Our performance was good, not communication
- Thread starter desijat
- Start date
No am not representing him, am representing the facts which are often blurred in this heat of promoting a person who has not shared his vision yet on dealing with INs problems.
And havent we been having debates already? I am still waiting for your response on whom should I vote for on Kondli seat
And havent we been having debates already? I am still waiting for your response on whom should I vote for on Kondli seat
We are having a debate but often you run away when pressed hard anyway here I asked Diggi and his supporters to have a debate on economics and UPA performance. Not sure why you replied if you are not representing him.
Is Kondli seat the one where you basically lied? And I am not sure what answer you are waiting for? I just wanted to see if there is any substance in what you are saying.
Is Kondli seat the one where you basically lied? And I am not sure what answer you are waiting for? I just wanted to see if there is any substance in what you are saying.
And I am challenging him and anyone who represent him !
prashantacmet
New member
Vikas, Perhaps this video would have got more view if you would have put it in Humor section...Hardly anyone takes this Dog-vijay talks seriously even if he is uttering golden words....very few would have listened him patiencely that's why people seems less interested in debate on this thread. 
Anyone it will be a mircale if Dog-vijay has barked sensibly. I will try to listen him
Anyone it will be a mircale if Dog-vijay has barked sensibly. I will try to listen himI feel what he said is correct, if you feel otherwie please correct him, and me instead of wasting so much effort in listing your challenge.
You wasted 3 messages to know my constituency and I thought it was to debate on the right candidate, only to realise you were just curious, you are wasting so many messages with your challenge, instead just bite the bullet and make your point.
You wasted 3 messages to know my constituency and I thought it was to debate on the right candidate, only to realise you were just curious, you are wasting so many messages with your challenge, instead just bite the bullet and make your point.
Vikas, Perhaps this video would have got more view if you would have put it in Humor section...Hardly anyone takes this Dog-vijay talks seriously even if he is uttering golden words....very few would have listened him patiencely that's why people seems less interested in debate on this thread.
That is the problem, people form perceptions without listening...
He is just picking up some data to show that UPA is better than NDA. I said I am happy to debate with him or for that matter with anyone else. Debate needs to be done properly not by just putting one figure across. As far as you are concerned you have left previous debates in middle.
I have no interest or curiosity in knowing your constituency. You were just talking without any base and that was my point there.
prashantacmet
New member
bipindahiya
New member
Sonia don't know how to speak,Rahul not know what to speak,Manmohan complete dumb rest if any one has the courage to speak anything is DOGVIJAY.,.,.,.,.,.,.,He even don't know what he is speaking .,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,just speaking for the sake of speaking,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,
ting ting taaaning ... ha ha ha ...
Bhai, YOU DAMN NAILED IT ... I am speechless ... no further comments needed. Thread closed
PS: woh kahavat s na "jib bhians punjjhadd thawe gi toh moti tode e na tapka we gi, us ne toh gobar e karna s" so whenever PigVijay opens his mouth ... need I say more
Bhai, YOU DAMN NAILED IT ... I am speechless ... no further comments needed. Thread closed
PS: woh kahavat s na "jib bhians punjjhadd thawe gi toh moti tode e na tapka we gi, us ne toh gobar e karna s" so whenever PigVijay opens his mouth ... need I say more
No thief calls himself a thief
Last edited:
A STRONG LEADER takes the ownership, not offer excuses. Nach na jaane aangan tedha approach of UPA cant work. What we need is STRONG, DECISIVE LEADER who can take OWNERSHIP OF THE ISSUES and LEAD from the FRONT.
We do not live in an utopia. We live in a realistic world where there are contrasting constraints. So, we (voters) have to chose the best among the available alternatives, Pragmatic Realism i.e. utilitarianism.
Among the current lot, NaMo seems to fit this above-mentioend criteria better than others, despite whatever the propaganda and real/received shortcomings.
NaMo bashing coupled with PigVijay, Ra_owl and Mute-Maun shunning responsibility of the issues while in power can't cut it. Unbiased does not mean bashing one entity (NaMo) without bias. Without bias also entails not having hidden agenda (of indirectly defending UPA by unilaterally bashing NaMo), not picking only one entity to bash so as to paddle the prospects of the other more bash-worthy sick-ulle-re UPA.
Not being biased entails comparing the available alternative. Before bashing NaMo ALONE, measure the UPA on the same benchmark within the same comment, and then lets talk.
Also, taking a moral high ground when indirectly caught defending undefendable-UPA by indulging in blatant NaMo bashing, is not an healthy approach conducive to a good discussion. Moral high ground being "what is wrong is wrong" no matter who has done it, then highlight that for both the parties before bashing NaMo alone.
Moreover, taking high moral ground is a lame approach and it is more of a utopian view. As the adage goes "do not merely find faults/problem (of PiggyVijay or Re-Owl like excuses), rather offer the solution" or else empty noise leads to no conclusion on any discussion.
Without discussing pros and cons of all alternatives, singularly focused bashing on NaMo alone to hide UPA crap, taking high moral ground when caught doing singular NaMo bashing, lamenting problems without offering solutions, is all waste of time. Why are we then even discussing?
My 2c worth ... from the Timepass 'Vella' Jat ... winkzzz
We do not live in an utopia. We live in a realistic world where there are contrasting constraints. So, we (voters) have to chose the best among the available alternatives, Pragmatic Realism i.e. utilitarianism.
Among the current lot, NaMo seems to fit this above-mentioend criteria better than others, despite whatever the propaganda and real/received shortcomings.
NaMo bashing coupled with PigVijay, Ra_owl and Mute-Maun shunning responsibility of the issues while in power can't cut it. Unbiased does not mean bashing one entity (NaMo) without bias. Without bias also entails not having hidden agenda (of indirectly defending UPA by unilaterally bashing NaMo), not picking only one entity to bash so as to paddle the prospects of the other more bash-worthy sick-ulle-re UPA.
Not being biased entails comparing the available alternative. Before bashing NaMo ALONE, measure the UPA on the same benchmark within the same comment, and then lets talk.
Also, taking a moral high ground when indirectly caught defending undefendable-UPA by indulging in blatant NaMo bashing, is not an healthy approach conducive to a good discussion. Moral high ground being "what is wrong is wrong" no matter who has done it, then highlight that for both the parties before bashing NaMo alone.
Moreover, taking high moral ground is a lame approach and it is more of a utopian view. As the adage goes "do not merely find faults/problem (of PiggyVijay or Re-Owl like excuses), rather offer the solution" or else empty noise leads to no conclusion on any discussion.
Without discussing pros and cons of all alternatives, singularly focused bashing on NaMo alone to hide UPA crap, taking high moral ground when caught doing singular NaMo bashing, lamenting problems without offering solutions, is all waste of time. Why are we then even discussing?
My 2c worth ... from the Timepass 'Vella' Jat ... winkzzz
Last edited:
ha ha ha ... I'm enjoying some of the hilarious comments on this thread ... rofl ...
Btw bhai, you put it so aptly ... a sad reality but still funny
Btw bhai, you put it so aptly ... a sad reality but still funny
sanjaymalik
New member
i watched this show and remember when Pinky Anand (Sr Advocate) from BJP countered the data presented by Digvijay and tried to put some facts & record. Mr Digvijay instead of replying her befiting answer he defended himself saying you are advocate i can not argue with you & not here for arguments.
Vikas, Perhaps this video would have got more view if you would have put it in Humor section...Hardly anyone takes this Dog-vijay talks seriously even if he is uttering golden words....very few would have listened him patiencely that's why people seems less interested in debate on this thread.
There is a saying; "Jaisee nakti devi, waise hi oot pujari".
Jaisa diggi aur jaisa pappu, waise hi unke samarthak...
I concluded that its a total waste of time responding to them. Better talk to people who are sitting on fence and haven't made up their mind. Recruit them to vote for Modi, rather than debating here and getting bogged down. Winning or loosing the debate here is not going to be of much use. Remember the Ramayana story when Hanuman had to bring "Jeewanbooti" before sunrise ? Many "Rakshas" came on his way to confuse him. He did not heed anyone. Need of the hour for Modi supporters is to recruit voters and not these internet based meaningless debates with people who have well laid down agenda. Its better to loose debates here and win election. Winning a debate here and loosing votes is going to be disastrous. Best of luck.
RK^2
well said. However, look at their "internet Bhonpoos" who are trying to defend the un-defendable.
RK^2
Last edited:
I assume you mean entire Congress, its members, all legislators, CMs, MPs are bad, evil nakte?
I would have replied to it but its not in my taste to degrade leaders, even NaMo to create cheap humor
What is this ? A cheap humor degrading a leader or classic comedy ... looks like you just type n forget so let me remind you.