Live in relationships ..?

[arvindc]

Center accepts live-in-relationships as an acceptable norm

Live-in relationship not a crime, now an acceptable norm - The Hindu
The Centre on Thursday told the Supreme Court that live-in relationships should be seen as an“acceptable norm,” and pointed to how reputations of public personalities are often sullied in public because someone pried into their private life.

“With the changes in standards of society, live-in relationship is now an acceptable norm, akin to marriage. It is not a crime,” - Attorney-General Mukul Rohatgi



Live-in relationships now acceptable norm in society - SC- Times of India
Emphasizing that laws hould evolve according to changing times, the Supreme Court on Thursday said that live-in relationships, which were earlier considered to be a taboo, has now become a acceptable norm in society and is not considered a prohibited relationship.


Live-ins now acceptable in society, rules Supreme Court - India Today
Though the apex court has twice earlier ruled that live-in relationship is not a crime, it is for the first time that it has acknowledged that with passing time, the society has accepted it and the relation does not attract any penal action.

In a major psychological boost to couples in live-in relationships, the Supreme Court for the first time on Thursday removed the stigma from such liaisons, saying it has now become an accepted norm in society.



Supreme Court Continues Being Awesome - The Huffington
In a judgement that could revolutionise the social fabric of the Indian society, Supreme Court has ruled that an unmarried couple living together would be presumed legally married.
SC Rules Woman In Live-In Relationship To Be Considered Wife, To Inherit Partner's Property AfterHis Death.


Dear Jatlanders, अब तो मान जाओ!

 

[rekhasmriti]

Dear Jatlanders, अब तो मान जाओ!


This one was best ......

 

[arvindc]

Dear Jatlanders, अब तो मान जाओ!


This one was best ......

Well, Jats lags in acceptting change. The above poll shows this.

Changes are not always bad. Livve-in relationships are good for today's life and are more important to jatland because of the scewed sex ratio.

 

[rkhatkar]

लीव इन रिलेशन , गे , कुंवारी माँ , कुँवारा बाप , अव्यसक योनाचार , छेड़-छाड़, रिश्ते-नाते तार-तार ये इस नए जमाने की नवीनतम परिभाषाए है | इनसे मेल खाती पुरानी परिभाषाए थी – जार-वेस्या , रखेल, गैलड़ आदि |जारी व वेस्या सबसे माड़ा कर्म | रखेल उससे कुछ कम | गैलड़ थोड़ा ओर कम लेकिन ये सभी सामाजिक बट्टे माने जाते थे ओर इनको किसी प्रकार के सामाजिक संगठन या आयोजन मे मान्यता नहीं दी जाती थी | बचपन में कुछ वाक्य नहीं सुने थे जैसे लीव इन रिलेशन , गे , कुंवारी माँ , कुँवारा बाप , अव्यसक योनाचार , छेड़-छाड़, रिश्ते-नाते तार-तार | इनके बारे मे समाज क्या जवाब दे ; जवाब तो समय दे रहा है | परिजन यानि माँ, बाप, बेटा, बेटी, इकक्ठे सिनेमा हाल मे सिनेमा देखने नहीं जाते थे ; कारण प्यार भरे गाने व प्यार के संवाद | सभी जानते है शादी का मतलब लेकिन ये रिश्ते इसपर कभी चर्चा नहीं करते | क्या वह सही था या यह सही है कोन जानता है | गाँव गुवाहन्ड मे बहू बेटी सुरक्षित थी ओर अब घर मे भी नहीं |….that live-in relationships should be seen as an“acceptable norm,”…पता नहीं समाज के कोनसे संगठन ने सरकार को कब इस मुददे की स्वीकारोक्ति दी है | लेकिन जो भी हो ये मुददे हमारे समाज के लिए भविष्य की अप्रिय चुनोतियाँ बन सकती है | हमे अपने संस्कारों को ओर मजबूत करना होगा |

 

[arvindc]

Well, seems quite a lot misunderstanding about live-ins. This thread has lots of information from different people and different perspectives. You may read it from start.

Live-ins are about security and independence. They are about maturity and understanding.
They let young people to fulfill their dreams without getting drawn into a family life. It's about extraordinary achievements.

It's not that all this is not possible without live-ins but the chances in a traditional marriage are declining with changing times.

 

[arvindc]

Live-ins are also about controlling the ever growing human population.