Challenges and Chances before AAP

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lekin Bhaisaab, Amethi se chunaav ladna uski ek badi planning lagti hai.

1. People started taking AK seriously in Delhi when he declared that he will contest only and only against heavy weight Shiela Dickshit. Seems Kumar wants to go the same way.
2. Even if he loses, he is attracting the "media" and getting popularity, and his business is going to increase manyfold..........already he asks for 4-5 lakhs per show.
3. If he succeeds in limiting Rahul / Priyanka's campaign only to this constituency to an extent - he will be making a big dent in overall Congress prospects as they will not be able to consider this as safe seat and campaign for others. This is win win for BJP.
4. Win win for Amethi Janata..... at least.... Rahul and Mummy Sonia will be serious about their losing ground and thus will think of some real development in the area.

...anyways BJP is likely coming to power in center, I believe people of Amethi should show doors to Rahul Gandhi at least once ( BJP candidate can be voted) - Hamesha ke liye Gandhi parivaar ki aankhein khul jaayengi :victorious:




sanjaymalik said:
only a miracle can help his son to win against Rahul in Amethi claim his father.. his father wanted him to contests Loksabha election from some safe seat in Delhi
http://daily.bhaskar.com/article/DE...-gandhi-kumar-vishwas-father-4507355-NOR.html
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
anilsangwan said:
Lekin Bhaisaab, Amethi se chunaav ladna uski ek badi planning lagti hai.

1. People started taking AK seriously in Delhi when he declared that he will contest only and only against heavy weight Shiela Dickshit. Seems Kumar wants to go the same way.
2. Even if he loses, he is attracting the "media" and getting popularity, and his business is going to increase manyfold..........already he asks for 4-5 lakhs per show.
3. If he succeeds in limiting Rahul / Priyanka's campaign only to this constituency to an extent - he will be making a big dent in overall Congress prospects as they will not be able to consider this as safe seat and campaign for others. This is win win for BJP.
4. Win win for Amethi Janata..... at least.... Rahul and Mummy Sonia will be serious about their losing ground and thus will think of some real development in the area.

...anyways BJP is likely coming to power in center, I believe people of Amethi should show doors to Rahul Gandhi at least once ( BJP candidate can be voted) - Hamesha ke liye Gandhi parivaar ki aankhein khul jaayengi :victorious:
Click to expand...

Agreed with your all points, Vishwas have nothing to loose even in defeat.
 
In my opinion; Safe seat for AAP candidate can be anyone, which meets the criteria of constituency having a candidate with these credentials

1. Dishonest (Did he do what he promised)
2. Corrupted (focus on how many fold his asset increased after he was elected)
3. Illiterate (Does he understand what is up for)
4. Dynasty (Was he elected just because of his ancestary)
5. Change (What positive change did he bring after he got elected)
6. Funds utilization (Did he used the MP fund for his relatives or for real work)
7. Criminal background
7. etc...(for regional issues)
 
mann123 said:
In my opinion; Safe seat for AAP candidate can be anyone, which meets the criteria of constituency having a candidate with these credentials

1. Dishonest (Did he do what he promised)
2. Corrupted (focus on how many fold his asset increased after he was elected)
3. Illiterate (Does he understand what is up for)
4. Dynasty (Was he elected just because of his ancestary)
5. Change (What positive change did he bring after he got elected)
6. Funds utilization (Did he used the MP fund for his relatives or for real work)
7. Criminal background
7. etc...(for regional issues)
Click to expand...

Good disqualifications of failed representatives of people !

These could suit any party candidate, what is so special for AAP !
 
Kejriwal's decisions of holding janta durbar and protest in front of Rail Bhawan reminds me of "MOHAMMAD BIN TUGHLAQ" - a 14th century ruler of Delhi, who was highly educated & a genius, yet his major decisions failed miserably and backfired.... forcing him to change his decisions......but it was the DELHI people who suffered the most alongwith the state economy of that time.
 
rohittewatia said:
Kejriwal's decisions of holding janta durbar and protest in front of Rail Bhawan reminds me of "MOHAMMAD BIN TUGHLAQ" - a 14th century ruler of Delhi, who was highly educated & a genius, yet his major decisions failed miserably and backfired.... forcing him to change his decisions......but it was the DELHI people who suffered the most alongwith the state economy of that time.
Click to expand...

Md. Tughlaq possessed a very high opinion about his genius and his character was mixture of opposites. That is why he could not involve many people in decision making and all his five experiments failed.

It is good to be honest but to label others as dishonest and corrupt without any rhyme and reason violates Article 21 of the constitution !

However, AAP leadership is also busy in selling certificates of who is 'corrupt' and who is not, without providing proof ! It is to be seen if this tactic results in their success at the hustings or boomerangs !!
 
DrRajpalSingh said:
Md. Tughlaq possessed a very high opinion about his genius and his character was mixture of opposites. That is why he could not involve many people in decision making and all his five experiments failed.

It is good to be honest but to label others as dishonest and corrupt without any rhyme and reason violates Article 21 of the constitution !

However, AAP leadership is also busy in selling certificates of who is 'corrupt' and who is not, without providing proof ! It is to be seen if this tactic results in their success at the hustings or boomerangs !!
Click to expand...

Congress leadership accuses whole BJP of corruption and communal-ism and BJP accuses whole of congress leadership as corrupt! AAp hasn't made any such sweeping remark but named most of leaders who either have been charged with corruption or some inquiry is on about some corruption charges! Nothing new in that!
What they have said, " public knows that they are corrupt and the public should make sure to defeat them in the forth coming election".

Cheers!
 
Zero tolerance policy in critical reviews of Kejriwal by his adversaries is only a testimony to his impeccable integrity which is causing nervousness. It is but natural that blind-folded followers of the old guards will accept his criticism without going into any further analysis as their brain is already tuned otherwise.
 
AAP has come out supporting Khaps! Where is Phool bhai.............? :)

On a serious note, I saw the TimeNow debate on this topic and Arnab began haranguing AAP's Prof Anand Kumar from the very go. Neither did he let him complete when the Prof spoke about 'a balance between traditional (Khaps) and constitutional (legal) systems', nor he allowed him to respond to the other panelists comments. He is a bully of the first order and it always seems like he begins the discussion according to his own agenda instead of the discussion coming to a conclusion. Its hardly a discussion though and more like an inquisition!

Here's a comment from one of my FB friends:
"Mr Goswami, you are at your best tonight," AAP’s Prof Anand Kumar, at the receiving end of Times Now's inquisition, told Arnab on Friday (Jan 31) night, showing a patience rare on Arnab’s show. Not only did Goswami start the show by passing judgment on AAP as a "khap supporter", but without letting the professor complete his points, called in his battery of panellists to take on his "anteduvelian" views. The professor's opening submission – that khap panchayats are a traditional reality that exist despite the Constitution, and must be grappled with – made sense even to the lay viewer. So how come the erudite Mr Goswami didn't get it? An agenda at work? A similar agenda was seen in Sagarika Ghose’s Face the Nation on 'one month of AAP', when she tried, in vain, to get Capt Gopinath to bad-mouth AAP, having failed thoroughly to get the same result from Medha Patkar.
 
I challenge Arnab Goswami for an open debate about his caste based agenda of targeting just one social institution out of hundreds in India in his Newshour debates of 31st Jan, 2014 through Timesnow T.V. Channel. Come on Arnab Goswami and let's talk about that out of our social Framework, which one is legally recognized and which one not and why? You bring the your best and worst stands with examples and assertions you wish on this and I bring mine and lets debate with condition to fact that not even a single second of our debate will be edited by your news channel and should telecaste as it is.

Any friend from my friend-list or circle is free to convey this message to Goswami, instead I would be thankful to him/her for the same. - Phool Kumar Malik



swaich said:
AAP has come out supporting Khaps! Where is Phool bhai.............? :)

On a serious note, I saw the TimeNow debate on this topic and Arnab began haranguing AAP's Prof Anand Kumar from the very go. Neither did he let him complete when the Prof spoke about 'a balance between traditional (Khaps) and constitutional (legal) systems', nor he allowed him to respond to the other panelists comments. He is a bully of the first order and it always seems like he begins the discussion according to his own agenda instead of the discussion coming to a conclusion. Its hardly a discussion though and more like an inquisition!

Here's a comment from one of my FB friends:
"Mr Goswami, you are at your best tonight," AAP’s Prof Anand Kumar, at the receiving end of Times Now's inquisition, told Arnab on Friday (Jan 31) night, showing a patience rare on Arnab’s show. Not only did Goswami start the show by passing judgment on AAP as a "khap supporter", but without letting the professor complete his points, called in his battery of panellists to take on his "anteduvelian" views. The professor's opening submission – that khap panchayats are a traditional reality that exist despite the Constitution, and must be grappled with – made sense even to the lay viewer. So how come the erudite Mr Goswami didn't get it? An agenda at work? A similar agenda was seen in Sagarika Ghose’s Face the Nation on 'one month of AAP', when she tried, in vain, to get Capt Gopinath to bad-mouth AAP, having failed thoroughly to get the same result from Medha Patkar.
Click to expand...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top