dahiyavijay7
New member
The History taught to us by the NCERT is the root cause of communalism and terrorism in India. The history does not talk about the current demography of India. The NCERT books gives the false perception that Muslims came to India from Afghanistan & Turkey during Mougal empire and the Christian comes from Britain during British raj. We people are fooled to believe that muslims and Christian are different species from Hindus.
The Hindu people are forced to read the NCERT curriculum, which in the name of secularism do not give ample weightage to the contribution made by Hindu philosophy, science, culture and art. The muslims and british Christians rulers were given the similar treatment as ancient Indian rulers. The contribution made by these foreign rulers is lauded by the NCERT books, so that the Hindu community could have tolerant and sympathetic outlook towards these brutal invaders. However, the minority institutions in India are free to teach their own history. The Madrasa in India teach the History of India which commences with the invasion of muslims in India and muslims regards it as the victory of their community over the kafirs (Indian Hindus). The brutal atrocities made to the Hindu public of India are taken with pride. The muslim fundamentalist use these teachings to further intolerant terror politics. The muslims in India consider themselves as earlier rulers and the fact did not get down well with the muslims that in democracy they are not ruling the majority Hindus. Due to these teachings the muslim leaders could spread hatred among the muslim that all the miseries of the ruler muslims is the democratic setup in which a majority hindu has more chance to get the post of Prime Minister. This is the reason the minorities have more loyalty towards Arab countries than India.
However, it is all rubbish. Our history did not tell the reality that 99.9% of the muslim and Christian population in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh did not come from foreign land but are converted under Muslim and British rule respectively due to repression and enticement meted by these rulers. Historical surverys conducted before independence suggests that most of the people who converted to Christianity belong to Hindu Shudra community. Who is Ahmed Patel, a close associate of Sonia Gandhi ? How a muslim coming from Afghanistan or Turkey could be a Patel? Patel is a Hindu Gotra. These fanatic minority votaries were actually Hindus in the past. Mohammad Iqbal, author of song “Sare Jahan Se Accha Hindustan Hamara”, who later became strong votary of separate Pakistan for Muslims, was earlier a Hindu Brahmin. Today the people, who feel pride in associating themselves with the earlier rulers (Mougal & British invaders), do not how their forefathers were brutally beaten or mothers raped to convert them to Muslim religion. Had our history taught this reality to the people, then the muslims would have hated these invaders and would have shown their loyalty towards the Indian culture and history.
The Hindu people are forced to read the NCERT curriculum, which in the name of secularism do not give ample weightage to the contribution made by Hindu philosophy, science, culture and art. The muslims and british Christians rulers were given the similar treatment as ancient Indian rulers. The contribution made by these foreign rulers is lauded by the NCERT books, so that the Hindu community could have tolerant and sympathetic outlook towards these brutal invaders. However, the minority institutions in India are free to teach their own history. The Madrasa in India teach the History of India which commences with the invasion of muslims in India and muslims regards it as the victory of their community over the kafirs (Indian Hindus). The brutal atrocities made to the Hindu public of India are taken with pride. The muslim fundamentalist use these teachings to further intolerant terror politics. The muslims in India consider themselves as earlier rulers and the fact did not get down well with the muslims that in democracy they are not ruling the majority Hindus. Due to these teachings the muslim leaders could spread hatred among the muslim that all the miseries of the ruler muslims is the democratic setup in which a majority hindu has more chance to get the post of Prime Minister. This is the reason the minorities have more loyalty towards Arab countries than India.
However, it is all rubbish. Our history did not tell the reality that 99.9% of the muslim and Christian population in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh did not come from foreign land but are converted under Muslim and British rule respectively due to repression and enticement meted by these rulers. Historical surverys conducted before independence suggests that most of the people who converted to Christianity belong to Hindu Shudra community. Who is Ahmed Patel, a close associate of Sonia Gandhi ? How a muslim coming from Afghanistan or Turkey could be a Patel? Patel is a Hindu Gotra. These fanatic minority votaries were actually Hindus in the past. Mohammad Iqbal, author of song “Sare Jahan Se Accha Hindustan Hamara”, who later became strong votary of separate Pakistan for Muslims, was earlier a Hindu Brahmin. Today the people, who feel pride in associating themselves with the earlier rulers (Mougal & British invaders), do not how their forefathers were brutally beaten or mothers raped to convert them to Muslim religion. Had our history taught this reality to the people, then the muslims would have hated these invaders and would have shown their loyalty towards the Indian culture and history.
