To all the narrowminded...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well the mess has been sorted out. Apparently Amit DahiyaBadshah for whatever reason decided that he wanted to protect the honor of Mimi Singh (Maybe this is his way of getting her attention...who knows). He didn't realize that the info I posted was public information. He took it upon himself to call me at home in the US from India while I was at work. My wife realized he was a little kooky, so she wouldn't give him my work number, so he became indignant and threatening and started talking gibberish.

This guy also sent me a PM appearing indignant, saying that he was doing this on behalf of relatives of Mimi Singh. I contacted Mimi Singh, who informed me that this guy doesn't speak for her or her relatives. So I replied back to him saying that he has some issues and should seek help.

It would be a waste to devote any more time to this poser. I am not even going to speculate on his motives. I can easily take care of the guy the old fashion Jat way if he continues.
 
Last edited:
Vivek, good to know that matter got settled... once in while you come across these kindda jerks in your life then its time to use old-fashioned jat techniques to make life simper:-))

Jeetendra, what you are writing is inapproriate for public forum... your hints don't lead to any positive outcome... if you had bad experience with someone personally its not a matter of public discussion but if you think that letting everyone know about his/her indentity can save potential future dupes then the simplest thing would be to just name the guy and tell what happened with yourself... all these indirect naming calling is useless and somewhat offensive too...

As kapoorji have mentioned it... by associating Jat Orgn. with these kind of people you are hurting the image of orgns too... I think either you should directly indentify the person or moderators should scrap this thread....

vinod
 
Dear Jeetendra

We feel sorry for whatever happened with you, but from your comments it appears that this person’s actions have nothing to do with his position in a Jat Association; unless you feel that he lures unsuspecting people like you in to his web by offering them help through the Jat Association he is associated with. If that’s the case, I would like to know his identity. You can either email me at kapoorsingh@yahoo.com or call 609 705 5018.

The way you put forward your point suggested that this person entices unwary people into donating money by talking of doing great things for the community but ends up either duping them out of their money or messing up with their personal lives by playing upon their naiveté.

I am sure any social organization, be it NAJC, AJA, or any other for that matter, would like to disassociate itself from any such person if his personal life or behavior is affecting the manner in which he carries out his social responsibilities. Please confirm that this person is not associated with NAJC or AJA; because, we strive very hard to keep our image virtuous and squeaky-clean.

Best Wishes
 
Last edited:
cool

:rolleyes:
vivek said:
Well the mess has been sorted out. Apparently Amit DahiyaBadshah for whatever reason decided that he wanted to protect the honor of Mimi Singh (Maybe this is his way of getting her attention...who knows). He didn't realize that the info I posted was public information. He took it upon himself to call me at home in the US from India while I was at work. My wife realized he was a little kooky, so she wouldn't give him my work number, so he became indignant and threatening and started talking gibberish.

This guy also sent me a PM appearing indignant, saying that he was doing this on behalf of relatives of Mimi Singh. I contacted Mimi Singh, who informed me that this guy doesn't speak for her or her relatives. So I replied back to him saying that he has some issues and should seek help.

It would be a waste to devote any more time to this poser. I am not even going to speculate on his motives. I can easily take care of the guy the old fashion Jat way if he continues.
good to hear that the issue is solved at last. ;) :rolleyes:
 
Vivek

I am surprised that this guy is not done with it yet. I would suggest you to ignore him and to not lose sleep over it, because we all know your position on this matter.

Best Wishes.

vivek said:
The guy PM's me again.........

well i keep the forum out of it

*edited*
 
singhkapoor said:
Dear Jeetendra

We feel sorry for whatever happened with you, but from your comments it appears that this person’s actions have nothing to do with his position in a Jat Association; unless you feel that he lures unsuspecting people like you in to his web by offering them help through the Jat Association he is associated with. If that’s the case, I would like to know his identity. You can either email me at kapoorsingh@yahoo.com or call 609 705 5018.

The way you put forward your point suggested that this person entices unwary people into donating money by talking of doing great things for the community but ends up either duping them out of their money or messing up with their personal lives by playing upon their naiveté.

I am sure any social organization, be it NAJC, AJA, or any other for that matter, would like to disassociate itself from any such person if his personal life or behavior is affecting the manner in which he carries out his social responsibilities. Please confirm that this person is not associated with NAJC or AJA; because, we strive very hard to keep our image virtuous and squeaky-clean.

Best Wishes

Dear Kapoor Singh Ji,

I think we need to know if Jitender has any information on any of our office bearers in our two organizations that are so dear to us. Kindly share the information with me too, if you get any information from Mr. Jitender. Mr. Jitender's comments cast shadow on all office bearers of the Jat Associations in US. Since I am one of the office bearer, I would be interested to know about it.
Thanks for asking the particular information. That can be provided to us on our private email addresses.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top