Please read my reply below in bold and italics.
Let me make my stand more clear in no uncertain terms : I am a staunch supporter of any movement which is against corruption and I support the movement in question. What is wrong if people become cautious about the leadership of any movement. Do you suggest that people should recklessly and blindly follow any movement just because it has been spearheaded by the people you like.
I wish that more and more people join this campaign but, again, people have to be watchful to avoid any anarchic situation viz. looting, arson and vandalism etc. which took place in some countries recently, including Egypt where even a museum was ransacked.
References to people and incidents which happened 10 centuries ago, and not saying a word about the current incidents and present culprits, as well as casting of baseless suspicion on the leadership of "the movement against corruption" did made me skeptical.
My Ans: I could not make anything out of above, frankly.
However, if the last post was in support for the movement (which is invisible to me) and the intent was not of undermining the movement, then I am happy to say that I drew some wrong inferences.
My Ans: Better late than never. It is good that something made you happy finally.
Let me make my stand more clear in no uncertain terms : I am a staunch supporter of any movement which is against corruption and I support the movement in question. What is wrong if people become cautious about the leadership of any movement. Do you suggest that people should recklessly and blindly follow any movement just because it has been spearheaded by the people you like.
I wish that more and more people join this campaign but, again, people have to be watchful to avoid any anarchic situation viz. looting, arson and vandalism etc. which took place in some countries recently, including Egypt where even a museum was ransacked.
Last edited by a moderator: