. Kejriwal had political ambitions right from the beginning. Anti-corruption movement was a platform for him to become popular. If Kejriwal was genuine in his efforts, he could have protested for amendments within existing laws and Judicial framework. But such protest would not have got him popularity to fulfill the political ambitions. We already have enough anti-corruption law.
But need of the hour is to implement them and remove the loopholes. Much can be achieved by reforming existing institutions. Corruption cannot be removed completely but it can be reduced to a large extent by removing opportunity for corruption. By simplifying government processes and by bringing transparency. Adding ombudsman after an ombudsman will yield less but cost more.
And ramifications of such powerful Ombudsman are unforeseen. Nothing will move in such an environment of blame game. But such reforms are least understood by common people as they not interesting to discuss or talk about. Very few people with genuine intentions are still fighting within existing system to bring those reforms. They have no political ambitions or vested interests like Kejriwal.
Yes there are not many who honestly come on media. Kejriwal main reason of being popular is media. Media is like bread and butter for his business. One of his business deal got exposed of late. Here is the video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vhINUULDmY
It's a routine affair in every party. Be it Congress, BJP or AAP. No one is a saint in this business.
Last edited:
Ok, Fine. He has spread some awareness but then what? If he has all the proofs then why doesn't he go to court like Subhramanium Swamy did? Before forming a government in Delhi, he used to blame Sheila Dikshit similarly. But once he formed the government what did he do? After so much pressure by opposition parties he started looking into the matter. And before that he lied that I have lodged complaint against Sheila Dikshit on corruption.
Similarly during Nirbhaya case, he protested against Sheila Dikshit and categorically said, Delhi Police is under Sheila Dikshit's government but that was not true at all. He led a big protest against Sheila government and lied that police is under her control. Now when similar incident happened under his government, he started to complain about Central government and police. He was a legislator and he himself broke the law. What type of example he has set for people? He could not run his government properly. How will run this country(btw he will not get such chance in the future)?From the day one, his focus was on getting media attention not to redress the grivience of people. Rather to give grief to people by travelling into Metro unnecessarily.
And Kejriwal is not peddling lies to gain a political mileage? How is he different from other politicians if his actions are similar to other?
Last edited:
- Status