Have guts to answer it ???

[anilsangwan]

Bhai tenne to poonjh marod dee mere answer ki...

You said 11 min hourglass have sand equivalent to 4 mins...start counting. What we do with 7 min hourglass?

ANS: 7 min waale ko pada rehan do ebb. Iska kaam sirf 4 min tak pahoonchaana tha.

and why we turn 11 min hourglass again.

ANS: Once we measure 4 mins above...we need only 11 mins...which we can get just by turning the 11 mins hourglass so that its full again and can run for 11 mins...


Is 11 min hourglass can wait without pouring sand ?

Bera na bhai tu k keh gya is line mein...mere bhai Q ne pher tein padh ek be...aur menne bataye huye steps follow karo...

HOPE EBB KE TO SAMAJH MEIN AA GEE HOGI MERE BHAI....

Cheers
Anil

Anil bhai baat nahi bani abhi tak.

Explanation is uncpomplete. and why we turn 11 min hourglass again.That doesn't make sense.

Well, approach is good but we didn't get desired result still.

WELL TRY ANIL !

 

[vijay]

Bhai tenne to poonjh marod dee mere answer ki...

You said 11 min hourglass have sand equivalent to 4 mins...start counting. What we do with 7 min hourglass?

ANS: 7 min waale ko pada rehan do ebb. Iska kaam sirf 4 min tak pahoonchaana tha.

and why we turn 11 min hourglass again.

ANS: Once we measure 4 mins above...we need only 11 mins...which we can get just by turning the 11 mins hourglass so that its full again and can run for 11 mins...


Is 11 min hourglass can wait without pouring sand ?

Bera na bhai tu k keh gya is line mein...mere bhai Q ne pher tein padh ek be...aur menne bataye huye steps follow karo...

HOPE EBB KE TO SAMAJH MEIN AA GEE HOGI MERE BHAI....

Cheers
Anil

Anil bhai,

I appreciate your good efforts but why should we waste first seven precious minutes ?

 

[arunshamli]

Anil bhai,

I appreciate your good efforts but why should we waste first seven precious minutes ?

1. start both 7 and 11 min hourglass, after 7 min the big hourglass will have send equivalent of 4 min. we have measured 7 min.

2. Start the smalller hourglass again. after 4 more min, the bigger one will be completly done and the smaller hourglass will have send equivallent of 3 min. we have measured 7+4=11 min at this point.

3. Now reverse the smaller hourglass( it had 3 min on one side and 4 on the other side). it will be completly done in 4 min. and the total time will be 7+4+4=15

 

[vijay]

1. start both 7 and 11 min hourglass, after 7 min the big hourglass will have send equivalent of 4 min. we have measured 7 min.

2. Start the smalller hourglass again. after 4 more min, the bigger one will be completly done and the smaller hourglass will have send equivallent of 3 min. we have measured 7+4=11 min at this point.

3. Now reverse the smaller hourglass( it had 3 min on one side and 4 on the other side). it will be completly done in 4 min. and the total time will be 7+4+4=15

Yes, Arun you are right. What Anil was doing was near to it but he was wasting first 7 minutes.

Anil bhai got it now.

Well done Arun.

 

[vijay]

I have one more like this.


How can you measure 4 litres of liquid using a 3 litres and a 5 litres containers. ?

 

[vijay]

No Answer ?

 

[arunshamli]

No Answer ?

Bhai Vijay,

This was the simplest of all the puzzle you have asked. and I thought let someone else try it. but, lagta hai ke JAT log is thread ki taraf kam hee aate hain...sher-o-shayri and history me busy hain

1. 3 litter wale ko bhar ke 5 wale me daal do.
2. 3 litter wale fo fir se bhar ke 5 wale me tab tak dalo jab tak ke 5 wala bhar na jaye. ab 3 litter wale me 1 litter hai aur 5 wala full hai
3. ab 5 litter wale ko khali karke usme 3 litter ka sara pani dal do. ab 5 wale me 1 litter hai and 3 wala khali.
4. 3 wale ko fir se bahr ke 5 wale me dal do ...ab 5 wale me 4 litter hai.

 

[vijay]

Bhai Vijay,

This was the simplest of all the puzzle you have asked. and I thought let someone else try it. but, lagta hai ke JAT log is thread ki taraf kam hee aate hain...sher-o-shayri and history me busy hain

1. 3 litter wale ko bhar ke 5 wale me daal do.
2. 3 litter wale fo fir se bhar ke 5 wale me tab tak dalo jab tak ke 5 wala bhar na jaye. ab 3 litter wale me 1 litter hai aur 5 wala full hai
3. ab 5 litter wale ko khali karke usme 3 litter ka sara pani dal do. ab 5 wale me 1 litter hai and 3 wala khali.
4. 3 wale ko fir se bahr ke 5 wale me dal do ...ab 5 wale me 4 litter hai.

You are right Arun,
Jats seems busy in other sections that's why i started asking simple ones.
Right answer.

 

[vijay]

Ok one more.


They are two persons. They both born on the same day of the same month of the same year to the same parents. What is their relationship ?


hey they are not twins ?

 

[vijay]

Ok one more.


They are two persons. They both born on the same day of the same month of the same year to the same parents. What is their relationship ?


hey they are not twins ?

I am dissapointed that nobody answered that ?

Ok, Lemme answer it.

Thay are two of a set of triplets ( or quads, or quins etc. ).

Got it !

 

[vijay]

Well, now a simple one. Hope answerable !

A lady said' " In my family, each girl has an equal number of brothers and sisters, but each boy has twice as many sisters as brothers."

So, how many sisters and brothers are in her family ?

 

[arunshamli]

Well, now a simple one. Hope answerable !

A lady said' " In my family, each girl has an equal number of brothers and sisters, but each boy has twice as many sisters as brothers."

So, how many sisters and brothers are in her family ?

Is it 4G and 3B?

 

[vijay]

Is it 4G and 3B?

Good Arun, i was the simplest one !

 

[vijay]

Another one !


If i multiply the two digits of a number, then add ninetenn and multiply the digits again, the answer is one less than the number i originally started with.

What is the number i originally thought of ?

 

[arunshamli]

Another one !


If i multiply the two digits of a number, then add ninetenn and multiply the digits again, the answer is one less than the number i originally started with.

What is the number i originally thought of ?

My answer in c++.

void MagicNumber()
{
for(int a = 1 ; a < 10 ; a++)
{
for (int b = 0 ; b < 10 ; b++)
{
int originalNumber = 10*a + b;
int newNumber = a*b + 19;
int x = newNumber/10;
int y = newNumber - 10*x;
if ( (originalNumber-1) == (x*y))
cout << originalNumber;
}
}
}

 

[vijay]

My answer in c++.

void MagicNumber()
{
for(int a = 1 ; a < 10 ; a++)
{
for (int b = 0 ; b < 10 ; b++)
{
int originalNumber = 10*a + b;
int newNumber = a*b + 19;
int x = newNumber/10;
int y = newNumber - 10*x;
if ( (originalNumber-1) == (x*y))
cout << originalNumber;
}
}
}

Hi Arun,

The way you answered here seems a puzzle as you know everybody here is not a software engineer or programmer. But i am a programmer and very good in C/C++ indeed. Your answer is wrong. It is showing some garbage value after compiling and executing.

Be honest man, i respect your intellect.

If you can write the whole code here than why don't you just write the exact number here.

It seems more logical.

 

[arunshamli]

Hi Arun,

The way you answered here seems a puzzle as you know everybody here is not a software engineer or programmer. But i am a programmer and very good in C/C++ indeed. Your answer is wrong. It is showing some garbage value after compiling and executing.

Be honest man, i respect your intellect.

If you can write the whole code here than why don't you just write the exact number here.

It seems more logical.

Vijay, I was just teasing...and only a few people come to this thread.
In some other thread you had mentiond you are a c/c++ guy and thats why I had posted the c++ code. just to have some fun. But.....anyway...

Ok, now what is wrong in the code? email me at arun_shamli@yahoo.com
it should print the number 10 and nothing else. Is 10 the wrong answer?

 

[vijay]

Vijay, I was just teasing...and only a few people come to this thread.
In some other thread you had mentiond you are a c/c++ guy and thats why I had posted the c++ code. just to have some fun. But.....anyway...

Ok, now what is wrong in the code? email me at arun_shamli@yahoo.com
it should print the number 10 and nothing else. Is 10 the wrong answer?

Hi Arun,

I am glad to hear such a honest answer and believe me i really expected that from you. GREAT.

Well i am sorry that i didn't have much time to analyse the code literally but there is some error in your core. It shows -12 in my computer after compling and executing. Please check it again.


But, hey you are right
Answer is 10.

You are good Arun.

Cheers !

 

[vijay]

OK next one

Farmer A and Farmer B had adjoining lands. farmer A had a peacock, which used to wonder on both farmer A's and farmer B's fields.

One day farmer B found an egg on his fields and farmer A claimed that the egg was his because the bird was his. Farmer B, on the other hand, claimed that the egg was his simply because it was laid on his land.



So, who is right and why ?

 

[amitguliya]

OK next one

Farmer A and Farmer B had adjoining lands. farmer A had a peacock, which used to wonder on both farmer A's and farmer B's fields.

One day farmer B found an egg on his fields and farmer A claimed that the egg was his because the bird was his. Farmer B, on the other hand, claimed that the egg was his simply because it was laid on his land.



So, who is right and why ?

Hi. Just saw this thread.
Nice to see such a thread amongst all other threads going on.

By the way does peacock or peahen lays egg ??