thank u all for the inputs....
@mor saab -- for the gotras (mere to gotra bhid gaye !!
)
@ rakesh -- for her extra curricular activities during her childhood
@pannu -- for the links
@others-- for their comments
on a more serious note....the point i wanted to put forward was...since she is a hollywood actress and of questionable sexual orientation (but tht wont be an issue since article 377 has been amended) we dont want to associate ourselves with her or to make enquiries about her lineage and all..even though her surname suggets clearly she is a jat....there are no distortions unlike in >> moore ( from mor) or dillon (from dhillon) etc etc...
wud linking ourselves with her be too feminine?? or
hollywood is too non serious an enterprise for us "macho" jats ?? or
we cant appreciate finer things in life??
on this site we go out of our way to connect ourselves to barbarians/dictators, justify their acts and even put forward claims to prove those theories and believe me sometimes these claims look pretty ridiculous to say the least...we relish in the thoughts tht our ancestors created mayhem in north india in the past and go gaga over it....we drive our identity from it i.e from violence, even today...so much so that mentioning someone delicate like lindsay lohan invited all kinds of sarcasm...and when people mention tht--"jat to aise hote hain, jat to waise hote hain"...we accuse them of bias and discrimination...
should not we bring a change in the thinking ?? how about appreciating things that involve lot more creation and lot less destruction???
or the stock answer would be ....if we dont destroy no one will call us jats??
