inld 39 vidansabha per lead kar rahi h wa bhi dusre ki jamanat jabt wali.............mp aly m sahri vote hi sare seen ko.change karte
h . issue bhi log alag samjhate h national level k ...........
Last edited:
General Election's Result : Live
- Thread starter samarkadian
- Start date
h . issue bhi log alag samjhate h national level k ...........
ya to bishnoi bjp m milega ya chand mohamad k sath videsh m kahi set hoga...
bjp bus is overcowded kuldeep may not find any seat to sit.your second advise fits hereya to bishnoi bjp m milega ya chand mohamad k sath videsh m kahi set hoga...
na bhai tahmnhe hema ji jite de to abb jat leader hema hogi ............sare issue solve ho jayge kissan k i hope ...:redface:
Last edited:
25 seats to aisi hai Haryana mein jahan Jats apne dum par MLA ban sakte hai agar united rahe to ..
30 seats aisi hai jahan Jat support ke bina koi MLA nahi ban sakta ..
Is hisab se Jats have direct or indirect impact on more than 45 seats in Haryana ..
BJP ki parampara rahi hai ki vo elections se pehle CM project kar deti hai ..
Agar non-jat ko project kar diya to Jat BJP ko vote nahi denge jahan tak mera manna hai..
Non-Jat mein bhi kuch khaas unity mujhe nahi dikhayi deti .. Agar Ahir project kar diya to Brahman anti ho jayenge aur agar Baniya project kar diya to Punjabi anti ho jayenge aur agar Pichda project kar diya to Dalit anti ho jayenge ..
Choutala ko pta hai ki Brahman,Baniya aur Ahir INLD ko kabhi vote nahi denge isliye vo doosri caste ke votes lega ..
Let BJP fight alone and project non-jat CM ... Jats will get united and that's what we want .
hemanthooda
New member
Does anyone have data - who got how many votes assembly segment wise?I guess Election commision will take some more time to upload form 20 on its website.
16वी लोकसभा के बारे मे कुछ दिलचस्प तथ्य:
ø इस बार यह देश की सबसे बूढ़ी लोकसभा चुनी गई है| देश के स्वतंत्र होने के बाद से चुनाव दर चुनाव, हर चुनाव में लोक सभा बुजुर्ग ही होती जा रही है।
ø कुल 543 सांसदों में 253 की औसत उम्र 54 साल से अधिक है। 15 वी लोकसभा मे यह 53 वर्ष थी |
ø 40 साल से कम उम्र के सिर्फ 13 %, यानी 71 सांसद हैं।
ø सबसे उम्रदराज सांसद बीजेपी के 86 वर्षीय लाल कृष्ण आडवाणी हैं।
ø सबसे युवा सांसद दुष्यंत चौटाला 26 वर्ष है | दूसरे युवा सांसद (26.5 वर्ष) मेरे निर्वाचन क्षेत्र से डा जयवर्धन, दक्षिण चेन्नई जो mbbs है और अभी md के छात्र है |
ø इस बार चुने गए सांसदों के औसत धनाढ्यता 14.6 करोड़ प्रति सांसद है | 15वी लोकसभा मे यह 5.3 करोड़ प्रति सांसद थी |
ø क्रिमिनल सांसदों के संख्या 34% है | 15वी लोकसभा मे यह 30% थी |
ø महिला सांसदों की संख्या 11%(62सांसद) है| 15वी लोकसभा मे भी 11% थी|
ø इस बार यह देश की सबसे बूढ़ी लोकसभा चुनी गई है| देश के स्वतंत्र होने के बाद से चुनाव दर चुनाव, हर चुनाव में लोक सभा बुजुर्ग ही होती जा रही है।
ø कुल 543 सांसदों में 253 की औसत उम्र 54 साल से अधिक है। 15 वी लोकसभा मे यह 53 वर्ष थी |
ø 40 साल से कम उम्र के सिर्फ 13 %, यानी 71 सांसद हैं।
ø सबसे उम्रदराज सांसद बीजेपी के 86 वर्षीय लाल कृष्ण आडवाणी हैं।
ø सबसे युवा सांसद दुष्यंत चौटाला 26 वर्ष है | दूसरे युवा सांसद (26.5 वर्ष) मेरे निर्वाचन क्षेत्र से डा जयवर्धन, दक्षिण चेन्नई जो mbbs है और अभी md के छात्र है |
ø इस बार चुने गए सांसदों के औसत धनाढ्यता 14.6 करोड़ प्रति सांसद है | 15वी लोकसभा मे यह 5.3 करोड़ प्रति सांसद थी |
ø क्रिमिनल सांसदों के संख्या 34% है | 15वी लोकसभा मे यह 30% थी |
ø महिला सांसदों की संख्या 11%(62सांसद) है| 15वी लोकसभा मे भी 11% थी|
16वी लोकसभा के चुने हुए सांसदों का व्योरा-
Ø 541 सांसदों में से 186 के खिलाफ कोई न कोई आपराधिक केस दर्ज है। पिछली बार ऐसे लोगों की संख्या 158 थी। इनमें 98 बीजेपी के, 8 कांग्रेस के, 35 एआईएडीएमके के, 18 शिवसेना के और 7 तृणमूल कांग्रेस के हैं । 8 सांसदों पर मर्डर के आरोप हैं।
Ø अमीर सांसद नंबर 1 श्री जयदेव गल्ला हैं, जिनकी घोषित संपत्ति 683 करोड़ रुपये है। वह आंध्र प्रदेश के गुंटूर से टीडीपी के एमपी हैं। दूसरे नंबर पर श्री विशेश्वर रेड्डी , टीआरएस के 528 करोड़ की दौलत के साथ के़ हैं। तीसरा नंबर आंध्रप्रदेश के ही नारसापुरम से बीजेपी सांसद गंगे राजू (288 करोड़) का है।
Ø सबसे गरीब सांसद श्री सुमेधानंद सरस्वती बीजेपी के (सीकर से) हैं, जिनके पास सिर्फ 34 हजार की संपत्ति है।
Ø 541 सांसदों में से 186 के खिलाफ कोई न कोई आपराधिक केस दर्ज है। पिछली बार ऐसे लोगों की संख्या 158 थी। इनमें 98 बीजेपी के, 8 कांग्रेस के, 35 एआईएडीएमके के, 18 शिवसेना के और 7 तृणमूल कांग्रेस के हैं । 8 सांसदों पर मर्डर के आरोप हैं।
Ø अमीर सांसद नंबर 1 श्री जयदेव गल्ला हैं, जिनकी घोषित संपत्ति 683 करोड़ रुपये है। वह आंध्र प्रदेश के गुंटूर से टीडीपी के एमपी हैं। दूसरे नंबर पर श्री विशेश्वर रेड्डी , टीआरएस के 528 करोड़ की दौलत के साथ के़ हैं। तीसरा नंबर आंध्रप्रदेश के ही नारसापुरम से बीजेपी सांसद गंगे राजू (288 करोड़) का है।
Ø सबसे गरीब सांसद श्री सुमेधानंद सरस्वती बीजेपी के (सीकर से) हैं, जिनके पास सिर्फ 34 हजार की संपत्ति है।
Even I took a day off from officeSuch is the excitement that my daughter has taken a day off from school to witness the results of 2014 Lok Sabha polls.
Imagine how excited all young and old are.
TV on since 6 am
Sir ji, ulta ho gya ye to
Bhai Pls correct me its 417/426 who could not save their deposits
He won and it adds to one more JAT MP, who gave vote who didn't is a matter no more. Yes in state elections this will be a major factor jat vs not-jat, then we have to act smart.
Modi didn't want HJC to win, ultimately INLD will support BJP, a win win for BJP. HJC n INLD were at stake not BJP, it was modi wave which got them 7 seats in haryana where BJP had very weak base
BJP's 31% lowest vote share of any party to win majority!
"The fact that the BJP has won a majority on its own in the 16th Lok Sabha has, inevitably, drawn comparisons with previous elections in which parties have won a majority of seats on their own. What has not quite figured in most of these comparisons is the fact that no party has ever before won more than half the seats with a vote share of just 31%. Indeed, the previous lowest vote share for a single-party majority was in 1967, when the Congress won 283 out of 520 seats with 40.8% of the total valid votes polled.
This statistical fact points to an important aspect of the latest 'wave'. Far from spelling the end of a fractured polity, the 2014 results show just how fragmented the vote is. It is precisely because the vote is so fragmented that the BJP was able to win 282 seats with just 31% of the votes.
Simply put, less than four out of every 10 votes opted for NDA candidates and not even one in three chose somebody from the BJP to represent them. Those who picked the Congress or its allies were even fewer, less than one in five for the Congress with a 19.3% vote share (which incidentally is higher than the BJP's 18.5% in 2009) and less than one in every four for the UPA. Unfortunately for the Congress, its 19.3% votes only translated into 44 seats while BJP's 18.5% had fetched it 116 seats.
With the combined vote share of the BJP and Congress - the two major national parties - adding up to just over 50%, almost half of all those who voted in these elections voted for some other party. Even if we add up the vote tallies of the allies of these two parties, it still leaves a very large chunk out. The NDA's combined vote share was 38.5% and the UPA's was just under 23%. That leaves out nearly 39% — or a chunk roughly equal to the NDA's — for all others.
Is the 38.5% vote share for the NDA the lowest any ruling coalition has ever obtained? Not quite. The parties that constituted UPA-1 had just 35.9% of votes polled and the Congress won just 38.2% of the votes in 1991, when it ran a minority government under P V Narasimha Rao. But, except in 1991, they had to depend on outside support to keep the government afloat, which meant that the total vote share of those in the government or supporting it was higher.
In 1989, the National Front, consisting of the Janata Dal, DMK, TDP and Congress (S) won 146 seats and a vote share of 23.8%. To this was added the 85 seats and 11.4% of the BJP and the 52 seats and 10.2% of the Left, taking the total including those supporting from outside to 283 seats and 45.3% of the votes.
In 2004, parties in the pre-poll alliance stitched up by the Congress had 220 seats and just under 36% of the votes. But the UPA then got outside support from the Left, SP and PDP, which between them had 100 seats and about 11.2% vote share. Thus, UPA-1 was formed with the support of 320 MPs and about 47% of votes.
The NDA does not need any outside support to form the government. Indeed, the BJP can form it even on its own. But unless it ropes in others, it will become the government with the lowest popular support in terms of vote share after the Rao government."
"The fact that the BJP has won a majority on its own in the 16th Lok Sabha has, inevitably, drawn comparisons with previous elections in which parties have won a majority of seats on their own. What has not quite figured in most of these comparisons is the fact that no party has ever before won more than half the seats with a vote share of just 31%. Indeed, the previous lowest vote share for a single-party majority was in 1967, when the Congress won 283 out of 520 seats with 40.8% of the total valid votes polled.
This statistical fact points to an important aspect of the latest 'wave'. Far from spelling the end of a fractured polity, the 2014 results show just how fragmented the vote is. It is precisely because the vote is so fragmented that the BJP was able to win 282 seats with just 31% of the votes.
Simply put, less than four out of every 10 votes opted for NDA candidates and not even one in three chose somebody from the BJP to represent them. Those who picked the Congress or its allies were even fewer, less than one in five for the Congress with a 19.3% vote share (which incidentally is higher than the BJP's 18.5% in 2009) and less than one in every four for the UPA. Unfortunately for the Congress, its 19.3% votes only translated into 44 seats while BJP's 18.5% had fetched it 116 seats.
With the combined vote share of the BJP and Congress - the two major national parties - adding up to just over 50%, almost half of all those who voted in these elections voted for some other party. Even if we add up the vote tallies of the allies of these two parties, it still leaves a very large chunk out. The NDA's combined vote share was 38.5% and the UPA's was just under 23%. That leaves out nearly 39% — or a chunk roughly equal to the NDA's — for all others.
Is the 38.5% vote share for the NDA the lowest any ruling coalition has ever obtained? Not quite. The parties that constituted UPA-1 had just 35.9% of votes polled and the Congress won just 38.2% of the votes in 1991, when it ran a minority government under P V Narasimha Rao. But, except in 1991, they had to depend on outside support to keep the government afloat, which meant that the total vote share of those in the government or supporting it was higher.
In 1989, the National Front, consisting of the Janata Dal, DMK, TDP and Congress (S) won 146 seats and a vote share of 23.8%. To this was added the 85 seats and 11.4% of the BJP and the 52 seats and 10.2% of the Left, taking the total including those supporting from outside to 283 seats and 45.3% of the votes.
In 2004, parties in the pre-poll alliance stitched up by the Congress had 220 seats and just under 36% of the votes. But the UPA then got outside support from the Left, SP and PDP, which between them had 100 seats and about 11.2% vote share. Thus, UPA-1 was formed with the support of 320 MPs and about 47% of votes.
The NDA does not need any outside support to form the government. Indeed, the BJP can form it even on its own. But unless it ropes in others, it will become the government with the lowest popular support in terms of vote share after the Rao government."
A
amankadian
Guest
We are the responsible for it. Our duty is just to choose honest candidate. If you don't find any right candidate use non of the above.
Log sochte hai Non of the above use karne se kya fayda. According to Supreme court and EC if Nota percentage is increased. reelection will be in those constituencies
In India. it's not America.
PM is elected by the members of Lok Sabha, lower house of the parliament of India.
Log Annkh band karke kabi congress, kabi BJP, kabi BSP, SP ko vote de dete. Corruption free country kasie hogi.
really it's shameful, khudko itne bade bade gyani samjhte hai, vote karte time wo gyan kha chala jata hai.
S
sunnytewatia
Guest
what does that prove? modi is becoming pm. what to do with %age of votes. maya had plenty of it but failed to send a single mp to delhi. le ke baithe raho vote % apne ghar congres wale.
pawandahiya
New member
Desijat,
Aagya bhai? Chutti kisi ke rahi?
Suni se Teri khangress ki ghis likaad di? Nyu bhi kahve hai ak opposition leader chun-ne layak seat bhi na mili Teri party ne?
NDA has got 38.2% vote share. Hisab kitab bhul gya dikhe haar ki baukhlahat me!
FYI, khangress got only 19% votes. That means 81% people rejected it. Mayawati got just 4%, so 96% rejected her.
We do not have american or French system where only two parties fight out the final round and one who gets more than 50% wins.
Aayi kimme baat samajh me?
Aagya bhai? Chutti kisi ke rahi?
Suni se Teri khangress ki ghis likaad di? Nyu bhi kahve hai ak opposition leader chun-ne layak seat bhi na mili Teri party ne?
NDA has got 38.2% vote share. Hisab kitab bhul gya dikhe haar ki baukhlahat me!
FYI, khangress got only 19% votes. That means 81% people rejected it. Mayawati got just 4%, so 96% rejected her.
We do not have american or French system where only two parties fight out the final round and one who gets more than 50% wins.
Aayi kimme baat samajh me?
prashantacmet
New member
Rajpal ki, narender kharb, fateh singh singh ji ...arr aur bade bade history ke scholar kya yeh puzzle solve karenge....??
chaudhary charan singh ke kitne byaah hue the...?
ajeet singh ki maan kaun thi jaat ya yadav?
Mere information ke hisaab se chaundary charan ka ek byaah hua tha....unki wife aur ajeet singh ki maa ka naam gaytri devi tha...aur wo yadav thi na ki jaat..............
Prashant bhai, as I know Ajeet singh ki mataji ka naam Gayetri devi tha...aur wo jat thi .............. voh hamare vidhan sabha kshtra (Iglas (Aligarh) se ek baar(i think 1971 me) MLA ka chunab bhee ladee aur jeetee. Baad me 1994 Gyanbati jee ( Elder sis of Ajeet Singh) bhee 1994 me mla banee.