vilakshan_taank
New member
At the 1994 annual awards dinner given for Forensic Science, AAFS
President
Dr Don Harper Mills astounded his audience with the legal complications
of
a bizarre death.
Here is the story.....
On March 23, 1994 the medical examiner viewed the body of Ronald Opus
and
concluded that he died from a shotgun wound to the head. Mr Opus had
jumped from the top of a ten-story building intending to commit
suicide. He
left a note to the effect indicating his despondency .
As he fell past the ninth floor his life was interrupted by a shotgun
blast
passing through a window, which killed him instantly.
Neither the shooter nor the deceased was aware that a safety net had
been
installed just below the eighth floor level to protect some building
workers and that Ronald Opus would not have been able to complete his
suicide the way he had planned. Ordinarily,"
Dr Mills continued, "A person who sets out to commit suicide and
ultimately Succeeds, even though the mechanism might not be what he
intended,is still defined as committing suicide."
That Mr Opus was shot on the way to certain death, but probably would
not
have been successful because of the safety net,caused the medical
examiner
to feel that he had a homicide on his hands.
In the room on the ninth floor, where the shotgun blast emanated, was
occupied by an elderly man and his wife. They were arguing vigorously
and
he was threatening her with a shotgun. The man was so upset that when
he
pulled the trigger he completely missed his wife and the pellets went
through the window striking Mr Opus. When one intends to kill subject
"A"
but kills subject "B" in the attempt, one is guilty of the murder of
subject "B."
When confronted with the murder charge the old man and his wife were
both
adamant and both said that they thought the shotgun was unloaded.The
old
man said it was a long-standing habit to threaten his wife with the
unloaded shotgun. He had no intention to murder her.
Therefore the killing of Mr Opus appeared to be an accident;that is, if
the gun had been accidentally loaded.
The continuing investigation turned up a witness who saw the old
couple's
son loading the shotgun about six weeks prior to the fatal accident.It
transpired that the old lady had cut off her son's financial support
and
the son, knowing the propensity of his father to use the shotgun
threateningly, loaded the gun with the expectation that his father
would
shoot his mother.
Since the loader of the gun was aware of this, he was guilty of the
murder
even though he didn't actually pull the trigger. The case now becomes
one
of murder on the part of the son for the death of Ronald Opus.
Now comes the exquisite twist.
Further investigation revealed that the son was, in fact, Ronald Opus.
He
had become increasingly despondent over the failure of his attempt to
engineer his mother's murder. This led him to jump off the ten story
building on March 23rd,only to be killed by a shotgun blast passing
through
the ninth story window. The son had actually murdered himself, so the
medical examiner closed the case as a suicide.
President
Dr Don Harper Mills astounded his audience with the legal complications
of
a bizarre death.
Here is the story.....
On March 23, 1994 the medical examiner viewed the body of Ronald Opus
and
concluded that he died from a shotgun wound to the head. Mr Opus had
jumped from the top of a ten-story building intending to commit
suicide. He
left a note to the effect indicating his despondency .
As he fell past the ninth floor his life was interrupted by a shotgun
blast
passing through a window, which killed him instantly.
Neither the shooter nor the deceased was aware that a safety net had
been
installed just below the eighth floor level to protect some building
workers and that Ronald Opus would not have been able to complete his
suicide the way he had planned. Ordinarily,"
Dr Mills continued, "A person who sets out to commit suicide and
ultimately Succeeds, even though the mechanism might not be what he
intended,is still defined as committing suicide."
That Mr Opus was shot on the way to certain death, but probably would
not
have been successful because of the safety net,caused the medical
examiner
to feel that he had a homicide on his hands.
In the room on the ninth floor, where the shotgun blast emanated, was
occupied by an elderly man and his wife. They were arguing vigorously
and
he was threatening her with a shotgun. The man was so upset that when
he
pulled the trigger he completely missed his wife and the pellets went
through the window striking Mr Opus. When one intends to kill subject
"A"
but kills subject "B" in the attempt, one is guilty of the murder of
subject "B."
When confronted with the murder charge the old man and his wife were
both
adamant and both said that they thought the shotgun was unloaded.The
old
man said it was a long-standing habit to threaten his wife with the
unloaded shotgun. He had no intention to murder her.
Therefore the killing of Mr Opus appeared to be an accident;that is, if
the gun had been accidentally loaded.
The continuing investigation turned up a witness who saw the old
couple's
son loading the shotgun about six weeks prior to the fatal accident.It
transpired that the old lady had cut off her son's financial support
and
the son, knowing the propensity of his father to use the shotgun
threateningly, loaded the gun with the expectation that his father
would
shoot his mother.
Since the loader of the gun was aware of this, he was guilty of the
murder
even though he didn't actually pull the trigger. The case now becomes
one
of murder on the part of the son for the death of Ronald Opus.
Now comes the exquisite twist.
Further investigation revealed that the son was, in fact, Ronald Opus.
He
had become increasingly despondent over the failure of his attempt to
engineer his mother's murder. This led him to jump off the ten story
building on March 23rd,only to be killed by a shotgun blast passing
through
the ninth story window. The son had actually murdered himself, so the
medical examiner closed the case as a suicide.
