Hindu Ghata Desh Batta

Status
Not open for further replies.

ratheetheraist

New member
Jab Congress Ki Sarkaar Muslims Votes Ke Liye Is Hadd Tak Gir Chuki Hai To Hamen Desh Ko Girne Se Bachana Hai.........

Jahan Muslims Majority Me Hain Wahan Hindus Ki Wo Aisi Tesi Kar Ke Rakhte Hain .....u.p. Ek Constituency Hai Shayad Se Sultan Pur Hai Ya Sujanpur Hai ,wahan Muslims 52% Ki Population Me Hain .....wahan Unhone Hindus Ka Jeena Haram Kar Rakha Hai .......

Agar Is Bharat Ka Jeena Haram Karna Hai Do Hawa In Muslims Ko .......sada Se Ye Congress Waale Inke Chamche Rahe Hain Aazaadi Se Pehle Ke......

Main To Dosto Ek Baat Maanta Hun Ke
Hindu Ghata Desh Batta

Jab Jab Hindu Is Desh Me Ghat Ta Gaya

Tab Tab Desh Bat Ta Gaya,,,,,

Udaahraan ...paakistaan , Bangladesh

Ye Ab Sabse Badi Samasya Bani Hui Hain Hamare Bharat Ki

High Court Ke Order Ke Bad Bhi Muslims Ke Liye Reservation Jaari Hai In Congress Goverened Kuch States Me...its Pathetic

Aur Agar Aisa Hi Raha To Ek Din Aaega Ke Jis Bharat Ko Chaand Se Dekh Kar Rakesh Sharma Ne Kaha Tha..... Saare Jahan Se Acha ....

Uska Naamo Nishaan Nahi Milega.......

Jai Hind
 
right Mr. rathee,

But the problem is not muslim's...it is us the Hindu itself.

Most of the hindu's are not katter hindu and those are katter hindu, are not supported by the rest.

so if we are not able to be the part of RSS, Siv sena, VHP, Bajrag dal and many others , but still we can support them from outside. But the prob. is that we can't do even this for the sake of our Hinduism.....


As earlier discussed in the "Valentine Day" thread hindu's easily adopt other religion....so the main prob. is there (With Us)

We hav no problem to attend their festivals but they have (exceptions are allways there )

As far as majority/ minority....sooner the time come when hindus become minority as muslims are multiplying.......very fast

A request to all Hindu's ...please support RSS, Siv sena, VHP, Bajrag dal and many others hindu parties
.............



^^ DD
 
good point

I agree with the points that have been raised in this post. Although, I do not agree with the suggested solutions. Congress party is clearly at fault here, instead of GandhiJee's principles they opted to follow British Diplomatic principles. The most prominent one being patronising the minority at the cost of majority.
Britons always gave Hindus a "step-motherly" treatment in their own land. They knew by doing this they will divide the masses and rule them with ease. Congress did the similar thing, first they secured their Muslim votes, and then attracted Hindu voters (who were already faithful to them because of GandhiJee).
Today India stands as an admirable example of tolerance in the world, the Hindu majority nation has a Muslim President, Sikh PM, and Roman Catholic "PM maker". I give Hinduism the full credit of this tolerance, and also the credit for accomodating fast spawning population of Muslims and in the country. And this tolerance is rarely seen amongst the followers of Islam. So wherever they gain majority they try to establish their own rule.
But I think supporting such groups of parties will further worsen the situation. I blame these parties for marring the tolerant image of Hinduism, and I have never seen or heard of anything productive coming out of them.
Instead we should look up to Hindu organisations like BAPS or ISKCON who have spread the word of HInduism across the world, who have built amazing temples (without any bloodshed and with volunteer work) that will make coming Hindu generations proud of their religion.
We Hindus should be the last ones to be fanatic, our religion teaches us peace and tolerance. Many have tried to crush this religion without any success, and Hinduism still embraced them. We are not a religion whose goal is to increase the numbers, we do not call non Hindus evil or hellmongers. We have always respected and tolerated others and we should continue to do so. Parties like VHP, ShivSena and BajrangDal are totally contradictory to these principles and should be shunned by every Hindu.
The only solution that I see to stop conversions and to get Hindus to respect their own religion is to bring in a Renissance (which I feel is long due). We still have many ill patches left in our religion caused by the external pressures, practices like Castism should be given up totally. We should incorporate the teachings of Vedas and show Hindus that what their religion really is. This will help in strengthening the faith of people in the religion and they will not have to look elsewhere for peace of mind, and Hinduism will continue to prosper.
 
Bhaiyon Mussalmanon pe sara gussa kyun utaar rahe ho?

Come to the main point. Strike the root. Whats the main problem here? Government is the problem? Government is the whore that sells for cheap.

Gussa utarna hee hai to Government ko bhi dosh do. Mussalman bhi haramkhor hai, but Government to Musalman se bhi kameeni cheez hai.
 
long but read

i agree with you friend.the politics in india has always been insincere.the politicians and so the beaurocrats have taken the people(which comprises of the middle class and the poor{middle class is the backbone of every nation}).it is first their fault but we too r equally responsible.
first,what kind of values must a corrupt person be having?second,we r so cowardly and used to succumbing and be ruled that we do not come forward to make a change.another reason could be that we do not think with love for our nation(well i guess that jats r much better than gujjus,sindhismarwadis, nd many others.well no controversies).when a man stops on a road during our national anthem,we r the ones to make fun of him.
i do not agree with the suggesstion of joining the rss,vhp etc. .killing muslims will not solve the problem(godhra).a sincere politics can make all the difference.if we feel for our nation and we become the politicians,the problem would become no-problem
 
There are three type of societies;

1. Solid state
2. Liquid state
3. Gaseous state

India is in liquid state, europe in solid state.... africa in gaseous state...

one can break solids, but not liquids and gases... Be assured, India will never break again ....does not matter how politics play...

RK^2
 
no sir

rkumar said:
There are three type of societies;

1. Solid state
2. Liquid state
3. Gaseous state

India is in liquid state, europe in solid state.... africa in gaseous state...

one can break solids, but not liquids and gases... Be assured, India will never break again ....does not matter how politics play...

RK^2

Kalkhande sir i dont agree to u on this point,,,,, or ur theory...

india ko aap dekh lo j&k ka case uthaaiye ,,,wahan par hamari govt ka koi interfernece nahi hai ,, aur na hi laws similar hain ... there is no UNIFORM CIVIL CODE IN INDIA ....... which is the need of time , bt no govt is taking this point in consideration....

jaise aaj j&k india se door hotaa ja raha hai kewal muslims ki aur hamari kameeni govt( jaisa sumit bhai ji ne kaha tja) ki wajh se to wo din door nahi jab kuch aur tukdde ho jain hamare bhaart ke....

high court ke mana karne ke baad bhi andhra pradesh govt ne muslims ke liye 5% reservation laa di state main...... unki aisi tessi kyon hui??????
sirf wo chandd muslim vote lene ke liye . aur agar yun hi sab chalta gaya na to dekh lena hamare desh ka naash hone ka kaaran ye muslim honge aur hamari govt. usse badi......

rok sako to rok lyo bhaii ,,,,,, hum te chodte nahi sain apni koshish jaari rakhenge .... aur ek din AYODHAA MAIN RAM MANDIR BANA KAR RAHENGE...

GARV SE KAHO HUM HINDU HAIN ( SWAMI VIVEKANAND)
JAI HIND
 
Last edited:
ratheetheraist said:
rok sako to rok lyo bhaii ,,,,,, hum te chodte nahi sain apni koshish jaari rakhenge .... aur ek din AYODHAA MAIN RAM MANDIR BANA KAR RAHENGE...

GARV SE KAHO HUM HINDU HAIN ( SWAMI VIVEKANAND)
JAI HIND

Vikas,

Swami Vivekanand was not the one who gave this quote, it was the man who formed RSS, still the quote is very powerful and every Hindu should remember it and follow it.
Secondly, could you tell me what will be the benefit of building that Ram mandir now. This Mandir Issue has already worked very much against Hindus, it has put Hindus at the same platform as other religious fanatics. I suppose this is the first time Hindu broke down other religion's holy place, which should not have happened in the first place. So many Hindu families have already lost their loved ones to this Mandir, I think its high time we leave this issue behind and think of future instead of sticking to the past.

Thanks,

Amit
 
muslim
hindu
muslim
muslim
hindu
caste
jat
muslim
mandir
ram
ram
babri masjid
gandhi
hindu
muslim
muslim
babri masjid
rss
rss in mercedes
muslim
72 virgins
heaven running out of virgins
stop
stop
please
phaltu ka time
roti
kapda
makan
family
 
amanmalik said:
muslim
hindu
muslim
muslim
hindu
caste
jat
muslim
mandir
ram
ram
babri masjid
gandhi
hindu
muslim
muslim
babri masjid
rss
rss in mercedes
muslim
72 virgins
heaven running out of virgins
stop
stop
please
phaltu ka time
roti
kapda
makan
family


ha ha ha ha ..re bhai aman...kati sahi baat keh di apne to...hi hi hi ..

hey ram, gaya ram, yaa allah.. ya mohammed... hehehehe....

jab roti kapada and makan dang se mil jya to bhai ram hi miljya hai ..aise chahe ram mandir banwado yaa phir musani mata ka mandir kye hojyaga...
 
atul.jhajhria said:
Amit, i think you are coward. Sorry for putting it bluntly, but thats what i think about you. :)

You say that whats the use of Ram Mandir, well you answer my one question. What is the use of our caste Jat? :rolleyes:

Isn't it true that caste system has harmed India more then anything else.

It is weak people like you that we have so many muslims in India. Regarding at same platform with muslim fundamentalists, its true we are moving towards same plateform, but most of Indians are not as weak as you are. They cant see their brothers die at the hand of muslims. If you are ok with it that does not form the generality.
You have choice, you can be at higher plateform by letting all these atrocities happen or you can lower your plateform to fight against them.

So please if you have any wrong concepts either clear it or you can refrain yourself from giving stupid replys.

Et tu Atul,

I appreciate the quick feedback that you have given to my post, you seem to be way more efficient than me in making judgments about others (But I am very happy that I know what I am and who I am). As per you I am a coward Hindu Jat who is not willing to even let thoughts of violence and discrimination enter his mind. I suppose I will be considered by some (including you) a coward with stupid ideas.
But, I still do not know what to think of you or others who suggest solutions like building the Ram Mandir, keeping vendetta against the Muslims (who according to you killed our Hindu brothers and ancestors). Inept, incapable, weak, good for nothing, or simply put in Haryanvi "Thothe Chane Baaje Ghane" (empty vessles making more noice). If you and others like you feel so strongly about the Ram Mandir and avenging the Hindu deaths, then what are you people doing here. It’s been almost 14 years since that Ram Mandir is under construction and Hindus are still burnt to death. You people even make violence and discrimination as romantic as Quixote fighting the wind mills.
I might be a coward according to you, but at least I am sticking to and doing what I believe in. I thank God for making me strong enough to not fall prey to cheap Indian politicians' disgusting vote gaining tactics. Neither can I be so mediaeval in my ideas that I think of killing masses and destroying places of worship. Somehow this coward mind can only look ahead (but that does not mean I am not aware of my past). I want to see Indians forget the atrocities of past and live happily like the Europeans (they were killing each other in 50s and look at them now). I do not want India to become another Sudan where people are still killing each other for religion. The problem I see with India is that due to some capable violent people our majority of uneducated masses does behave like Sudanese and I hope it will not go for long.
I am positive person, I spend more time in thinking about Tajmahal than Babri Masjid, about Akbar than Aurangzeb, about Abul Kalaam than Daawood Abraham and so on (you get the idea). I infact prefered to visit and stay in Kashmir right after the war instead of sitting here and making judgements about Kashmiri Muslims. And my opinions might be stupid to many, but I am happy to have opinions of my own. I think therefore I am, and I feel therefore I have my ideas.
I am proud to be one of the oldest members of this site who is still hanging in here. I have seen many members drop like flies due to strong criticism of their opinions. I am sure they preferred to spend their time elsewhere, and many might even think that what am I doing here? (They think I am wasting my time). But, being positive I always think more of the support and appreciation this site has provided me, the beautiful people I have been fortunate to know through here. And I consider this optimism the biggest part of my Jat identity (I really do not consider Jat just as a caste but more of an identity and philosophy), so I suppose you have your answer to why am I on this website, and why I am proud to be a Jat.
And fortunately I had never heard of a Jat being involved in this Mandir issue, infact I have been fortunate to see strong relationship between Jats and Muslims in Mewat (Jats had actually saved many Muslim villages in 1947 in that region and till today they share the same villages). I do not know from where you people being Jats have developed this strong disliking towards Muslims, if you really have to condemn some people then think of those who have actually affected Jats and did everything possible to keep them down.
Sir Choturam did not pick arms against the Muslims, but he crushed the HINDU banias and got us out of their evil traps. Swami Dayanand got us out of evil Hindu Brahmin traps. I really cannot think of a Jat hero in recent history who raised his/her voice against Muslims. You might want to think why? then I suppose the answer is because every hero has a logic to see where the real problem lies.
So scram and use some logic in finding the real problem in us Jats and Hindus. And if you still have more judgements to pass in your criticism than Bring It on Home.
 
sansanwalamit said:
Et tu Atul,

I appreciate the quick feedback that you have given to my post, you seem to be way more efficient than me in making judgments about others (But I am very happy that I know what I am and who I am). As per you I am a coward Hindu Jat who is not willing to even let thoughts of violence and discrimination enter his mind. I suppose I will be considered by some (including you) a coward with stupid ideas.

I will do my best.

sansanwalamit said:
But, I still do not know what to think of you or others who suggest solutions like building the Ram Mandir, keeping vendetta against the Muslims (who according to you killed our Hindu brothers and ancestors). Inept, incapable, weak, good for nothing, or simply put in Haryanvi "Thothe Chane Baaje Ghane" (empty vessles making more noice). If you and others like you feel so strongly about the Ram Mandir and avenging the Hindu deaths, then what are you people doing here. It’s been almost 14 years since that Ram Mandir is under construction and Hindus are still burnt to death. You people even make violence and discrimination as romantic as Quixote fighting the wind mills.

You are telling us to keep vandetta agaist muslims as if we(Hindus) are at fault. Its a common knowledge that where ever muslims are in majority they dont let hindus breathe. Its you who is Inept, incapable, weak and good for nothing. Regarding avenging hindu deaths, offcourse no one including myself is going and kill them because thats plain stupid. But if there is riot in my place then yes i will take part actively.

Regarding "Thothe Chane Baaje Ghane", its you who suits that definition. You are talking on Jatland forum as if you have some affinity towards Hindu Jats, but where will you be when Jats will need you? Telling fellow Jats that you dont hold vandetta against muslims you will run first.

I will be there with my brothers. :)


sansanwalamit said:
I might be a coward according to you, but at least I am sticking to and doing what I believe in. I thank God for making me strong enough to not fall prey to cheap Indian politicians' disgusting vote gaining tactics. Neither can I be so mediaeval in my ideas that I think of killing masses and destroying places of worship. Somehow this coward mind can only look ahead (but that does not mean I am not aware of my past). I want to see Indians forget the atrocities of past and live happily like the Europeans (they were killing each other in 50s and look at them now). I do not want India to become another Sudan where people are still killing each other for religion. The problem I see with India is that due to some capable violent people our majority of uneducated masses does behave like Sudanese and I hope it will not go for long.

No, you are not the only one who is sticking to principles, i also stick to my principles :rolleyes: and nobody can take that right from me. You thank god for making you strong enough to not fall prey to cheap politics and we ask god why people like you were born in our religion making our community weak.

You want Indian to forget past :rolleyes: what about present.

What about hindus who get killed by bomb blasts, in Kashmir, our army people who die for India.

You are comparing India with sudan, i frankly dont know details about sudan but i know when muslims will become majority India will any how become sudan.

sansanwalamit said:
I am positive person, I spend more time in thinking about Tajmahal than Babri Masjid, about Akbar than Aurangzeb, about Abul Kalaam than Daawood Abraham and so on (you get the idea). I infact prefered to visit and stay in Kashmir right after the war instead of sitting here and making judgements about Kashmiri Muslims. And my opinions might be stupid to many, but I am happy to have opinions of my own. I think therefore I am, and I feel therefore I have my ideas.

I am glad that you figured out how stupid your opinion will sound to others.

sansanwalamit said:
I am proud to be one of the oldest members of this site who is still hanging in here. I have seen many members drop like flies due to strong criticism of their opinions. I am sure they preferred to spend their time elsewhere, and many might even think that what am I doing here? (They think I am wasting my time). But, being positive I always think more of the support and appreciation this site has provided me, the beautiful people I have been fortunate to know through here. And I consider this optimism the biggest part of my Jat identity (I really do not consider Jat just as a caste but more of an identity and philosophy), so I suppose you have your answer to why am I on this website, and why I am proud to be a Jat.
And fortunately I had never heard of a Jat being involved in this Mandir issue, infact I have been fortunate to see strong relationship between Jats and Muslims in Mewat (Jats had actually saved many Muslim villages in 1947 in that region and till today they share the same villages). I do not know from where you people being Jats have developed this strong disliking towards Muslims, if you really have to condemn some people then think of those who have actually affected Jats and did everything possible to keep them down.

Being one of the oldest member does not make you best Jat, same way you being Hindu is not beneficial to our religion.

How intersting to know Jats in mewat saved many muslim lives, how much more interesting it would be when the descendents of same muslims will take lives of Jats. ;)

Tell me little about those people who actually affected Jats and did everything possible to keep them down. It would be fun to know your views.

sansanwalamit said:
Sir Choturam did not pick arms against the Muslims, but he crushed the HINDU banias and got us out of their evil traps. Swami Dayanand got us out of evil Hindu Brahmin traps. I really cannot think of a Jat hero in recent history who raised his/her voice against Muslims. You might want to think why? then I suppose the answer is because every hero has a logic to see where the real problem lies.
So scram and use some logic in finding the real problem in us Jats and Hindus. And if you still have more judgements to pass in your criticism than Bring It on Home.

Sir chotturam did not picked arms against muslims because muslims were not in good position then. Britons subdued muslims during all their tenure. Sir chotturam picking arms against banias can never be compared to picking arms against muslims. Muslims killed Jats and Banias exploited Jats. If you have little sense then you can realize who is more harmful.

Since you have given example of Sir chotturam then let me give one more example. What about Mohd. Gauri killing Jats. :rolleyes: Did your ancestors loved that or what. May be your ancestors thought that Mohd. Gauri is very bad person and therefore they will never fight aginst him( Lmao), but when it came to Banias your equally weak ancestors thought that picking arm against Banias was right. :)
 
gamasaan yudh chal raha hae. jats in american and canada are fighting battles on jatland.com about muslims and banias in india.
dekhe kaun jitata hae.
tamasha chalu rakho.
yeh sunglasses kaunse brand ke haeen?
aap teeeno ke.
mera face thoda oval hae.
kaunsa brand aur style sahee rahega?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Atul Jhajharia,

Do not repeat the mistake of commenting about either mine or someone else's ancestors on this website. This not only brings you down while displaying your true colours, but spoils the site's image and decorum as well. And if you are capable of maintaining this decorum and respect for others then only stick around in this website or else you might wanna leave.

(Look what you made me do, this is the first time I have ever been so rude on this site, and honestly you deserve it. Always address others in a way you would like to be addressed ok. And dont forget I am a SANSANWAL, insulting my ancestors will mean insulting one of the biggest heros of our history. The ones who actually stood against Muslims and fought for Jats, till today we hear the stories of our ancestors coming to Delhi from Sinsini and Bharatpore around 400 years back to fight for Hindus and save the religion from Muslim attrocities.
And, believe me, like my ancestors I will always stand for my people be it for a Jat, or a Hindu if need be. And a caveat too, I would also stand for a Muslim or Christian if I see any unjustice being done to him/her from anyone, because respecting and protecting life is one of the biggest teaching my religion has taught me.)
 
cooljat said:
Bhai Amit
very well Explained
A jat is a jat is a jat.
kudos to u :)

rock on
Jit

Thanks Bhai Jeetender,
par ek baat to maani padegi, ki chashme ki style ka aur aadmi ke mind ka kuch to correlation hai.
Ib dekh, we both are donning Aviators (the most rock n roll shades ever) aur hamaare vichaar kitne mile hain. On the other hand Atul is wearing shades of a different style and we all know how much our thoughts meet.
So, moral of the story Aviator waale ne Aviator waala hi samjhe hai.

Aman Malik,

So, I suppose you have got your answer now, choosing the right kind of shades is not just about the shape of your face, or your cheek bones. I would suggest rushing to any sunglass hut nearby (they are everywhere, and have the best collection) and then check out a style that suits you, your attitude and your mindset.

Hope this helps,

Cheers,

Amit
 
Amit
great
Keep this sane thinking ,people will always respect such openions.
Bravery is not shown in killing people in mob.
It is in saving them from mobs.

One should see in this game of devide and rule played to the perfection jointly by BJP and CONGRESS learned from their predecessor britishers.

These petty muslim fundamentalists are actively groomed and encouraged
by both groups with the single aim of polarising right thinking persons in to for and against groups.

We need stalwarts like CH.CHOTTU RAM who can think of common man,wether he is hindhu or muslim.


.........................................................


Jit
You are really cool.
bravo!
jat is a jat is a jat.

.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
sansanwalamit said:
Atul Jhajharia,

Do not repeat the mistake of commenting about either mine or someone else's ancestors on this website. This not only brings you down while displaying your true colours, but spoils the site's image and decorum as well. And if you are capable of maintaining this decorum and respect for others then only stick around in this website or else you might wanna leave.

I found your comments about tolerance more disturbing then my own comments. If you does not have any emotions for fellow Hindu Jats, you can do the favour as well.

sansanwalamit said:
(Look what you made me do, this is the first time I have ever been so rude on this site, and honestly you deserve it. Always address others in a way you would like to be addressed ok. And dont forget I am a SANSANWAL, insulting my ancestors will mean insulting one of the biggest heros of our history. The ones who actually stood against Muslims and fought for Jats, till today we hear the stories of our ancestors coming to Delhi from Sinsini and Bharatpore around 400 years back to fight for Hindus and save the religion from Muslim attrocities.
And, believe me, like my ancestors I will always stand for my people be it for a Jat, or a Hindu if need be. And a caveat too, I would also stand for a Muslim or Christian if I see any unjustice being done to him/her from anyone, because respecting and protecting life is one of the biggest teaching my religion has taught me.)

How come that Great Sansanwal means there can not be any not so good Sansanwal.

You tell us that you will stand by Jat and Hindu if needed be, what do you mean by that. What will you do if there is Hindu-Muslim riot :rolleyes:.

@narender kharb: I knew a muslim from rajasthan, who once said: when we will be enough in numbers to beat Jats, Yadavs and Rajputs we will beat all hindus.


what does that signifies to you or amit. I am just curious how both of you will feel.

Its not that i was born with this hatred, neither did BJP played any rule. :)
 
Now we are talking,

Firstly, thanks for avoiding personal derogatory comments about me or my ancestors.

Ok so now we are getting into the realms of hypothetical situation, but I will try to imagine the situation and answer accordingly.
If there is ever a Hindu vs. Muslim or, Jat vs. other Hindus, or Muslims, or anyone else situation occurs, then honest to God, I will stand with the right side. And as my experience has shown that most of the times Jats and Hindus have been on the right hand side, so there is a very big probability that I will be on Jat or Hindu side.
My issue is not standing on some side, my issue is about being violent, or being the first to attack. In history I have always seen and I am proud of the fact that Hindus have never attacked. And no matter what happens I will never be the first to create violence. But, when the other side (i.e. Muslims) ever attacks my people then I will surely stand up to save them. I hope I am getting through, I mean I can never be the one to instigate, even if the people I identify are doing so, but I will always be with them in case they are attacked.
I give you an example, the village I come from Jats only constitue 5% of the total population, but they are the actual owners and resident of the village. Rest 95% are outsiders, who rent out their living in my village, many times our Jat brothers beat up some non Jat tenant for no reason, and I have never stood with them in such situations (infact I feel ashamed). So if tomorrow I see Jats or Hindus doing this at a bigger scale, i.e. being the instigator of violence, then I am sure I will not be by their side. And I do not think that we should attack someone just because someone hates us or wants to wipe us out. This only makes us look insecure, let the evil doers do what they want and then put a lid on it when they step out of their boots.
Isn't this what our Government has been doing with Pakistan, everytime Pakis were the ones who attacked us, we just answered their calls with big bangs and showed them what they are. Same thing should be done internally, but I have hope that Muslims of India will not do so, I firmly believe that these riots and killings are political gimmicks, because most of the people who die are so poor that religion is secondary to them, primary is food and shelter.

..................................................................................

And as far as that Muslim guy who made that comment is concerned well I would despise him and feel sorry for him.
But I will feel worst to see a Hindu saying the same thing, because in that case I will feel sorry for myself too, because I am Hindu myself.

..................................................................................

Thanks Narender for your support :)
.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top