What those so called secular who were advocating about everything to be for Muslims, those making every policy to appease Muslims....State and Centre both the govt. visited Muslims why not Jat or Hindus?....Our PM said the first right on everything we have is with Muslims what it means. I now that full Jat belt where no RSS Shakha is available than how they organise it. Is there any powers in RSS hands I think no..Where is the state and Centre Govt. whom responsible for law and order and peace. If its RSS's Game than also its a failure of State and Centre Govt Sir.
First of all, permit me to thank u mr veer, for the reply, and allow me to reply ur every question one by one!!
1. as far as support to the one, who play the politics of appeasement, is concerned, I don't think, that freeing oneself from the clutches of one beast and falling into the lap of another more deadly one is a better way of sorting things out!
2.well, did the power hungry group did visit the minority community?! yes, indeed, the representatives of govts., state as well as the union, should have gone to meet both the communities, as both of these communities suffered in the riots.
3. You say, that, there is no RSS shakha exist there, then with due regard to ur views, don't u see, that is the reason, that it all happened there. U don't need ur permanent presence at a place to ignite a bomb!
4.as regards ur view about 'no power in the rss hands' , I ask u , what power is all about? In my view, the one who has the money power, has all the power available at his/her disposal, regardless of which political party he or she has affinity. And, bye the way, who do u think these RSSwalas are!As per my knowledge, and I have full faith on at least, at this piece of my knowledge, are none other than those I mentioned in my earlier post! They are the one, who actually control the real money!!
5. And finally the last part of ur view, I'm in full agreement with u that the govts. at both levels, were a total failure on this matter! But being on war front with each other, will only serve the purpose of the vested interests, no matter who they are, but, surely at our cost.