Bush

Status
Not open for further replies.
taliban was supported by USA against Russians, financially n with arms. those who don't know it please don't read further.
where are USA watchdog when taliban hang president of afganistan on a xing. whenever Osama went to USA
(before taliban)where he stay n with whom.?
they attack afgan to find osama but he is nt there. they were nt there for taliban prima facia. what about who lost life there.
according to USA supporter, nting.
according to other 5% unjustice n takeovere the right of life.
 
rakeshmalik said:
I am really pleased to watch that people in india opposing presedent Bush.
He should not be allowed to enter in india. as they do with Narender Modi. like Modi he is also responsible for the death of lot of people.
Here in UK most of people don't like Bush or Tony. but in india we are ready to dive in the feet of a war criminel.

People did not opposed Bush visit, only muslim people did.

If you have not followed the polls, 71% approve him and 54% admire his ways.

Muslims opposed because of Bush's war on Iraq and afghanistan.

rakeshmalik said:
He should not be allowed to enter in india. as they do with Narender Modi. like Modi he is also responsible for the death of lot of people.
Here in UK most of people don't like Bush or Tony. but in india we are ready to dive in the feet of a war criminel


If that is the criteria almost every leader in the world can not visit India including Bush, Blair, Saudi King, Japenese PM, Australian PM, Chirac and so on.

Modi was not allowed because he was not important to US, if he would have been PM, then they cant deny him.

You are wrong that most of people in US and Britain dont like Bush & Blair. They may not agree with everything both the leaders did but there is difference between disagreement and disliking.

rakeshmalik said:
people choose BUSH n TONY for second term for the same reason as people choose Atal Bihari Vajpayee after Kargil battel.
create fear in people psyche and let them believe that u r the only person who can save them n its guarnteed 100% they wud vote 4 u.

Blair is very different personality, Blair can be compared to Clinton and he came to power because he was charismatic.

Bush played iraq-war card during second term but blair was in comfortable position, he did not won because of Iraq war.

rakeshmalik said:
if USA send army in india to save us from khalisthan militants or kashmiri militants.
can't u c this battel is for oil reserve.

Again wrong, war was not related to oil reserves. The most important reason was because saddam decided to trade in Euro instead of dollar. There are many other reasons as well.

rakeshmalik said:
Bush sr try one thing.
bt he don't know people are so week that there wudn't be any resistent if u take 1 country. but Bush jr know it. he did it. history books of future wud be writen like that if people nt think in narrow views.
status que is not narrow? it is indeed.
first tell me r u ok with d idea that one country can occupy other country.
british ruled indians, is it ok with u?

Thats the thing, world was never fair and it will never be fair. Friends changes but goal remains same.

rakeshmalik said:
hw can people think that india's nuclear progress depends on USA. indeed feel happy that USA giving sm liberties to india. are we a state of USA. a sovergien country don't need permission from other country for its personel activities.
Indira Gandi was quite rightly understood this n carry indian neuclear prog irrespective of pressure of other countries.
are USA, China or other take india permission when they develope their nuclear power or in present r these countries care about UN or other countries. NO.
but india have to. disrimination b/t countries n people find it encourising.

India is not giving up its nuclear program. Infact this deal is one sided and is completely in favour of India.

We have 8 nuclear military sites completely on our own, India is not opening those military site to foreign inspection.

Indira gandhi has to resist the pressure from US, china because they did not wanted India to have nuclear weapon. Now situation is different, US in effect has recognized India's nuclear status though not completely.

India's nuclear progress does depend on US because US has advance technology. We can carry on independent program but that will lead to slow progress. With US technology we get 20yr boost in nuclear technology. Isn't that good for India. This deal is also important for political reasons.

rakeshmalik said:
taliban was supported by USA against Russians, financially n with arms. those who don't know it please don't read further.
where are USA watchdog when taliban hang president of afganistan on a xing. whenever Osama went to USA
(before taliban)where he stay n with whom.?
they attack afgan to find osama but he is nt there. they were nt there for taliban prima facia. what about who lost life there.
according to USA supporter, nting.
according to other 5% unjustice n takeovere the right of life.

As i said, world is not fair and India is not superpower, rich and powerful always dictate terms. Wise-man dont resist authority instead they become authority. To become world's major power India should ally with US.

Only thing that matters is the way India handles the situation and so far Mr. Singh has done wonderful job for India.
 
Rakesh(or whatever your name is), looks like people have doubts over your identity... remember, this site is only for Hindu Jats and others can be banned...

-vinod

rakeshmalik said:
taliban was supported by USA against Russians, financially n with arms. those who don't know it please don't read further.
where are USA watchdog when taliban hang president of afganistan on a xing. whenever Osama went to USA
(before taliban)where he stay n with whom.?
they attack afgan to find osama but he is nt there. they were nt there for taliban prima facia. what about who lost life there.
according to USA supporter, nting.
according to other 5% unjustice n takeovere the right of life.
 
This was an excellent visit, and both countries were able to make great progress. It is also more important (and encouraging) to note that India and the general population did not get distracted by Bush's unpopularity and fumbling foreign policy practices in other parts of the world, for the most part. India capitalized on its interests and welcomed a fellow democratic superpower in grand fashion.

However, I am not too dismissive of the protests that were going on. They did number in the tens of thousands, from what the press was reporting. Even more interesting was the less-than-grand, maybe even a bit Grumpy reception in Pakistan. I would have guessed a "one upmanship" approach would have worked better in Pakistan. India definitely shined on this trip and showed the type of diplomacy a new Superpower is capable of.
 
rakeshmalik said:
taliban was supported by USA against Russians, financially n with arms. those who don't know it please don't read further.
where are USA watchdog when taliban hang president of afganistan on a xing. whenever Osama went to USA
(before taliban)where he stay n with whom.?
they attack afgan to find osama but he is nt there. they were nt there for taliban prima facia. what about who lost life there.
according to USA supporter, nting.
according to other 5% unjustice n takeovere the right of life.

US supported talibna when it was required. But then Taliban thought it could eat up its own boss. Now US is smoking them out.

What is your problem with their war games with each other ?

Bush' visit to India was opposed by Communists, Mullahs and Muslim/pro-muslim politicians. All these people have a consistent history of anti-national activities.

Bush is a killer. So he should be opposed. Though the people at the receiving end of his supposedly wrong policies are not remotely Indian. But the same people did not oppose Musharraf the killer. And Musharrqaf killed our own countrymen.

Bush' visit was good for India from many many angles. Other members have already elaborated on that.

One small question . Staying in England but pathetic in English. How ?????
 
People chose Blair because their only other choice was choosing the Tories (conservative party). Now all that "European Conservatism" has died out, thanks to "integration" and "public education." Its hip to be liberal and socialist in Europe.

I will agree with Rakesh for Bush's victory. There is an atmosphere of fear in the US. Even thous, Economy is turning out to be big factor in peoples's minds, during the 2004 elections "Terrorism" was the biggest factor in peoples' minds. Thanks to the then recent attacks, and the "media blitzkreig" promtoed by pro-bush people. Others voted just because Bush prays every day.

Anyhow, coming to the main point, I do not think we should stop anyone from coming to our country, as long as their motives are interpretably noble. Bush came, and spent millions of dollars. India got a lot of limelight in the US media. On the top of it all, I am glad that there will be a civilian nuclear power program in India. I have always rooted for privatization of such services.

Like it or not, India does need to be on good terms with the US. It is the world's largest economy. Majority of outsourcing that has boomed our economy comes from the US. There was a time when an American president came to India once in 25 years, at the best. He is the second consecutive US president to have visited India. This reflects our growing importance on the global stage.

Finally, I would like to talk about the Muslim protests in India during Bush's visit. I could see that most of the resentment came from the Muslims. I heard some Mslim leaders say things like: Bush must not be allowed to set foot our "sacred soil." What a bullshit. Since when did Muslims start considering INdia as their "sacred soil." For centuries they have killed, robbed, pillaged, terrorised and oppressed our people. For centuries, inspite of being a majority Hindu country, we lived the lives worse than that of "chamaars." Even when they had their chance to have their own "Muslim nation," most of these A**holes did not leave us alone. Do not forget that there are more Muslims in India than in Pakistan, making India the second largest Muslim nation in the world. After partition they have constantly rioted doing the same killing and maiming, they did when they were in charge. The more dedicated ones became gangsters like Dawood and Shakeel, and operate from Pakistan and other Muslim nations. Even today so many Muslims marry off their daughters in Pakistan. Why? I can go on and on about the sympthy that Muslims in India carry for Pakistan, even though they are well aware of the fact that even today the Mohajirs (those muslims who migrated from India) in pakistan are a "second class community." We have our superstars in Kalam, Shahrukh, Salman, Aamir and others. But their Army recurited the first non-muslim Officer just last year. Hindus and other minorities did not have equal rights till recently. When Bush was in India, I was constantly watching news channels for related news and commentary. And guess what, the Anti-America and Anti-Bush placards, with thousands of muslims protesting and burning American flags, were all over the media. Americans take such things really seriously. Who likes bad things being said about their country in a foreign land? There was definitely a lot of negative reaction on the top of all the whinning about outsourcing. These jerks protested, just to make India look bad internationally, because they knew that the whole world was watching India when Bush was there.

Now some people will say that all Muslims aren't alike. Ok. Agree. I want the "good Muslims" to go and educate the "bad Muslims." Let them know that they must be grateful for living with peace and freedom, while Muslims in other countries hardly have any rights. Where execution by beheadings, and maimings are commong place, for the smallest of crimes. They live in a country where they have an equal opportunity just like others. A country where a Muslim can do anything including becoming a the President. There should be a zero-tolerance policy for "Islamic fanatacism." Firearms must be legalized in India, so that we can take care of all those loud-mouthed mullahs and qazis. You want to declare a "fatwa," go to Pakistan and do it. This is a free society,where people have rights.

I am sorry if you think I flipped off. Recent events have just made me really bitter towards Islam. Then I have been re-analyzing historical "Islam-related" events. All this has made me very allerigic to Islam. But, I am sure there are a lot of fellow members who harbor similar feelings. We live in a Hindu nation. There is no doubt about it. More than the religion, it is the cultural ties that bring us together. And we all must be proud of it. Centuries of Islamic operation, and western domination has failed to frey our society. Even though we are older than the Mecca or Jerusalem, we stand strong like the "rock of Gibraltar." Hinduism is the reason for our unity. Lets take it seriously for once and raise our heads high with our chests filled with pride.
 
are tu isse comment chodega ek nahi tu sai kun

rakeshmalik said:
taliban was supported by USA against Russians, financially n with arms. those who don't know it please don't read further.
where are USA watchdog when taliban hang president of afganistan on a xing. whenever Osama went to USA
(before taliban)where he stay n with whom.?
they attack afgan to find osama but he is nt there. they were nt there for taliban prima facia. what about who lost life there.
according to USA supporter, nting.
according to other 5% unjustice n takeovere the right of life.


Arre bhai tu kame hadd te bati samjhdar lage se tu yadde apni positve comment bheja kar na ki negetive. ya site te bhai pure jata tai se na ki others tai tu. maine tu inn baata te kati ohter category ka lage se .
 
dahiyarules said:
People chose Blair because their only other choice was choosing the Tories (conservative party). Now all that "European Conservatism" has died out, thanks to "integration" and "public education." Its hip to be liberal and socialist in Europe.

I will agree with Rakesh for Bush's victory. There is an atmosphere of fear in the US. Even thous, Economy is turning out to be big factor in peoples's minds, during the 2004 elections "Terrorism" was the biggest factor in peoples' minds. Thanks to the then recent attacks, and the "media blitzkreig" promtoed by pro-bush people. Others voted just because Bush prays every day.

Anyhow, coming to the main point, I do not think we should stop anyone from coming to our country, as long as their motives are interpretably noble. Bush came, and spent millions of dollars. India got a lot of limelight in the US media. On the top of it all, I am glad that there will be a civilian nuclear power program in India. I have always rooted for privatization of such services.

Like it or not, India does need to be on good terms with the US. It is the world's largest economy. Majority of outsourcing that has boomed our economy comes from the US. There was a time when an American president came to India once in 25 years, at the best. He is the second consecutive US president to have visited India. This reflects our growing importance on the global stage.

Finally, I would like to talk about the Muslim protests in India during Bush's visit. I could see that most of the resentment came from the Muslims. I heard some Mslim leaders say things like: Bush must not be allowed to set foot our "sacred soil." What a bullshit. Since when did Muslims start considering INdia as their "sacred soil." For centuries they have killed, robbed, pillaged, terrorised and oppressed our people. For centuries, inspite of being a majority Hindu country, we lived the lives worse than that of "chamaars." Even when they had their chance to have their own "Muslim nation," most of these A**holes did not leave us alone. Do not forget that there are more Muslims in India than in Pakistan, making India the second largest Muslim nation in the world. After partition they have constantly rioted doing the same killing and maiming, they did when they were in charge. The more dedicated ones became gangsters like Dawood and Shakeel, and operate from Pakistan and other Muslim nations. Even today so many Muslims marry off their daughters in Pakistan. Why? I can go on and on about the sympthy that Muslims in India carry for Pakistan, even though they are well aware of the fact that even today the Mohajirs (those muslims who migrated from India) in pakistan are a "second class community." We have our superstars in Kalam, Shahrukh, Salman, Aamir and others. But their Army recurited the first non-muslim Officer just last year. Hindus and other minorities did not have equal rights till recently. When Bush was in India, I was constantly watching news channels for related news and commentary. And guess what, the Anti-America and Anti-Bush placards, with thousands of muslims protesting and burning American flags, were all over the media. Americans take such things really seriously. Who likes bad things being said about their country in a foreign land? There was definitely a lot of negative reaction on the top of all the whinning about outsourcing. These jerks protested, just to make India look bad internationally, because they knew that the whole world was watching India when Bush was there.

Now some people will say that all Muslims aren't alike. Ok. Agree. I want the "good Muslims" to go and educate the "bad Muslims." Let them know that they must be grateful for living with peace and freedom, while Muslims in other countries hardly have any rights. Where execution by beheadings, and maimings are commong place, for the smallest of crimes. They live in a country where they have an equal opportunity just like others. A country where a Muslim can do anything including becoming a the President. There should be a zero-tolerance policy for "Islamic fanatacism." Firearms must be legalized in India, so that we can take care of all those loud-mouthed mullahs and qazis. You want to declare a "fatwa," go to Pakistan and do it. This is a free society,where people have rights.

I am sorry if you think I flipped off. Recent events have just made me really bitter towards Islam. Then I have been re-analyzing historical "Islam-related" events. All this has made me very allerigic to Islam. But, I am sure there are a lot of fellow members who harbor similar feelings. We live in a Hindu nation. There is no doubt about it. More than the religion, it is the cultural ties that bring us together. And we all must be proud of it. Centuries of Islamic operation, and western domination has failed to frey our society. Even though we are older than the Mecca or Jerusalem, we stand strong like the "rock of Gibraltar." Hinduism is the reason for our unity. Lets take it seriously for once and raise our heads high with our chests filled with pride.

Sumit bilkul 16 anne ki baat kahi. Jat ki ek hi kafi hai.
 
vinodks said:
Rakesh(or whatever your name is), looks like people have doubts over your identity... remember, this site is only for Hindu Jats and others can be banned...

-vinod

mere identity layke tane ke naster lane hai bagri bhai.

melgya ke saboot, ak kateaa kagaj le ke managa
.
 
Last edited:
i am writing this coz I don't want to take u people out of ur comfort zone. sm of u think that i am outsider but m not.
most people feel safe if they shared their thoughts with majority.
It’s a good thing if majority of people think like u. and if u thinks that ur nt sharing the majority views than also its all right.
if 1 is not with majority or not sharing their common comfort thinking. Then it doesn't automatically mean that he is not from their caste or race. their is no criteria for a caste to think in 1 way only.
this was 1 of most ridiculous logic 1 could believe. I don't understand why people doesn't want to listen to different thought.
people try 2 built wall between the problem n themselves. instead they have to discuss it n solve...
most of my friends doesn't have any prob to share this world with any race or caste. we don't believe that we are superior to anybody or inferior to anybody. But me n my friends are small minority in jat community n i like that.
because we represent our caste n religion to others in much clear n honest way. whenever we talk 2 other people, we give them respect for whatever they are. coz that's what we believe. so those people think that all jats people are nice n have respect for others. we are very good ambassador of jat community than others narrow minded people. we could represent much better and let people think positive about jats. no need to tell that what damage the majority had already done to our caste. hw people think about us in india.
except 1 or 2 replies to both of my threads, i find nothing relevant.
people use it as time pass n its not other way around.
although its not relevent to thread, but anyhow i think this thread was closed much earlier from my side.
 
Last edited:
dahiyarules said:
Finally, I would like to talk about the Muslim protests in India during Bush's visit. I could see that most of the resentment came from the Muslims. I heard some Mslim leaders say things like: Bush must not be allowed to set foot our "sacred soil." What a bullshit. Since when did Muslims start considering INdia as their "sacred soil." For centuries they have killed, robbed, pillaged, terrorised and oppressed our people. For centuries, inspite of being a majority Hindu country, we lived the lives worse than that of "chamaars." Even when they had their chance to have their own "Muslim nation," most of these A**holes did not leave us alone. Do not forget that there are more Muslims in India than in Pakistan, making India the second largest Muslim nation in the world. After partition they have constantly rioted doing the same killing and maiming, they did when they were in charge. The more dedicated ones became gangsters like Dawood and Shakeel, and operate from Pakistan and other Muslim nations. Even today so many Muslims marry off their daughters in Pakistan. Why? I can go on and on about the sympthy that Muslims in India carry for Pakistan, even though they are well aware of the fact that even today the Mohajirs (those muslims who migrated from India) in pakistan are a "second class community." We have our superstars in Kalam, Shahrukh, Salman, Aamir and others. But their Army recurited the first non-muslim Officer just last year. Hindus and other minorities did not have equal rights till recently. When Bush was in India, I was constantly watching news channels for related news and commentary. And guess what, the Anti-America and Anti-Bush placards, with thousands of muslims protesting and burning American flags, were all over the media. Americans take such things really seriously. Who likes bad things being said about their country in a foreign land? There was definitely a lot of negative reaction on the top of all the whinning about outsourcing. These jerks protested, just to make India look bad internationally, because they knew that the whole world was watching India when Bush was there.

Now some people will say that all Muslims aren't alike. Ok. Agree. I want the "good Muslims" to go and educate the "bad Muslims." Let them know that they must be grateful for living with peace and freedom, while Muslims in other countries hardly have any rights. Where execution by beheadings, and maimings are commong place, for the smallest of crimes. They live in a country where they have an equal opportunity just like others. A country where a Muslim can do anything including becoming a the President. There should be a zero-tolerance policy for "Islamic fanatacism." Firearms must be legalized in India, so that we can take care of all those loud-mouthed mullahs and qazis. You want to declare a "fatwa," go to Pakistan and do it. This is a free society,where people have

either u never read our consitution or u don't have any belief in that. by calling muslims a** holes u only showing ur good nature?
n u also don't have any respect for the muslims soldiers who died for india or who still there serving so called ur india.
good muslims n bad muslims, u can use bad humen or good humen instead, but u didn't.
Islamic Fanatacism, how many muslims are in india n hw many are militents.
u r behaving like a child. accusing whole of religion for fault of few people. that's bad generalisation.
 
Last edited:
my two cents...

This thread was started on effects of Bush's visit to India. So lets keep it in that direction.

I agree with most people here that India has gained enormous ground with this particular visit of a US president, however, I'm a bit sceptical as to how Bush is going to make India payback for this huge favour. He is a good businessman and I dont think he would grant such favours based on purely altruistic motives of both the countries being democratic or fighting against the same thing-terrorism. One example has already been set by Indian governemnt voting against Iran in the UN resolution.

I think Rakesh has raised a valid point that Indian government should not be happy and complacent with the achievements from Bush's visit but should be watchful that their position in the world (with other nations) and their foreign policy values are not compromised due to some American favours. If they can be strong enough to get deals out of America and have good economic terms with them, nothing like it but not at the cost of losing its reputation of a Swabhimaani country, which it is now.
 
rakeshmalik said:
either u never read our consitution or u don't have any belief in that. by calling muslims a** holes u only showing ur good nature?
n u also don't have any respect for the muslims soldiers who died for india or who still there serving so called ur india.
good muslims n bad muslims, u can use bad humen or good humen instead, but u didn't.
Islamic Fanatacism, how many muslims are in india n hw many are militents.
u r behaving like a child. accusing whole of religion for fault of few people. that's bad generalisation.

You know what dude, damn the constitution. Constitution is a tool that empowers the government, and not the people. It is designed in such a way that it enables the government to keep the power in its steel clutches. How accesible is an ordinary minister to an ordinary every day citizen like me and you. Forget about a minister, you will consider it good fortune if you can access his PA.I have read the constitution, and thats why I have come to this conclusion. I dont give a crap about the contitution, becuase it is the biggest and only barrier between individual liberty and abuse of power.

Coming to muslims serving in the military, they do serve the government. They do not serve me. All military personnel will defend the government befor ethey will defend you. Military is another tool besides the constitution that government uses to control the masses. I lost my sympathy for men in uniform long time ago. So, I am totally indifferent about hindus or muslims serving in the military. They are all government's pawns. And I am not farting in the air when I say this. Unfortunately all my family serves in the military, including my brother who is in the US Navy.

Coming back to good and bad muslims, what is your criteria for purging them based on their loyalties? I really have a hard time doing that. Their religion is evil. Their past is bloody. What have they done besides oppressing everyone they ruled over, that I should show them love. I do not mind showing my love for Mother Theresa or Dalai Lama, who have stuck their principles and have done immense good for the society.

Ok Rakesh, whoever you are, Mohammaed, Sayyed, Munir etc. etc., this is a jats only site. Prove your credentials. Is there one long time jatlander, or any jat who knows a jatlander who will vouch for your authenticity? I invite healthy debate form you on this forum, only if you are a hindu jat. Otherwise you are free to exchange emails with me.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
dahiyarules said:
Ok Rakesh, whoever you are, Mohammaed, Sayyed, Munir etc. etc., this is a jats only site. Prove your credentials. Is there one long time jatlander, or any jat who knows a jatlander who will vouch for your authenticity? I invite healthy debate form you on this forum, only if you are a hindu jat. Otherwise you are free to exchange emails with me.
but i don't think u have a healthy mind buddy. no respect for constitution, which we get after such a great struggle. u can't understand yankee, from USA world looks b`ful to u.

nw born individualistic first start respecting others.
i don't have any prob if i was born as mohd,sayyed,mark,phillip or with any other name.
its better if next time u give ur view about thread only.

 
rakeshmalik said:
but i don't think u have a healthy mind buddy. no respect for constitution, which we get after such a great struggle. u can't understand yankee, from USA world looks b`ful to u.

nw born individualistic first start respecting others.
i don't have any prob if i was born as mohd,sayyed,mark,phillip or with any other name.
its better if next time u give ur view about thread only.


You must be a genius doctor dost. You can analysze people's mental condition on an online forum.

Read my arguments against the constitution. What do you mean by "we got it after all the struggle." What good did it do for the oridinary man." The government has always twisted it and used it for its own narrow purposes. If you have ability answer my post. Dont just fly thing out of you know where, and deviate from the argument.

Dont give me this secular crap. No one in the world is really open minded. I always ask this question to nutheads like you. If you had a daughter, would you have married her off to a muslim guy from Pakistan? I dont think so. If your answer is yes, then I think you are actually as stupid as you are in your posts. Get a reality check.
 
Malik saab self-analysis kar lai

Malik saab,

Aap badi jajbati baatien kar rahe ho constitution ko lekar. You need to do a bit of self-analysis here.

You said - We struggled a lot for constitution. The fact is that you didn't have any say in the constituion. You seems to have read some bits of it. And since 99.9999999....% indians have not read it so you think you own it. How can you expect 99.9999999....% indians to respect constitution when they don't know what the hell is that and I bet for 99% of our political leaders also this will be a googly. :)

'Good human bad human' - Badi badi baatein chodkar moti baat sun lai bhai . Islamic fundamentalism is worldwide problem and that is a fact.
-
 
YogeshJagal said:
Malik saab,

Aap badi jajbati baatien kar rahe ho constitution ko lekar. You need to do a bit of self-analysis here.

You said - We struggled a lot for constitution. The fact is that you didn't have any say in the constituion. You seems to have read some bits of it. And since 99.9999999....% indians have not read it so you think you own it. How can you expect 99.9999999....% indians to respect constitution when they don't know what the hell is that and I bet for 99% of our political leaders also this will be a googly. :)


-
u can read 1 line of consti preamble : india is a sovergine state.
that was struggle. it means on india there is no control of any other nation of this world. n v get this after english left in 1947.
mere bhai, agar 99% logo ne consti nahi pada to isse consti badal to nahi jayga. this s d irony in india. lack of knowledge is no defence in eye of law n in commen sence also.
v r writing on this site freely coz consti allow us u/fundamentel rights.
if there was restriction of expression of thoughts, then v can't write or exchange views.
eb kise ne ginte nahi aandi to este 1 or 1 paanch to koni ban jya gay.
our govt, beaurocracy or every policy n law have to relevent to the language n means of whatever is written there in consti.
v can't manuplate it according to our comfort legelly.
there is something above to humen emotions, coz emotions n felling might change accoring to personel comfort, but there sud be sm thing which have a helicopter view n i.e consti.
if anybody decide to say i hate muslims n don't want them in india, then he or c can try it publically. coz he have the right to express his or her view but bound to obey art of consti that: freedom of expression sud not be unlimited n can't be use to say smthing offended to others religion.
u know people try to behave brave but they are not.
anybody hate muslims please try his views in front of law n he could understand what is law or consti.
coz if i hate smthing then i have beliefe in me that i can say it anywhere, whether in front of public,magistrate,president or judge.
but people here always choose middle way. they hate but don't try to go to wrong side of law. double standard which i hate most n only followers have this cowardness of not expression.
i like every religion of this world coz i only c a human not what is his religion, n i have no shame n fear of saying it anywhere in d world, n i mean anywhere dear.
n this ans is for everybody who read it.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top