No: 29 Haryana

[ssgoyat]

There is nothing wrong in denying facts but deny them with facts...If you read my post again and thn try to understand what i just replied what you said...i said about the land prices and you compared it to the Infrastructureby saying check the conditions in gurgoan and faridabad you were meant Infrastructure ...something which you mentioned and now blaming it on me?????
I didnt say gurgoan and faridabad are best in just quoted the land prices there....DHARAVI is a slum in mumbai but they have one of the best land prices in the mumbai city.....

bhai wahi to pooch raha hu

ki gurgaon/faridabad....highest land price ka...best hone se kya tallukkk...

aur agar gurgaon best hi hai....to kaise hai....fir aapne kaha infrastructure....to chalo theek hai, infrastructure hi bata do...usme do sabse neechay hai gurgaon...

abb aap ne fir land prices ki baat karr di.

 

[ajayrohtak]

bhai wahi to pooch raha hu No 1, in what context....????

bhai ye city states ke hoya karein, yo aur samjha de.....

http://www.pbplanning.gov.in/pdf/Ranking of States Current.pdf

 

[vivekdh]

goyat saab aap theek kaho ho

Poor performance in agriculture sector has pushed down Haryana’s economic growth to 9.3 % in 2007-08 from a robust 14.2 %in 2006-07. Meanwhile, the state has projected its gross state domestic product at current prices to jump to Rs 2,12,910 crore in 2009-10. The agrarian economy has managed to achieve 9.3% GSDP rate in real terms in 2007-08, which was mainly fuelled by sectors like trade, communication, construction, transport, manufacturing, electricity and real estate etc, according to Haryana’s Economic Survey 2008-09. In 2006-07, it was the outstanding performance of the farm sector, part of the primary sector, that helped the state to achieve GSDP to grow by a double digit of 14.2 %. But now the growth in primary sector has come down to one per cent in 2007-08, further adversely impacting the overall growth of GSDP. The sectoral analysis further revealed that GSDP at constant prices from primary sector, which comprises agriculture, livestock, forestry, fishing, mining, increased from Rs 21,127.82 crore in 2006-07 to Rs 21,344.82 crore in 2007-08, showing a marginal increase of one %against 13.9 %growth in 2006-07. Although state achieved good growth in crops like rice, wheat, bajra and cotton at 7.2, 1.8, 13.7 and 4.4 %respectively in 2007-08 but the output of other crops such as oilseeds, sugarcane, and gram dipped by 23.2, 8.2 and 40 %respectively. “As a consequence of decreased production, the farm sector grew by just 0.9 %in 2007-08,” the report said . The impact of contraction in growth of farm sector on GSDP could be substantiated by the fact that about two third of state’s population still depends on agriculture for their livelihood.</I></B>

source :-
http://www.financialexpress.com/news/haryana-growth-dips-to-9.3/423885/

bhai wahi to pooch raha hu

ki gurgaon/faridabad....highest land price ka...best hone se kya tallukkk...

aur agar gurgaon best hi hai....to kaise hai....fir aapne kaha infrastructure....to chalo theek hai, infrastructure hi bata do...usme do sabse neechay hai gurgaon...

abb aap ne fir land prices ki baat karr di.

 

[ajayrohtak]

bhai wahi to pooch raha hu

ki gurgaon/faridabad....highest land price ka...best hone se kya tallukkk...

aur agar gurgaon best hi hai....to kaise hai....fir aapne kaha infrastructure....to chalo theek hai, infrastructure hi bata do...usme do sabse neechay hai gurgaon...

abb aap ne fir land prices ki baat karr di.

best for economic prosperity of the state of the Haryana...i said that land prices of gurgoan and faridabad contributed to the rise of the per capita income in the state of haryana...and it was always around no.5 since Green Revolution thus this increase from gurgoan and Faridabad contributed to make it BEST....

 

[ajayrohtak]

goyat saab aap theek kaho ho


Poor performance in agriculture sector has pushed down Haryana’s economic growth to 9.3 % in 2007-08 from a robust 14.2 %in 2006-07. Meanwhile, the state has projected its gross state domestic product at current prices to jump to Rs 2,12,910 crore in 2009-10. The agrarian economy has managed to achieve 9.3% GSDP rate in real terms in 2007-08, which was mainly fuelled by sectors like trade, communication, construction, transport, manufacturing, electricity and real estate etc, according to Haryana’s Economic Survey 2008-09. In 2006-07, it was the outstanding performance of the farm sector, part of the primary sector, that helped the state to achieve GSDP to grow by a double digit of 14.2 %. But now the growth in primary sector has come down to one per cent in 2007-08, further adversely impacting the overall growth of GSDP. The sectoral analysis further revealed that GSDP at constant prices from primary sector, which comprises agriculture, livestock, forestry, fishing, mining, increased from Rs 21,127.82 crore in 2006-07 to Rs 21,344.82 crore in 2007-08, showing a marginal increase of one %against 13.9 %growth in 2006-07. Although state achieved good growth in crops like rice, wheat, bajra and cotton at 7.2, 1.8, 13.7 and 4.4 %respectively in 2007-08 but the output of other crops such as oilseeds, sugarcane, and gram dipped by 23.2, 8.2 and 40 %respectively. “As a consequence of decreased production, the farm sector grew by just 0.9 %in 2007-08,” the report said . The impact of contraction in growth of farm sector on GSDP could be substantiated by the fact that about two third of state’s population still depends on agriculture for their livelihood.</I></B>

Bhai sahab its recession time it says the projected growth rate is going to slow down to about 9.3% which is still a good average....china and india are the only two countries which are growing more thn 5% during recession..wheras developed countries are in minus growth..this shows the robustic economy of haryana which is growing by a good average in a recession time

 

[ajayrohtak]

double post

 

[vivekdh]

ajay bhai aapki baat bilkul theek hai ki recession time hai or iss time me growth rate itna honna sahi hai
per aap dekho iss article ki pehli line
"Poor performance in agriculture sector has pushed down Haryana's economic growth"

to mera kehna sirf itna hai ki kahi agriculture ki aandekhi to nahi ho rahi

Bhai sahab its recession time it says the projected growth rate is going to slow down to about 9.3% which is still a good average....china and india are the only two countries which are growing more thn 5% during recession..wheras developed countries are in minus growth..this shows the robustic economy of haryana which is growing by a good average in a recession time

 

[ajayrohtak]

goyat saab aap theek kaho ho

Poor performance in agriculture sector has pushed down Haryana’s economic growth to 9.3 % in 2007-08 from a robust 14.2 %in 2006-07. Meanwhile, the state has projected its gross state domestic product at current prices to jump to Rs 2,12,910 crore in 2009-10. The agrarian economy has managed to achieve 9.3% GSDP rate in real terms in 2007-08, which was mainly fuelled by sectors like trade, communication, construction, transport, manufacturing, electricity and real estate etc, according to Haryana’s Economic Survey 2008-09. In 2006-07, it was the outstanding performance of the farm sector, part of the primary sector, that helped the state to achieve GSDP to grow by a double digit of 14.2 %. But now the growth in primary sector has come down to one per cent in 2007-08, further adversely impacting the overall growth of GSDP. The sectoral analysis further revealed that GSDP at constant prices from primary sector, which comprises agriculture, livestock, forestry, fishing, mining, increased from Rs 21,127.82 crore in 2006-07 to Rs 21,344.82 crore in 2007-08, showing a marginal increase of one %against 13.9 %growth in 2006-07. Although state achieved good growth in crops like rice, wheat, bajra and cotton at 7.2, 1.8, 13.7 and 4.4 %respectively in 2007-08 but the output of other crops such as oilseeds, sugarcane, and gram dipped by 23.2, 8.2 and 40 %respectively. “As a consequence of decreased production, the farm sector grew by just 0.9 %in 2007-08,” the report said . The impact of contraction in growth of farm sector on GSDP could be substantiated by the fact that about two third of state’s population still depends on agriculture for their livelihood.</I></B>

source :-
http://www.financialexpress.com/news/haryana-growth-dips-to-9.3/423885/

The projected growth rate is in MINUS for UK,USA,JAPAN AND GERMANY this year...what does that mean???
bhai sahab it says the growth is coming down from 14% to 9.3% which is still better thn the all india growth rate of 6% projected for this year...The article is quoting the facts that its coming down it doesnt says that its the worst in the country...if that makes an impact on you vivek bhai sahab so as USA has a negative growth rate this year is the worst country in the world????
China used to achieve 14% couple of years back but now slowed down to 9% ...same is haryana after couple of years in two digits its growth rate comes down to single digit

 

[ajayrohtak]

ajay bhai aapki baat bilkul theek hai ki recession time hai or iss time me growth rate itna honna sahi hai
per aap dekho iss article ki pehli line
"Poor performance in agriculture sector has pushed down Haryana's economic growth"

to mera kehna sirf itna hai ki kahi agriculture ki aandekhi to nahi ho rahi

Vivek bhai sahab..you are 100% right that agriculture is being neglected but the argument was on the present economic conditions in haryana....

 

[ajayrohtak]

Ohh my God...don't you have any idea how this poor infrastructure sucks in gurgaon...

Do you have any idea what does basic amenities means....and what things gets include in infrastructure..

Electricity, power, roads, water, sewage, street lights, public transport....

bhai pehle to google ne
chhod arr meham te bahar likad....

chal meham ki e baat karan....odde ki sadak hi halat ke sai tanne bera e sai...sarri tutti hodd sai....

arr meham te agge sorkhi, gadhi dhore se bhi issa e haal sai....

bhai infrastructure ala jikra galat chhed diya tanne...

tu is per capita income ne repeat kar kar ke thakk gaya dikkhe...

just stick to the topic bhai sahab..how do you know that i have never been outside of meham???
you are just saying show me wriiten haryana as no.1...HERE is the link
Every honorable member please check this link
http://www.pbplanning.gov.in/pdf/Ranking%20of%20States%20Current.pdf

 

[vivekdh]

got ur pnt gusse me matt aa bhai

Vivek bhai sahab..you are 100% right that agriculture is being neglected but the argument was on the present economic conditions in haryana....

 

[ssgoyat]

just stick to the topic bhai sahab..how do you know that i have never been outside of meham???
you are just saying show me wriiten haryana as no.1...HERE is the link
Every honorable member please check this link
http://www.pbplanning.gov.in/pdf/Ranking%20of%20States%20Current.pdf

Bhaaaai bhaaaai bhaaaai

1. The data is of FY 2005-06 (i.e FY ending march 06, means data 2005 ka hai)
Even in these figure's of 05-06
2. Haryana: 38832 iss sse oopar hai Chandigarh 86629, Goa 70112, Delhi 61676, Pondicherry 48477

and surprisingly Andman & Nicobar: 34853....now Gujarat: 34157, Himachal 33805...

Now,
In your terms, Andaman & nicobar is more prosperous than even Gujarat & Himachal n rest all major states (as only haryana, maharashtra n punjab are ahead in Major States figures than Andaman) ....

I do hope you will not repeat, atleast this link in future...

 

[ajayrohtak]

Bhaaaai bhaaaai bhaaaai

1. The data is of FY 2005-06 (i.e FY ending march 06, means data 2005 ka hai)
Even in these figure's of 05-06
2. Haryana: 38832 iss sse oopar hai Chandigarh 86629, Goa 70112, Delhi 61676, Pondicherry 48477

and surprisingly Andman & Nicobar: 34853....now Gujarat: 34157, Himachal 33805...

Now,
In your terms, Andaman & nicobar is more prosperous than even Gujarat & Himachal n rest all major states (as only haryana, maharashtra n punjab are ahead in Major States figures than Andaman) ....

I do hope you will not repeat, atleast this link in future...

So You are saying that you dont believe in stats but you started this thread on the basis of stats...there are more reasons to believe my stats thn yours which says haryana is no.29.....

On the basis of your statement even i can ask a counter question
how come states like UP are ahead of haryana(your first post)???
Abd btw pondicheery and chandigarh are UTs and now dont ask me again to show haryana No.1 AS I ALREADY POSTED THE LINK...accept it or not its up to you

 

[ajayrohtak]

Bhaaaai bhaaaai bhaaaai

1. The data is of FY 2005-06 (i.e FY ending march 06, means data 2005 ka hai)
Even in these figure's of 05-06
2. Haryana: 38832 iss sse oopar hai Chandigarh 86629, Goa 70112, Delhi 61676, Pondicherry 48477

and surprisingly Andman & Nicobar: 34853....now Gujarat: 34157, Himachal 33805...

Now,
In your terms, Andaman & nicobar is more prosperous than even Gujarat & Himachal n rest all major states (as only haryana, maharashtra n punjab are ahead in Major States figures than Andaman) ....

I do hope you will not repeat, atleast this link in future...

You quoted major states so if you compare the stats of major states Haryana is no.1....WHY are you so worried about andaman and nicobar???...our argument is on haryana...So, You accept that only goa and delhi are ahead which are city states....but in major states HARYANA IS NO.1

 

[ssgoyat]

So You are saying that you dont believe in stats but you started this thread on the basis of stats...
][/COLOR]

I always believe in stats, facts n figures (pls go thru my post maine kaha bhi hai aisa)

provided stats are latest...and not of 2005

my stats are latest one in recent India No-1 Business Magazine "states comptetiveness survey.."

And u've been googling since yesterday but came up with just 2 links, which you kept on repeating again n again....and that too very old figures....out of which one was of a politician statement...

 

[ajayrohtak]

I always believe in stats, facts n figures (pls go thru my post maine kaha bhi hai aisa)

provided stats are latest...and not of 2005

my stats are latest one in recent India No-1 Business Magazine "states comptetiveness survey.."

And u've been googling since yesterday but came up with just 2 links, which you kept on repeating again n again....and that too very old figures....out of which one was of a politician statement...

well google is a free tool of information anyone can use it...
i provided you with last year 2008 stats as well ..you declined them saying you want to see no.1 not no.3...when i provided you stats in which it says haryana no.1 you are saying its too old(2006)...

 

[ssgoyat]

well google is a free tool of information anyone can use it...
i provided you with last year 2008 stats as well ..you declined them saying you want to see no.1 not no.3...when i provided you stats in which it says haryana no.1 you are saying its too old(2006)...

yes 05-06 is too old....cos it's till March 06, means 2005 data...

Pls use this tool wisely..

No doubt i do agree haryana is no-3 as per per capita income (which is just one parameter)....
but i want to probe the false n tall claims of it being No 1....used as political strategy n befooling ppls...

And it's 29th (bottom) is also just for one parameter only....

I again repeat: pls do some more googling (as u're quite good at it) and show me few parameters of this false, tall, n bogus claims of N0-1 haryana used for adertising polling compaigns...

 

[ajayrohtak]

yes 05-06 is too old....cos it's till March 06, means 2005 data...

Pls use this tool wisely..

No doubt i do agree haryana is no-3 as per per capita income (which is just one parameter)....
but i want to probe the false n tall claims of it being No 1....used as political strategy n befooling ppls...

And it's 29th (bottom) is also just for one parameter only....

I again repeat: pls do some more googling (as u're quite good at it) and show me few parameters of this false, tall, n bogus claims of N0-1 haryana used for adertising polling compaigns...

AT last you agreed onSomething from me
And also FOR YOUR kind knowledge if you look at the data it came out last year...if you look at the right hand top most corner it does say that it published on 31 December 2008 and it is from planning commission
Economic data always come like that....yes you can predict the for cast in advance but facts always found in History NOT IN FUTURE

 

[sachinb]

Bhai some time people become so adamant due to personal interests that whatever you show them they will not agree,,,,,,,,,,,,,,there is a set of group which doesnt want to agree to the fact that Haryana is progressing fast now.

AT last you agreed onSomething from me
And also FOR YOUR kind knowledge if you look at the data it came out last year...if you look at the right hand top most corner it does say that it published on 31 December 2008 and it is from planning commission
Economic data always come like that....yes you can predict the for cast in advance but facts always found in History NOT IN FUTURE

 

[ajayrohtak]

yes 05-06 is too old....cos it's till March 06, means 2005 data...

Pls use this tool wisely..

No doubt i do agree haryana is no-3 as per per capita income (which is just one parameter)....
but i want to probe the false n tall claims of it being No 1....used as political strategy n befooling ppls...

And it's 29th (bottom) is also just for one parameter only....

I again repeat: pls do some more googling (as u're quite good at it) and show me few parameters of this false, tall, n bogus claims of N0-1 haryana used for adertising polling compaigns...

Now i understand the hatred is political motivated..first i thought that you are from outside of haryana(i am still not sure)...
and parameters applies on all states not only on haryana ...
we are comparing haryana with other states of india not with any european country.....DOESNT Matter how bad the other parameters of haryana are but still they are better thn any other state of india