Punjabi (Jul 08, 2004 04:17 p.m.):
Haryana state is not 50% of the undivided Punjab.
Leaving aside Pakistani Punjab, the East Punjab is states of Punjab, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh and Union territories of Chandigarh and Delhi.
To resolve all outstanding issues this entire East Punjab (but probably minus Delhi) should be merged together into one unit called Punjab.
Punjab, Haryana and Himachal are small useless states as they exist now. Look at other areas of India and see how large and intact the states are then look in north-west corner and see three small useless states.
Time to reunite East Punjab and put an end to all petty issues.
My opinion,
Regards,
Ravi Chaudhary (Jul 08, 2004 05:42 p.m.):
http://www.jattworld.com/exoops/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=588&forum=1
The misconceptions are plenty. How do you clear them up?
Ravi Chaudhary
Abhishek Dhama (Jul 13, 2004 06:58 a.m.):
http://www.tribuneindia.com/2004/20040713/main1.htm
http://www.tribuneindia.com/2004/20040713/main2.htm
may be next step is declaring punjab a sovereign state...déjà vu!
Ramandeep (Jul 08, 2004 06:48 p.m.):
Why call it "Punjab"? When most of the people in this hypothetical bloc wont even speak Punjabi?Punjabi (Jul 08, 2004 04:17 p.m.):
.
Leaving aside Pakistani Punjab, the East Punjab is states of Punjab, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh and Union territories of Chandigarh and Delhi.
To resolve all outstanding issues this entire East Punjab (but probably minus Delhi) should be merged together into one unit called Punjab.
Why not a Jat-stan?
Yet again we see Singh-Sabha imperialist views in action.
Ajay Singh Chohan (Jul 05, 2004 10:16 p.m.):
the khalistani sentiment is a natural reaction of punjabis to the attack on golden temple by a terrorist lady called indira, and also the massacres of punjabi sikhs in delhi by a bastard named rajiv gandhi. this might hurt your feelings, but in punjab, no one hates pakistani punjabis, as punjabi is a race, and paki punjabis are our brothers, only thing that divides the two punjabis is our religion. but we still share the same language, culture, food and traditions. so to be honest, punjabi sikhs have more similarities with the paki punjabis, then we have with the rest of india.
peace!
vikram lal (Jul 16, 2004 09:02 p.m.):
Ramandeep (Jul 08, 2004 06:48 p.m.):
Why call it "Punjab"? When most of the people in this hypothetical bloc wont even speak Punjabi?Punjabi (Jul 08, 2004 04:17 p.m.):
.
Leaving aside Pakistani Punjab, the East Punjab is states of Punjab, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh and Union territories of Chandigarh and Delhi.
To resolve all outstanding issues this entire East Punjab (but probably minus Delhi) should be merged together into one unit called Punjab.
Why not a Jat-stan?
Yet again we see Singh-Sabha imperialist views in action.
Hey punjabi have you forgotten recent history.
Before 1966 there WAS only one province of
Punjab. In the given year it was split into 3
states Punjab, Haryana and Himichal. some
other participant had a better idea. Have the
western districts of UP where much of our
communtiy is, merge with haryana into one
big Hindu jat state. Maybe we should
incorporate Bharatpur which is the only historic
Jat state
[/quote]Vikas Dahiya (Jul 17, 2004 05:47 a.m.):
Indra ne to sirf us temple ko us ki purani saakh lota di. Aur agar indra terrorist thi thi hum log bhi hain kyoun ki kisi bhi sapole ko mandir,musjid ya guradwaroon ki aad main is desh se nahi khelne diya jayega.
Vikas Dahiya (Jul 17, 2004 05:47 a.m.):
Mr Ajay singh,
If any of us think ourself as punjabi or jat or any thing else before a bharatiya, he or she should leave this nation on the ground of morality. "Jis Thali main khana usi main ched kerna ayse hi logo ke liye hota hai". Izzatdar bhasha main aise logo ko "Gaddar" bhi bolte hain vasi hrammi bolna chaiye. Aaj is desh ka durbhagye hi ye hai ki is
**************
Mr Dahiya
Mr Singh has been banned from this site, and cannot respond.
I doubt if he can understand your hindi either
Why are moderators allowing this thread when a person cannot reply ?.
What exactly is the point of a forum if we cannot have communication with others.
Ravi
Ravi Chaudhary (Jul 18, 2004 08:25 a.m.):
why should it be divided equally?
ravi
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.