jitendershooda
New member
Shayad wo samae aa gaya hai jab humein apni purani soch ko nae hisab se disha ya sehanseelta pradan karni padegi ..... chahe purani dharnae aur reeti-rivaj kitne hi gunkari kyon na hon. AfterAll killing is not the solution and such cases are more and more during last few years. Youth is adamant to do love (or they fell in love by gods will) within the restricted or not-permissible relations in society .... then what? if youth cant help then society/panchayats have to change and not to force them or kill them.
http://www.tribuneindia.com/2009/20090324/haryana.htm#1
Couple faces threat from panchayat
Saurabh Malik
Tribune News Service
Chandigarh, March 23
Another case of hatred for love has surfaced. It seems the entire panchayat of Dhani Mohu village in Tosham tehsil of Haryana’s Bhiwani district is against Asha Rani’s marriage with Sanjay, the boy of the same village. They too have expressed apprehensions regarding their safety.
The threat to the duo’s life comes less than a week after the alleged issuance of death warrants by a Khap panchayat against a Jind-based couple. Available information suggests, the Jind couple had eloped as they were of the same caste.
Taking cognizance of threat to their safety, Haryana has already issued orders providing security to Asha and Sanjay. Modalities are being worked out for providing adequate security to their families also.
Chandigarh Administration too has assured full protection to the two as long as they remain in the city.
The squalid side of Asha-Sanjay’s love story came under the high court scanner after the two filed a petition for safeguarding their “life and liberty”. They wanted protection against Asha Rani’s parents Ranbir and Laxmi for marrying against their wishes. During the course of hearing, it transpired the panchayat too was against them.
As the matter came up for hearing before Justice Rajan Gupta, counsel for Chandigarh Administration confirmed threats were being issued to the couple. In fact, threats were being handed down to Sanjay on his mobile phone.
Counsel said the case urgently required the court’s intervention as the danger to the lives of the two was quite apparent. Counsel for Asha Rani’s parents D.S. Bishnoi and Haryana’s additional advocate-general K.C. Gupta expressed similar apprehension.
The UT counsel said “a larger issued was involved as those getting married within the same religion, caste or sub-caste could not be allowed to be left to fend for themselves in hostile social and cultural environment”.
He insisted the entire village could not be “described as prohibited zone for marriage” and it would “impinge on the constitutional rights of individuals”.
After hearing the arguments, Justice Gupta took note of the fact that security had been provided and an advocate-general committee, on grant of protection to runaway couples, had already been constituted pursuant to the high court directions. “In view of the fact that issue of larger public interest has arisen for consideration of this court and many cases of this nature are likely to arise, it would be appropriate if the matter is put up before the Chief Justice to be put up as per roster”. Justice Gupta also granted liberty to Asha Rani to accompany Sanjay. She was hitherto putting up in Nari Niketan, Sector 26.