In response to the last few posts (almost the entire page - by Kapil, Vijay -both, Vipin & Brahm).
First and foremost, regardless of whether the legislation should be amended for Jats or not, what does this issue has to do with other communities and why are they publishing their (ill-informed) opinions in the media? The legislation, if adopted, will only impact the Jats. So why is this hue and cry from the media?
Secondly, when maligning of a particular community’s image is started without any sort of provocation, a tit-for-tat battle is normal and understandable. A writer, publishing an article, in a widely circulated daily, has at least a 10 times more responsibility of validating the content than an individual writing a personal email.
Also, I do not think there is any harm to call “a liar” a liar. There are communities widely known in India whose sole business model is based on deception. When a Jat (who is unaware and unexposed to the deception techniques) fall their pray, the anger and anguish is understandable and I believe, is right as well. If left unchallenged, this poison would spread to the whole country. I have been to other countries and was really shocked to see how moral the business community there is. A shopkeeper there would really try to understand your need and present you the best suitable options which fulfill your need, not the best options that give him/her the highest commission.
Lastly, and above all, learn to live with dignity and let others also live with the same dignity.
Also, remember that a single person is not a representative of the entire community. When an individual, communicating at a personal level, uses an abusive language or does not present his/her ideas/thoughts in a diligent manner, then, that person could be reminded politely to keep decorum, rather than jumping to a hala gula of the community.