Haryana MLAs and their Perks

rkumar

Active member
Here is an interesting news item on Haryana MLAs perks and salaries. Most interesting part is that their income tax is paid by state government;

Haryana CS lists accommodation, perks of MLAs, MPs in court

CHANDIGARH: The state government informed the Punjab and Haryana high court on Thursday that there were 38 units and 56 rooms in Haryana MLA flats and Haryana Niwas in Sector 3, Chandigarh to accommodate its 90 MLAs in the city. Besides, around 160 rooms and dormitories are also available in various guesthouses of Haryana government in Chandigarh and Panchkula. This accommodation is excluding the bungalow allotted to the chief minister and palatial houses given to ministers and chief parliamentary secretaries of the state government.

The statistics have exposed the claims of Haryana government that had allotted 79 plots to various legislators and parliamentarians of the state under discretionary quota in Panchkula's upscale Mansa Devi Complex (MDC) area with the objective to "provide adequate accommodation" to MLAs and MPs, elected from Haryana, "during their visit to Chandigarh."

Staying the allotment of plots to MLAs/MPs, the Punjab and Haryana high court had recently asked Haryana chief secretary to provide details of accommodation available for state legislators in Chandigarh and Panchkula, where they could stay while coming to the capital to attend their work. The court had also asked the CS to provide details of salary, perks and other benefits available to MLAs of Haryana.

In a detailed affidavit filed by chief secretary before the high court on Thursday, it was informed that there were 38 flats and 40 rooms in MLA flats and MLA hostel in Sector 3, Chandigarh. While 16 rooms, including CM suite, are available in Haryana Niwas in the same area.

In Panchkula, there are 36 rooms available in Kisan Bhawan, Sector 14 and 23 rooms in HUDA field hostel, Sector 6. The CS also mentioned in the affidavit that 22 rooms and 40 dormitories in Haryana Panchayat Bhawan, Sector 28, Chandigarh and 39 rooms and some dormitories were available in various rest houses/guesthouses of various boards and corporations of the state.

Providing details about the salary and perks of MLAs in Haryana, the chief secretary's affidavit informed that each legislator was entitled for around Rs 1,55,000 in cash, which included salary and office, sumptuary, telephone and other allowances. Besides, the MLA is also entitled for Rs 2 lakh per annum as travel allowance, Rs 40 lakh as advance for house construction, Rs 10 lakh for a vehicle, free travel passes for road, rail and air transport, a laptop, accommodation expenses of Rs 5,000 per day and a conveyance allowance Rs 15 per km during official tours.

The CS also informed that income tax on the income of MLAs income was paid by the state. Regarding MPs, the CS informed that around Rs 2 lakh per month in the form of salary and other allowances was paid to them, excluding other facilities and financial benefits.

The matter had reached the high court in the wake of a petition filed by Panchkula-based Herald Group Housing Cooperative Society seeking cancellation of allotment of plots in the town under discretionary quota to MLAs and MPs of Haryana. Prominent beneficiaries of the scheme include country's richest woman Savitiri Jindal, her MP-son Naveen Jindal, MLA and senior Congress leader Venod Sharma and chief minister Bhupinder Singh Hooda's son Deepender Singh Hooda - an MP from Rohtak.
 
I wonder if the salary of Rs 2.00 lacs per month paid to an MP is in addition to what he/ she draws from Parliament ? If so, can a MP draw two government salaries at the same time?

RK^2
 
I doubt this thread will get the same traction as AAP thread (that reflect how we are and what we want). Since RK jee started a good thread on inspecting our representative...let's do some fact check

Here is the data from National Election Watch in 2009 after Haryana govt. finished the first so called clean term
Main points
The highlights of the analysis for re

‐contesting MLAs are‐

Total re‐contesting MLAs= 40
The average assets for these re contesting MLAs as declared in 2004= Rs 16,533,043 (Rs 1.6 Cr)
The average asset for these re contesting MLAs as declared in 2009= Rs 63,804,123 (Rs 6.3 Cr)
Average asset growth for these re contesting MLAs = Rs 47,271,080 (Rs 4.7 Cr)
Percentage growth in assets for these re contesting MLAs = 398%

Highlight: Sharda Rathore INC Ballabhgarh assest during the period of 5 years growth was amazing 5488% () growth not sure why our economy is still growing at rate of 4.5%
 
As per rule of nature
Higher & lower salary both are bad. Paying low salary to your servant is the biggest crime. Why we not think that we should pay low salary to our workers.
Many small , medium Industry and Shop owners today pay less than Rs.5000/- to their workers on monthly basis.
When we start paying good salary to workers all will become ok and economy will grow.


I doubt this thread will get the same traction as AAP thread (that reflect how we are and what we want). Since RK jee started a good thread on inspecting our representative...let's do some fact check

Here is the data from National Election Watch in 2009 after Haryana govt. finished the first so called clean term
Main points
The highlights of the analysis for re

‐contesting MLAs are‐

Total re‐contesting MLAs= 40
The average assets for these re contesting MLAs as declared in 2004= Rs 16,533,043 (Rs 1.6 Cr)
The average asset for these re contesting MLAs as declared in 2009= Rs 63,804,123 (Rs 6.3 Cr)
Average asset growth for these re contesting MLAs = Rs 47,271,080 (Rs 4.7 Cr)
Percentage growth in assets for these re contesting MLAs = 398%

Highlight: Sharda Rathore INC Ballabhgarh assest during the period of 5 years growth was amazing 5488% () growth not sure why our economy is still growing at rate of 4.5%
 
He is an honest man, not knowing even 0.001% of the truth about these wealthy 'pigs'.
May be his idea can work only when all the current 'politicians' of this country are 'shot down' and only new ones with high perks are invited and asked not to indulge into corruption.

Expecting 'no corruption' from the existing class like Laloos, Mulayams, Sibals, Khursheeds, Sukhrams, Virbhadra Singhs, Jayanti Natrajans, Kalmadis, Rajas, Tharoors etc is like expecting no terrorists in Pakistan.


Please see the Infosys Chairman Mr. Murthy views also, He support higher salary for legislators
 
He is an honest man, not knowing even 0.001% of the truth about these wealthy 'pigs'.
May be his idea can work only when all the current 'politicians' of this country are 'shot down' and only new ones with high perks are invited and asked not to indulge into corruption.

Expecting 'no corruption' from the existing class like Laloos, Mulayams, Sibals, Khursheeds, Sukhrams, Virbhadra Singhs, Jayanti Natrajans, Kalmadis, Rajas, Tharoors etc is like expecting no terrorists in Pakistan.

I doubt it he does not know it, he runs one of the biggest companies which engages in what US calls legally lobbying, uses Indian govt to put pressure on US when caught in immigration scams, just now paid USD 32M as a fine.

What he probably means is give them money and that might fill their ambition but he is going by the assumption that politicians come with a lid, which is so untrue.

Waise bhai list se Gadkaris, Laxmans, Mahajans, Fernandes ka naam missing sa tha ;) Yaad na aaye? Badaam kha bhai
 
Mr Murthy has ran an organization which is much more homogenious in thinking, following internal policies, education levels and so on. It is much different than dealing with these corrupt "Netas". Er ye list lambi hai... across party line... tu count kare ja,.....er ye badam apne aap pe istemaal kar...... khada baal theek ho jaaga tera!!!


I doubt it he does not know it, he runs one of the biggest companies which engages in what US calls legally lobbying, uses Indian govt to put pressure on US when caught in immigration scams, just now paid USD 32M as a fine.

What he probably means is give them money and that might fill their ambition but he is going by the assumption that politicians come with a lid, which is so untrue.

Waise bhai list se Gadkaris, Laxmans, Mahajans, Fernandes ka naam missing sa tha ;) Yaad na aaye? Badaam kha bhai
 
As per rule of nature
Higher & lower salary both are bad. Paying low salary to your servant is the biggest crime. Why we not think that we should pay low salary to our workers.
Many small , medium Industry and Shop owners today pay less than Rs.5000/- to their workers on monthly basis.
When we start paying good salary to workers all will become ok and economy will grow.

can you support that with data and facts than making a generic statement. I believe they are public servant and should not make public their servant
 
Back
Top