NDTV and Barkha Dutt indulging in some dadagiri

Status
Not open for further replies.

sidchhikara

New member
Many of you might've heard this latest fiasco about NDTV's Barkha Dutt suing a blogger for defamation. The blogger criticized their telecast of the Mumbai attacks.

anyway, here's a writeup...
originally at : http://gauravsabnis.blogspot.com/2009/01/ndtv-self-righteous-ill-advised-or-both.html

Thursday, January 29, 2009

NDTV - Self-righteous, ill-advised or both?



By now, anyone who has any exposure to blogs or twitter must know about the Kunte-NDTV flap. Chetan Kunte wrote a blog post criticizing NDTV's and particularly Barkha Dutt's coverage of the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks (the blogpost is only available through Google cache). The post is gone from Kunte's blog, and instead we see this apology that makes for a very sad reading.

It does not take a PhD in reading between the lines to guess what happened. NDTV probably sent Kunte a legal notice, asking him to pull the post down, apologize, never write about them again, and pay an absurdly massive amount of money. Remember this legal notice from a few years back? Seems like NDTV might have used the same basic wording.

And here's my guess of what might have happened next. NDTV probably sent the legal notice. Kunte, probably satisfied that the post had done its job by raising awareness, must have agreed to take the post down. But NDTV lawyers, or maybe even Barkha Dutt herself (I don't know for sure) might have insisted that unless he issues a sniffling apology, they will take him to court and demand crores and crores. And who knows, since they seem to have been following the IIPM playbook so closely, maybe they even tried to contact his employers to pressure him (again, I don't know if this is true.... just speculating).

I don't know which of these opinions I feel more strongly -

a) NDTV should be ashamed of browbeating a lone blogger using legal threats. They can dish out rough stuff, but clearly can't take it. Some humility might take NDTV and Dutt a long way. Sadly, the media, the watchmen of the society seem to consider themselves more equal than others. This self-righteousness and goonda-ism using legal cells is not something one would have expected from a news organization.

b) Forget the rights and wrongs, but NDTV has made such a big mistake tactically. Even if they didn't like what Kunte wrote, forcing him to post an apology was extremely ill-advised. Obviously, bloggers and tweeters and facebookers would pick up on it, and the blowback to NDTV would spread all over the internet. And it seems to have started already. Influential and widely read bloggers such as Shripriya, Patrix, Rohit, Prem Panicker, Sandeep among others have already written about this. The contents of the post, and further criticism and "shame on you"s for NDTV will receive greater publicity and attention than Kunte's original post ever did.

What remains to be seen is, how will the other news channels, i.e. NDTV's competitors handle this news? Since their own 26/11 coverages didn't exactly receive bouquets, will they take a "chor-chor mauserey bhai" approach and ignore this story in solidarity with NDTV? Or will the competitors actually report on this and take the opportunity to claim they are better than that? Can't you just picture Rajdeep Sardesai on screen talking about this story at the top of his voice, probably with Mahesh Bhatt, saying "CNN-IBN is mature enough to take criticism in its stride. Mahesh Bhatt, why do you think our competitors are making an issue out of one blogger's opinion? Your response??" And how will the newspapers react? There are enough interconnections between TV channels and newspapers to kill the story everywhere but on the internet.

No matter which way you spin it, the story does not reflect well on Barkha Dutt and NDTV. If by some minuscule chance they are reading this, my suggestion to them, based on having lived through a similar situation - just apologize to Kunte, praise free speech, blame the matter on some misunderstanding or miscommunication with your legal cell, save face and move on.
Labels: barkha dutt, chetan kunte, free speech, freedom of speech, iipm, legal threats, libel, ndtv


posted by Gaurav at 4:21 AM
Your Opinions?
 
Hi Read this also
http://roydebarshi.sulekha.com/blog/post/2008/08/barkha-dutt-yesterday-as-shameless-as.htm

Admiral Suresh Mehta did not spare Ms. Dutt and made an observation about her ‘alleged misdemeanor’ during the time of Kargil war. This is what Admiral has been reported saying…
Singling out a lady journalist from an English news channel, Mehta, who is also the chairman of chiefs of staff committee, said irresponsible coverage of the war had compromised the safety of troops and led to the death of three soldiers. He said this particular journalist had cajoled an army colonel to demonstrate the firing of an artillery gun (Bofors) to capture a great shot on the camera. He said the colonel was later dismissed from service.
​
 
NDTV ne th lgata hai BJP ki supari le rakhi hai..bjp ruled states ki choti choti se choti khabar ko bhi chalkar dkhate hain.. MODI ke peeche pade hue hain..
par maharasjtra main kya ho rah hai woh inhe nahee dikhayee deta..:confused:
 
Mein bhi aap ki baat se kaafi hadh tak sehmat hun Jitender ji

NDTV ne th lgata hai BJP ki supari le rakhi hai..bjp ruled states ki choti choti se choti khabar ko bhi chalkar dkhate hain.. MODI ke peeche pade hue hain..
par maharasjtra main kya ho rah hai woh inhe nahee dikhayee deta..:confused:
 
USP of NDTV and its team is, anti India, anti-Hindu, anti Indian values, Pro- Muslim, Pro-Cristian. Lakhs of Hindu driven out of Kashmir do not bother them but encounter at Batala House is conspiracy against Muslims. If you think over NDTV reporting over problem of infiltration in Assam, Incident of Orisa, J&K matters, you will see anti Hindu colour. It is not NDTV fault because anything which is anti-Hindu or anti-India, sells well here.
 
quite true. ( according to my perception )

Pranoy Roy ( owner of NDTV ) started his career by a 1/2 hour weekly english news programme on doordarshan "world this week ", later when the cable Tv came to india he got associated with STAR-NEWS and some time later launched his own channel NDTV, in his initial days of independent channel he found it really hard to survive... and then some lobby came around and saved him of his piling financial losses.i think till present day he is indebted to that lobby and is serving their wishes and commands through his NEWS Channel. and now needless to name which lobby is behind such selective and dogmatic presentation of NDTV's news items.
 
Last edited:
Pranoy Roy ( owner of NDTV ) started his career by a 1/2 hour weekly english news programme on doordarshan "world this week ", later when the cable Tv came to india he got associated with STAR-NEWS and some time later launched his own channel NDTV, in his initial days of independent channel he found it really hard to survive... and then some lobby came around and saved him of his piling financial losses.i think till present day he is indebted to that lobby and is serving their wishes and commands through his NEWS Channel. and now needless to name which lobby is behind such selective and dogmatic presentation of NDTV's news items.

Media should be the watchdog of the people, not a lapdog of the government. If today the government can put a collar around the media's neck, tomorrow it can and will put a collar around people's neck too.

I saw the Indian media coverage of the Mumbai Terrorist Attacks. It was throwing pure manure coming out of some government department in people's faces.

If media executed even 1 % of its responsibilities, it won't glorify the government's sluggish preparedness for and eventual action against the terrorists.

I am seriously appalled by the way media operates in India. For some reason we are copying everything from the US, including all the social and civic ills of this once great nation, that will be the eventual reason for its downfall.

Shame on the media and shame on Barkha Dutt. Now go sue me!

Shame on the media for acting as an extension of the government.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top