Islamisation of Media

Status
Not open for further replies.
islamisation of media

[FONT="Times New Roman"]What about the pro-islamic & anti-hindu contents being shown by the media? Almost all the ch# (specially NDTV & IBN) show the news items which are biased against hinduism. These people have already proved guilty the Hindu Org like VHP, Bajrang dal, Hindu Jagran Manch etc (sadhvi pragya & party), though, nothing is established yet. On the other hand, they all have raised doubts in tune with Amar Singh & party on the athenticity of Jamia encounter and sacrifice of a police officer. The media and so called intellectuals don't speak anything against the muslim fundametalists & irresponsible politicians. For instance, Mr Ram Vilas Paswan :rock:recently was stating openly as under:

1. Give Indian citizenship to all Bangaladeshi muslim migrants.
2. Ban VHP and Bajrang Dal.
3. Lift ban from SIMI.
4. Jamia millia should give legal assistance to the detained terrorists.

None of the channels criticised these veiws of persons like Paswan, lalu, Mulayam and Amar Singh.
If media for TRP (plus other reasons) and Politicians for Vote bank ki rajniti are allowed to continue this way, days are not far when our next gen will live in Islamic India.

Let me tell you all, I am not connected in any way with any Hindu Org or party.[/FONT]Vinod
 
Vinod, your concerns are quite genuine about the present Muslim Appeasement Era and i agree with you. But if we look at the title post of the thread then we are supposed to discuss the language which is used by media, by us. What is present scenario regarding the language of a common man and where it may lead us in near future.
 
vijay said:
Nope, Sanskrit is the source of all Hindi words. Urdu contains so many words of Sanskrit/Hindi as Urdu itself is a derived language but not an original one. Urdu is a mixture of Persian, Arabic and Hindi and was popularised by Muslim rulers in India. India have the largest Urdu speaking people in the world.
Click to expand...

Chalo aise sahi...but i am sure some hindi words are adapted from arabi/farsi ,,ofcourse sanskrit was the main base. mera kehne ka maksad ye tha ki aam bolchaal mein hamesha hi eclectic approach rahi hai,, aur ab bhi hai... even in Hindi literature, there is mixture of words depending upon the area it is representing.
 
VinodDhatrawal said:
[FONT="Times New Roman"]What about the pro-islamic & anti-hindu contents being shown by the media? Almost all the ch# (specially NDTV & IBN) show the news items which are biased against hinduism. These people have already proved guilty the Hindu Org like VHP, Bajrang dal, Hindu Jagran Manch etc (sadhvi pragya & party), though, nothing is established yet. On the other hand, they all have raised doubts in tune with Amar Singh & party on the athenticity of Jamia encounter and sacrifice of a police officer. The media and so called intellectuals don't speak anything against the muslim fundametalists & irresponsible politicians. For instance, Mr Ram Vilas Paswan :rock:recently was stating openly as under:

1. Give Indian citizenship to all Bangaladeshi muslim migrants.
2. Ban VHP and Bajrang Dal.
3. Lift ban from SIMI.
4. Jamia millia should give legal assistance to the detained terrorists.

None of the channels criticised these veiws of persons like Paswan, lalu, Mulayam and Amar Singh.
If media for TRP (plus other reasons) and Politicians for Vote bank ki rajniti are allowed to continue this way, days are not far when our next gen will live in Islamic India.

Let me tell you all, I am not connected in any way with any Hindu Org or party.[/font]Vinod
Click to expand...




My take on this is simple and that at the same time also caters as an answer to the question posed by the author of the thread !

There ain't any doubt that this is an appeasement era! Politicians / news channel / media exploit the sentiments of people. Mumbai meri jaan , the movie was an eye opener where Soha Ali khan was the journalist , she did not realise the pain people go through till she was subject to that herself!


We people are equally responsible for the same , If you watch Chak de India carefully , the girls from the east say that they cannto be happy when people call them a guest in their own country. Similarly it is not the numbers that make Muslims or any other minority community a minority , it is the percpetion which is the average of the perception we have towards them. And the perception is of minority , looking down with suspicion , same is true with the author himself.
Even a class 12th guy would recognise that it is not the "Islamisation" of media/language but is the "Cocktailisation" of languages that is happening. English , hindi , urdu , haryanvi and other dialects mixed to form a "mixed" cocktail! :)

Till the point we adhere to the provoking of emotional sentiments of these politicians who do not want to be national leaders but want to be the leaders of a particular sect ( Mayawati , Paswan for Dalits ) , some others for Muslims , some representing north east , some representing the Reservation classes, some representing the classes that have not got reservation , this is bound to happen.

No body looks at the big picture , nobody looks for any vision , short term goals take precedence on something that can be more beneficial in the long run ! This is bound to happen , Politicians , media , a particular caste / community ain't responsible , what is responsible is "WE"! :)


PS: I have duly answered the author in a couple of previous posts of mine and in this one , till the point that we will using those "provoking" words and forget about the solution , we are not getting anything.
Please try and use those divisive words at a minimum! This is a humble personal request!
 
Anil Ji I sort of agree with you. Theres a lot id like to say, but i dont want to get too into it, all ill say is this, all indians no matter what religion, or caste, geographical origin, or language they speak must respect eachother, and must stay united for our own greater benefit. Its nice to learn about other peoples cultures, and share values and learn other languages. Just because theres a lot of urdu on t.v. doesnt mean we are going to ditch hindi. The minroty is the bad people, the people who look down on other people, the people who go bombing and killing and politicising religion. I believe the majority of indians are good people, for a country of its population there are bound to be scattered incidents.

Why is the author feeling threatened about urdu taking over, i dont want to be rude, but it just sounds a bit stupid and ridiculous to me. There are a million more important things to worry about. It's a person's choice if he wants to listen to urdu ghazals, he may be interested in urdu but it doesnt mean he'l convert to speaking urdu. There are hundreds of t.v channels and radio stations out there, and many of them may be urdu, but noone's forcing u to listen to them, its a personal choice. India is got an overwhelming hindu majority u think they'l just turn muslim or something, heloooooooooooooooooooooooooooo! knock knock anybody home!
As for politicians they always got their agendas and want personal benefit or votes and shift sides acoordingly.
 
Last edited:
I am sharing two links ... nicely written. I found that Kadian bhai is right if he want to say that Media and other secularist organisations are going biased day by day. In the blindness of minority and other hidden benefits they are not treating neutral and not demanding justice for the majority people.

Only questions to the secularist organisations and media:

1) Why nobody wants to talk for UCC?
2) Why nobody want to talk for Root cause of orrissa and mangalore issues ... i.e. Cristian missionaries.
3) When it comes to Gujarat why nobody wants to talk for the victims of sabarmati express?

http://navbharattimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/3597772.cms

http://navbharattimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/3564672.cms

उड़ीसा में जो कुछ भी ईसाई चर्च और ननों पर आक्रमण के रूप में दिख रहा है उससे वे सामान्य हिन्दू भी दुखी हैं जो अन्यथा ईसाइयों के छल, बल और कपट से किए जाने वाले धर्मान्तरण के विरोध में तीक्ष्ण मत प्रकट करते हैं।

अगर हिन्दुओं को भारत वर्ष में अपनी धर्म संस्कृति और सभ्यता बचाने का हक नहीं होगा तो क्या यह काम वह सऊदी अरब में कर सकेंगे? सैकड़ों सालों से भारत में जन्मे पंथों पर विदेशी आक्रमण हुए। इन पंथों में वैदिक सनातनी सिख, जैन, बौद्ध आदि शामिल हैं। परन्तु आज़ादी के बाद इन्हीं पंथों पर जिहादी और ईसाई मतांतरण के आक्रमण बढ़ते गए। क्या हमें अपना धर्म बचाने का हक नहीं? यह हक अपने समाज के भीतर व्याप्त पाखण्ड को दूर करते हुए तथा पंडों, पुजारियों और ऊंची जात का अहंकार रखने वाले लोगों से धर्म को वंचित तथा वनवासी समाज के लिए समान रूप से ले जाने पर ही मिल सकता है।

दुर्गा की पूजा करना और फिर कन्या भ्रूण हत्या करना, देवी से धन, विद्या, शक्ति मांगना फिर दहेज न लाने पर उसी देवी को जलाकर मार डालना तीर्थ और मंदिर गंदे रखना तथा हिन्दू द्वारा ही हिन्दुओं के विरोध में खड़ा होना आज के हिन्दु-समाज की समस्याएं हैं। अगर हम इकट्ठा हो गए तो न जिहाद जीत सकता है और न ही मतांतरण की शक्तियां ।

Here the author has really put the nice picture of the problems within our hindu religion.

जिन हिन्दुओं ने भारत में कभी उपासना पद्धति और संप्रदाय के आधार पर कभी किसी से कोई भेदभाव नहीं किया, जिन्होंने ईसाई, मुस्लिम, पारसी, यहूदी आदि सभी बाहर से आने वाले मजहबों को यहां फलने-फूलने दिया और अरब, तुर्क, मुगल, ईसाई, ब्रिटिश और पुर्तगालियों के बर्बर हमलों के बावजूद उनके मजहबी उत्तराधिकारियों से कभी घृणा नहीं की, बल्कि राष्ट्रपति, गृहमंत्री, गृहसचिव, कैबिनेट सचिव, वायु सेना अध्यक्ष, सर्वोच्च न्यायालय के मुख्य न्यायाधीश, विदेश सचिव जैसे पदों पर ही नहीं बल्कि मीडिया, फिल्म और खेल जगत में मजहबी भेद भूलकर मुस्लिम और ईसाइयों को दिल से स्थापित होने के रास्ते खोले, उन्हें सम्मानित किया तथा उनके प्रशंसक और अनुयायी बनने में कोई संकोच नहीं किया, ऐसे हिन्दू से मित्रता और उनकी भावनाओं का सम्मान करने के बजाय उनकी संख्या कम करने के लिए विदेशी मदद लेना क्या दर्शाता है?

कहीं भी किसी भारतीय पर कोई आघात हो तो उसके विरूद्ध राज्य, राजनीति और प्रजा के चिंतकों का सामूहिक उद्वेलन और प्रतिरोध सर्वपंथ समभाव पर आधारित सेकुलरवाद का स्वाभाविक चरित्र होना चाहिए। लेकिन जिस प्रकार आज सेकुलरवाद का व्यवहार किया जा रहा है, वह केवल अहिन्दुओं के प्रति ही संवेदनशील है। इस बारे में असम का उदाहरण ताजा है।

असम के दारंग और होजाई क्षेत्रों में इन दिनों भयंकर हिंसा चल रही है। 60,000 से अधिक लोग सरकारी शिविरों में शरण लेने के लिए बाध्य हो गए हैं। बोडो हिन्दू जनजातियों के 40 गांव जला दिए गए हैं। उदालगुडी के पास एक गांव के प्रमुख (गांव बूढ़ा) उनकी मां और बहन को मुस्लिमों ने जिंदा जला दिया। 40 से अधिक जनजातीय बोडो हिन्दुओं की हत्या की जा चुकी है। लेकिन दिल्ली में इस बारे में शायद ही कोई आवाज उठी। गांव उजड़ गए, परिवार जिंदा जला दिए गए, फिर भी राजनीति और सेकुलर मीडिया में सन्नाटा छाया रहा। क्या इसकी वजह यह है कि जिनके गांव ध्वस्त हुए और जो जिंदा जलाए गए, वे हिन्दू थे? कंधमाल पर हमने केवल एक मजहब की पीड़ा पर वैटिकन से वॉशिंगटन और पैरिस तक शोर सुना। सवाल है कि हिन्दुओं की वेदना पर कौन बोलेगा?

One Question:

Can we as a group from JL, do something in this regard? Offcourse after discussions and forming some hierarchy under seniors? Completly secularist?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top