Couldnt find the suitable TITLE for this?

Status
Not open for further replies.

vpannu

Active member
Spanish PM Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero came to India on an official visit but he cut short his visit and went back to Spain immediately because of a train accident in Spanish city of Valencia,only around 30 people were killed.In Mumbai, bomb exploded and about 200 people killed and soon after our PM Mr.Manmohan Singh went to St. Petersburg for G8 submit (he convinced Indian media and people by saying that he would raise this terrible incident of terrorism in that meeting),where he got almost null support from the so-called 'superpowers'.
Shouldnt he had waited for things to settle down here? Was that summit too important than lives of those people who got killed in that tragedy?:mad:​
 
Last edited:
I would not compare things like this. Spain's situation is totally different. PM's going to G8 was a very smart diplomatic decision to get support and sympathy of the G8 and the rest. I would say he should have gone there even if he was not planning to.

India as a country never got the kind of support it is getting now due to similar diplomatic and international relations with WEST, earlier it was all about Russia which was cornered by the rest of the world anyways.
 
I would not compare things like this. Spain's situation is totally different. PM's going to G8 was a very smart diplomatic decision to get support and sympathy of the G8 and the rest. I would say he should have gone there even if he was not planning to.

India as a country never got the kind of support it is getting now due to similar diplomatic and international relations with WEST, earlier it was all about Russia which was cornered by the rest of the world anyways.



I agree....It is not that he is not concerned.
 
What support do we need?

Spain's situation is totally different
Chillar Bhaaisaab, the only differences I could see are the Population and the value of life in both these countries.
57 people died in London tube train blasts and this was made the headline of the newspapers of the world and the whole world was baffled by that.
What kind of support do we need?
Lets suppose if Bush says"The act of terror in Mumbai was highly condemnable and we support India in its battle against terror" or he can just blame any terrorist group with Pakistani roots.If you call this as support then I would say it doesnt mean anything for the families of those who got killled in blast.That is not a support at all.
 
Last edited:
Don't go by Emotions

Mr. Pannu's post shows the emotional outbrust against the establishment/ say the ruling party. This is the kind of politics played in our country, as people don't have worth while issues to bring to the people in order to get political support. Media itself is not unbiased and tows the line of favored political parties. The try to sensanalise the news so that people get attracted to it. Mr. Pannu's post looks to me more into this line.
Now let us discuss the issues raised by the author of the post.
1. Firstly, Mr. Manmohan Singh cancelling his visit and attending the victims. Well if he was not doing any thing then it would have been a very good gesture. Don't expect PM of the country to be present every where. Let the people on ground do the work they are suppose to do. There is a home minister and there is a CM of the state, apart from the long line of civil officials who are suppose to be acting in such situations.
2. Getting diplomatic support. I guess the entire world have condemned these attacks. These news were very well coverd in US media and I am sure must have been covered in other countries. The problem with such reporting is that the terrorists want exactly that. While the people do have right to no, and media does have the duty to inform, sensanalizing the news has the negative effects on the efforts of the govts to control the terrorism.
3. President's Bush's reaction. Well apart from making the statement, he is not expected to do any thing else. It has not be proved as yet as to who did it? The rule of the law is that a person is not guilty unless proved otherwise. We know that Pakistan is supporting the terrorism, however when it comes to proving it, it becomes difficult at the international level.
I think we made a big mistake by not taking actions after the terrorists attack on Parliament. The unfortunate part is that the then Govt. did moblize the military thus spending the major cost of the war, and yet chickened out to cross the border.
Terrorism is going to be the order of the day. We have to be strong enough to face it. We need to take actions at our level also, and not leave every thing to the govt. There is a lot that can be written on the subject. Let us not blame the government for every thing, and let us not expect our PM to be every where. I am sure he would visit Mumbai as some point of time.
 
Spanish PM Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero came to India on an official visit but he cut short his visit and went back to Spain immediately because of a train accident in Spanish city of Valencia,only around 30 people were killed.In Mumbai, bomb exploded and about 200 people killed and soon after our PM Mr.Manmohan Singh went to St. Petersburg for G8 submit (he convinced Indian media and people by saying that he would raise this terrible incident of terrorism in that meeting),where he got almost null support from the so-called 'superpowers'.
Shouldnt he had waited for things to settle down here? Was that summit too important than lives of those people who got killed in that tragedy?:mad:​

Your concern is meaningful but "Pyaasa hee koowein ke paas jata hai". He must be concerned about blasts but a miss at G8 means a missed opportunity of raising voices at international levels.

Otherwise also, cost of life in India ia very less. Israel can attack Lebanon only with the reason that they killed their 10 soldiers and in contrast, there are much more civilian and military deaths in Kashmir everyday...and we are yet to see any action from our Federal govt.
 
Difference

Your concern is meaningful but "Pyaasa hee koowein ke paas jata hai". He must be concerned about blasts but a miss at G8 means a missed opportunity of raising voices at international levels.

Otherwise also, cost of life in India ia very less. Israel can attack Lebanon only with the reason that they killed their 10 soldiers and in contrast, there are much more civilian and military deaths in Kashmir everyday...and we are yet to see any action from our Federal govt.
Navin, Spain's population is around 4.5 crore and India has more than 100 crore.Now as G8 has finished what we have got from that summit? That is all about diplomacy and politics.No one cares about people in India and thats very true indeed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top