Jats in Pre Aurangzeb days

ravichaudhary

New member
http://www.jatland.com/home/Jat_history_prior_to_1669


"The Jat history prior to 1669, according to the historian Qanungo, had little scope for their lawless activity under the strong governments of the Surs and the Mughals down to the accession of Aurangzeb (1658 - 1707). They remained quite till the religious persecution of that Emperor and the misrule of the provincial viceroys goaded them into rebellion.[1]

After the enchanted sleep of a century, administered successively by the hypnotic spell of Akbar, the genial indifference of Jahangir, and the mild patting of Shah Jahan, Hindu India woke to life again in second half of the seventeenth century, being rudely shaken by the pious activity of the saintly Emperor Aurangzeb (1658 - 1707). Accustomed to look upon the occupant of the throne of Delhi, though of an alien faith, as th e shadow of God on earth, the awakened Hindus found to their surprise and sorrow that the impartial ruler of Hindustan had changed into a militant missionary of Islam.[2]


The above is an extract form Jatland wiki


How accurate is it?

Interesting that Quanango describes Jats as ' lawless", and but for the ' strong rule of the Muslim Mughals, would have continued their lawless ways!

Comments?


Ravi Chaudhary
 
Word "Lawless" in itself does not mean much unless one defines what law or laws were broken by Jats and under what circumstances. There was nothing like Indian constitution in those days and the states were run on the whims of Kings. It all had to do with who was more powerful. Strong kings could force their whims and not the weaker kings.

RK^2
 
jat never broke n e rule. he simply broke the that why muslim aur maratha wanna have their one third to 1/6 produce?

one budhist monk shouted,"oh, king what is ur pride worth? we give you 1/6 of our produce. that makes u king"
 
thhare yahan pe up kabhi maratha jat battle hui thi...chauth maange the per jaatyann nna chauth (gobar) diya
 
the wolf was appointed to save goat...was said about churaman...
 
i always respected ur sentiments when u found tomer n shakuni in europe...by google search...plz keep it up
 
The issue is that Professor Quanango is wrong, and ha sgot carried away with his own rhetoric.

The Jats fought with Jehangir, Shahjehan, and Akbar, and own their right to govern themsleves without interference.

They certainly did not look upon the ' ruler at Delhi' as a shadow of GOD"
My purpose of putting the quote was,

1) to note that it is on our site

2) to provoke discussion

3) to correct our website

Ravi
 
Word "Lawless" in itself does not mean much unless one defines what law or laws were broken by Jats and under what circumstances. There was nothing like Indian constitution in those days and the states were run on the whims of Kings. It all had to do with who was more powerful. Strong kings could force their whims and not the weaker kings.

RK^2

plz define first that whether reservation is law or lawnesnes. we all jat will support u on either way u propose to the jats........
 
there are many khuddar jats here. plz invite them...shall..i name them... they are khuddar for lip service here...
 
plz learn something for the last 5000 years that how jats are beaten in their own majority, the 8th wonder the biggest wonder of world...why all jat clan names were after the animals... plz stop all the threads untill unless jat is recruited as sc as in gujrat, obc as in rajasthan...etc...
 
gandhi ne namak banao andolan..shuru kiya tha..he had to break the law, gujjar had to break the law...but u jats were always eating on the properties of ur ancestors...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Word "Lawless" in itself does not mean much unless one defines what law or laws were broken by Jats and under what circumstances. There was nothing like Indian constitution in those days and the states were run on the whims of Kings. It all had to do with who was more powerful. Strong kings could force their whims and not the weaker kings.

RK^2

thodi ghani history tte mme bhi jjannu su. from recent to ancient about jats. yo thaara vp singh thaari poonchh me aag laga gaya ssye. jissye ravan ne lagaayee thi hanuman ki punchh me...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
hodi ghani history tte mme bhi jjannu su. from recent to ancient about jats. yo thaara vp singh thaari poonchh me aag laga gaya ssye. jissye ravan ne lagaayee thi hanuman ki punchh me...thode is pe gaur karyo bhai ji, aur thare bhatere shakuni jin ko aap sare aam duniyan me google search kar rahe ho, ve yahin isi samay jat land pe baithye ssen...
 
all history discussion is false... till jat does not realise his home land where he was kept as slave for 5000 years, n till today jats talk of law. where is the law? jat with greater percent is kept aside. n that is aaceptable but the biggest blunder is that jat himself supports this lawlessness...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
do or die piecefully. but if u accept reservation then accept it for jat also. n if u dnt accept then dnt do it for n e one.
 
here are many jat mahatmas on this site. when india comes they advise to fight, but when australia, germany, america...etc are there they'd always prefer to keep mum....
 
Back
Top