The Indians were silly to give up Tibet on a platter to China.
It was a betrayal of the Tibetan and the Indian interests.
Until they did, Tibet was an independent Country, and India had a long and peaceful border, since the Vedic times. Certainly there was no invasion of Tibet by Indians or vice versa.
There was trade, and more importantly exchanges of ideas and philosophy, which meant that both Tibetan and Indian ethos, had a common source.
There are many places in Tibet which are sacred to Indians and Hindus. Buddhism
Tibet is also important to India, as it is the source of the Major rivers that flow in to India- the Brahmaputra being just one.
The Tibetans have nothing in common with the Chinese. Since 1947 what has been happening is that, The Chinese have been flooding Tibet with their people, ( The Han Chinese) enslaving the Tibetans, and ethnically cleansing Tibet of Tibetans
Giving up Tibet also allowed the Chinese to have a direct access to Pakistan, Myanmar, and Nepal Bhutan etc.
China is no friend of Indians or India. The way to keep your enemy busy is to keep him far from your borders. By cravenly handing over Tibet, Nehru and co made a big blunder, a price , our soldiers paid in 1962, we are paying now, and will pay well into the future.
The Dalai Lama is also a symbol of free Tibet.
Maybe we will re open the Tibet question, and discuss the Tibet- Chinese Border.
Let us not be so hasty as to fall into the ‘Chini- Hindi Bhai Bhai’ rhetoric.
Ravi Chaudhary