shail i know u have tact of playing around with words.and being in america u might have become so called modern.but atleast think before writing.arguments happen on all the topics.but the kind of vocabulary u r using i will never tolerate.either u edit it yourself or otherwise u have to.
...Hmmm, like I was trying to explain to Vivek, at the end of the day it's every man for himself... by that I mean; everyone finds their own way and nuances to deal with the opposite sex; and what can I say?...that's mine!!!![]()
Come on now...in all fairness I don't think there is anything hidden or between the lines in my post to really warrant a 'sarcastic' designation ....I think I made myself pretty clear as to what I wanted to say....that being the initial topic of this thread was unfortunately sidetracked and is degressing.
No...I know, I know... I haven't missed a beat... I too have read the other recent posts addressed to me just now and apparently no one likes to be told they were being a prude.............. (but god knows we have enough Male Chavunistic Pig's and Bra-burning women running around the world to start another debate on who is actually superior among the sexes, even here on our Jatland!...) so tell you what, I shall smile at that little try of a slap on my wrist and move on......... (you see? Every man for himself!?! Heh! Heh!![]()
![]()
)
NOTHING LIKE COMING BACK TO JATLAND AND BEING WELCOMED IN THE OLD TESTED STYLE! HEH! HEH!![]()
I still stand by my initial post: if anything the fairer opposite sex actually intimidates with their beauty, .....now the wits (if there) are a welcome thing, in fact a wonderful challenge...(and well, as to the dumb? ...dumb is as dumber does, insecure and always shouting from roof top that they are actually smart!)....