Aint got James Joyce? Can get Nobel
For all those who failed to follow James Joyce, smile coz you are lucky to have a wonderful company. No not mine (u aren't that lucky either
). The great Irish writer and his work also evades well (ahem!) Nobel laurate Sir Vidia S Naipaul's understanding. Read on:
Novelist Sir VS Naipaul has lambasted literary greats from Jane Austen and Charles Dickens to "the worst writer in the world" Henry James.
Naipaul said Thomas Hardy was "an unbearable writer" who "doesn't know how to compose a paragraph".
And Ernest Hemingway "was so busy being an American" he "didn't know where he was", he told the Literary Review.
The Trinidad-born UK writer, who was knighted in 1990, said his own writings had been neglected in his home country.
"England has not appreciated or acknowledged the work I have done," he said.
Sir Vidiadhar Surajprasad Naipaul was awarded the Nobel Prize in 2001 and is best known for A House for Mr Biswas and the Booker Prize-winning In A Free State.
"English writing is very much of England, for the people of England, and is not meant to travel too far," said the 73-year-old author.
The author slates Dickens for his "repetitiveness" and cites the experience of reading Jane Austen's Northanger Abbey as a revelatory one.
"I thought halfway through the book, 'Here am I, a grown man reading about this terrible vapid woman and her so-called love life.'
"I said to myself, 'What am I doing with this material? This is for somebody else, really."
But the author is more complimentary towards HG Wells, Mark Twain and his friend Harold Pinter.
It is not the first time the Literary Review has provided a platform for the author's strong opinions.
In 2001, he accused EM Forster of being a sexual predator and described Irish author James Joyce as incomprehensible.
)).. he had gone mad(as most of them go) during last 8 years of his life... a great thinker... atheist but lover of godliness... proud misogynist in obsession with glory...