Deependra hooda ki sagayee

Status
Not open for further replies.
yudhvirmor said:
Neelam ji Apake gaam main hoyi hai ke Deepender ke sagai??
Click to expand...

Na ji...humara gaon..gaon kam, town jyada hai.....baaki main jis profeesion mein hoon wahan aise logon ka aana-jana laga rahta hai aur hume unse related logon ko deal karke hi hatey hain abhi abhi....maine hi deal kiya tha n they only provided me this info. ki Bhupendra Bhaisaab ka rishta pakka ho gaya hai....sagai se pahle ka pata hai :)
 
choudharyneelam said:
Aap apni iss anokhi smile ke saath kya bayaan karna chahte hain....thora sa vistaar mein bataiye
Click to expand...

Kabhi kabhi sankshipt mein kehna behtar hota hai, the bit I was referring to had been quoted by me-
"ki Bhupendra Bhaisaab ka rishta pakka ho gaya hai....sagai se pahle ka pata hai "

I know you won't have wanted to say this, and I was just kidding...so pls don't take offense...
 
kapil.dalal said:
Kabhi kabhi sankshipt mein kehna behtar hota hai, the bit I was referring to had been quoted by me-
"ki Bhupendra Bhaisaab ka rishta pakka ho gaya hai....sagai se pahle ka pata hai "

I know you won't have wanted to say this, and I was just kidding...so pls don't take offense...
Click to expand...

Your thoughts :)...I can't turn their direction of flow that they r taking.

I remember those days also when once I wished Deependra on his b'day with warm wishes n ended with 'love n regards' which I use to do many times as I know how I take the meaning of my written or spoken words.....but the issue was made by ritu dear.....anyways....you people have the full right to tease/pull the leg but upto a limit a person does not get hurt...don't worry, I didn't felt like that :)

Rest, I don't like to give any clarifications about anything untill unless it is formally/purposefully required.

:)
 
anjoo said:
I disagree.
Agar koi public kii vajah se "public figure" bana hai, toh public kii marjii kii usse maala pehrave ya jooth bagawe!!!
Click to expand...

But on public issues not on the private ones.

Bottom line every one is a human being and he/she must be given at least his basic human rights!

Do you disagree?

Thank you,
Anil
 
My friend, who is quite eminent :D, got engaged. Did you read about it in the newspapers?
Jokes apart, I do agree with what you said. :)
anilsinghd said:
But on public issues not on the private ones.

Bottom line every one is a human being and he/she must be given at least his basic human rights!

Do you disagree?

Thank you,
Anil
Click to expand...
 
anjoo said:
I disagree.
Agar koi public kii vajah se "public figure" bana hai, toh public kii marjii kii usse maala pehrave ya jooth bagawe!!!
Click to expand...

I disagree with the disagreement. Joot/maala should be for his/her "public" deeds, not private ones. Unless of course if his/her private deeds involve larger ethical questions that create doubts on his/her suitability to hold public office.

I will take a controversial example. What Bill Clinton did with Monica Lewinsky was strictly their private affair as far as it was consensual. But as soon as the issue became about lying under oath/perjury/bribery/misusing office for malafide influence, it became a larger public issue (stating the ideal case as per me and not what happened in real. It became a hot issue with media anyways).
 
I can draw a story parallel to the one you have quoted. But I will refrain, because I am not concerned either way relative to this thread.
As I agreed with Anil earlier, I am with you in your comment that-
Joot/maala should be for his/her "public" deeds, not private ones. Unless of course if his/her private deeds involve larger ethical questions that create doubts on his/her suitability to hold public office.
kapil.dalal said:
I disagree with the disagreement. Joot/maala should be for his/her "public" deeds, not private ones. Unless of course if his/her private deeds involve larger ethical questions that create doubts on his/her suitability to hold public office.

I will take a controversial example. What Bill Clinton did with Monica Lewinsky was strictly their private affair as far as it was consensual. But as soon as the issue became about lying under oath/perjury/bribery/misusing office for malafide influence, it became a larger public issue (stating the ideal case as per me and not what happened in real. It became a hot issue with media anyways).
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
choudharyneelam said:
Na ji...humara gaon..gaon kam, town jyada hai.....baaki main jis profeesion mein hoon wahan aise logon ka aana-jana laga rahta hai aur hume unse related logon ko deal karke hi hatey hain abhi abhi....maine hi deal kiya tha n they only provided me this info. ki Bhupendra Bhaisaab ka rishta pakka ho gaya hai....sagai se pahle ka pata hai :)
Click to expand...

Perhaps you wanted to say "Bhupendra bhaisaab ke yahan rishta pakka ho gaya hai" :)
 
Sriman, Sirmatis, naujawano aur deviyon:
What is public life and what is private life?:confused:
Iss mamle mein janch padtal karne ke paschat yeh baat malumat hue hae.
Jaanch padtal internet tak semit hae.
dowry accusation ka mamla tha girl ke family ke taraf se. court mein case kiya tha. ladki waale lose kar gaye case ko. yeh tho public information hae.
Then yeh baat kya public life nahee?confused:
waise ladki ko divorce ke baad dusre shaadi karne mein problem aati haee. Uss ladki ka koi jikar nahe?:confused:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
amritkharb said:
Sriman, Sirmatis, naujawano aur deviyon:
What is public life and what is private life?:confused:
Iss mamle mein janch padtal karne ke paschat yeh baat malumat hue hae.
Jaanch padtal internet tak semit hae.
dowry accusation ka mamla tha girl ke family ke taraf se. court mein case kiya tha. ladki waale lose kar gaye case ko. yeh tho public information hae.
Then yeh baat kya public life nahee?confused:
waise ladki ko divorce ke baad dusre shaadi karne mein problem aati haee. Uss ladki ka koi jikar nahe?:confused:
Click to expand...

Information about one's private life can be in public domain. In fact, it is increasingly the trend courtesy the falling standards of journalism and pressure of delivering "what sells".

But the fact that an information has become public doesn't mean that it pertains to one's public life. What public knows or wants to know has nothing to do with what public NEEDS to know (which is what I'd term as public life- something public has a right to know through acts like RTI). It is human nature to be interested in gossipy masala that has no bearing on anyone apart from the individuals involved.
 
Jaatni ki Juban, Palat nahi sakti.!!!!

kapil.dalal said:
You must be brave to point it out after seeing 2 attempts at the same that were dealt with aggressively...:D
Click to expand...

Anju Madam ab toh jaakar apni post dekh lo ki aap kya kah rahe ho. Aur usko edit bhi kar dena. Aur agar apki baat sahi hai toh yeh toh news nahi sansani hogi. babu bete kathe chala karenge.

BTW wishes to couple.:)
 
Do you even know which posts are being referred to by Kapil? Oh sorry, I forgot that you are too blinded by your ego to have a reasonable thought.

dskadyan said:
Anju Madam ab toh jaakar apni post dekh lo ki aap kya kah rahe ho. Aur usko edit bhi kar dena. Aur agar apki baat sahi hai toh yeh toh news nahi sansani hogi. babu bete kathe chala karenge.

BTW wishes to couple.:)
Click to expand...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top