Sorry....... Confused Stand
Dear Dr. Sahab,
What had been done, is not right and that is exactly what we are discussing. The question is whether we should become part of this wrong for our personal gains, or fight for what is right for the nation. By not raising our voice and fighting till end, and surrendering to the wrong, we might just get a little bit temporary advantage for our community at the expense of the nation. My outlook is a little bigger and broader on the issues that has a conflict between the community and the nation. I think (and I may be wrong and for some insane too) if we can build a strong nation on the basis of equality, we would have more permanent prosperity, peace and development. We need to take our weak fellows together on the journey to success and progress, but that should not be at the expense of our talented people irrespective of caste and religion they come from.
Prosperous and advanced countries draw talent from other countries for their development, here we are ignoring our own talent just because we want little extra then our brother next door. it is NO.
These are my personal views and I have my reasons for that.
Dear Col.Saheb
You were really honest while replying that
Young people are
not getting equal oppertunities in their studies and competions..ie rural people are disadvantaged as compared to urban people.
You agree that rural young people are
no less talented than these urban well tutioned guys..
You do recognise the
influence of money and beaurocratic interference....
What does this mean .......
It means that posts and oppertunities are
not already offered on the basis of talent.
Than what does your statement again and again
At the cost of talent mean? Can you explain a bit?
Had these rural guys got same facilities and influence they could have got a job that went to a son of more influential guy.
This simply mean that current system of offering job and oppertunities is not
just and ethical.
So a better system was thought of that was ...
Compartmentalisation of oppertunities...ie
reservation on group bases.
which is instead of 80% of jobs going to people with 20%of population make certain compartment where atleast other people also get some posts which they could not because of prevalent unequalities of oppertunities.
Contrary to certain people belief, this system was the brain child of choudhary Charan Singh but there was a confusion about jats so the report was pending....
Now this further can be improved by implementation of creamy layer with in a group or like hegde formula but the first step of its implementation has to be implemented first and other steps can be taken later...
As you know that 80% of govt jobs were kept by 20% of cast group.
Was that ethical??
Don't you think that it was
against the basis of equality of oppertunity on which the
strength of a nation depends.
To sum it up this step was taken with a right motive but implemented in a political opportunist style so it lost its sheen...
Jats were just taken aback as they should have been there but due to political game plan they were left out of it.So they just opposed it.
Had it been implemented honestly taking deserving
jats because 80%of them have rural background they would have supported this step with whole.
Now we have really no choice....
As similar other groups have been taken and our youth are
facing a dark future ....
Or we can oppose it and than put our rural youth in direct competion with all those city guys whose tution teachers come regularly after their class and than they go to some reputated coaching institutes and finally sit in the same hall with our village guy.
Yes I forgot to tell you that electricity comes in village only for four hours.