well mr rajendra no offences meant, but i gather that u failed to see a point here, well i don't expect somebody else to do my work for me, when i can't get any written material about the history of my elders i naturaly posted a message here, i thought someone wud help as people here know so much about jat history......well so much has been written about the tomars of delhi being rajputs, well i remember a jat mahasabha poster which inlcluded notable jats from history, and it mentioned one dille ram tomar as the first king of delhi and one anangpal tomar( who is mentioned to be a rajput in every material i found on net)..... i have met some tomars in my life who are rajputs but they were no match for their jat counterparts, the jat being sturdier, braver, and showing more leadership skills........ since many people have mentioned in this forum that jats have shown a general indifference and neglect about their written history cud it be possible that the tomars of delhi who possibly cud be jats were claimed to be rajputs by the historians who had brahiministic leanings
(well tomars are still the single largest khap with 84 villages in the baraut belt alone)
glad to know that ur mother is a tomar