History of Marwar in Rajasthan Part I

lrburdak

Active member
Marwar (मारवाड़) is a region of southwestern Rajasthan state in western India. It lies partly in the Thar Desert. The word Marwar is derived from Sanskrit word 'Maruwat'. English translation of the word is "region of death", reflecting harsh climatic conditions. Other view is that the word 'Marwar' is made up of ‘Mar’ from alternate name of Jaisalmer and last part ‘war’ of Mewar.

Imaginary homeland of Marwaris

Marwar is erstwhile princely state of Jodhpur. Marwar is the mythic place of Marwari origin. There is no part of India called Marwar. Historian James Tod says that the dry area between river Sutlej and sea was called Marwar in the past. But today it is supposed to be between Sindh, Gujarat, Mewar, Ajmer and Jaipur. Marwar is an imaginary homeland of Marwaris. In 1929 a Hindi magazine “Chand Marwari Ank” (November 1929) published a special Marwari issue, on the past and present conditions of Marwar, noted that the place politically known as Rajputana is geographically and socially known as Marwar.

History of Marwar

Present Jodhpur division was called Marwar state before independence. The Jodhpur state was founded in the 13th century by the Rathor clan of Rajputs and was later a vassal of the Mughal empire. The British brought it under their control in 1818, and in 1949 it was merged with the state of Rajasthan. Jodhpur city, capital of the former state and now a district administrative centre, was founded in 1459.

Modern researches have indicated that the land of Marwar was sea in ancient times. The Aravalli hill ranges touched the sea. The sand of the desert is considered to be the coastal sand of the sea. During Jurassic period the desert extended up to Narmada River in the south (Imperial Gazette). There is a myth in the Marwar region that this region was called Hakara Sea. Sugarcane was cultivated on the coast of this sea. The traces of stone oil mill (kolhu) are still found in the area.

Head of the state was Maharaja Jodhpur, assisted by Jagirdars, Jamidars and Thakurs. There were 22 parganas and 4500 villages in Marwar state.

Castes of Marwar

In the Marwar state there was Jagidari system of governance before independence. The right to ownership of land was available to higher castes Rajputs, Mahajans and Brahmans. Rajputs were owner of the land, Mahajans were associated with money landing and Brahmans and Purohits were associated with religious functions. Other castes inhabiting Marwar were Jat, Rajput, Gurjar, Mali, Sirvi, Kalbi, Nai, Darji, Suthar, Meghwal, Chamar, Naik, Bhil, Brahman, Jain, Danchi etc.

Out of these Jat, Gurjar, Mali, Sirvi, Kalbi etc. were engaged in cultivation of land and animal husbandry. Rural population had a majority of Jats.

Farmers of Marwar

The rular areas of Marwar region are dominated by farming communities. The farmers of the Marwar region are considered to be the most simple in the state of Rajasthan. The most dominating farmer community in the rural areas of Marwar is Jat. The Jats are politically and economically very sound. The major land holdings in the present times are with Jats. Then comes the Rajput community who were the Jagirdars before independence. The Brahmins and Harijans also play important role in the area. The farmers of the region have done great struggle to come to the present status.

Though the position of Kisan (farmer) in what was Khalsa (under the direct control of the state) was better in comparison to a Kisan of the Jagir areas, he was only a little above a beast of burden. In Jagir areas of Marwar state before independence all cultivators were really landless. There was no tenancy Law and one could be thrown away from the land one cultivated at the pleasure of Jagirdar, his "malik". In most of the Jagirs a Jagirdar would in the first instance be taking fifty percent of the produce. This would be taken by actual division of the produce on the thrashing floor or by appraisal of the standing crop (kunta). The latter method proved at times more onerous as the appraisal depended on the whims of the Kamdar. Then over and above the share of the produce the farmer had to pay numerous "lags" or cesses. There were 64 kinds of begars (work without pay) prevalent in Marwar. Together with the share of the produce known as "Hasil" these cesses meant that the farmers had to part with more than eighty percent of their produce. The findings of the Sukhdeonarain Committee in the years 1940-42 bear this out. If a farmer had to marry his daughter he had to pay "Chavri Lag" if he held a dinner then a "Kansa Lag"; if members of the family separated then "Dhunwa Lag" and so on. If the Jagirdar had a guest then fodder for his mount had to be supplied. Then there was "begar" that is forced labour, for tilling the personal lands of the Jagirdar. The homestead in which the farmer lived in the Abadi had to be vacated in case he ceased cultivating the land. He could not alienate the plot to anyone. Then the bigger Jagirdars had judicial powers including magisterial powers. Further they had their own police force besides the revenue staff. This enabled them to keep their stronghold on the farmers. Over and above this policy of divide and rule was fully practiced. By offering the temptation of giving better land for cultivation one farmer would be set against another. There were no schools worth the name in rural areas and the masses were steeped in ignorance.

Abolition of Jagirs
The oppression of the public by traditional Samants (chiefs) and Jagirdars (feudatories) of Marwar state made their life difficult, which led to a class war. In urban areas, Jaynarayan Vyas started agitation against oppression, under the banner of "Marwar Lok Parishad" founded on 16th May 1938. This movement was supported by National Congress. The persons who played important role in "Marwar Lok Parishad" were: Shiv Dayal Dave and Jorawar Singh Oswal of Nagaur, Kishanlal Sahu, Manak Chand Konari and Sari Mal of Kuchaman, Tulsiram of Didwana, Srikishan Pandit of Kolia and Sukhdev Dipankar of Ladnu.

Rural masses of Marwar were united by Kisan Kesari-Baldev Ram Mirdha under the banner of "Marwar Kisan Sabha" founded in 1940. After the formation of Rajasthan, Baldev Ram Mirdha who had by then retired from Government service formed the "Rajathan Kisan Sabha" and unified the Kisans of Rajasthan under its banner. He was its first president. Since the broad objectives of the Kisan Sabha and the congress were identical the congress leaders approached Baldev Ram Mirdha to unite the Rajasthan Kisan Sabha with the Congress. Baldev Ram Mirdha was a visionary and he realized that the two could not and should not remain separate. Therefore, he just made one demand from the national leaders that the Jagirs be abolished forthwith in Rajasthan. This was agreed to by the Congress high command with the result that the Jagirs were soon abolished. A tenancy law was passed and the cultivating farmers were made the owners of the land.
 
History of Marwar in Rajasthan Part II

Jat population in Rajasthan in 1931

Thakur Deshraj has given an analysis of Jat population in Rajasthan as on 1931. After that census was not by castes. Rajasthan was called Rajputana prior to independence. As per 1931 census the population of Jats in Rajasthan was as under:

Rajputana…………….1042152
Ajmer-Merwara………….30000
Bisnoi Jats………………69873
Total Jat population…. 1142025

The population of jats in then princely states where they were in sizable proportion was as under:

Bharatpur state…………72378
Bikaner state………….215947
Jaipur state……………313609
Marwar state…………..283933

Bisnoi jats mainly inhabited the areas of Bikaner, Jaipur, Bharatpur, Marwar, Kishangarh and Mewar and their combined population was 69873. We find from above table that Marwar had the maximum population of Jats next to Jaipur state and it was 283933.

Famous Jats from Marwar

Baldev Ram Mirdha,
Foolabai,
Guru Jambheshwar,
Harchand Ram Moond,
Karmabai,
Khema Baba,
Nathuram Mirdha,
Parasram Maderna,
Raghuvendra Mirdha,
Ram Niwas Mirdha ,
Ranabai,
Sona Ram,
Tejaji

Jat Gotras in Jodhpur district

Jodhpur is the center of Marwar region and is important Jat belt. We do not have any combined report which can give details about the distribution of Jat gotras in Marwar region. Jat Samaj Magazine, December 2006 issue gives membership list from All the states, the region of Marwar is also there. We find that maximum membership from any district in Rajasthan is from Jodhpur. There are large number of people who use Chaudhary, Jat or no surname. Out of these people with gotra as surnames were selected and tabulated. These are 236 people and 112 gotras. The figure after gotra is the count out of 236 from which we can roughly assess comparative population of that gotra. Here is the list of Jat gotras in Jodhpur district:

Anwla 1, Atri 1, Ausu 1, Badeta 1, Badiyasar 1, Bambal 1, Banga 1, Banta 1, Barra 1, Beda 2, Behra 1, Benda 1, Beniwal 6, Bhadla 1, Bhadu 2, Bhakal 2, Bhakar 3, Bhambhu 3, Bhanun 1, Bhanwaria 1, Bhaskar 1, Bhinchar 1, Bhukar 1, Bijarnia 1, Chahar 1, Chhirang 2, Dara 1, Dater 1, Dawan 1, Delu 1, Dhaka 2, Dhatarwal 8, Dhauliya 1, Dhayal 1, Dhidariya 1, Dimaniya 1, Dogipal 1, Dorwal 1, Dudhwal 1, Dudi 10, Duktawa 3, Fadak 1, Fadauda 1, Garu 1, Gawaria 1, Ghat 1, Godara 11, Gurjar 2, Gwala 1, Hardu 1, Hooda 10, Jakhar 14, Jaliyawda 2, Jalwania 1, Jandu 2, Jhajharia 1, Jyani 4, Kachchhawa1, Kajla 1, Kakrawa 1, Kala 1, Kalirana 1, Kamediya 3, Kapdia 1, Karwasra 1, Kaswan 4, Kataniya 1, Khod 1, Khoja 8, Khot 2, Kot 1, Lamrod 1, Latiyal 1, Lol 2, Machra 3, Maderna 3, Makar 2, Malhan 1, Mayla 2, Mehria 1, Mirdah 3, Mothra 2, Mundan 2, Mundel 3, Mundiyara 1, Nahar 1, Naradhaniya1, Pachar 1, Padauda 1, Pawar 1, Pichkya 1, Pilania 1, Punia 7, Ralia 1, Rayal 1, Rewad 1, Sabarwal 1, Sail 2, Sangwa 2, Sani 1, Saran 16, Senwar 2, Shail 1, Sheoran 1, Shihag 1, Sinwar 1 Sirohi 1, Siyol 3, Sou 1, Tada 1, Tandi 3, Thori 1,

We find from above list that Saran (16) is the biggest gotra in Jodhpur district followed by Jakhar (14), Godara (11), Hooda (10), Dudi (10), Khoja (8), Dhatarwal (8), Punia (7), Beniwal (6), Kaswan (4), Jyani (4) etc in decreasing order.

References

Rosemary Crill Marwar Paintings: A History of the Jodhpur Style, India Book House, Mumbai, 1999 ISBN: 8175081392

Bakshi, S.R. & et. al. (Eds.) Marwar and its Political Administration; Delhi, 2000 ISBN: 81-7629-224-9

Tod, Payne, C.H. Annals of Rajasthan Annals of Marwar HC., 1994, ISBN 8120603508

Colonel James Tod: Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan, Oriental Books, New Delhi, 1994

D.K.Taknet: “Heroes of a Desert Land” in B.M.Birla: A great visionary, Indus, New Delhi, 1996

Mohanram Maruka: “Marwar ka Itihas” in Jat Samaj (January-February, 1998), Agra
Illan Cooper: “What is in a name”, Marwar: A chronical of Marwari History and Achievement, Arpan Publications, Mumbai, 1996

Illan Cooper: “A painted History”, Marwar: A chronical of Marwari History and Achievement, Arpan Publications, Mumbai, 1996

D.K.Taknet: Marwari Samaj Aur Brijmohan Birla, Indian Institute of Marwari Entrepreneurship, Jaipur, 1993ISBN 81-85878-00-5

Dr Natthan Singh: Jat-Itihas, Jat-Samaj Kalyan-Parishad, Gwalior, 2004

Jat Samaj, Agra, December 2006
 
History of Marwar Part III

Nagaur district

Nagaur is a district town in Rajasthan. It was founded by Naga Gotra Jats. Nagas originally ruled over this place and about 7th century onwards the Chauhans became the overlords of Nagaur and it was included in Sapadalaksha. The foundation of city dates back to 4th century. Nagaur city was at the centre of Muslim invasion from Central Asia. The Nagaur fort is the famous place of historical importance.

Glorified by the bards, the history of Nagaur finds mention even in the Mahabharata. The kingdom of Ahichhatrapur which Arjun is said to have conquered and subsequently offered to his Guru Dronacharya, was perhaps some of the area of the Nagaur district. The birth place of Meera and Abul Fazal, Nagaur district has a charbhuja and Parsawanath Temple at Merta and the Dargah of Sufi Saint Tarkin at Nagaur city.

Nagaur District is situated between 26°25' & 27°40' North Latitude & 73°.10' & 75°.15' East Longitude. It is situated amidst seven districts namely Bikaner, Churu, Sikar, Jaipur, Ajmer, Pali, Jodhpur. Nagaur is the fifth largest district in Rajasthan with a vast terrain spreading over 17,718 sq. K.M. Its geographical spread is a good combine of plain, hills, sand mounds & as such it is a part of the great Indian Thar Desert.

The present district of Nagaur finds a place in the heart of the Rajasthan state. If we draw a cross over the map of Rajasthan the centre of this cross is bound to fall in the district of Nagaur. Before the merger of the states, Nagaur was a part of the erstwhile Jodhpur State.

After indepenence, Nagaur had the honour of being selected as the place in the country from where the Democratic Decentralisation process was launched by the late Shri Jawaharlal Nehru, the first Prime Minister of India on the 2nd October 1959.

Jat gotras in Nagaur district

As per the member list of Jat Samaj Agra, December 2006, the Jat gotras in Nagaur district are:

Bajya, Balhara, Bapedia, Batesar, Beda, Beerda, Bhakal, Bhakal, Bhambhu, Bhinchar, Bisu, Bugalia, Chandelia, Dabola, Danga, Dhaka, Dhauliya, Dhayal, Didel, Dookya, Dugastawa, Farauda, Galwa, Garhwal, Garu, Gatiyal, Godara, Golia, Inania, Jajra, Jakhar, Janjhaliya, Kalwania, Kanwalada, Karwasara, Kaswan, Khadaw, Kharra, Khudkhudia, Kukana, Lamrod, Loyal, Manda, Matwa, Mawlia, Meel, Mehria, Mundaliya, Mundel, Murawatia, Muwal, Netad, Netra, Nimbad, Pichkiya, Punia, Ranwa, Sangwa, Saran, Senwar, Shahu, Sirohi, Sou, Tada, Thalod, Tholia,
 
History of Marwar Part IV

Jat Gotras in Barmer district

Barmer is the western part of Marwar region and is important Jat belt. We do not have any combined report which can give details about the distribution of Jat gotras in Marwar region. Jat Samaj Magazine, December 2006 issue, which gives membership list. I find that maximum membership from any district in Rajasthan is from Jodhpur followed by Barmer. There are large number of people who use Chaudhary or no surname. Out of these people who put gotra as surnames were selected and tabulated. These are 201 people and 57 gotras in Barmer district. The figure after gotra is the count out of 201 from which we can roughly assess comparative population of that gotra.

List of Jat gotras in Barmer district is:

Bairad 5, Balhara 1, Bana 1, Beniwal 23, Bhadu 3, Bhagaur 1, Bhakar 1, Bhambhu 4, Bhanwaria 1, Bhaumu 1, Bhukar 2, Bidiyasar 1, Deswal 1, Dhaka 1, Dhatarwal 5, Dhedu 1, Dookya 8, Dudi 2, Duger 1, Ghat 1, Godara 19, Gorasia 1, Gujar 1, Hooda 2, Isram 2, Jajra 1, Jakhar 10, Jandu 1, Jyani 3, Kakad 1, Karwasra 7, Khot 1, Kukana 1, Langoria 1, Legha 3, Lol 1, Lukha 2, Machra 2, Manwal 1, Moond 1, Moonth 1, Muralia 1, Nain 2, Nehra 1, Pawda 2, Potalia 1, Punia 6, Sahu 2, Sani 1, Saran 24, Sau 12, Senwar 1, Sihag 13, Siyol 1, Tandi 1, Tetarwal 1, Thori 6,

The biggest gotra in Barmer district from above analysis is Saran (24) and Beniwal (23), followed by Godara (19), Sihag (13), Sau (12), Jakhar (10), Dookya (8), Karwasra (7), Thori (6), Punia (6), Dhatarwal (5), Bairad (5), Bhambhu (4) etc in decreasing order.
 
There is a lot of hard work that has gone into collecting and putting to paper this material.

All of us are appreciative of that.


As one has pointed out previously, the articles need a little more organizing in terms of thoughts, concepts and chronology.

These concepts need to be sorted out, prior to letting loose a torrent of articles.

One hopes this will not be taken amiss, but these articles, in their present state, will do a lot of damage !

A few points:

MARWAR.

Marwar is not an imaginary area. The area was and is known as Marwar.

It had other, names as well, Jangaldesh., Matsya desh etc

RAJPUTANA:

The term only arose for a couple of centuries or less, and was coined by the British. The area was never known as Rajputana prior to that, so why harp on that?.

LAND OWNERSHIP- IZAREDARI, JAGIRDARI

The rajputs never owned the land.

They held the land at the pleasure of the Delhi Muslim Mughals. Later the British confirmed their zamindari, and allowed them ownership rights. The british also allowed then to ride rough shod over the populace.

That was something the Muslims by themselves, never managed to achieve!

The Rajputs were given the Izaredari, also known as Zamindari. The were given the land on contract, and they had pay a certain amount of money as – rent or lagaan, which they paid to their Masters.

These Izaredaris were also bought by them by their selling the sisters and daughters to the Delhi Muslims. In no case was a Muslim women given back in marriage to any rajput family.

As a separate piece of research, it may be a Phd thesis, why did this phenomena succeeded in Rajstashan, and not in Haryana, Western UP, where the Sarv Khap held sway????

MAHARAJASHIP- JODHPUR ETC

The maharaja ship was also a term given to them by the British.

Today a number of Indian Historians seek to glorify the rajputs .

The facts are a little different, and when writing these articles it is very important the attention be paid to the details and nuances therein contained

If that attention is not paid, we simply have a confused jumble, a mish mash of information.


Regrettably, that does no good what so ever!

Ravi Chaudhary
 
Hi Raviji,

Thanks a lot but I do not agree with you that these articles will do damage. Can you explain how and why? We are bringing facts, which were so far hidden. Situations in Rajasthan were very different from Haryana and UP. Can you put inputs to rectify the historical mistakes and the remedies? Here are comments on your confusions:

Marwar

I have written that Marwar is the mythic place of Marwari origin. There is no part of India called Marwar. Marwari does not mean people from Marwar. What is understood in media about Marwaris is the business people controlling Indian economy, appear to belong to Marwar. It is not so. All business people from Rajasthan and even Haryana are called Marwaris. That is why I have written Marwar as mythic place of Marwari origin. Probably you have not understood it properly.

Marwar does not cover Jangaldesh, Matsya desh etc. It was a separate region.

Maharaja Jodhpur

You are not aware about situations in Rajasthan during those days. It is alright that they were titled Maharaja by British Raj but it was a fact. We can not be harsh to this extent that we simply appear biased and our views are simply rejected. We have to bring all the facts and then come to certain conclusions after discussion.

Rajputana
Rajputana is again and again used by all historians. Even reputed historians like RC Majumdar mention term Rajput in ancient times when even this term had not come in use. How can you avoid ? What are the ways ?
 
Hi Raviji,

Thanks a lot but I do not agree with you that these articles will do damage. Can you explain how and why? We are bringing facts, which were so far hidden. Situations in Rajasthan were very different from Haryana and UP. Can you put inputs to rectify the historical mistakes and the remedies? Here are comments on your confusions:


Rajputana
Rajputana is again and again used by all historians. Even reputed historians like RC Majumdar mention term Rajput in ancient times when even this term had not come in use. How can you avoid ? What are the ways ?

Burdakji

I have no desire to get into tit for tat arguments.

My comments are on the methodology, and the following of certain logical steps to creating of a historical persective , specifically for the History of the Jats.

The first step is the creation of a solid foundation. To create such a foundation, certain premises, axioms, rules, need to be created . Evidence needs to be produced, analysed and argued out, and a solid foundation created.

We should not fall into the trap, that volume means quality, or that a simple accumulation of ' facts', opinions and views. with reference to some books thrown in for good measure,means progress.

Jat history requires reconstruction, and the rejection of hastily formed views, views which are propogated and taught in our text books, which unfortunately is mostly what we have.

This reconstruction involves patience, much pain, many arguments with those who oppose us, especially when they hold positions where they dominate the distribution of material- eg to schools, and universities.

No solid foundation, means that the rest of the edifice is also shaky.



As to how these articles of yours can cause much damage ?:


For one example( there are many others, but just one to illustrate the point) :

You are stating that R C Majumdar used a term "Rajput" for since ancient times, and that Majumdar was wrong.

That has nothing to do with Majumdar being a respected historian. Respected Historians can also be wrong.

If you continue to propogate Majumdar's, wrong usage, then are you not also being wrong?.

Is your article then also not wrong?.

Will your article then, not be propogating a wrong perspective?.

Will this wrong perspective not cause damage?

What is worse is, that these articles will become part of the main offerings of this website, part of the history section of this site and other sites - an official position of the Jats , as it were!.

Is that what you wish to see?

Do please reflect upon this.

Often haste is best made slowly.

Best regards


Ravi Chaudhary
 
Burdakji

My comments are on the methodology, and the following of certain logical steps to creating of a historical persective , specifically for the History of the Jats.

The first step is the creation of a solid foundation. To create such a foundation, certain premises, axioms, rules, need to be created . Evidence needs to be produced, analysed and argued out, and a solid foundation created.

Ravi ji

Can you explain how should we go about it ?

What should be premises ,axioms and rules?
 
Lets be little accomodating with each others' "styles" of writing. There is always space for debate, which is good, but it shouldn't discourage any of us. I guess such articles are good even though they dont have much which is not already in common books that most of us own; still they are good for reminding general facts.

As per axioms and basis for Jat history I didnt understand question and I personally have no axioms so far neither hope to nor care to develope any in near future. So far it has been gathering of random facts. I guess it takes years before one(atleast I) would be able to get complete picture. Imagine, a history student does BA with history subjects, then MA and finally 3-4 years of PhD. In these 8-9 years he comes across many books, articles and all sorts of exams and homework/night-outs and then he feels confident to be able to "begin" research in particular subject. I personally feel us most of us have missed that formal process and directly jumped into research. But still discussions are good, it atleast maintains the enrivonment with illusion of research. I personally wont be able to post much here in future because it's no use (atleast to me). Discussions are good just to "arouse interest" but one has to go through same usual process of collecting references, smearing books by underlines, doing boring homeworks to make up for the jump from technical profession to history. I personally think before reading books on Jat history one need to "thoroughly" read history of India, central asia and Persia. Then, reading Jat history books would be useful to know "what hasn't been done yet" and one can begin to fill up the links.

-vinod
 
Last edited:
Regarding damage

Regarding damage, It is a Jatland discussion form and it is not the final what has been written. My writings are on Wiki Media which is editable. If one feels that some thing does not suit somebody or it appears to be harming it can be modified. If we keep on waiting some best things automatically, it will not happen. We will have to bring with hard work. It will take time. Megasthenese mentioned only a few Jat clan names and we quote in our history. So gradually we will build history. The point is if do not allow things to come in our own in-house discussion, how will we reconstruct the Jat History. We are bringing Jat clans in various regions and their distribution in these articles that will help to build the history, how they are damaging ? Also we have to keep a balanced approach also to make it acceptable to all people in the society. If Jat history is only for Jats then it will not be a part of History. I believe let us keep moving not remain stationary thinking and thinking. It is rightly said in sanskrit about the society that:

चैरेवति ! चैरेवति ! - चलते रहो ! चलते रहो !

RC Majumdar

Regarding RC Majumdar, we have to give credit to him for the reason that he realizes that unjustice has been done to Jat history.

R.C.Majumdar in his book "History of culture of the people of India, the classical age" (page 42) writes about their role in stemming the tide of Islam for two centuries as under:

"From the very commencement through every one of these routes. The early naval raids against Thana, Baroch and Debal and subsequent raids in the same direction mark the vain efforts to reach India by sea, of the land routes, the Kheyber pass was guarded by Kabul and Zabul while the Bolan pass was protected by the brave Jats of Kikan, If there had been history of India written without prejudices and predilections the heroic deeds of these brave people, the jats who stemmed the tide of Islam for two centuries, would certainly have received the recognition they so richly deserved."

Regards,
 
iHi Ravi and Laxman ji

Both of you have raised very genuine points and suggestions as per both you are also very pertinet and they need to be taken in to account for our future endavours regarding Jat history.

First of all I agree with Laxman ji that we need to make a start and otherwise in serach of perfection that is only relative, we may not start at all.

So right way will be give suggestions and edit article if those points are valid.

I am really happy with the positive approach shown by Laxman ji that we need to give credit to others also for some achivement of theirs and our efforts should not cater to mere ego pampering of Jats and should also be acceptd by others like RC Majumdar in this case.

However I would like to agree with Ravi ji in this regard that these efforts to get the support of other historians should not be at the cost of truth and negative consequences for our own history .

Like in this case though RC Majumdar is a respected historian It is also true that Rajput word has not been mentioned in any ancient texts ,I would like to Know if he has quoted any source any where regarding this ,now to accept the existence of Rajput term in ancient times will mean denying the heritage of Jat Kings who later were called Rajputs by some but who never called them so.

To accept this lie of Rajputs will mean that there were two groups one farmer and other ruler and our ancesstors had tilled the lands only.Though farming is a very noble profession but the fact is that Jats had Kingdoms and were rulers and real owner of lands that no body can deny .I am not against any one but fact is if we see some of pampered classes today have no real history and a very shameful past ,now to glorify them we can not allow our own history to be a causality in the process.

Again certain terms like Rajputana is a very neo term aimed at showing and glorifying some; now we know the before the active collabration of some foreigners whole of this area has been dominated by other groups and Jats being one of them,so we can avoid such terms and use more representative terms in this regard .

I myself tried to have a debate in this regard over certain basic terms like aryan, Sythian, Rajput, gujjar, yadu, bhatti etc But response was lacking from even Ravi ji so I had to leave it.

Now, we are moving in to the next phase of Jat History i.e. inferences of collective data .By now we already know most of the refrences regarding jats in various texts which have been quoted by various authors but we have missing links like gap between Kushans and jat king sahasi rulers or jat king Harshwardhan who were unambigously jat rulers.

Now certainly jats were here in between those times that lead us to a point that they were reffered by other name, what was that and what is the proof ?

Further searching on Yashodharma ,Shiladitya and Vikramaditya to accertain their identity in unambigous terms.

Finding relation of jats, huns, gujjars and khatris and reason of confusion regarding their common clans.

Putting that info on internet which both of you are doing excelantly.


So, need of hour is a more intence debate with an open mind in this regard free from any bias.


And lastly many enthusitic scholars are doing efforts regarding our history they need to be encouraged one idea was to sponser them as you discussed already and second is to credit them for their efforts if they come out with some good articles that should be archived in their own names .A similar suggestion was put by Vinod on Yahoo group and people; particulary young will feel rewarded if their article or reserach is archived in their own names in Jat history records.We can start a section where we can submit the article and after a discussion we can put that for records if found up to mark.
 
Last edited:
Jar rulers in Marwar - Loyal Jats

Loyal (लोयल) is a gotra of Jats found in Marwar region of Rajasthan. Loyal gotra Jats are also found in Sikar district of Rajasthan. They have been rulers in Marwar region prior to 16th century.


History
They had ruled Nagaur prior to 16th century. Pathans, Mughals etc had occupied the big cities of the region like Nagaur but the Loyal people never paid royalty to them. They ruled their areas under Bhumiachar system. When Akbar became the ruler of Delhi he arrested many Jat sardars after inviting them to Delhi. When this thing came to the notice of Jat chieftain named Tola he went to Delhi to meet Akbar. Akbar told him to pay the taxes. Tola replied that take as much of gold coins as can be carried by your mules and leave our brothers. This indicates that Tola was a very rich chieftain. The discussion between Tola and Akbar is recorded in poetic form as follows in Rajasthani Language:

''Akbar sun Tola mila, Karke baat karari'',

अकबर सूं तोला मिला, करके बात कराडी

''Patti rahun mai Nagaur’ri, ghar mhara khari'',

पट्टी रहूं मैं नागौररी, घर म्हारा खाडी

''Khachchar bharle moharanki, Biradari chhod mhari''

खच्चर भरले मोहरां की, बिरादरी छोड म्हाडी

Capital of Tola Sardar

The capital of Tola sardar was at Khari village in Nagaur pargana. A pond in the west of village was named ‘Torna’ after him. There is an inscription on this pond dated bhadwa sudi 8 samvat 1565 (1508 AD). On this stone there is a statue of Tola chieftain. Kistana, Dhololav etc are ponds near Khari village, which were constructed by the ancestors of Tola, reflecting the richness of this clan.

Villages in Nagaur district where Loyal Jats still live are : Khari, Kuchera, etc. Loyal Jats are also found in Village Dalmas in Sikar district.

Reference

Thakur Deshraj: Jat Itihas (Hindi), Maharaja Suraj Mal Smarak Shiksha Sansthan, Delhi, 1934, 2nd edition 1992, page-608
 
Abolition of Jagirs - Dabda Kand

Dabda or Dabra (डाबड़ा) is a village in Didwana tehsil of Nagaur district in Rajasthan. The village is known for Dabda Kand in 1947 during the agitation for abolition of Jagirs in Rajasthan.


Back ground of Dabda Kand

The Jats in Bikaner, Jaipur and Jodhpur States are a formidable factor. The Jat community was the most numerous and largest single community in the Princely States of Bikaner, Jaipur and Jodhpur. The Maharajas, minor estates holders (feudatory) and their Kinsmen (the jagirdars) oppressed and suppressed the Jat Kisans in various manners forcing them to carry out agitations. Unfortunately the Imperial power (British) were always there to provide them much needed support. In the Shekhawati area of Sikar, Khetri, Nawalgarh, Dundlod, Bissau etc. the Jat Kisans carried out prolonged agitations against the feudal oppression form 1922 to 1930, 1930 to 1938 and from 1938 to 1947. The feudal lords grudgingly yielded and some concessions were wrested from them. The worst was exploitation in the name of “Begar” under which the Jat Kisan had to render free services by way of these feudal lords. They had to provide not only free labour but also their bullocks and carts too to their feudal lords. In Jodhpur State 84% of the kind was parceled out in Jagirs (feudal land lords) most of whom were Kinsmen of the Maharaja. Several of them held revenue and magisterial powers over their peasants against which there was no appeal. [1]


A glance at the ‘Census Report of Marwar (Jodhpur State) for 1941’ [2], would make one aware of the size of the Jat community in the State. The total population of the State was 25,55,904 out of which 3,54,342 or approximately 14% were Jats. In the Jat belt extending from Mallani paragana (present Barmer District bordering Sindh province), Jodhpur paragana (Jodhpur district) Merta, Nagaur, Didwana and Parabatsar paraganas (present Nagaur district) the Jats formed nearly 30% of the total population, not an insignificant proportion by any standard. Their capacity to create trouble in the State can, therefore, be easily visualized. If the Jats of Punjab formed the crux of the Pakistan problem, the Jat community in Marwar (Jodhpur State) was no less the crux of problem in Marwar in the even the Maharaja acceded to Pakistan. As in Punjab in Marwar in the event of the Maharaja acceded to Pakistan. As in Punjab here also the question posed was, ‘Would this robust community meekly’ accept the accession of Jodhpur State to Pakistan? They would certainly resist it by force. This fact is also borne out by the advice rendered by Lord Mountbatten to the Maharaja that were he to do so serious communal trouble in the state would be the inevitable consequence. V.P. Menon has quoted in the his book “ the integration of Indian States" that The community which could create trouble was none other than the Jat community which would have resisted this decision by force. [3]


The Marwar Kisan Sabha was organised to ventilate grievances of the predominant Jat Kisans. The Marwar Kisan Sabha held its annual session in 1943 where Chowdhary Sir Chhotu Ram then Revenue Minister in Punjab, was invited as the Chief Guest. The Main Resolution among others that was settlement operations in the Jagir areas which was vehemently opposed by the leading Jagirdars. The on going Kisan agitation finally culminated in what is known as “Dabra Kand’ a veritable Jallianwalla Bagh. [4]


The Dabra Kand, a black deed and watershed

The Kisan movement which was being orgainsed by the Marwar Kisan Sabha and the Marwar Lok Parishad jointly was a parallel movement to that of the national movement going on in British India whose aims were common i.e. to free the country form foreign rule. To mobilize the peasants, meetings under the joint auspices of Marwar Lok Parishad and Marwar Kisan Sabha were held at various place in the Jat belt and such meeting was fixed at village Dabra in Nagaur district for 13th March 1947. The Jagirdars got together in a bid to crush the political awakening among the Kisan and the black deed at Dabra was planned. In this the Jagirdars had the blessings and active support of the Maharaja. The Kisan Sammelan was to have been addressed jointly by leaders of Marwar Lok Parishad and Kisan Sabha. The jagirdars had collected nearly a thousand Rajputs of the surrounding area and had begun massive preparations three day in advance of the Kisan gathering to teach a lasting and final lesson to the agitating peasantry and the Jats in particular. The Jat troops of Jodhpur Sardar infantry, who were on leave at that time having returned from Hongkong, participated in large number in this gathering. As soon as the peasants started congregating on the morning of 13th March, 1947 they were attacked by the Jagirdars and their henchmen wielding guns and swords. These armed ruffians started to terrorize the village, ransacking and putting fire to the thatched huts. In this premeditated and murderous attack five Kisans, four of them Jats were killed. Among the killed, three Jats were soldiers from Jodhpur Sardar infantry namely Rugha Ram, Ramu Ram and Panna Ram, Subedar Kisan Ram and Sepoy Bodu Ram both of Sardar infantry were among the grievously injured. Subedar Kishna Ram was blinded during this attack while protecting the defenseless villagers. Bodu Ram had both his arms broken. Sarvashri Mathurdas Mathur, Dwarkadas Purohit , Chhagan Raj Chopasniwala, Kishan Lal Shah of the Lok Parishad and Narsinh Kachhwaha of the Kisan Sabha received grave and serious injuries. They were dragged into the Jagirdar’s Kot (Fort) and were left there for dead. Even women were not spared and many of them received grievous injuries. Smt. Tulsi had her legs cut off by sword blows and Smt. Kesar also received grave injuries. The State civil and police authorities swung into action and registered cases of rioting, rebellious conduct and murderous assault against the unarmed and peaceful but gravely injured victims and prosecuted them. [5]


It was also commonly held that this black deed known as ‘ Dabra Kand’ had been carried out with the blessings of the Maharaja. This has been narrated poignantly by Shri Ram Kisen Kalla in his book “ Dabra Ki Kahani, Usi Ki Jabani’ (Hindi). A martyrs’ column has been erected in the village upon which names of those killed have been inscribed. Sobhag Mathur in his book “ Struggle for Responsible Government in Marwar” writes: “The Dabda Kand was one of the blackest deeds of Marwar feudalism”. This black deed had evoked widespread protest both in the press and in public. The weekly paper “Praja Sewak” of Jodhpur condemned it in unequivocal language. The Bombay weekly ‘vandematram’ while holding the Maharaja responsible for this tragedy declared, “it will shake the foundation of his throne.” ‘Janambhumi’ another Bombay weekly said, ‘The blood spilled in Dabra will grow into the plant of freedom in which the Rajas and Nawabs will have no place’. ‘the Lokvani’ of Jaipur described the tragedy at Dabra as “ Sensational and an armed attack on non violent persons as disgrace to mankind.” The Regional Committee of the All India States peoples Conference for Rajputana adopted a resolution against jagirdari repression, condemned the “Dabra Kand” and blamed the Maharaja and his Government”. The Dabra Kand was a veritable Jallanwalla Bagh and indeed proved to be a watershed in the peasant agitation in Jodhpur State. [6]


References

1. ↑ D.R. Chaudhary: “The Role of Jats and their contribution to the Polity of North-West India”, The Jats, Vol. II, Ed Dr Vir Singh, Delhi, 2006, p. 294
2. ↑ The Census Report of Marwar (Jodhpur State) – 1941, published by Government of Jodhpur
3. ↑ D.R. Chaudhary: “The Role of Jats and their contribution to the Polity of North-West India”, The Jats, Vol. II, Ed Dr Vir Singh, Delhi, 2006, p. 295
4. ↑ D.R. Chaudhary: “The Role of Jats and their contribution to the Polity of North-West India”, The Jats, Vol. II, Ed Dr Vir Singh, Delhi, 2006, p. 295
5. ↑ D.R. Chaudhary: “The Role of Jats and their contribution to the Polity of North-West India”, The Jats, Vol. II, Ed Dr Vir Singh, Delhi, 2006, p. 296
6. ↑ D.R. Chaudhary: “The Role of Jats and their contribution to the Polity of North-West India”, The Jats, Vol. II, Ed Dr Vir Singh, Delhi, 2006, p. 296

Further reading

* The Census Report of Marwar (Jodhpur State) – 1941, published by Government of Jodhpur
* V.P.Menon, Integration of the Indian States, Orient Longman, New Delhi
* Ram Kishan Kalla, Dabra Ki Kahani, Usi Ki Jabani (Hindi), Rajasthan National Congress
 
Laxmanji,

Let me first say that you are doing great job in writing such articles.
But at the same time let me make a comment which I wanted to make for long time but couldn't dare because of respect for your effort and also due to the unspoken consensus amongst our little group not to criticize anyone who is putting efforts in Jat history even though it's not proper in strictest sense. Most of your articles are compilation of paragraphs taken verbatim from the references. Taking this last post as an example, it's just soft copy of Col Choudhary's article (p294-295) in Vir Singh's book. In fact Ravi ji too had a soft copy which I got from him. I am putting full article here just in case anyone is interested in reading. (Dabra kaand is described in p9-10 in pdf file.)
http://www.wam.umd.edu/~vinods/Col_Chaudharydr_article.pdf

I don't know where is the value addition in typing this article whose soft copy is already available. But we want to spread knowledge freely to as many people as possible. Agreed. So please don't mind me and continue your work. But instead of referencing with your authorship the way you do just mention that this article is copy from such and such source.

-vinod
 
Thanks Vinod,

I searched Dabra on Net and found nothing on it except one entry which I have given as External link about Dabra article on Jatland Wiki. ( See - http://www.jatland.com/home/Dabda) Since I have posted this article on Jatland Wiki so lost any originality about its authorship. Dabra incidence is so prominent but no entry on net so I thought to give it on net for the easy search with both hindi name and alternative english name. This is to make search easy. I did not know that you are having this soft copy. You wrote only after it came on Jatland. So knowledge about Jat history is there with you are Raviji or Narenderji or Dharampalji but not with our general readers. We teach history or science to our children repeatedly every year. Radios and TVs repeat things regularly. This is done to make a permanent memory.

It served my purpose. It was there on Jatland Wiki but no body commented. Here it draws your attention. We are not here for original research. Though this content may help to prepare an original paper because it has got proper references.

Also I have fitted this info in Marwar article, movements of farmers on wikipedia also. May some times look boring but it has purpose. You can understand how boring might be the work to prepare these contents. Hope this clears my point !!!
 
Madhyakalin Rajasthan me Jat Janapada

मध्यकालीन राजस्थान में जाट जनपद

सात प्रमुख जाट जनपद

भूतपूर्व बीकानेर राज्य की स्थापना से पहले इस भूभाग में जाटों के सात गणराज्य थे. दयालदास के अनुसार विक्रम की 16 वीं शताब्दी पूर्वार्ध में इन जनपदों (राज्य) की स्थिति इस प्रकार अंगरेजी के समान सन्दर्भ अंक शब्द के अंत में कुछ ऊपर थी. [1] [2]

अनुक्रमांक नाम जनपद नाममुखिया गाँवों की संख्या राजधानी

1. पूनिया कान्हा 360 बड़ी लून्दी (लूद्दी)

2. बेणीवाल रायसल 360 रायसलाणा

3. सोहुवा अमरा 84 घाणसिया

4. सिहाग चोखा 140 सूई

5. सारण पूला 360 भाड़ंग

6. गोदारा पाण्डू 360 शेखसर

7. कसवां कंवरपाल 360 सीधमुख


गाँवों की कुल संख्या 2024

इस तरह दयालदास के अनुसार उस समय जाटों के अधीन गाँवों की संख्या 2040 थी. जबकि कर्नल टाड ने जोहियों को भी जाट मानते हुए जाट राज्यों के गाँवों की संख्या 2200 बताई है जो इस प्रकार है[3]-

अनुक्रमांक नाम जनपद नाममुखिया गाँवों की संख्या राजधानी

1. पूनिया कान्हा 300 बड़ी लून्दी (लूद्दी)

2. बेणीवाल रायसल 150 रायसलाणा

3. जोहिया शेरसिंह 600 घाणसिया

4. सिहाग चोखा 150 सूई

5. सारण पूला 300 भाड़ंग

6. गोदारा पाण्डू 700 शेखसर


गाँवों की कुल संख्या 2200[4]


इनसे अलग ठाकुर देशराज ने जाटों के अधीन गाँवों की कुल संख्या 2660 बताई है[5] -

अनुक्रमांक नाम जनपद नाममुखिया गाँवों की संख्या राजधानी

1. पूनिया कान्हा 300 बड़ी लून्दी (लूद्दी)

2. बेणीवाल रायसल 150 रायसलाणा

3. जोहिया शेरसिंह 600 भुरूपाल

4. सिहाग चोखा 150 सूई

5. सारण पूला 360 भाड़ंग

6. गोदारा पाण्डू 700 शेखसर

7. कसवां कंवरपाल 400 सीधमुख

गाँवों की कुल संख्या 2660

जाटों की इन शाखाओं के अलावा ठाकुर देशराज ने जाटों की कुछ अन्य शाखाओं और उनके राज्यों का उल्लेख किया है जिसमें सुहाग, भादू, भूकर, चाहर, जाखड़ और नैन मुख्य हैं [6] [7]इस तरह इतिहासकारों द्वारा दी गयी संख्या में पर्याप्त अन्तर है. मुंशी सोहन लाल ने भूतपूर्व बीकानेर रियासत का कुल एरिया 23500 वर्गमील और गाँवों की संख्या 1739 दी है. [8]जबकि जाटों का अधिकार पूर्व बीकानेर रियासत के एक हिस्से पर ही था. ऐसा लगता है की इन प्रमुख जाट पट्टियों में जाटों की दूसरी शाखाओं व अन्य जातियों के गाँव भी मिले हुए थे. कभी-कभी एक शाखा के गाँव एक स्थान पर न होकर अलग-अलग भी होते थे. जैसे सीधमुख तहसील राजगढ़ में कसवां जाटों का आधिपत्य था और चुरू तथा चुरू तहसील के अनेक गाँवों पर भी उनका अधिकार था, किंतु इन दोनों स्थानों के बीच लूद्दी में पूनिया जाटों का तथा ददरेवा में चौहान राजपूतों के ठिकाने थे. इस तरह एक गाँव के विभिन्न भागों को विभिन्न जाट शाखाओं में जोड़ने से व अलग-अलग गिनने से जाट राज्यों के अधीन इन गाँवों की संख्या आई होगी.[9] [10]

जाट जनपदों का विवरण

लाघडिया व शेखसर के गोदारा

शेखसर व लाघड़िया दोनों ही गोदारों की राजधानियाँ थी. शेखसर चुरू से लगभग 58 मील उत्तर-पश्चिम में है जबकि लाघड़िया डूंगरगढ़ तहसील में है. इनके अधीन 360 से 700 गाँवों का होना लिखा है. अतः जाट राज्यों में गोदारों की शक्ति सबसे अधिक थी. वैसे इन जाटों में फूट और प्रतिस्पर्धा रहती थी. राठोड़ बीका ने जब इस इलाके की और राज्य स्थापित करने की दृष्टी से प्रयाण किया तो उस समय लाघड़िया का शासक पांडू गोदारा था जिसके दान देने की चर्चा चारों और फ़ैली हुई थी. [11][12]

भाड़ंग के सारण

भाड़ंग चुरू जिले की तारानगर तहसील में चुरू से लगभग 40 मील उत्तर में बसा था. पृथ्वीराज चौहान के बाद अर्थार्त चौहान शक्ति के पतन के बाद भाड़ंग पर किसी समय जाटों का आधिपत्य स्थापित हो गया था. जो 16 वीं शताब्दी में राठोडों के इस भू-भाग में आने तक बना रहा. पहले यहाँ सोहुआ जाटों का अधिकार था और बाद में सारण जाटों ने छीन लिया. जब 16 वीं शताब्दी के पूर्वार्ध में राठोड इस एरिया में आए, उस समय पूला सारण यहाँ का शासक था और उसके अधीन 360 गाँव थे. इसी ने अपने नाम पर पूलासर (तहसील सरदारशहर) बसाया था जिसे बाद में सारण जाटों के पुरोहित पारीक ब्राह्मणों को दे दिया गया. पूला की पत्नी का नाम मलकी था, जिसको लेकर बाद में गोदारा व सारणों के बीच युद्ध हुआ. [13] सारणों में जबरा और जोखा बड़े बहादुर थे. उनकी कई सौ घोड़ों पर जीन पड़ती थी. उन्हीं के नाम पर जबरासर और जोखासर गाँव अब भी आबाद हैं, मन्धरापुरा में मित्रता के बहाने राठोडों द्वारा उन्हें बुलाकर भोज दिया गया और उस स्थान पर बैठाने गए जहाँ पर जमीन में पहले से बारूद दबा रखी थी. उनके बैठ जाने पर बारूद आग लगवा कर उन्हें उड़ा दिया गया.[14][15]

घाणसिया के सोहुआ

घाणसिया चुरू से लगभग 45 मील उत्तर-पश्चिम में स्थित था. इस पर सोहुआ जाटों का अधिकार था. दयालदास की ख्यात के अनुसार इनका 84 गाँवों पर अधिकार था और राठोडों के आगमन के समय इनका मुखिया सोहुआ अमरा था. कहा जाता है की पहले भाड़ंग पर सोहुआ जाटों का अधिकार था. किंवदन्ती है कि सोहुआ जाटों की एक लड़की सारणों को ब्याही थी. उसके पति के मरने के बाद वह अपने एकमात्र पुत्र को लेकर अपने पीहर भाडंग आ गयी और वहीं रहने लगी. भाड़ंग के सोहुआ जाट उस समय गढ़ चिनवा रहे थे लेकिन वह गढ़ चिनने में नहीं आ रहा था. तब किसी ने कहा कि नरबली दिए बिना गढ़ नहीं चिना जा सकता. [16] कोई तैयार नहीं होने पर विधवा लड़की के बेटे को गढ़ की नींव में चुन दिया. वह बेचारी रो पीटकर रह गयी. गढ़ तैयार हो गया, लेकिन माँ के मन में बेटे का दुःख बराबर बना रहा. एक दिन वह ढाब पर पानी भरने गयी तो वहां एक आदमी पानी पीने आया. लड़की के पूछने पर जब आगंतुक ने अपना परिचय एक सारण जाट के रूप में दिया तो उसका दुःख उबल पड़ा. उसने आगंतुक को धिक्कारते हुए कहा कि क्या सारण अभी जिंदा ही फिरते हैं ? आगंतुक के पूछने पर लड़की ने सारी घटना कह सुनाई. इस पर वह बीना पानी पिए ही वहां से चला गया. उसने जाकर तमाम सारणों को इकठ्ठा कर उक्त घटना सुनाई. तब सारणों ने इकठ्ठा होकर भाडंग पर चढाई की. बड़ी लड़ाई हुई और अंततः भाड़ंग पर सारणों का अधिकार हो गया. [17] इसके बाद सोहुआ जाट घाणसिया की तरफ़ चले गए और वहां अपना अलग राज्य स्थापित किया. उनके अधीन 84 गाँव थे. [18][19]
 
मध्यकालीन राजस्थान में जाट जनपद

सीधमुख के कसवा

सीधमुख राजगढ़ तहसील में चुरू से 45 मील उत्तर-पूर्व में बेणीवालों की राजधानी रायसलाना से 18 मील दक्षिण-पूर्व में स्थित है. कर्नल टाड ने यद्यपि जाटों की कसवा शाखा का उल्लेख जाटों के प्रमुख ठिकानों में नहीं किया है लेकिन दयालदास, पाऊलेट, मुंशी सोहन लाल आदि ने कसवा जाटों को प्रमुख ठिकानों में गिना है. उनके अनुसार कसवां जाटों का प्रमुख ठिकाना सीधमुख था और राठोडों के आगमन के समय कसवां कंवारपल उनका मुखिया था तथा 400 गाँवों पर उसकी सत्ता थी.[20]

कसवां जाटों के भाटों तथा उनके पुरोहित दाहिमा ब्रह्मण की बही से ज्ञात होता है की कंसुपाल पड़िहार 5000 फौज के साथ मंडोर छोड़कर पहले तालछापर पर आए, जहाँ मोहिलों का राज था. कंसुपाल ने मोहिलों को हराकर छापर पर अधिकार कर लिया. इसके बाद वह आसोज बदी 4 संवत 1125 मंगलवार (19 अगस्त 1068) को सीधमुख आया. वहां रणजीत जोहिया राज करता था जिसके अधिकार में 125 गाँव थे. लड़ाई हुई जिसमें 125 जोहिया तथा कंसुपाल के 70 लोग मारे गए. इस लड़ाई में कंसुपाल विजयी हुए. सीधमुख पर कंसुपाल का अधिकार हो गया और वहां पर भी अपने थाने स्थापित किए. सीधमुख विजय के बाद कंसुपाल सात्यूं (चुरू से 12 कोस उत्तर-पूर्व) आया, जहाँ चौहानों के सात भाई (सातू, सूरजमल, भोमानी, नरसी, तेजसी, कीरतसी और प्रतापसी) राज करते थे. कंसुपाल ने यहाँ उनसे लड़ाई की जिसमें सातों चौहान भाई मरे गए. चौहान भाइयों की सात स्त्रियाँ- भाटियाणी, नौरंगदे, पंवार तथा हीरू आदि सती हुई. सतियों ने कंसुपाल को शाप दिया, जिसके कारण पड़िहार कंसुपाल ने जाटों के यहाँ विवाह किया, जिसमें होने वाली संतान कसवां कहलाई. फाल्गुन सुदी 2 शनिवार, संवत 1150, 18 फरवरी, 1049, के दिन कंसुपाल का सात्यूं पर कब्जा हो गया. फ़िर सात्यूं से कसवां लोग समय-समय पर आस-पास के भिन्न-भिन्न स्थानों पर फ़ैल गए और उनके अपने-अपने ठिकाने स्थापित किए. [21] [22]

ज्ञानाराम ब्रह्मण की बही के अनुसार कंसुपाल के बाद क्रमशः कोहला, घणसूर, महसूर, मला, थिरमल, देवसी, जयसी और गोवल सीधमुख के शासक हुए. गोवल के 9 लडके थे- चोखा , जगा, मलक, महन, ऊहड, रणसी, भोजा और मंगल. इन्होने अलग अलग ठिकाने कायम किए जो इनके थाम्बे कहे जाते थे. चोखा के अधिकार में 12 गाँव यथा दूधवा, बाड़की, घांघू, लाघड़िया, सिरसली, सिरसला, बिरमी, झाड़सर, भुरड़की इत्यादि. बरगा के अधिकार में हड़ियाल, महणसर, गांगियासर, लुटू, ठेलासर, देपालसर, कारंगा, कालेराबास (चुरू का पुराना नाम) आदि , रणसी के अधिकार में जसरासर, दूधवामीठा, रिड़खला, सोमावासी, झारिया, आसलखेड़ी, गिनड़ी, पीथीसर, धीरासर, ढाढर, बूंटिया इत्यादि. जगा के अधिकार में गोंगटिया, बीगराण, मठौड़ी, थालौड़ी, भैंरूसर, इन्दरपुरा, चलकोई आदि तथा ऊहण के अधिकार में नोपरा, जिगासरी, सेवाटादा], मुनड़िया, रुकनसर आदि. इसी प्रकार अन्य थामों के नाम और गाँवों का वर्णन है. [23] परवाना बही राज श्रीबिकानेर से भी ज्ञात होता है की चुरू के आसपास कसवां जाटों के अनेक गाँव रहे थे यथा चुरू (एक बास), खासोली, खारिया (दो बास), सरसला, पीथुवीसींसर, आसलखेड़ी, रिड़खला (तीन बास), बूंटिया, रामसरा, थालोड़ी, ढाढर, भामासी, बीनासर, [[बालरासर], भैंरुसर (एक बास), ढाढरिया (एक बास) धान्धू, आसलू, लाखाऊ, दूधवा, जसरासर, लाघड़िया, चलकोई आदि. भाटों की बही के अनुसार कंसुपाल के एक वंशज चोखा ने संवत 1485 माघ बदी 9 शुक्रवार (31 दिसम्बर 1428) को दूधवाखारा पर अधिकार कर लिया. [24]

विक्रम की 16 वीं शताब्दी के पूर्वार्ध में अन्य जाट राज्यों के साथ कसवां जाटों के राज्य को भी राठोडों ने अधिकृत कर लिया. यद्यपि मूल रूप में कसवां जाटों के प्रमुख सीधमुख के कंवारपाल ने राठोडों की अधीनता ढाका युद्ध के बाद ही स्वीकार कर ली थी, लेकिन हो सकता है कि बाकी कस्बों के स्थानीय ठिकानों पर छोटे-मोटे भूस्वामी काबिज बने रहे हों, जिन्हें हराकर राठोडों ने शनैः शनैः उन सब ठिकानों पर अधिकार कर लिया. [25] [26]

लूद्दी (लून्दी) के पूनियां

लूद्दी चुरू से 38 मील उत्तर-पूर्व में और सीधमुख से 16 मील दक्षिण-पूर्व में राजगढ़ कसबे के पास है. यह पूनिया जाटों की राजधानी थी. [27] इसके तीन बास है - लूद्दी छाजू, लूद्दी खुबा और लूद्दी झावर . किसी समय लूद्दी स्मरद्ध कस्बा रहा होगा, लेकिन अब यह अति साधारण गाँव है. पूनियों के अधीन 360 गाँव थे. [28]

ठाकुर देशराज ने लिखा है की पूनिया जांगल देश में ईसा के प्रारम्भिक काल में पहुँच गए थे. उन्होने इस भूमि पर 16 वीं सदी के पूर्वार्ध तक राज किया. रठोड़ों के आगमन के समय इनका राजा कान्हादेव था. कान्हा बड़ा स्वाभिमानी योद्धा था. उसने राव बीका की अधीनता स्वीकार नहीं की. अंत में राठोडों ने उसके दमन के लिए उनके एरिया में गढ़ बनाना प्रारंभ किया. दिन में राठोड़ गढ़ बनाते थे और पूनिया जाट रात को आकर गढ़ ढहा देते थे. कहा जाता है की राजगढ़ के बुर्जों में कुछ पूनिया जाटों को चुन दिया गया था. बड़े संघर्ष के बाद ही पूनियों को हराया जा सका था. पूनियों ने राठोड नरेश रामसिंह को मारकर बदला चुकाया. [29] [30]

सूई के सिहाग

सूई चुरू से उत्तर-पश्चिम में 58 मील दूर तथा गोदारा जाटों के ठिकाने शेखसर से 12 मील उत्तर-पूर्व में लूणकरणसर तहसील में है. यह सिहाग जाटों की राजधानी थी और यह प्रदेश सियागगोटी कहलाता था. दयालदास ने इनके गाँवों की संख्या 140 लिखी है जबकि कर्नल टाड व ठाकुर देशराज ने इनको असिहाग लिखा है तथा इनके गाँवों की संख्या 150 बताई है जिन पर इनका अधिकार था. [31] ठाकुर देशराज व दयालदास के अनुसार इनकी राजधानी पल्लू थी. और राजा का नाम चोखा था. इनके राज्य की सीमा में रावतसर, बीरमसर, दांदूसर, गण्डेली आदि थे. सिहागों का दूसरा ठिकाना संभवतः पल्लू रहा हो जो सूई से कुछ मील दूर नोहर तहसील में है. चौहानों के काल में पल्लू जैन धर्म का एक प्रमुख केन्द्र था, जहाँ से 11 वीं शताब्दी की अनेक मूर्तियाँ मिली हैं जिनमें एक राष्ट्रीय संग्रहालय नई दिल्ली व एक बीकानेर संग्रहालय में है. कहा जाता है कि पहले इसका नाम कोट किलूर था जो बादमें इस ठिकाने के जाट सरदार की लड़की के नाम पर पल्लू हो गया. विक्रम की 16 वीं शताब्दी के पूर्वार्ध में अन्य जाट ठिकानों की तरह पल्लू व सूई पर भी राठोड़ों का अधिकार हो गया. कहते हैं कि सिहाग जाटों ने बाद में भी सरलता से राठोड़ों की अधीनता स्वीकार नहीं की थी. तब सिहाग जाटों को धोखे से बुलाकर एक बाड़े में खड़ा करके जला दिया गया था. [32][33]

रायसलाणा के बेणीवाल

रायसलाणा चुरू से 50 मील उत्तर-पूर्व में और सारण जाटों के ठिकाने भाड़ंग से 18 मील उत्तर-पूर्व में स्थित है. यह बेणीवाल जाटों की राजधानी था. बेणीवालों के कितने गाँव थे, इसके बारे में इतिहासकारों में बड़ा मतभेद है. ठाकुर देशराज ने बेणीवालों के गाँवों की संख्या 84, चारण रामनाथ रत्नू ने 40, और मुंशी ज्वालासहय ने वाकए राजपूताना में 150 दी है. दयालदास ने अपनी ख्यात में संख्या 360 गाँवों के होने का उल्लेख किया है. [34] राठोड़ों के आगमन के समय इनका सरदार रायसल था. रायसल की बेटी मलकी का विवाह भाड़ंग के सरदार पूला सारण के साथ हुआ था. इसी मलकी के अपहरण काण्ड को लेकर गोदारों का शेष सब जाटों से युद्ध हुआ था और अंत में सीधमुख के पास ढाका नमक स्थान पर जो लड़ाई हुई, उसमें गोदारों के सहायक राठोड़ों की विजय हुई थी, जिसके परिणाम स्वरूप रायसलाणा के ठिकाने पर भी राठोड़ों का अधिकार हो गया था. [35] [36]

जाटों के अन्य ठिकाने

उपरोक्त सात जनपदों के अलावा जाटों की कुछ अन्य शाखाओं के भी ठिकाने थे.

इनमें से एक जाखड़ जाटों का था. यह ठिकाना बिग्गा तहसील डूंगरगढ़ में था. इनका गोत्र पड़िहार बतलाया गया है. कहते हैं कि कोलियोजी पड़िहार पहले पहल मंडोर से आकर ग्राम केऊ तहसील डूंगरगढ़़ में बसा था. इसका बेटा जक्खा हुआ जिसने अपने नाम पर जाखासर बसाया. कहते हैं उसने अपने परिवार के रिश्ते वहां बसे जाटों में करने आरंभ कर दिए थे तथा 'नए जाट गोत्र' जाखड़ का जनक कहलाया. उसकी एक लड़की का नाम रिड़ी था, जिसके नाम पर रिड़ी गाँव बसाया. जक्खा का बेटा मैहन था, जिसका बेटा बिग्गा बड़ा शूरवीर हुआ. इसी के नाम पर बिग्गा गाँव बसा. कहते हैं कि बिग्गा ने गायों की रक्षा के लिए राठ मुसलमानों से युद्ध किया जिसमें गैरक्षार्थ वह संवत 1393 (1336) में काम आया. पाऊलेट ने बीकानेर गजेटियर में बिग्गा की म्रत्यु का समय 1315 दिया है. बिग्गाजी का जन्म विक्रम संवत 1358 (1301) में रिड़ी में हुआ रहा. बिग्गा और उसके आसपास के एरिया में बिग्गा गोरक्षक लोकदेवता के रूप में पूजे जाते हैं.[37] गाँव बिग्गा व रिड़ी में जाखड़ जाटों का भोमिचारा था और लंबे समय तक जखड़ों का इन पर अधिकार बना रहा.[38]

इसके अतिरिक्त चाहर, भाकर, कल्हेर , नैन आदि जाट गोत्रों के ठिकाने थे.

किंवदंती है कि काल्हेर जाटों ने चुरू को बसाया था. चुरू का प्राचीन नाम कालेराबास था.
ठाकुर देशराज के अनुसार 'नेन' शाखा अनंगपाल के एक वंशज नैनसी के नाम पर चली. कालांतर में ये लोग डूंगरगढ़ तथा रतनगढ़ तहसील में आकर आबाद हुए. इनमें श्रीपाल नामक व्यक्ति का जन्म संवत 1398 (1341) में हुआ, जिनके 12 लड़के हुए, जिनमें राजू ने लद्धोसर, दूला ने बछरारा , कालू ने मालपुर, हुक्मा ने केऊ, लल्ला ने बीन्झासर और चुहड़ ने चुरू आबाद किया. [39] नैन गोत्र जाट यहाँ के प्राचीन निवासी हैं. [40]
इसी तरह ठाकुर देशराज ने अनेक अन्य जाट वंशों का राजस्थान के विभिन्न इलाकों में शासन करने का उल्लेख किया है.

सांगवान गोत्र का राज्य मारवाड़ के अंतर्गत सारसू जांगल प्रदेश था. इनके पूर्वज आदू राजा से लेकर 13 पीढी तक इनका राज्य सारसू जांगल पर रहा. भादू गोत्र के जाटों का जांगल देश में राज रहा इन्होने भादरा गाँव बसाया. संमतराजे इनमें प्रसिद्ध राजा हुए हैं. बादमें इनका एक दल अजमेर-मेरवाडा की तरफ़ चला गया, जहाँ कई गाँवों पर इन्होने अधिकार कर लिया जो अकबर के समय इनके हाथ से निकल गए.

भूकर गोत्र के सोमसी ने जांगल देश में पहुँच कर भुकरका नामक गाँव बसाया.

गढ़वाल गोत्र के जाटों ने झुंझुनूं के निकट केड, भाटीवाड़, छाबसरी पर अपना अधिकार जमाया, और मुसलमानों के आने तक राज किया.

मान गोत्र के जाटों ने गौरीर नामक गाँव बसाया और आगे जितना भी हो सका, अपना राज्य बढाया.

कुलड़िया गोत्र ने कोलिया से लेकर डीडवाना तक के इलाके पर काफी लंबे समय तक राज किया.
गैना गोत्र का भी डीडवाना के परगने पर राज रहा.

लौयल गोत्र के जाटों ने नागौर के प्रदेश पर काफी लंबे समय तक राज किया. [41]

मारवाड़ में बलहारा जाटों का भी एक समय बड़ा राज्य था. बाकी, बिलाड़ा, बालोतरा उन्हीं राज्यों के प्रसिद्ध नगर थे. डीडवाना परगने के मौलासर पर भी उन्हीं की सत्ता थी.

नागौर पर खोखर जाटों का आधिपत्य था. नागौर से लेकर डीडवाना और मंडार तक के प्रदेश पर उनका प्रभाव था.

मेड़ता में एक समय मौर्य जाटों का राज था.

आनंदपुर कालू में बिडियासर जाटों का लंबे समय तक राज रहा. (ठाकुर देशराज, मारवाड़ का जाट इतिहास, पेज 136-138 )

ये सारे प्रमाण इस बात के सबूत हैं की राजस्थान में विभिन्न भागों पर जाटों की सत्ता थी और वे अलग अलग स्थानों पर कभी शासन करते थे.[42]

लेखक: Laxman Burdak लक्ष्मण बुरड़क
************************************************************************
Note - This article is also available on Jatland Wiki at URL

*http://www.jatland.com/w/index.php?title=Madhyakalin_Rajasthan_me_Jat_Janapada&redirect=no
 
Last edited:
मध्यकालीन राजस्थान में जाट जनपद

References

1.↑ दयालदास की ख्यात, भाग 2, पेज 8
2.↑ Dr Pema Ram, The Jats Vol. 3, ed. Dr Vir Singh,Originals, Delhi, 2007 p. 201
3.↑ Dr Pema Ram, The Jats Vol. 3, ed. Dr Vir Singh,Originals, Delhi, 2007 p. 201
4.↑ कर्नल टाड, अन्नाल्स एंड एन्टीक्विटीस ऑफ़ राजस्थान, भाग 2, पेज 360
5.↑ ठाकुर देशराज, जाट इतिहास, पेज 612, 620
6.↑ ठाकुर देशराज, जाट इतिहास, पेज 612
7.↑ Dr Pema Ram, The Jats Vol. 3, ed. Dr Vir Singh,Originals, Delhi, 2007 p. 202
8.↑ मुंशी सोहनलाल, तवारीख राज श्री बीकानेर, पेज 1, 13
9.↑ गोविन्द अग्रवाल, चुरू मंडल का शोधपूर्ण इतिहास, पेज 109-110
10.↑ Dr Pema Ram, The Jats Vol. 3, ed. Dr Vir Singh,Originals, Delhi, 2007 p. 202
11.↑ मुंशी सोहनलाल, तवारीख राज श्री बीकानेर, पेज 97
12.↑ Dr Pema Ram, The Jats Vol. 3, ed. Dr Vir Singh,Originals, Delhi, 2007 p. 202
13.↑ दयालदास ख्यात, देशदर्पण, पेज 20
14.↑ चौधरी हरिश्चंद्र नैन, बीकानेर में जनजाति, प्रथम खंड, पेज 18
15.↑ Dr Pema Ram, The Jats Vol. 3, ed. Dr Vir Singh,Originals, Delhi, 2007 p. 202
16.↑ पंरेऊ, मारवाड़ का इतिहास, प्रथम खंड, पेज 92
17.↑ गोविन्द अग्रवाल, चुरू मंडल का शोधपूर्ण इतिहास, पेज 112-113
18.↑ दयालदास ख्यात, देशदर्पण, पेज 20
19.↑ Dr Pema Ram, The Jats Vol. 3, ed. Dr Vir Singh,Originals, Delhi, 2007 p. 203
20.↑ Dr Pema Ram, The Jats Vol. 3, ed. Dr Vir Singh,Originals, Delhi, 2007 p. 203
21.↑ गोविन्द अग्रवाल, चुरू मंडल का शोधपूर्ण इतिहास, पेज 115-116
22.↑ Dr Pema Ram, The Jats Vol. 3, ed. Dr Vir Singh,Originals, Delhi, 2007 p. 203-204
23.↑ सात्यूं के ब्राहमण ज्ञानाराम की बहीहस्तलिखित्) , पेज 10-16 गोविन्द अग्रवाल, चुरू मंडल का शोधपूर्ण इतिहास, पेज 116
24.↑ Dr Pema Ram, The Jats Vol. 3, ed. Dr Vir Singh,Originals, Delhi, 2007 p. 203
25.↑ गोविन्द अग्रवाल, चुरू मंडल का शोधपूर्ण इतिहास, पेज 116-117
26.↑ Dr Pema Ram, The Jats Vol. 3, ed. Dr Vir Singh,Originals, Delhi, 2007 p. 205
27.↑ ठाकुर देशराज ने पूनिया जाटों की राजधानी झंसल तहसील भद्र लिखी है जाट इतिहास, पेज 613
28.↑ Dr Pema Ram, The Jats Vol. 3, ed. Dr Vir Singh,Originals, Delhi, 2007 p. 205
29.↑ ठाकुर देशराज , जाट इतिहास, पेज 613-614
30.↑ Dr Pema Ram, The Jats Vol. 3, ed. Dr Vir Singh,Originals, Delhi, 2007 p. 205
31.↑ ठाकुर देशराज , जाट इतिहास, पेज 616
32.↑ चौधरी हरिश्चंद्र नैन, बीकानेर में जनजाति, प्रथम खंड, पेज 18
33.↑ Dr Pema Ram, The Jats Vol. 3, ed. Dr Vir Singh,Originals, Delhi, 2007 p. 205-206
34.↑ दयालदास ख्यात, देशदर्पण, पेज 20
35.↑ गोविन्द अग्रवाल, चुरू मंडल का शोधपूर्ण इतिहास, पेज 121
36.↑ Dr Pema Ram, The Jats Vol. 3, ed. Dr Vir Singh,Originals, Delhi, 2007 p. 206
37.↑ पाऊलेट, बीकानेर गजेटियर, p. 90
38.↑ Dr Pema Ram, The Jats Vol. 3, ed. Dr Vir Singh,Originals, Delhi, 2007 p. 206
39.↑ ठाकुर देशराज, बिकानेरीय जागृति के अग्रदूत चौधरी हरिश्चंद्र नैन, पेज 335-337
40.↑ Dr Pema Ram, The Jats Vol. 3, ed. Dr Vir Singh,Originals, Delhi, 2007 p. 206
41.↑ ठाकुर देशराज , जाट इतिहास, पेज 591, 593, 595, 602, 6o4
42.↑ Dr Pema Ram, The Jats Vol. 3, ed. Dr Vir Singh,Originals, Delhi, 2007 p. 207
 
Back
Top