ACP Rajbir Singh shot dead !

[baliyanvijay]

i do not know how in a civilized society any cop can take the law in his hand? shame on the person who are praising him. after all he also was a criminal though in police uniform. if he was right then abolish the judicial system and let the cops allow to judge who is guilty or not and what kind of punishment he or she should be rewarded. my dear all the supporters of any encounter specialists, encounter is not only against the demand of natural justice rather it is a crime against the humanity. think for a movement, what ? if any of our ne'er and dear had come under the trap of these so called hero/encounter specialist. please, for God sake, do not make hero them and give a logic that criminals/terrorists do not respect the human values so why a cop should. have all of us has been forget the famous Canought Place encounter, various death in jails and thanas? i am sorry, if i am being rough but in my view any encounter is a blot on the humanity and all encounter specialists are simply criminals same is the Rajbeer Singh as well.​

 

[trueblueindian]

Honestly, i dont want to argue but please do check the disctionary meaning of MIGHT... it should remove your doubts regarding my post

But loved the way you reched to the conclusion and spun a story around my post... ever tried script writing? Your imagination power is quite good

now i am refraining myself from posting further on this point.. and with due regards i expect the same....

infact before reading this even i was confused

WHY DID THE GENTLEMAN DID NOT SEE ---- MIGHT

LOL he even JUMPED THE GUN or else letz say --- was too much rigger happy ... quite relational to the topic discusses

 

[ygulia]

infact before reading this even i was confused

WHY DID THE GENTLEMAN DID NOT SEE ---- MIGHT

LOL he even JUMPED THE GUN or else letz say --- was too much rigger happy ... quite relational to the topic discusses

I read the word MIGHT, you can see my earlier comments and it is highlighted in RED. Do not draw the literal meaning of might, first read all sentences of his comments and then draw the meaning by keeping in view what is written before it. If you know some thing then only you will conclude some thing. Hence the guy reached on a conclusion means he has some basis to reach on that conclusion. First go through all comments and then react.

 

[gaganjat]

gagan bhai ... network is run by intelligence and not by personal hunger .. manna ki network key liye bhi paise ki jarurat hai lekin if u can read the fine line in my earlier post ... things would be much clear .. . rahi baat comfort ki tou police ki naukri mei kam sei kam iss desh mei physical comfort tou hai nahi ... lets acknowlige this fact .. haaan paise ka comfort jarur hai . ..

aur haaan 300 cr ki personel property sei network nahi chalta ... khaer hum isss insaan ko hi kyu galat bolley maximum are from the same category ...
haaan aek sach hai ... chahey khuch bhi ho kam sei kam 54 tou kam hue aur unhe dekh key shayad kai guna jyada ... thoddey bahut tihar mei bhi honggey ...

insaan ki niyati hai galat karney ki ... chahe usne koisa bhi coat pehena ho ... safed / kala / khakhi / ya jurm ka .. . jitni safai hui utni key liye hi santosh karna bhi galat nahi

lekin galat tou galat hai ... tankhwaa hum tax payers devvey arr mauj levvey koi aur ... yaa baat ghanni dukkhey sei. . bakhat padan pae aaap thanney mei ghus key tou dekkho ... ppl at seat ka raviyyya sab kimmm bakkk dega dost ..

aaaj dilli mei respectable makaaan lena aek well settled aadmi key liye bhi asambhav ho gaya hai ... imaandaar ki baat choud dou bhai ... kya yeah sab aise hi paisey ka natija nahi hai ... tou if we as a society see it ... we are the only ones at loss ... but who cares to look at the macro effect ...

RULE OF LAW SIMPLY DOSEN'T EXIST FOR THE un-affordable IN THIS COUNTRY

still sympathetic and feeling sorry for the cop and his family

Sandesh yaar tere jisse sare ho ja tai yo desh desh nahi 'sone ki chidya' ho ja ga ! jo bhi tanne kahi sari thik sai !

 

[gaganjat]

I don't understad why the ppl are getting crazy for that bloody corrupt KHAKI. He was merely a link of the syndicate that bloody politician run and provide shelters to high profile criminals. He would established rapport with those criminals , if anyone among them seemed to be a threat for the politicians, he encountered him taking advantange of personal relations and got rewarded . He was nothing more that a cheater

ussne RAJBEER RAMALA arr PUSPENDRA JAAT kyooker maare the iska to bara hogga aap logga ne.......iski mahima ka gungaan raahan hi do.

Bhai mere rajbeer aur puspendra the to Jat par the to badmaas he, maar diye agle ne !

At the end of the day if we go by books, no corruption charges were proved against rajbir singh and he was awarded 5 medals including president gallantry award. he killed lot of criminals.

If u prepare his balance sheet. he was 'profitable' for the society.

 

[gaganjat]

My friend, just to remind you of another stereotype: we Indians are also the rankest hero-worshippers. Anyways, let’s not stretch the argument like a bubblegum. In fact, I don’t want to argue and I am sure neither do you.

However, I just want to make a few points clear. One of them is that I am with you on all the fake encounters that Rajbir Singh did of real criminals. We all know how long it can take for our courts to actually, if at all, mete out the justice and trial and punish the outlaws.

Law enforcement agencies have to take a detour from the course of law to orchestrate encounters and, mostly, justifiably execute the criminal.

Had it happened to Omar Sheikh, when he was in behind bars in India before getting released, with four others, in lieu of IC 814 passengers, who knows Daniel Pearl might have been alive. So, unfortunate that might be, but fake encounters sometimes are a necessary evil.

However I am not talking about the encounters. I am talking about when the freehand that is given to the hitmen – be that Rajbir Singh or Daya Nayak – is used by them to get the personal favors done. Like striking a land deal, as is alleged in Rajbir’s case, or joining hands with one gang to selective eliminate the members of the rival outfits, as was in Daya Nayak’s case.

We don’t the truth is in Rajbir’s case. Let’s wait for that.

Acknowledged such people must be for doing their jobs and eliminating criminals; but they ought to be chastened if they stray and the power, flowing from the barrel of their guns, corrupts them.

Kabir!
when the law enforcement agencies are given a green signal to do something in a way which is not lawful then, thats not just that one event which is unlawful. the whole process to make that one event happen is unlawful.

its a chain reaction. either we shouldnt give it a green signal or expect lot of other things to get messed up as well.

so u either got to favour the complete process or not to favour it at all.

refer to the history how terriorism was controlled in punjab, J&K it was all unlawful but it was necessary. lot of other things happened with it which were unavoidable (rapes, extorton, killing innocents etc)

When human beings are involved instead of machines it can go anywhere beacuse we dont work on a programme.

In India we change the whole way of working lawfully into unlawful approach when its needed to control somethinh which cant be controlled otherwise.

one day we support it next day we dont. doesnt work that way. got to make up our mind for 1.