The darkest phase of Indian democracy

Status
Not open for further replies.

ganeshjat

New member
June 26, 1975. Exactly thirty years ago, India woke up to a long spell of darkness. It was the day when the late prime minister Indira Gandhi imposed Emergency. President Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed declared a state of Emergency in the country on June 25-26, 1975.



The ensuing 19 months are often cited as the darkest phase of Indian democracy.



Hundreds of opposition politicians were arrested and put in jail, the Constitution was amended to suit the prime minister's whims and fancies, laws were modified to overturn court orders, buildings were razed, people were forcibly sterilised and the press was muzzled.

Those were the days when even the slightest dissent was not forgiven.



For those who may not know what the Emergency was all about, here is some facts :



What is this Emergency one hears so much about? Emergency literally means a crisis, so was this a crisis?
Yes, it was a crisis all right, but a constitutional crisis. Emergency here refers to a period of governance under an altered constitutional setup that the President of India proclaims when he/she perceives grave threats to the nation from internal and external sources or from various crises that include financial situations and natural calamities.



So it is the President of India who declares Emergency?
Yes. The President declares it, but on the advice of the Union Cabinet headed by the prime minister.



Is there a Constitutional provision to declare Emergency?
Yes. Articles 352 to 360 of the Constitution of India deal with the proclamation of Emergency.

Articles 352, 353, 354, 358 and 359 deal with circumstances necessitating a state of emergency at the national level.
Articles 355, 356 and 357 deal with the imposition of federal rule in the states (dissolving the legislative functions at the state level).
Article 360 deals with the imposition of financial emergency.

Is there a time limit on how long the Emergency can be in force?
Emergency is declared for a six-month period. But it would automatically cease to operate after the lapse of a month unless passed by both houses of Parliament. The President can call a parliamentary session, if the house is not already in session to decide on the proclamation. The proclamation would also cease to operate unless renewed at the end of every six months.



How many times has Emergency been declared in India?
Three times since 1947. The first two were triggered off by wars with China and Pakistan. The first one came into force on October 26, 1962. The second one on December 3, 1971. The third one was declared by Mrs Gandhi on June 25, 1975.



How long did that Emergency last?
Nineteen months -- from June 26, 1975, to January 18, 1977.



What prompted Mrs Gandhi to impose it?
The prime reason was a verdict on June 12, 1975, by the Allahabad high court, which found Mrs Gandhi guilty of election malpractices and unseated her from the Lok Sabha. It also barred her from contesting elections for six years.



But didn't she go in an appeal against the verdict?
Yes, she did. She moved the Supreme Court against the verdict. The Supreme Court on June 24 gave a conditional stay, allowing her to remain a member of Parliament, but disallowed her to take part in the proceedings of the Lok Sabha.



Who was the Supreme Court judge who gave that judgment?Justice V R Krishna Iyer. Justice Iyer, since retired, has this to tell rediff.com: "I refused the prime minister the right to vote in Parliament. My point was that: 'Be you ever so high, the law is above you'." Justice Iyer says his verdict along with the Allahabad high court ruling were the main reasons that prompted Mrs Gandhi to declare Emergency. "The Emergency was the darkest era in the democratic history of India," Justice Iyer, who has fought on behalf of many victims of Emergency, said.



What was Mrs Gandhi's argument?
Mrs Gandhi said she was clamping down emergency because the country's security was endangered due to internal destabilisation.



Were the court verdicts the main reasons for Emergency?
No. There were other compelling political reasons as well. Mrs Gandhi's political opponents led by the Gandhian socialist Jayaprakash Narayan had been agitating against her government. Soon after the Allahabad high court verdict, Narayan and a coalition of opposition leaders launched a massive national movement of civil disobedience to remove Mrs Gandhi as prime minister. So intense was the political opposition to her that not many expected Mrs Gandhi to last long as prime minister. She responded by proclaiming Emergency.



What were Mrs Gandhi's immediate actions soon after Emergency was declared?
Most opposition leaders including Narayan were arrested and put in jail. Mrs Gandhi's argument was that they were creating internal security problems for India. She then recklessly amended the Constitution to suit her purpose soon after Emergency was declared. She amended the Representation of Peoples Act and two other laws with retrospective effect to ensure that the Supreme Court is left with no option but to overturn the verdict of the Allahabad high court. The prime minister also took away from the apex court the authority to adjudicate election disputes relating to the president, the vice-president, the prime minister and the Lok Sabha speaker and transferred it to a body to be appointed by Parliament.



How many people were arrested?
Exact figures are not available. But it is said during Emergency, more than 100,000 person were jailed without trial.



What were the excesses reported during the Emergency?
Officially 22 custodial deaths were reported. Unofficially, it is said there were many deaths, including political killings. People in cities like Delhi bore the worst of it. Houses, many of them in slums, were demolished in the name of beautification. The worst was the forcible sterilisation of people. More than a million people were forcibly sterilised. People traveling in buses were forcibly taken out and sterilised.



Any glaring incidents...?
In Haryana, a bus carrying professors for a seminar was diverted to a hospital and all the learned participants in the seminar were forced to undergo vasectomy despite their protests.



Who was behind the sterilisation plan?
Sanjay, Indira Gandhi's youngest son.



But didn't the press create a ruckus over all this?
The press was also muzzled. Newspaper offices were raided, telephone and fax lines to them were cut and regular publication of many newspapers blocked. The courageous Indian Express was the most glaring example. In effect, no one in the country was allowed to speak and write freely.
 
The urban elite betrayed the nation the rural and poor masses rose

Dear Ganesh,

A curious fact of the emergency was the complacency and indeed the support of the emergency by the pseudo elite and the urban middle class, who thought the emergency was the final solution to the problems of Indian poverty. Jayprakash Narain found support only from the student, the farmer and the beggar. The politicians and journalists who opposed the emergency did so out of professional and political expediency.

Amit Dahiyabadshah
 
Indira Gandhi was a woman of very weak moral fiber. It was evident in her high school days in Switzerland. Her Guardian had to be summoned because she went missing during the nights. Her abortions were kept secret (the source for this is her Guardian...who became good friends with my dad in Switzerland). Then she treated India as her personal kingdom. She got what she deserved.
 
It was not that country was in any kind of turmoil requiring the proclamation of emergency. Rather the main reason was Indira's election from Rae Bareli being declared null and void by the Allahabad High Court for electoral malpractices. As per the judgement Indira Gandhi was required to vacate her seat in Parliament and PMship which was not acceptable to her as it would have affected her "after me my son" designs. Barring a few villagers in Haryana (notably Pipli) who revolted against forced FP operations, nobody dared to oppose it. All opposition leaders, including student leaders belonging to opposition outfits were lifted forcibly from their homes at midnight and jailed. Sanjay and his goons, including his keeps Ambika Soni and Amrita Singh's mother (forgot her name) were ruling the roost. Psychophancy was all prevading. The CM of Andhra Pradesh was photographed lifting the chappals of Sanjay Gandhi. Dev Kant Baruah, the then Congress President, broke all limits and said "Indira is India and India is Indira". Though I didn't see the British period, but am sure must not have been worse than the emergency period. There were no fundamental rights and it was a complete police raj.
 
Last edited:
Sanjay's 'Rakhail' was Raksana Sultana. There was a rumor that Amrita was his daugher. There was some hanky panky business with Maneka Gandhi...I believe her father was killed, but the reasons are very murky. That crooked nosed woman, and her younger son sure caused some grief
 
Thanks Vivek, yeh it was Rukhsana Sultana who, along with Ambika Soni, had a big influence on Sanjay. Even Ministers used to que up before them. Col. Anand, Maneka's father was found murdered at his farm house at Punjab Khod near Kanjhawla. It was rumoured that Sanjay had got him killed because he had forced Sanjay to Marry Maneka against his will. Maneka was a model for DCM towels and Sanjay had taken her to Dehradun for mauj mastri but Col. Anand got the wind, reached there and forced Sanjay to marry Maneka at gun point.
 
'What About Others?

I am surprised that no one has talked about Ch. Bansilal who was in hand and gloves relationship with Sanjay Gandhi during that period. I would like some one to comment on the role of Ch. Bansilal during the emergency period.

Further, Mr. Jagjivan Ram was the member of the same cabinet that recommended the emergency and remained part of it during emergency period, yet, when emergency was lifted he formed CFD and won 28 seats. I was pained when the then Janta Party accepted the merger of CFD into Janta Party and offered the Dy PM's post to him along with Ch. Charan Singh.

I have two questions to ask, with 116 Lok Dal MP's out of total 272 of Janta Party's total strength in the house then, how come Mr. Morarji Desai became the PM and not Ch. Charan Singh. And if others did not accept him the PM then why did he not object the inclusion of Jagjivan Ram and H.N. Bahuguna into Janta Party? These are the important questions to be answered. Did Ch. Charan Singh made a mistake. And finally, how come Ch. Charan Singh accepted the support from the very Lady against whom he conducted inquiries as the Home Minister, to fullfill his dream of becoming the PM.

I agree that the emergency was the worst era, but only for the reasons it was imposed. I am strong believer that the democracy has been absued in our country. Probably a directed democracy is the answer to our most problems in social life, till we have an electoral collage which understands the power of vote, and exercises it without passion and prejudice.
 
How Can One Forget Those Days...

Dear All,

Oh yes, the 'Emergency'. It was quite an experience, more so for a young student like me who in May 1975 found himself in Sonepat after spending Seven Years in the peaceful but disciplined confines of Sainik School Bijapur. The greater shock perhaps was being in JAT College Sonepat!!! One can write a book actually.

I very clearly remember that my uncle, who was a lawyer, disappeared for a few days to escape arrest. And those of you who remember those times in Sonepat, we used to say we have 'Triple Emergency', one by the DC, Mr Ram Narayan it was, I think, then by Bansi Lal and of course one by Madam Gandhi. I very distinctly remember that I spent those 18 months wearing the JAT College Hockey Team shirt. I wore it as a protection against being lifted by those 'Family Planning Walas'. The most dangerous area was the 'Phatak' opposite Hindu College, which I had to use twice daily. This was the place where a SP of Haryana Police misbehaved with a serving Army Officer. The SP was beaten up in full view of the public. Interestingly no member from the police escort intervened!!!

I also remember the 'Pipli Kand' very much. One if my sisters is married in Pipli. Mainly Dahiyas got together and the situation was really tense for a few days.

Bansi Lal too was responsible for excesses and he can't escape from it. But I think he has paid rather dearly for it. God should have forgiven him and not punished him by taking his son away. But Bansi Lal had moved to the Centre, first as Defence & then as Railway minister, or was it vice versa.

My aunt is from Karala village, very near to where Col Anand was murdered by Snajay's goons.

But the irony of the matter is that some of those who were in jail, like Laloo Yadav, are now sitting in the lap of another Madam Gandhi. And Ambika Soni is a 'Senior' member of 'High Command'.

As for the mistakes of the Janta Party, less said the better.

Regards,

JS Malik
 
jagmohan said:
Dear All,
The greater shock perhaps was being in JAT College Sonepat!!! One can write a book actually.

Col Sir, it would be great to learn more about your Jat College experience,
in a separate thread if necessary.....
 
jagmohan said:
But the irony of the matter is that some of those who were in jail, like Laloo Yadav, are now sitting in the lap of another Madam Gandhi. And Ambika Soni is a 'Senior' member of 'High Command'.
It's not a new thing in politics.."Chor Chor Mausere bhai..."
What I read about Emergency from literature, to my surprise, Indira changed articles in the constitution so that India's supreme court can never intervene in the election of PM, President and other high profile posts.
I think it as the worst after effects of emergency as already weak Indian courts were drained off more power...
 
Really good information about emergency era. Its really good for us to listen to experiences of emergency from some senior persons at this site.

Its even more educative for lots of my friends who are in their 20s and cant even think that these types of incidents were possible in INDIA even after independence. Really, I am surprised to learn about the environment during emergency. We have always taken emergency very lightly. We thought it as one more tool to fight with your political rivals, like that in Bihar.

Its very surprising to know that government can force citizens for sterilization. People can be jailed without trials and that too in large numbers.

I request all of you senior members of this site to continue this thread and let us know more about those times.
 
very right sandeep , we have always taken emergency lightly , we thought it as a political 'rasassa kasi' ,
thanks to our senior members who r putting thr experience in this forum...

can anyone tell us , what was sanjay gandhi's role in emergency?
is there any relation in his death/murder/accident(i heard that indira gandhi killed him) and in emergency?
 
raj2rif said:
I am surprised that no one has talked about Ch. Bansilal who was in hand and gloves relationship with Sanjay Gandhi during that period. I would like some one to comment on the role of Ch. Bansilal during the emergency period.

Further, Mr. Jagjivan Ram was the member of the same cabinet that recommended the emergency and remained part of it during emergency period, yet, when emergency was lifted he formed CFD and won 28 seats. I was pained when the then Janta Party accepted the merger of CFD into Janta Party and offered the Dy PM's post to him along with Ch. Charan Singh.

I have two questions to ask, with 116 Lok Dal MP's out of total 272 of Janta Party's total strength in the house then, how come Mr. Morarji Desai became the PM and not Ch. Charan Singh. And if others did not accept him the PM then why did he not object the inclusion of Jagjivan Ram and H.N. Bahuguna into Janta Party? These are the important questions to be answered. Did Ch. Charan Singh made a mistake. And finally, how come Ch. Charan Singh accepted the support from the very Lady against whom he conducted inquiries as the Home Minister, to fullfill his dream of becoming the PM.

I agree that the emergency was the worst era, but only for the reasons it was imposed. I am strong believer that the democracy has been absued in our country. Probably a directed democracy is the answer to our most problems in social life, till we have an electoral collage which understands the power of vote, and exercises it without passion and prejudice.

You have raised very important points Tavathia sahab. Bansilal acted almost like a dalal of Mrs Gandhi in those days. Mr Bansilal was the defence minister. There was a slogan, " Nasbandi ke teen dalal, indira sanjay, bansilal". More than emergency, it was post emergency period which saw many morals broken. Ch Charan Singh was not above that moral collapse. Ofcourse, lifting of emergency was almost like India gain independence. I arrived in India towards the end of emergency after my studies in UK. I remember visiting Youth congress office at 10 Janpath road where now Sonia Gandhi lives. Yes Ambika Soni was a terrific looking female in those days. There there were these tow programmes called 20 sutree and 4 sutree programmes of mother and son. Almost ever wall was painted with thoese 20 and 4 points.

Then came the elections of 1977 and all those emergency stalwarts in North India lost the elections. Interestingly, congress won in South India. Post election rally at Ramlila grounds was historic, as if whole India decended over there.

Credt must go to Sanjay, how he organised congress once again in North India. New crop of leaders like Rajesh pilot, Jagdish Tytler etc were created. I remember it was sometimes in 1979 while I was working at AIIMS, Sanjay Gandhi came with Maneka Gandhi for her CT scan. Trust me, there was no one with him and he was driving the ambassador car himself. I spent about 30 minutes stnading withm silently. No one cared to accompany him back to his car. Wish I had some foresight...hahhaaa...I would have been minister long back...LOL

RK^2
 
With the onset of Emergency Bansilal's attitude and image changed completely. He was brought in by Indira to the Union cabinet as Defence Minister. More than Indira he became thick with Sanjay and the famous quote "jab tak bachhra mere pass hai gai kahan jayegi" (Indira being gai and Sanjay her bachhra) was attributed to him. Incidently congress symbol at that time was gai and doodh peeta bachhra). His son was called the Sanjay of Haryana let loose on helpless people. His deeds during emergency overshadowed the good work done by him in Haryana resulting in his defeat during the 1977 elections. Such was the route of Congress in North India that they could get only one seat from Punjab to Bihar. Indira, Sanjay, Bansilal, all were defeated badly at the hustings. Indira was completely shattered. However, it was Sanjay and his wife Maneka who were not to be bogged down and faced the Janta regime boldly. The present Madam, Sonia, deserted her and the moment election results were announced ran away with Rajiv and children and took shelter in Italian Embassy in New Delhi. But the Janta Party (a conglomerate of various small parties) could not capitalise on its victory mainly because of the ego problem between Ch. Charan Singh and the then PM Morarji Desai. Jagjivan Ram a senior minister of Indira's cabinet during emergency along with Chandrashekhar, a young congress turk then, sensing the defeat ditched her and formed a separate party named Congress for Democracy, CFD for short. Jats didn't like him ana used to say Chamar fer dobega (CFD). The Jansangh group led by Vajpayee, though merged with Janta Party remained steadfast Sanghis and their double loyalty was one of the stumbling block in the non-existing unity of Janta Party. Jagjivan Ram had his own ambitions and Ch. Charan Singh, rightly called the lion of North India being popular from Amritsar to Patna, could not digest JP's choice of Morarji Desai as PM who had no grassroot support. Morarji's only qualification was that he was a senior congress member and a sworn enemy of Indira. Ch. Charan Singh was all for punishing Indira for her misdeeds during emergency whereas there people within Janta Party who had a soft corner for her and this internal friction led to Ch. Charan Singh being removed from Home Ministry and was re-inducted as Deputy PM and Finance Minister. However, Jagjivan Ram was also made Deputy PM which Ch. Charan Singh could not digest and ultimately brought down the Government in July 1979. Sanjay proved too smart for this jhagda party. He played a trick by assuring Congress support to Ch. Charan Singh's PMship through Raj Narayan, the so called Hanuman of Ch. Charan Singh and backed out immediately before the Vote of Confidence. This is how the dream of Indian people of having a non-congress government was shattered and Indira and Sanjay brigade returned to power in January 1980 to power with absolute majority. Jan Sangh faction became BJP and Ch. Charan Singh restored his Lok Dal.
 
Thanks for sharing interesting information.Request senior members to share there views on the topic below,taken from rediff.
Regards -Achal Singh
Kissinger referred to Indians as bastards

Suman Guha Mozumder in New York | June 30, 2005 09:36 IST
Last Updated: June 30, 2005 11:44 IST


Former US president Richard Nixon and his secretary of state Henry Kissinger did not have a good opinion of Indians in general, and of then prime minister Indira Gandhi in particular – and that is putting it mildly,

Kissinger referred to Gandhi as a 'bitch', and to Indians as 'bastards' in course of private conversations shortly after her visit to the US, just ahead of the 1971 Indo-Pak crisis.

According to transcripts of White House tapes and declassified documents made available as part of the State Department's Foreign Relations of the United States (FRUS) series, Nixon and Kissinger met in the Oval Office of the White House on the morning of November 5, 1971, to discuss the former's conversation with Gandhi the previous day.

The two discussed the India's possible motives and plans with regard to the crisis in what was then East Pakistan.
Kissinger felt Nixon had achieved his objective, during his interaction with Gandhi. 'While she was a bitch, we got what we wanted too. . . . She will not be able to go home and say that the United States didn't give her a warm reception and therefore in despair she's got to go to war.'

Kissinger's opinion was that Gandhi had been thwarted in her objective: 'She would rather have had you give her a cool reception so that she could say that she was really put upon.'

'We really slobbered over the old witch,' Nixon says, on tape.

Kissinger felt that on matters of substance, nothing of importance had been conceded. 'You slobbered over her in things that did not matter, but in things that did matter, you didn't give her an inch,' he said.

Nixon and Kissinger agreed that during the next meeting with Gandhi, the approach to take was to be 'a shade cooler' and allow her to do more to carry the conversation than had been the case in the first meeting.

Nixon and Gandhi met in the Oval Office at 11:20 am November 5; also present were Kissinger and P N Haksar, then principal secretary to the prime minister.

Louis J. Smith, editor of the new volume of documentation for the FRUS series, notes that Nixon opened the conversation by discussing the objectives of his planned trip to China. 'Thereafter the conversation, which lasted an hour, became a diplomatic tour d'horizon, touching on many of the trouble spots of the world, but with scant reference to South Asia,' the note says.

Gandhi did not respond to Nixon's proposal of the previous day, to consider a withdrawal of Indian forces from the Pakistan border.

Read full transcripts
 
Well Said

Dear Sehrawat Ji,

You have given a very accurate and detailed account of the events of that time. However my question still remains unanswered. Firstly: With 116 Lok Dal Members how come Ch. Charan Singh allowed Mr. Morarji Desai to become the PM in first place? Was he politically too weak to bow down against JP? or was he not sure of the loyalty of his members and was afraid of they deserting him for lust of power or he himself had lust for power?

Second thing, if he allowed Morarji Desai to become the PM, why could he not bargain the trade, that CFD not to be included in the Cabinet, since Janta Party did not need CFD to form the government. After all CFD was led by his archrival and the second seniormost member of Mrs. Indira Gandhi's cabinet during emergency Jagjivan Ram and had Mr. HN Bahuguna, who had confessed that he as CM of UP in 1974 had rigged the UP elections to prevent Ch. Charan Singh coming in to power in UP. If Bahuguna had not done what he did in 1974 UP elections, probably it would have been difficult for Mrs. Gandhi to impose emergency in 1975.

Thirdly, if Ch. Charan Singh was so committed to punish Mrs. Gandhi that he wasted his entire energhy and tenure as Home Minister to bring her to books, then how come he accepted the support of the same Lady with in two years to become the PM/Caretaker PM of the country. What does this reflects for our Nationalist leader like Ch. Charan Singh?

The problem I see here and during most Jat Forum discussions is that we lack courage to criticize our own community leaders. I feel, it is not fair. We need to let our younger people know both good points as well as the bad points of our community leaders. Similarly, Ch. Devi Lal disowned his own son Mr. Om Prakash Chautala during that period when he was caught for charges of smuggling and then, during VP Singh's government, he put all this aside to ensure Mr. Chautala becomes the CM in Haryana. We blame Mrs. Gandhi, Laloo Yadav and other leaders to bring the dynasty rule, but lack courage to say the same thing for our own community leaders.

I would appreciate if members could comment on these issues as well. Similarly, Sanjay Gandhi was also responsible for planting so many trees in entire nation in general and in Rajasthan in particular. He did lot of bad things, but he also did some good things like plantation of trees and removing illigal Juggies from Delhi and Bombay. These Jhuggies were illigally allowed by leaders like HKL Bhagat to get some dedicated votes for themselves.
 
Last edited:
Col. Sahab,

Before we discuss Ch. Charan Singh, I may add that Emergency was imposed by Indira on the advice of only a few trusted aides and Sanjay. The Cabinet was not even taken into confidence. The Ministers were just hurriedly gathered and informed of the proclamation. Sanjay, through not holding any position in party or government (he was made Youth President much latter), had the gall to order the then I&B Minister, IK Gujral, to send him every news bulletin for his clearance before it was relayed. Kudos to Gujral that he did not agree to this unjustified demand and preferred to resign. VC Shukla replaced him and became notorious like Bansilal. During his tenure as I&B Minister even as famous a singer as Kishore Kumar was not spared. Kishor Kumar was asked to sing at a function where Sanjay was to be the chief guest. When Kishor denied saying "main koi darbari bhand nahin jo kal ke aawara chhokron ke aage gata phirun" Shukla ensured that his songs were not played on All India Radio or shown in Chitrahaar for a quite long time.

The Emergency was lifted as abruptly as it was declared. The main opposition leaders were still in jail and many, like Fernandes, had to contest while still in Jail. There was hardly any time to go into the intricacies of ideologies etc. JP who was a father figure for opposition leaders asked them to get united and defeat the dictator. Hence, it was an impulsive decision to get united for the sake of defeating Indira. When the issue of electing a leader came, Kriplani and JP chose Morarji. Nobody understood the logic behind this move. In fact, even some surviving leaders like Fernandes and Vajpayee had called it an arbitrary decision. Ch. Charan Singh though not seemingly happy even when the elected members gathered at Rajghat, somehow kept mum. This party which was actually a group of factions with one desire to defeat Indira Gandhi, did not find any thing common among its members after they defeated Gandhi. As long as JP was alive, the different factions still stayed together. But after his death in 1978 a clear split occurred in the Janata Party between Morarji Desai's supporters and Charan Singh's supporters. In 1979 Morarji Desai resigned as Prime Minister when most of his cabinet colleagues deserted him (Charan Singh resigned much later) and Jagjivan Ram tried to replace him as Prime Minister and in fact was very near to becoming Prime Minister as all anti-Charan Singh factions wanted to make him PM to appease the dalits, who till then were diehard supporters of Indira and voted enbloc to her party. Here, you may recall that after the elections even Congress had split into two; one called Congress (I) and other Congress led by YB Chavan/BN Reddy. With the backing of his own 28 members, morarji supporters (read anti-Charan Singh) and Chavan faction had almost staked the claim when Sanjay went to Raj Narayan, the right hand of Ch. Charan Singh and extended his support ostensibly unconditional as no conditions were acceptable to Ch. Charan Singh. Indira and Sanjay were so angry with Jagjivan Ram for deserting them at the very crucial moment that they were dead against his becoming PM. Ch. Charan Singh was proclaimed the new Prime Minister. But the mother-son duo showed their real colour after Ch. Charan Singh was sworn in. They insisted on withdrawal of all cases pending against them; Ch. Charan Singh did not oblige and chose to remain caretaker PM and recommended dissolution of the House. Those who accuse Ch. Charan Singh of being power hungry are liars or don't know the full facts. Had he been power hungry he could have bargained PMship at the very inception itself as he had the support of the largest faction of Janta Party MPs. Ch. Charan Singh baiters in the zeal to criticize him, forget that Indira, when she was hard pressed from all sides, had invited him to join her Government (though it was her ploy to break the opposition especially to reduce the effect of JP movement). Had he been after chair, he could have bargained for an important portfolio. I was a teenager at that time studying in 10th standard when I listened to his speech just before 1977 elections on a wintry evening at Najafgarh, near Dhansa stand. Though I don't remember how he began his speech but I vividly remember him lambasting people. He asked people if they would vote for him. People cried in unison "haan". Saare mere he supporters hain. "Par mujhe sharam aati hai aap logon ko mera supporter kahte hue. Jab Madam aur uske Raj Kumar ne aap logon pe julam dhaye, to aap logon ki mardangi kahan chali gayi thi, kyo nahin latth leke thano pe chadh gaye". A power hungry politician would never utter such words. But why and how he was labelled as power hungry, opportunist etc. etc. Because he had such a large following among rural populace who could gather at his one call, especially after 1977, that branding him with opportunism was the only defence left with his detractors. The major weakness I could notice in him was that he could not handle media properly in his favour; he did not help even his diehard supporters in their day to day life, especially administrative matters and he was too stubborn. To sum up I may say that Ch. Charan Singh was an intellectual who had plans to remove poverty in rural areas(many of the present schemes including kam ke badle anaj, antodya, social forestry, drinking water schemes, harvesting of water etc. were the brainchild of Ch. Charan Singh. Those who have read his books would verify this. He was the leader of masses, gem of a man but a very bad politician.
 
Greatfulness

I am greatful to all elders for giving such a detailed account of the EMERGENCY days and about various leaders of yester years. It is an eye opener atleast for me. I hardly knew any thing about it. Thank you all.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top