I am new to the forum. So not equipped to make serious comments on issues before I have fully understood them. But I beg to submit a few things for consideration. 1. We should keep mythology seperate from History Not denying the evidence from the former). 2. (i)Unauthentic texts , especially those in ancient languages like Sanskrit and Prakrit should be critically looked at before giving them a place at par with the authentic ones. (ii) the interpretations should be in cordancewith the context and as per rules of the grammar. 3. Caste patiotism, however commendable a thing, should not prevail over the facts supplied by evidence material. 4. Chronology being the life line of history should not be sidetracked for convenient conclusions.In my humble opinion several Jat historians have fallen prey to the syndrom of we are the best, 'we are the ancient most'. A good thing in itself for keeping the fir e alive, but fatal for ariving at the truth.5. We should delink the label (today it is jat, and we will defend it) and the people whose identity was famous by their gotra nmaes, which , no doubt have undergone unrecognisable changes and transformation.Thanks