Nathuram Godse -- Know the truth

  • Thread starter Thread starter meghaguliya
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

meghaguliya

Guest
Ambala Central Jail
Dated: Nov. 12, 1949

My Most Revered Parents:

My last humble salutations to you, I have your photo with me. While offering adorations to your photo I will be absolved in Brahma (The Almighty).

There will be no doubt that due to the wordly and practical relationship that existed between us, my death will certainly give you a terrible grief. But I am not at all writing this letter either due to the grief or to discuss about the grief.

You both are acquainted with the teachings of the Bhagavad Gita and have thoroughly studied our Mythologies.

Bhagavan Sri Krishna had preached the 'Gita'. The name Sri Krishna with his powerful weapon 'Sudarshan Chakra' had decapitated 'Sishupal', an Aryan King; not in the battlefield but on the land of the Rajasuya Yagna. Who can dare call this very act of Sri Krishna a sin?

Sri Krishna had killed so many persons both in wars and on other occasions for the sake of establishing universal happiness.

For the sake of one 'Seeta Devi' the Ramayana story was developed. Only for the sake of one 'Draupadi' the history of 'Maha Bharat' had been born.

Today, in front of our own eyes the chastity of thousands of women is being violated. The persons who are committing these monstrous atrocities on women, are being helped in all possible ways. In such horrible circumstances, either for fear of our lives or for fear of public criticism, it was not possible for me to be silent without doing anything.

I strongly believe that the blessings of thousands of women are backing me and substantiate my act.

I am laying down my sacrifice at the feet of my beloved Motherland. My sacrifice may cause a bit of a loss to our own family. But, the destructed, demolished temples, the heaps of decapitated heads, the cruel murders committed on boys and girls and the atrocities on women...are reeling every minute before my eyes. I felt it was my utmost duty to cut off the help that was being carried to the wicked committing these cruel deeds.

My mind is clean. Though many would entertain varied thoughts regarding my act, my mind is not perturbed even for the fraction of a second. If there is anything such as heaven, my place has been assured there and hence there is no necessity for me to offer a special prayer. If at all there is anything as such salvation, I am eligible to it.

I do not in the least wish to live at the mercy of amnesty. I feel that a life obtained by an act of mercy is the real death for me.

Death has not come in front of me. I myself have gone to the face of death. I am seeing with my smiling face, the Goddess of death. That Goddess of death also is so eagerly waiting to embrace me as a friend. Death has no power to distort the image of the 'realized ones', with sorrow.

To fulfil the dream of my ideal that, from the river 'Sindhu' to the seas, this whole land of Bharat should become independent...this body of mine must essentially die.

This self-sacrifice of mine for which the eyes of lakhs of people of this country that are shedding tears will share your sorrow.

Akhand Bharat Amar Rahe! Vande Mataram!!



Many Many Salutations to your feet,
Humbly Yours,

Nathuram.



"If devotion to one's country amounts to a sin, I admit I have committed that sin. If it is meritorious, I humbly claim the merit thereof. I fully and confidently believe that if there be any other court of justice beyond the one founded by the mortals, my act will not be taken as unjust. If after the death there be no such place to reach or to go, there is nothing to be said. I have resorted to the action I did purely for the benefit of the humanity. I do say that my shots were fired at the person whose policy and action had brought rack and ruin and destruction to lakhs of Hindus."

Shri Nathuram Godse
 
I know we've discussed this point to death in multiple threads. But I fail to see why Nathuram or RSS blamed Mahatma Gandhi for all bad; why didn't Mr. Godse take revenge on Jinnah or the Muslim League?

Mahatma Gandhi in my opinion was all for peace, though tons of time he was impractical in his solutions to complicated political problems, but I feel he meant no harm. Unlike Jinnahs of the world who were calling for "Direct Action" and hailing a "two-nation" on blood theory!
 
Bhai Hooda,

Well the answer to your querry is quite simple.

Gandhi was the only guy majority of the masses followed.His so called 'Ahinsa' caused us lot of davastation and the wounds are fresh even today in the hearts of many indian hindus.

Jinnah is blamed so is muslim league but they can not be compared with gandhi.Reason being ye tatpoonjiye thhe.They used Gandhi and abused the Hindu innocence of following Gandhi blindfolded.Gandhi just kept running away from problems, he just wanted to find easy way out time after time.Say for exampe pakistan ko 55 crore dila diye for no bloody reason.

Gandhi himself became a puppet in their hands.He was and is to blame for his actions and Hindu suffering.You must know the famous saying " Majboori ka naam Mahatma Gandhi".
So your 'Mahatma' Gandhi was only a majboor man trapped in the net of his own impractical decisions and actions based on a weak character and heart.

Nathuram Godse realised it was time to put the foot down and do something about it and so he did, got rid of the puppet of Jinnah and Muslim league.

Thanks but no thanks gandhi ji, ohh sorry i forgot to put the prefix 'Mahatma'.

deepender said:
I know we've discussed this point to death in multiple threads. But I fail to see why Nathuram or RSS blamed Mahatma Gandhi for all bad; why didn't Mr. Godse take revenge on Jinnah or the Muslim League?

Mahatma Gandhi in my opinion was all for peace, though tons of time he was impractical in his solutions to complicated political problems, but I feel he meant no harm. Unlike Jinnahs of the world who were calling for "Direct Action" and hailing a "two-nation" on blood theory!
 
u r right mr. kundu......
mejboori ka nam ganhi hi bolte hai........
 
Read The Book

praveendangi said:
u r right mr. kundu......
mejboori ka nam ganhi hi bolte hai........

All of you, who want to know why and how did he killed Gandhiji, Kindly read the book titled "Man who killed Gandhi" written by Colonel Manohar Malgaonkar. The book was banned during Congress Regime, but I was able to get a copy at Allahabad from one of the famous book store. The book is now available at Barnes and Noble or even on internet. It gives detailed account of Gandhi's assassination. It also gives as to why he did not kill Mr. Jinnah.
 
right

well the topic u have picked is sensitive and true. wht is happning in indias capital is shows how free we women can move on road. in broad day light girls are being kidnapped and raped. and wht happns the people who did it nothing!
when i come to know that countrys like paksitan which are technoligy wise far behind us but for women safety they are so good i feel. were had we gone wrong. y cannot girls be on street at 10 in night in delhi were in lahore girls are in market tell 10. why ? wht is going wrong ?
were is our morality going!
 
Muslims commit violence against Hindus. Hindus Commit Violence against Hindus. Someone goes out and Kills Gandhi. Hmm. Do the pieces faal in place to make a sensible picture. Not according to me.

Gandhi tried his best to stop the partition. Later on he was trying to stop the mad rioting between hindus and muslims. And someone goes out and kills Gandhi. Do the pieces faal in place to make a sensible picture. Not according to me.

I dont have any compasion for Gandi the politician. He was a horrible leader who set the precendents for horrible policies for a post independence India. But I have a lot of Compassion for Gandhi the individual. He was a great person whose thoughts are appreciated the world over. I am practicing some tips I got from the great guy after reading his autobiography.

I never endorse any form of violence. Violence never solved a problem. Violence sows the seeds for another problem. Pakistan and India are still at war. Guns have been pointed at each other 24X7, for last nearly 60 years. Hindus and Muslims still fail to coexist in India. If killing gandhi was a sacrfice for Godse, then let his soul know that his sacrfice was in vain.

Its the human mind thats the greatest weapon of all. A gun might temporarily change a mind. But its "thoughts" that cause a mass change of mind. Put aside the gun, and start thinking again.
 
Hi All,

Gandhi had done nothing for future generations of India. he lacked a Vision.

It was very hard for me But I ranked hitler above Gandhi who create a feeling of Patriotism and Sovereignty among Germans.

Most of the story we headrd about Hitler were amended by British and Americans.

Churchill was the person who played foul game to cause tesion between germany and russia during world war -2 .

Regards
Jitender
 
It seems that we have nothing to discuss without gandiji. I think it becomes a publicity stunt on the jatland...

Yesterday I was reading a survey in dhanik bhaskar conducted among the youth in Rajasthan that whom they consider national hero of our freedom struggle :- 54 % are agreed on the name of Gandiji…

So-called intellectuals will be discussing this topic but to the common public He will remain a national hero.

No Doubt and no question
 
Mukseh Bhai,

Never follow a bhedchaal.. make your own assumptions and decisions.

Take care

Regards
Jitender

mukesh_kumar007 said:
It seems that we have nothing to discuss without gandiji. I think it becomes a publicity stunt on the jatland...

Yesterday I was reading a survey in dhanik bhaskar conducted among the youth in Rajasthan that whom they consider national hero of our freedom struggle :- 54 % are agreed on the name of Gandiji…

So-called intellectuals will be discussing this topic but to the common public He will remain a national hero.

No Doubt and no question
 
jitender_singh said:
Mukseh Bhai,

Never follow a bhedchaal.. make your own assumptions and decisions.

Take care

Regards
Jitender

My dear Jitender
Don't worry. I never go for such a bhedchaal... but It is my strong belief that He has been a national hero since independence. He did lot of things for our nation in comparison to his mistakes....
 
hi all,

Gandhiji was great person and he is national hero. but in my point of view the stands he taken at the time of independence and thereafter by forcing people to follow by fast, was not right. he did what he thought was right and Godse did what he thought was right. but the problem still remains. we neither have a country of Gandhi nor of Godse. you don't find hindu-muslim riots in Pakistan but in India. if the religion was the basis of partition then why it was not fulfilled and if it was not then why did we had partition. as far as Jat population is concerned i guess there are a good number of muslim and sikh jats too but when it comes to Jat community why Muslim jats keeps themselves away.


dear lucky, don't compare lahore and delhi, India is much more then Delhi and Good and Bad are in every society. atleast we don't hide Dawood.


Jitendra
 
Good point Mukesh bhaisa'ab

mukesh_kumar007 said:
It seems that we have nothing to discuss without gandiji. I think it becomes a publicity stunt on the jatland...

Yesterday I was reading a survey in dhanik bhaskar conducted among the youth in Rajasthan that whom they consider national hero of our freedom struggle :- 54 % are agreed on the name of Gandiji…

So-called intellectuals will be discussing this topic but to the common public He will remain a national hero.

No Doubt and no question
 
deepender said:
I know we've discussed this point to death in multiple threads. But I fail to see why Nathuram or RSS blamed Mahatma Gandhi for all bad; why didn't Mr. Godse take revenge on Jinnah or the Muslim League?

Bhai Deepender, Donot bring Jinnah and Muslim League anywhere in comparison to Gandhi and Congress as they were both opposite .... by this you are giving them too much height for which they were not at all deserving ...

From the very beginning Muslim league just think of muslims and their own favour and they had nothing much to do with the indian freedom.Gandhi and congress were working for the indian freedom but....

NOT ONLY GANDHI AS IT IS BEING POTRAYED TO THE SCHOOL GOING KIDS IN INDIA .....HE WAS ONE OF THEM

( er bhai mukesh wo 52% isiliye hai ki a school going kid start reading their gungan from the very beginning )

par wo bechara nu LUKHMA KUN MARYA BHARAT SARKAR NE ..... CHORE TAHI TEM BHI NA DIYA LOGA AAGE KIME KAHEN KA .....KIME KAHEN DETE JIBE TE BERA PAT TA, EK KE THI DIMAG MEIN USKE.... IT was not good from democratic country like india ......


I think he was a Marathi and nothing to do much faced during the riots of HINDU-MUSLIM ....after shooting at him he didn;t ran away and even not tried to ran away .....

Kuch Kaho kime te tha jo humne is tem na itna serious lagta, er aaj tahi gandhi gandhi padhte na soch pa rahe ... but that all circumstances made that BRAVE GUY took such a big step ....


Something that is written for the things that might have flooded Godse's mind are :

1. One of the conditions imposed by Gandhi for his breaking of the fast
unto death related to the mosques in Delhi occupied by the Hindu
refugees. But when Hindus in Pakistan were subjected to violent attacks
he did not so much as utter a single word to protest and censure the
Pakistan Government or the Muslims concerned.

2. Gandhi's pro-Muslim policy is blatantly in his perverse attitude on
the question of the national language of India.

3. He alone was the Judge of everyone and every thing; he was
the master brain guiding the civil disobedience movement; no other
could know the technique of that movement. He alone knew when to begin
and when to withdraw it. The movement might succeed or fail, it might
bring untold disaster and political reverses but that could make no
difference to the Mahatma's infallibility. 'A Satyagrahi can never fail'
was his formula for declaring his own infallibility and nobody except
himself knew what a Satyagrahi is.
 
Jitender Bhaisa'ab -

I highlighted the two points from your reply below:
I agree with the first one - it was foolish of me to bring Jinnah or Muslim League in this conversation.

However, I disagree with the second. I don't think Godse was brave guy, on the contrary he was a coward. Gandhi, even after he was made aware of the imminent threat on his life many times, had refused security. Only a coward can shoot a old man with no weapons or means of defence. Godse had every right to disagree with all of Gandhi's ideology (so does anyone of us) but he (or anyone for that matter) had no right to kill him. A braver man would have fought Gandhi on ideology.

jitendershooda said:
Bhai Deepender, Donot bring Jinnah and Muslim League anywhere in comparison to Gandhi and Congress as they were both opposite .... by this you are giving them too much height for which they were not at all deserving
---------
jitendershooda said:
Kuch Kaho kime te tha jo humne is tem na itna serious lagta, er aaj tahi gandhi gandhi padhte na soch pa rahe ... but that all circumstances made that BRAVE GUY took such a big step ....
 
Last edited:
deepender said:
However, I disagree with the second. I don't think Godse was brave guy, on the contrary he was a coward. Gandhi, even after he was made aware of the imminent threat on his life many times, had refused security. Only a coward can shoot a old man with no weapons or means of defence. Godse had every right to disagree with all of Gandhi's ideology (so has anyone of us) but he (or anyone for that matter) had no right to kill him. A braver man would have fought Gandhi on ideology.
---------

How well put Deepender, and no truer words indeed specially the fact that assassination is an act of cowardice no matter what the situation...

And specially in this case when I too personally don't completely agree with the way Gandhi handled the aftermath of the Independence (apparently like most of us non-believers ;) ); the advantage of the whole debate was definitely lost with the way Godse reacted to the situation...
 
sory to say

dahiyarules said:
Muslims commit violence against Hindus. Hindus Commit Violence against Hindus. Someone goes out and Kills Gandhi. Hmm. Do the pieces faal in place to make a sensible picture. Not according to me.

Gandhi tried his best to stop the partition. Later on he was trying to stop the mad rioting between hindus and muslims. And someone goes out and kills Gandhi. Do the pieces faal in place to make a sensible picture. Not according to me.

I dont have any compasion for Gandi the politician. He was a horrible leader who set the precendents for horrible policies for a post independence India. But I have a lot of Compassion for Gandhi the individual. He was a great person whose thoughts are appreciated the world over. I am practicing some tips I got from the great guy after reading his autobiography.

I never endorse any form of violence. Violence never solved a problem. Violence sows the seeds for another problem. Pakistan and India are still at war. Guns have been pointed at each other 24X7, for last nearly 60 years. Hindus and Muslims still fail to coexist in India. If killing gandhi was a sacrfice for Godse, then let his soul know that his sacrfice was in vain.

Its the human mind thats the greatest weapon of all. A gun might temporarily change a mind. But its "thoughts" that cause a mass change of mind. Put aside the gun, and start thinking again.
i am sorry to say but i today disagry with u. partion was right. SEE to musafapur aligarh muslims there donot think them selfs as indians they want to be paksitani.we need partion. now also being in majorty we lived as minorty. we could not ever chalange muslim till BJP it not come to power or we would have lost again some part of our country to paksitan this time it would have been kargil land, and thier laws. becoz of gandhi and nehru muslims have diffrent law why? no were in world they have doffrent law except for india. becoz of gandhi and nehru we have kashmir problem. and we lost leaders like BHAGAT SINGH, AND BOSS. GANDHI COULD HAVE STOPED BHAGAT SINGH DEATH BUT HE DID NOT.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top