What is paraded as journalism by capturing airwaves/print by the likes of Tehelka, NDTV Prannoy Roy, India Today Aroon Poories, CNN Rajdeep Sardesai, N. Ram of Hindu and others has little to do with journalism. The same people tirading against Narendra Modi will crawl in front of Sonia like dogs wagging their tails. What is the real interest of these people? Do they want to contribute to growth of India or they want to divide on communal basis. All Gujartis irresepective of their religion are benefitting from the progress of the state and don't we want to put that as model for growth and emulate in all parts of the country?
In a democracy, no one should be held sacrosanct and it is the duty of journalism to expose the culprits from any section. But what if the journalists themselves culprits with an agenda of their own. They put a label and dismiss the message that goes against their agenda.
If the real interest of the media is exposing the culprits, why did they also not go after Sonia with all the corruption and division of country which threatens the security and unity of the country? Why do they not go after the Sikh Riots where 3000 sikhs burnt alive, before the Punjab elections? How about the mysterious deaths of Rajesh Pilot, Madhav Rao Scindia etc at the same time Sonia rose in congress? What about the carnage victims in the train in Godhra? Why do they not go after Rahul being anointed as next PM with little regards to ability or eligibility? Why are they not going after government that has done little to curb terrorism? What have they done about Kashmir terrorism? Can they make a video of the terrorists in Kashmir and show it?
Are Muslims innocent? A friend of mine told us a story how in Hyderabad his uncle who owed money to a Muslim moneylender, his aunt and two daughters were taken away for non-payment in time and they never saw them. This was in 1977 and somone did see the aunt after several years with purdah and she told the daughters are sold and was afraid to even talk for more than few minutes.
Can anyone of these Journalists define what secularism is? Is secularism the destruction of one section to the advantage of another. How dare NDTV runs a show on questioning the faith in Sabarimala flame? Will they do same thing about Christ coming alive after being crucified or about Virgin birth? Will the same people dare to talk about the treatment of women in Islam? Did they have guts to talk when Taslima was threatened to be beheaded by fundamentalists. Mr. N. Ram who says Danish Cartoons are wrong declares that Hussain paintings of nude Hindu gods or goddesses are artistic expressions? Did he question why Hussain never painted Muhammad or his (Muhammad's) daughter the same way? Does he has anything to say about rampant illegal conversions going on in the country.
The same journalists compare India with America. How many terrorist events happened since 2001 in US whereas Indian Govt in pursuit of vote bank politics resulted in the maximum number of terrorist victims since the current Government came into power. In spite of so much slavery which killed 50 million African Americans (which church justified that they do not have souls), they are removing any affirmative action policies whereas India purusing division of country for power and dynasty. While Bobby Jindal conversion to Christianity helped him get elected, Sonia Gandhi voted with many who are Hindus, disdains Hinduism, declares their sacred God is mythological and reduces the number of Hindu holidays in a country with 70% Hindus to same or even less than the the other sections. Holi or even Rama Navami are removed from Government holiday lists. What does the Indian media have to say about this?
Can anyone of these journalists survive even for one day in any islamic country if they talk even a fraction of about Islam the way they talk about Hinduism in India? What do these people want? Convert the whole country into Islam and Christian and wipe out Hinduism? Or convert Hindus into second class citizens? Is this what Mahatma Gandhi dreamed of when he went out of his way to protect minorities? Did these people read history of India for last 700 years without prejudice?
The list can go on... and it only says these dogs have little self respect and they are simply sold. They are untouchable criminals of the Indian society. If you pay them or threaten them enough, they will do anyone's bidding. It is sacred duty of evey sensible citizen to eliminate these type of journalism in whatever means possible. Perhaps it is time to issue fatwas at these people.
Surinder Singh
In a democracy, no one should be held sacrosanct and it is the duty of journalism to expose the culprits from any section. But what if the journalists themselves culprits with an agenda of their own. They put a label and dismiss the message that goes against their agenda.
If the real interest of the media is exposing the culprits, why did they also not go after Sonia with all the corruption and division of country which threatens the security and unity of the country? Why do they not go after the Sikh Riots where 3000 sikhs burnt alive, before the Punjab elections? How about the mysterious deaths of Rajesh Pilot, Madhav Rao Scindia etc at the same time Sonia rose in congress? What about the carnage victims in the train in Godhra? Why do they not go after Rahul being anointed as next PM with little regards to ability or eligibility? Why are they not going after government that has done little to curb terrorism? What have they done about Kashmir terrorism? Can they make a video of the terrorists in Kashmir and show it?
Are Muslims innocent? A friend of mine told us a story how in Hyderabad his uncle who owed money to a Muslim moneylender, his aunt and two daughters were taken away for non-payment in time and they never saw them. This was in 1977 and somone did see the aunt after several years with purdah and she told the daughters are sold and was afraid to even talk for more than few minutes.
Can anyone of these Journalists define what secularism is? Is secularism the destruction of one section to the advantage of another. How dare NDTV runs a show on questioning the faith in Sabarimala flame? Will they do same thing about Christ coming alive after being crucified or about Virgin birth? Will the same people dare to talk about the treatment of women in Islam? Did they have guts to talk when Taslima was threatened to be beheaded by fundamentalists. Mr. N. Ram who says Danish Cartoons are wrong declares that Hussain paintings of nude Hindu gods or goddesses are artistic expressions? Did he question why Hussain never painted Muhammad or his (Muhammad's) daughter the same way? Does he has anything to say about rampant illegal conversions going on in the country.
The same journalists compare India with America. How many terrorist events happened since 2001 in US whereas Indian Govt in pursuit of vote bank politics resulted in the maximum number of terrorist victims since the current Government came into power. In spite of so much slavery which killed 50 million African Americans (which church justified that they do not have souls), they are removing any affirmative action policies whereas India purusing division of country for power and dynasty. While Bobby Jindal conversion to Christianity helped him get elected, Sonia Gandhi voted with many who are Hindus, disdains Hinduism, declares their sacred God is mythological and reduces the number of Hindu holidays in a country with 70% Hindus to same or even less than the the other sections. Holi or even Rama Navami are removed from Government holiday lists. What does the Indian media have to say about this?
Can anyone of these journalists survive even for one day in any islamic country if they talk even a fraction of about Islam the way they talk about Hinduism in India? What do these people want? Convert the whole country into Islam and Christian and wipe out Hinduism? Or convert Hindus into second class citizens? Is this what Mahatma Gandhi dreamed of when he went out of his way to protect minorities? Did these people read history of India for last 700 years without prejudice?
The list can go on... and it only says these dogs have little self respect and they are simply sold. They are untouchable criminals of the Indian society. If you pay them or threaten them enough, they will do anyone's bidding. It is sacred duty of evey sensible citizen to eliminate these type of journalism in whatever means possible. Perhaps it is time to issue fatwas at these people.
Surinder Singh
